Central post-stroke pain An intetegrative review of somatotopic damage, clinical symptoms, and neurophysiological measures

Introduction: The physiopathology of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is poorly understood, which may contribute to the limitations of diagnostic and therapeutic advancements. Thus, the current systematic review was conducted to examine, from an integrated perspective, the cortical neurophysiological changes observed via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), focusing on the structural damage, and clinical symptoms in patients with CPSP. Methods: The literature review included the databases EMBASE, PubMed, and ScienceDirect using the following search terms by MeSH or Entree descriptors: [(“Cerebral Stroke”) AND (“Pain” OR “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation”) AND (“Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation”)] (through September 29, 2020). A total of 297 articles related to CPSP were identified. Of these, only four quantitatively recorded cortical measurements. Results: We found four studies with different methodologies and results of the TMS measures. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, two studies had low methodological quality and the other two studies had satisfactory methodological quality. The four studies compared the motor threshold (MT) of the stroke-affected hemisphere with the unaffected hemisphere or with healthy controls. Two studies assessed other cortical excitability measures, such as cortical silent period (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). The main limitations in the interpretation of the results were the heterogeneity in parameter measurements, unknown cortical excitability measures as potential prognostic markers, the lack of a control group without pain, and the absence of consistent and validated diagnosis criteria. Conclusion: Despite the limited number of studies that prevented us from conducting a meta-analysis, the dataset of this systematic review provides evidence to improve the understanding of CPSP physiopathology. Additionally, these studies support the construction of a framework for diagnosis and will help improve the methodological quality of future research in somatosensory sequelae following stroke. Furthermore, they offer a way to integrate dysfunctional neuroplasticity markers that are indirectly assessed by neurophysiological measures with their correlated clinical symptoms

Intramuscular electrical stimulus potentiates the motor cortex modulation effects on pain and descending inhibitory systems in knee osteoarthritis : a randomized, factorial, sham-controlled study

Background: Neuroplastic changes in nociceptive pathways contribute to severity of symptoms in knee osteoarthritis (KOA). A new look at neuroplastic changes management includes modulation of the primary motor cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Objectives: We investigated whether tDCS combined with intramuscular electrical stimulation (EIMS) would be more efficacious than a sham (s) intervention (s-tDCS/s-EIMS) or a single active(a)-tDCS/s-EIMS intervention and/or s-tDCS/a-EIMS in the following domains: pain measures (visual analog scale [VAS] score and descending pain modulatory system [DPMS], and outcomes, and analgesic use, disability, and pain pressure threshold (PPT) for secondary outcomes. Registration: The trial is registered in Clinical trials.gov: NCT01747070. Methods: Sixty women with KOA, aged 50–75 years old, randomly received five sessions of one of the four interventions (a-tDCS/a-EIMS, s-tDCS/s-EIMS, a-tDCS/s-EIMS, and s-tDCS/a- EIMS). tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), for 30 minutes at 2 mA and the EIMS paraspinal of L1–S2. Results: A generalized estimating equation model revealed the main effect of the a-tDCS/a- EIMS in the VAS pain scores at end treatment compared with the other three groups (P<0.0001). There existed a significant effect of time and a significant interaction between group and time (P<0.01 for both). The delta-(Δ) pain score on VAS in the a-tDCS/a-EIMS group was –3.59, 95% CI: –4.10 to –2.63. The (Δ) pain scores on VAS in the other three groups were: a-tDCS/s- EIMS=−2.13, 95% CI: −2.48 to –1.64; s-tDCS/a-EIMS=−2.25, 95% CI: −2.59 to –1.68; s-tDCS/s-EIMS MR =–1.77, 95% CI: –2.08 to –1.38. The a-tDCS/a-EIMS led to better effect in DPMS, PPT, analgesic use, and disability related to pain. Conclusion: This study provides additional evidence regarding additive clinical effects to improve pain measures and descending pain inhibitory controls when the neuromodulation of the primary motor cortex with tDCS is combined with a bottom-up modulation with EIMS in KOA. Also, it improved the ability to walk due to reduced pain and reduced analgesic use

BDNF and serum S100B levels according the spectrum of structural pathology in chronic pain patients

