5 research outputs found
Public health surveillance of physical activity in adolescents and adults in Namibia : a cross-sectional validation of activity questionnaires against accelerometry
Background: Monitoring population-level physical activity is crucial for examining adherence to global guidelines and addressing obesity. This study validated self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) against an accurate device-based method in Namibia. Methods: Adolescent girls (n = 52, mean age 16.2 years [SD 1.6]) and adult women (n = 51, mean age 31.3 years [SD 4.7]) completed the PACE+/GPAQ self-report questionnaires and were asked to wear an Actigraph accelerometer for 7 days. Validity of self-reported MVPA was assessed using rank-order correlations between self-report and accelerometry, and classification ability of the questionnaires with Mann–Whitney tests, kappa's, sensitivity and specificity. Results: In the adolescents, Spearman's rank coefficients between self-reported MVPA (days/week) and accelerometry measured MVPA were positive but not significant (r = 0.240; P = 0.104). In the adults, self-reported MVPA (minutes/day) was moderately and significantly correlated with accelerometer-measured MVPA (r = 0.396; P = 0.008). In both groups, there was fair agreement between accelerometry and questionnaire-defined tertiles of MVPA (adolescents κ = 0.267; P = 0.010; adults κ = 0.284; P = 0.008), and measured MVPA was significantly higher in the individuals self-reporting higher MVPA than those reporting lower MVPA. Conclusions: The PACE+ and GPAQ questionnaires have a degree of validity in adolescent girls and adult females in Namibia, though more suitable for population than individual level measurement
External validation of a prediction model for estimating fat mass in children and adolescents in 19 countries: individual participant data meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a UK based prediction model for estimating fat-free mass (and indirectly fat mass) in children and adolescents in non-UK settings. DESIGN: Individual participant data meta-analysis. SETTING: 19 countries. PARTICIPANTS: 5693 children and adolescents (49.7% boys) aged 4 to 15 years with complete data on the predictors included in the UK based model (weight, height, age, sex, and ethnicity) and on the independently assessed outcome measure (fat-free mass determined by deuterium dilution assessment). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome of the UK based prediction model was natural log transformed fat-free mass (lnFFM). Predictive performance statistics of R2, calibration slope, calibration-in-the-large, and root mean square error were assessed in each of the 19 countries and then pooled through random effects meta-analysis. Calibration plots were also derived for each country, including flexible calibration curves. RESULTS: The model showed good predictive ability in non-UK populations of children and adolescents, providing R2 values of >75% in all countries and >90% in 11 of the 19 countries, and with good calibration (ie, agreement) of observed and predicted values. Root mean square error values (on fat-free mass scale) were <4 kg in 17 of the 19 settings. Pooled values (95% confidence intervals) of R2, calibration slope, and calibration-in-the-large were 88.7% (85.9% to 91.4%), 0.98 (0.97 to 1.00), and 0.01 (-0.02 to 0.04), respectively. Heterogeneity was evident in the R2 and calibration-in-the-large values across settings, but not in the calibration slope. Model performance did not vary markedly between boys and girls, age, ethnicity, and national income groups. To further improve the accuracy of the predictions, the model equation was recalibrated for the intercept in each setting so that country specific equations are available for future use. CONCLUSION: The UK based prediction model, which is based on readily available measures, provides predictions of childhood fat-free mass, and hence fat mass, in a range of non-UK settings that explain a large proportion of the variability in observed fat-free mass, and exhibit good calibration performance, especially after recalibration of the intercept for each population. The model demonstrates good generalisability in both low-middle income and high income populations of healthy children and adolescents aged 4-15 years
External validation of a prediction model for estimating fat mass in children and adolescents in 19 countries: individual participant data meta-analysis
Peer reviewed: TrueAcknowledgements: We thank John Reilly for his advice on data sources and data access; Cara L Eckhardt, Josephine Avila, Igor Y Kon, and Jinzhong Wang from the Eckhardt et al study23; and all staff involved in recruitment and data collection from the included studies. Data gathered from South Africa was supported by South Africa Medical Research Council and National Research Foundation.Objective
To evaluate the performance of a UK based prediction
model for estimating fat-free mass (and indirectly fat
mass) in children and adolescents in non-UK settings.
