68 research outputs found

    The Prospects for Democracy in Iran

    Get PDF
    Streaming video requires RealPlayer to view.The University Archives has determined that this item is of continuing value to OSU's history.Why did Iran's pro-democracy movement fail? Mark Gasiorowski, director of the International Studies Program at Louisiana State University, argues the movement failed because its leaders opted to pursue incremental, gradual change from within rather than directly confronting the Islamic regime.Ohio State University. Mershon Center for International Security StudiesEvent webpage, streaming video, photos, lecture summar

    Democracia vs. eficiência: como alcançar equilíbrio em tempo de crise financeira

    Get PDF
    Resumo A administração pública é forçada a encontrar um equilíbrio entre eficiência e democracia na definição da sua agenda e curso de ação. Uma das características da administração pública é que todas as decisões devem refletir valores democráticos, para além de serem eficientes. No entanto, a reforma administrativa, motivada por dificuldades financeiras, tende a destacar a importância do desempenho financeiro, em detrimento dos aspetos democráticos nas políticas de gestão pública. Esta pesquisa visa analisar a relação e tensão entre a eficiência e a democracia à luz da mais recente crise financeira global. O trabalho utiliza uma abordagem quantitativa e recolhe dados de governos locais portugueses para testar o argumento de uma relação linear inversa de desempenho financeiro e procedimentos democráticos. Os resultados confirmam o argumento de uma relação inversa, definida por Waldo (1948). Adicionalmente, os resultados também permitem concluir que a crise financeira evidenciou o efeito negativo dos procedimentos democráticos no desempenho financeiro

    Sanctions and Democratization in the Post-Cold War Era

    Full text link

    Op-Ed The Causes and Consequences of Iran's June 2005 Presidential Election; Strategic Insights: v.4, issue 8 (August 2005)

    Get PDF
    This article appeared in Strategic Insights (August 2005), v.4 no.8Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a hardline conservative Islamist, scored a stunning victory in the second round of Iran's June 2005 presidential election. Many observers have described Ahmadinejads victory as a key turning point for Iran, predicting that it will produce a new era of radical, puritanical rule at home and greater militancy in Iran's foreign policy. However, Iran's new president will face important political obstacles that will limit his ability to act, so it is not clear whether, and to what extent, he will be able to carry out such drastic changes. This article examines why Ahmadinejad achieved such a decisive victory and what consequences his victory may have for Iranian politics and for Irans domestic and foreign policy. Its main conclusion is that domestic and international political realities will place substantial limitations on Ahmadinejad, making it harder for him to pursue his agenda in some policy areas than in others. Ahmadinejad's victory probably will have a fairly big impact on domestic economic policy and political conditions inside Iran, but its impact on socio-cultural conditions and foreign policy probably will be more limited

    The structure of Third World economic interdependence

    No full text
    corecore