Central sensitivity syndrome (CSS) consists of adaptive pathophysiological changes associated with neuroplasticity in some chronic pain disorders. It could be grouped in two main conceptual conditions: one includes those chronic pain patients without overt structural pathology such as fibromyalgia, and the other subgroup includes conditions with recognizable structural abnormalities, both somatic (osteoarthritis) and visceral (endometriosis). In order to understand the role of neuromodulators in CCS we aim to determine whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and S100B are associated to specific chronic pain disorders. Serum BDNF and S100B were measured in chronic pain women with different diagnosis: 88 with osteoarthritis, 36 with endometriosis, 117 with fibromyalgia, 33 with chronic tension type headache and in 41 healthy controls. ANCOVA analysis followed by heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix was performed to evaluate BDNF and S100B levels, adjusted for depression severity, pain levels and use of analgesics according different pathologies. Serum BDNF concentrations were higher and not different in patients with fibromyalgia and headache, the CSS group without structural pathology. In contrast, the concentrations of S100B were higher in patients with osteoarthritis and endometriosis, in comparison to controls, fibromyalgia and tensional headache patients. This study supports the hypothesis that BDNF and S100B neuromodulators present different serum levels according to the background disease associated to the chronic pain. These have the potential to be studied as markers of active disease or treatment evolution

Motor cortex excitability and BDNF levels in chronic musculoskeletal pain according to structural pathology

The central sensitization syndrome (CSS) encompasses disorders with overlapping symptoms in a structural pathology spectrum ranging from persistent nociception [e.g., osteoarthritis (OA)] to an absence of tissue injuries such as the one presented in fibromyalgia (FM) and myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). First, we hypothesized that these syndromes present differences in their cortical excitability parameters assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), namely motor evoked potential (MEP), cortical silent period (CSP), short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and short intracortical facilitation (SICF). Second, considering that the presence of tissue injury could be detected by serum neurotrophins, we hypothesized that the spectrum of structural pathology (i.e., from persistent nociception like in OA, to the absence of tissue injury like in FM and MPS), could be detected by differential efficiency of their descending pain inhibitory system, as assessed by the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm. Third, we explored whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) had an influence on the relationship between motor cortex excitability and structural pathology. This cross-sectional study pooled baseline data from three randomized clinical trials. We included females (n = 114), aged 19-65 years old with disability by chronic pain syndromes (CPS): FM (n = 19), MPS (n = 54), OA (n = 27) and healthy subjects (n = 14). We assessed the serum BDNF, the motor cortex excitability by parameters the TMS measures and the change on numerical pain scale [NPS (0-10)] during CPM-task. The adjusted mean (SD) on the SICI observed in the absence of tissue injury was 56.36% lower than with persistent nociceptive input [0.31(0.18) vs. 0.55 (0.32)], respectively. The BDNF was inversely correlated with the SICI and with the change on NPS (0-10) during CPM-task. These findings suggest greater disinhibition in the motor cortex and the descending pain inhibitory system in FM and MPS than in OA and healthy subjects. Likewise, the inteThis research was supported by grants and materials support from the following Brazilian agencies: (grants to; AD, JAD-S, FC) and material support. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq (grants to ILdST, WC). Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences at the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (material support). International Cooperation Program-CAPES-PGI-project (023-11). CAPES 129/2013 material support and grant for FP as visiting professor (AD, WC, PP). Postgraduate Research Group at the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre-PIPE HCPA (material support). Foundation for Support of Research at Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) (material support). Brazilian Innovation Agency (FINEP) process number-1245/13 (ILdST, WC). Research grant: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq (ILdS 302345/2011-6 and WC-301256/2013-6)

Efeito da estimulação transcraniana de corrente contínua e da eletroestimulação intramuscular na dor, na capacidade funcional e na excitabilidade cortical de pacientes com osteoartrite