Design
Individual participant data meta-analysis.
Setting
19 countries.
Participants
5693 children and adolescents (49.7% boys) aged
4 to 15 years with complete data on the predictors
included in the UK based model (weight, height,
age, sex, and ethnicity) and on the independently
assessed outcome measure (fat-free mass determined
by deuterium dilution assessment).
Main outcome measures
The outcome of the UK based prediction model
was natural log transformed fat-free mass (lnFFM).
Predictive performance statistics of R2
, calibration
slope, calibration-in-the-large, and root mean square
error were assessed in each of the 19 countries and
then pooled through random effects meta-analysis.
Calibration plots were also derived for each country,
including flexible calibration curves.
Results
The model showed good predictive ability in non-UK
populations of children and adolescents, providing
R2
values of >75% in all countries and >90% in 11
of the 19 countries, and with good calibration (ie,
agreement) of observed and predicted values. Root
mean square error values (on fat-free mass scale)
were <4 kg in 17 of the 19 settings. Pooled values
(95% confidence intervals) of R2
, calibration slope,
and calibration-in-the-large were 88.7% (85.9% to
91.4%), 0.98 (0.97 to 1.00), and 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.04),
respectively. Heterogeneity was evident in the R2
and
calibration-in-the-large values across settings, but not
in the calibration slope. Model performance did not
vary markedly between boys and girls, age, ethnicity,
and national income groups. To further improve the
accuracy of the predictions, the model equation was
recalibrated for the intercept in each setting so that
country specific equations are available for future use.
Co nclusion
The UK based prediction model, which is based on
readily available measures, provides predictions
of childhood fat-free mass, and hence fat mass,
in a range of non-UK settings that explain a large
proportion of the variability in observed fat-free mass,
and exhibit good calibration performance, especially
after recalibration of the intercept for each population.
The model demonstrates good generalisability in both
low-middle income and high income populations of
healthy children and adolescents aged 4-15 year
Status and Trends of Physical Activity Surveillance, Policy, and Research in 164 Countries: Findings From the Global Observatory for Physical Activity—GoPA! 2015 and 2020 Surveys
Background: Physical activity (PA) surveillance, policy, and research efforts need to be periodically appraised to gain insight into national and global capacities for PA promotion. The aim of this paper was to assess the status and trends in PA surveillance, policy, and research in 164 countries. Methods: We used data from the Global Observatory for Physical Activity (GoPA!) 2015 and 2020 surveys. Comprehensive searches were performed for each country to determine the level of development of their PA surveillance, policy, and research, and the findings were verified by the GoPA! Country Contacts. Trends were analyzed based on the data available for both survey years. Results: The global 5-year progress in all 3 indicators was modest, with most countries either improving or staying at the same level. PA surveillance, policy, and research improved or remained at a high level in 48.1%, 40.6%, and 42.1% of the countries, respectively. PA surveillance, policy, and research scores decreased or remained at a low level in 8.3%, 15.8%, and 28.6% of the countries, respectively. The highest capacity for PA promotion was found in Europe, the lowest in Africa and low- and lower-middle-income countries. Although a large percentage of the world’s population benefit from at least some PA policy, surveillance, and research efforts in their countries, 49.6 million people are without PA surveillance, 629.4 million people are without PA policy, and 108.7 million live in countries without any PA research output. A total of 6.3 billion people or 88.2% of the world’s population live in countries where PA promotion capacity should be significantly improved. Conclusion: Despite PA is essential for health, there are large inequalities between countries and world regions in their capacity to promote PA. Coordinated efforts are needed to reduce the inequalities and improve the global capacity for PA promotion.</jats:p