Introdução: A osteoartrite de joelhos (KOA) apresenta alta prevalência, principalmente em mulheres. Com o envelhecimento da população esta prevalência irá aumentar. Os tratamentos conservadores apresentam limitada eficácia em expressivo número de pacientes no curso do tratamento . A cirurgia de protetização apresenta altos custos, possibilidade de complicações pós-operatórias graves e ainda que a correção anatômica seja perfeita, em torno de 20% dos pacientes persistem com dor crônica pós-operatória. Portanto, é preciso avançar no conhecimento dos mecanismos fisiopatológicos e estudar novas abordagens terapêuticas para agregar às existentes, visando melhor manejo da dor e para restabelecer a função de maneira mais efetiva. Estas questões motivaram três questões centrais que origiram os três estudos que compõem esta tese. Estudo I: No primeiro estudo avaliamos os mecanismos pelos quais há perpetuação da dor na KOA. Para responder a esta questão buscou respostas aos seguintes objetivos: I) Comparar se a função da via da dor inibitório descendente está associada com o estado de inibição no sistema corticospinal, indexado pelo potencial evocado motor (MEP) e o período de silêncio cortical (CSP) em pacientes com KOA e controles saudáveis. II) Determinar se há correlação entre as medidas de inibição intracortical (CSP, MEP) com alterações na escala de dor numérica (NPS 0-10) na KOA durante a tarefa de modulação condicionada de dor (CPM-task) considerando o efeito da capacidade funcional auto-relatada avaliada pelo Western Ontário and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) e uso de analgésicos. Métodos: Estudo transversal, foram incluídas 21 pacientes femininas com KOA e 10 controles saudáveis com idade entre 19 a 75 anos. Os parâmetros de excitabilidade do córtex motor (MEP e CSP) foram avaliados utilizando a estimulação magnética trasncraniana (EMT). Avaliação de dor e a incapacidade pelo WOMAC e a NPS (0-10) durante a CPM-task. Resultados: A média ajustada (DP) do CSP observada em pacientes com OA foi 23,43% menor do que em indivíduos saudáveis [54,54 (16,10) vs. 70,94 (22,87)], respectivamente (P = 0,01). A função do sistema modulador descendente de dor avaliado pela alteração do NPS (0-10) durante o CPM-task foi negativamente correlacionada com o parâmetro de excitabilidade cortical indexado pelo CSP (P = 0,001). O CSP foi negativamente correlacionado com a dor e incapacidade avaliada pelo índice WOMAC. Conclusão: Foi observado um sistema inibitório descendente de dor enfraquecido, corroborando com os achados em outras patologias de dor crônica. Estudo II O segundo estudo buscou determinar se na KOA, uma sessão de IMS (eletroestimulação intramuscular) ativa comparada com sham promove um efeito nos parâmetros de excitabilidade do córtex motor [MEP, inibição intracortical curta - SICI, facilitação intracortical (ICF) e CSP] e nas medidas de dor [limiar de dor a pressão (PPT); escala visual analógica de dor (VAS) e mudança na escala de dor numérica (NPS0-10) durante a CPM-task]. Esse estudo também se propôs a determinar se o fator neurotrófico derivado do cérebro (BDNF) sérico medeia o efeito desta estimulação no sistema cortico-espinhal, tal como avaliado pelo MEP e pelo PPT. Métodos: Foram incluídas 26 mulheres com KOA, com idade entre 50 a 75 anos. Elas foram divididas randomicamente para receber uma sessão de 30 minutos de IMS ativa (n = 13) ou IMS sham (n = 13) por meio de eletroestimulação com frequência de 2 Hz. As agulhas foram inseridas paravertebrais em nível da saída das raízes lombares de L1 a S2 e nos músculos cuja inervação corresponde a essas raízes e que sustentam a articulação do joelho (vasto medial, reto anterior, vasto lateral, tibial anterior e inserção da pata anserina). Os desfechos foram as medidas de dor (VAS, PPT, NPS durante CPM-task) e parâmetros de excitabilidade (MEP, CSP, SICI, ICF) realizados antes e imediatamente após a intervenção. Resultados: a IMS ativa comparado com sham diminuiu o MEP em 31,61% [intervalo de confiança (IC) 95%, 2,34-60,98]. Para os resultados secundários, IMS reduziu o ICF e aumentou o CSP. A IMS melhorou a dor relatada no VAS, o PPT e a pontuação do NPS (0-10) durante a CPM-task. O BDNF foi negativamente correlacionado com o PPT (r = 20,56). Conclusão: Obtivemos resultados demonstrando melhora da dor e reforço do sistema cortico-espinhal inibitório comparado ao tratamento sham com IMS. Estudo III O terceiro estudo buscou: 1) Avaliar se a utilização da ETCC (estimulação transcraniana de corrente contínua) combinada a IMS pode promover um resultado melhor de modulação da via cortico-espinhal de dor através da potenciação dos efeitos dos dois tratamentos; comparado a cada um deles isoladamente e ao tratamento sham. 2) Avaliar a capacidade da ETCC em reforçar o sistema inibitório descendente de dor e modular a excitabilidade neuronal através da VAS, PPT e NPS durante CPM-task. Além disso, avaliamos se o BDNF sérico poderia prever o efeito da terapia no final do tratamento. Métodos: 60 mulheres de 50 a 75 anos. Randomizadas em um de quatro grupos: ETCC+IMS, ETCC+IMS sham, ETCC sham+IMS, ETCC sham+IMS sham. Receberam 5 sessões de tratamento: ETCC anodal, lado contrário ao joelho acometido, 2mA, 30 min. IMS: estimulação com freqüência de 2Hz, 30 min; agulhas colocadas a 2cm de L1 á S2, nos músculos vasto medial, vasto lateral, reto anterior, tibial anterior e na inserção da pata anserina. Resultados: O a-tDCS + a-IMS mostrou os melhores resultados com diferença significativa na dor (VAS) [média (DP) relacionadas ao tratamento (pós e pré): 0.46 (0.04) vs. 6.32 (1.97); 95%CI -5.42 (-8.24 to -4.36), p=.003] e funcionalidade. Esse resultado iniciou na primeira sessão e manteve-se ao longo do estudo. A-tDCS+a-IMS foi o único capaz de modificar o sistema inibitório descendente de dor. Conclusão: Obtivemos melhora da dor e capacidade funcional com IMS, ETCC e ETCC+IMS. Mas somente o grupo de tratamento ETCC+IMS demonstrou capacidade de modificação do sistema inibitório descendente de dor.Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has a high prevalence, especially in women. With the aging of the population this prevalence will increase. Conservative treatments have limited efficacy in expressive number of patients in the course of the treatment. The total knee replacement surgery presents high costs, possibility of serious postoperative complications and although the anatomical correction is perfect, around 20% persist with chronic postoperative pain. Therefore, it’s necessary to advance in the knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms and to study new therapeutic approaches to add to the existing ones, aiming to better manage pain and to restore function more effectively. These questions motivated three central questions that originated the three studies that compose this thesis. Study I In the first study we evaluated the mechanisms by which there is perpetuation of pain in knee osteoarthritis and to answer this question sought to answer the following objectives: I) To compare if the function of the descending inhibitory pain pathway is associated with the state of inhibition in the corticospinal system, indexed by the motor evoked potential (MEP) and the cortical silent period (CSP) in patients with KOA and healthy controls. II) To determine if there is a correlation between the intracortical inhibition measures (CSP, MEP) with changes in the numerical pain scale (NPS 0-10) in the KOA during the task of conditioned pain modulation (CPM-task) considering the effect of the self-reported function evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) and the use of analgesics. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 21 female patients with KOA and 10 healthy controls aged 19-75 years old. Motor cortex excitability parameters (MEP and CSP) were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Pain assessment and disability by WOMAC and NPS (0-10) during the CPM-task. Results: The adjusted mean (SD) of CSP observed in patients with OA was 23.43% lower than in healthy subjects [54,54 (16,10) vs 70.94 (22.87)], respectively (P = 0.01). The function of the descending pain modulatory system evaluated by the NPS (0-10) change during the CPM-task was negatively correlated with the cortical excitability parameter indexed by CSP (P = 0.001). CSP was negatively correlated with pain and disability assessed by the WOMAC index. Conclusion: It was observed a descending pain inhibitory system weakened, corroborating the findings of other chronic pain conditions. Study II The second study sought to determine if one active IMS session compared to sham promoted an effect on motor cortex excitability (MEP, short intracortical inhibition - SICI, intracortical facilitation (ICF) and CSP and in the pain measures [pressure pain threshold (PPT); Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and numerical pain scale change (NPS0-10) during the CPM-task]. This study also aimed to determine whether serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mediates the effect of this stimulation on the cortico-spinal system, as assessed by MEP and PPT. Methods: Twenty-six women with KOA, aged 50-75 years old, were included. They were randomly divided to receive a 30-minute session of active IMS (n = 13) or IMS sham (n = 13) by electrostimulation with a frequency of 2 Hz. The needles were inserted paravertebral at the level of the lumbar roots exit from L1 to S2 and in the muscles whose innervation corresponds to these roots and which support the knee joint (vastus medialis, rectus anterior, vastus lateral, tibialis anterior and insertion of the anserine paw). The outcomes were pain measures (VAS, PPT, NPS during CPM-task) and excitability parameters (MEP, CSP, SICI, ICF) performed before and immediately after the intervention. Results: the active IMS compared with sham decreased the MEP by 31.61% [confidence interval (CI) 95%, 2.34-60.98]. For the secondary outcomes, IMS reduced ICF and increased CSP. IMS improved pain reported in VAS, PPT, and NPS score (0-10) during the CPM-task. BDNF was negatively correlated with PPT (r = 20.56). Conclusion: We obtained results demonstrating improvement of pain and enhancement of the inhibitory corticospinal system compared to sham treatment with IMS. Study III The third study aimed to: 1) Evaluate if the use of the combined tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) to IMS can promote a better result of modulation of the corticospinal pain pathway through the potentiation of the effects of the two treatments; compared to each of them alone, and with the sham treatment. 2) To evaluate the ability of the tDCS to strengthen the descending inhibitory pain system and to modulate neuronal excitability through VAS, PPT and NPS during CPM-task. In addition, we evaluated whether serum BDNF could predict the effect of therapy at the end of treatment. Methods: 60 women aged 50 to 75 years old. Randomized in one of four groups: tDCS + IMS, tDCS + IMS sham, tDCS sham + IMS, tDCS sham + IMS sham. They received 5 sessions of treatment: anodal tDCS, opposite side to affected knee, 2mA, 30 min. IMS: stimulation with frequency of 2Hz, 30 min; needles placed at 2 cm from L1 to S2, in the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus anterior, tibialis anterior and insertion of the anserine paw. Results: a-tDCS + a-IMS showed the best results with significant difference in pain (VAS) [mean (SD) related to treatment (post and pre): 0.46 (0.04) vs. 6.32 (1.97); 95% CI -5.42 (-8.24 to -4.36), p = .003] and functionality. This result started in the first session and was maintained throughout the study. A-tDCS + a-IMS was the only one able to modify the descending inhibitory pain system. Conclusion: We achieved improved pain and functional capacity with IMS, tDCS and tDCS + IMS. But only the tDCS + IMS treatment group demonstrated ability to modify the descending inhibitory pain system

Efeito da estimulação transcraniana de corrente contínua e da eletroestimulação intramuscular na dor, na capacidade funcional e na excitabilidade cortical de pacientes com osteoartrite

Introdução: A osteoartrite de joelhos (KOA) apresenta alta prevalência, principalmente em mulheres. Com o envelhecimento da população esta prevalência irá aumentar. Os tratamentos conservadores apresentam limitada eficácia em expressivo número de pacientes no curso do tratamento . A cirurgia de protetização apresenta altos custos, possibilidade de complicações pós-operatórias graves e ainda que a correção anatômica seja perfeita, em torno de 20% dos pacientes persistem com dor crônica pós-operatória. Portanto, é preciso avançar no conhecimento dos mecanismos fisiopatológicos e estudar novas abordagens terapêuticas para agregar às existentes, visando melhor manejo da dor e para restabelecer a função de maneira mais efetiva. Estas questões motivaram três questões centrais que origiram os três estudos que compõem esta tese. Estudo I: No primeiro estudo avaliamos os mecanismos pelos quais há perpetuação da dor na KOA. Para responder a esta questão buscou respostas aos seguintes objetivos: I) Comparar se a função da via da dor inibitório descendente está associada com o estado de inibição no sistema corticospinal, indexado pelo potencial evocado motor (MEP) e o período de silêncio cortical (CSP) em pacientes com KOA e controles saudáveis. II) Determinar se há correlação entre as medidas de inibição intracortical (CSP, MEP) com alterações na escala de dor numérica (NPS 0-10) na KOA durante a tarefa de modulação condicionada de dor (CPM-task) considerando o efeito da capacidade funcional auto-relatada avaliada pelo Western Ontário and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) e uso de analgésicos. Métodos: Estudo transversal, foram incluídas 21 pacientes femininas com KOA e 10 controles saudáveis com idade entre 19 a 75 anos. Os parâmetros de excitabilidade do córtex motor (MEP e CSP) foram avaliados utilizando a estimulação magnética trasncraniana (EMT). Avaliação de dor e a incapacidade pelo WOMAC e a NPS (0-10) durante a CPM-task. Resultados: A média ajustada (DP) do CSP observada em pacientes com OA foi 23,43% menor do que em indivíduos saudáveis [54,54 (16,10) vs. 70,94 (22,87)], respectivamente (P = 0,01). A função do sistema modulador descendente de dor avaliado pela alteração do NPS (0-10) durante o CPM-task foi negativamente correlacionada com o parâmetro de excitabilidade cortical indexado pelo CSP (P = 0,001). O CSP foi negativamente correlacionado com a dor e incapacidade avaliada pelo índice WOMAC. Conclusão: Foi observado um sistema inibitório descendente de dor enfraquecido, corroborando com os achados em outras patologias de dor crônica. Estudo II O segundo estudo buscou determinar se na KOA, uma sessão de IMS (eletroestimulação intramuscular) ativa comparada com sham promove um efeito nos parâmetros de excitabilidade do córtex motor [MEP, inibição intracortical curta - SICI, facilitação intracortical (ICF) e CSP] e nas medidas de dor [limiar de dor a pressão (PPT); escala visual analógica de dor (VAS) e mudança na escala de dor numérica (NPS0-10) durante a CPM-task]. Esse estudo também se propôs a determinar se o fator neurotrófico derivado do cérebro (BDNF) sérico medeia o efeito desta estimulação no sistema cortico-espinhal, tal como avaliado pelo MEP e pelo PPT. Métodos: Foram incluídas 26 mulheres com KOA, com idade entre 50 a 75 anos. Elas foram divididas randomicamente para receber uma sessão de 30 minutos de IMS ativa (n = 13) ou IMS sham (n = 13) por meio de eletroestimulação com frequência de 2 Hz. As agulhas foram inseridas paravertebrais em nível da saída das raízes lombares de L1 a S2 e nos músculos cuja inervação corresponde a essas raízes e que sustentam a articulação do joelho (vasto medial, reto anterior, vasto lateral, tibial anterior e inserção da pata anserina). Os desfechos foram as medidas de dor (VAS, PPT, NPS durante CPM-task) e parâmetros de excitabilidade (MEP, CSP, SICI, ICF) realizados antes e imediatamente após a intervenção. Resultados: a IMS ativa comparado com sham diminuiu o MEP em 31,61% [intervalo de confiança (IC) 95%, 2,34-60,98]. Para os resultados secundários, IMS reduziu o ICF e aumentou o CSP. A IMS melhorou a dor relatada no VAS, o PPT e a pontuação do NPS (0-10) durante a CPM-task. O BDNF foi negativamente correlacionado com o PPT (r = 20,56). Conclusão: Obtivemos resultados demonstrando melhora da dor e reforço do sistema cortico-espinhal inibitório comparado ao tratamento sham com IMS. Estudo III O terceiro estudo buscou: 1) Avaliar se a utilização da ETCC (estimulação transcraniana de corrente contínua) combinada a IMS pode promover um resultado melhor de modulação da via cortico-espinhal de dor através da potenciação dos efeitos dos dois tratamentos; comparado a cada um deles isoladamente e ao tratamento sham. 2) Avaliar a capacidade da ETCC em reforçar o sistema inibitório descendente de dor e modular a excitabilidade neuronal através da VAS, PPT e NPS durante CPM-task. Além disso, avaliamos se o BDNF sérico poderia prever o efeito da terapia no final do tratamento. Métodos: 60 mulheres de 50 a 75 anos. Randomizadas em um de quatro grupos: ETCC+IMS, ETCC+IMS sham, ETCC sham+IMS, ETCC sham+IMS sham. Receberam 5 sessões de tratamento: ETCC anodal, lado contrário ao joelho acometido, 2mA, 30 min. IMS: estimulação com freqüência de 2Hz, 30 min; agulhas colocadas a 2cm de L1 á S2, nos músculos vasto medial, vasto lateral, reto anterior, tibial anterior e na inserção da pata anserina. Resultados: O a-tDCS + a-IMS mostrou os melhores resultados com diferença significativa na dor (VAS) [média (DP) relacionadas ao tratamento (pós e pré): 0.46 (0.04) vs. 6.32 (1.97); 95%CI -5.42 (-8.24 to -4.36), p=.003] e funcionalidade. Esse resultado iniciou na primeira sessão e manteve-se ao longo do estudo. A-tDCS+a-IMS foi o único capaz de modificar o sistema inibitório descendente de dor. Conclusão: Obtivemos melhora da dor e capacidade funcional com IMS, ETCC e ETCC+IMS. Mas somente o grupo de tratamento ETCC+IMS demonstrou capacidade de modificação do sistema inibitório descendente de dor.Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has a high prevalence, especially in women. With the aging of the population this prevalence will increase. Conservative treatments have limited efficacy in expressive number of patients in the course of the treatment. The total knee replacement surgery presents high costs, possibility of serious postoperative complications and although the anatomical correction is perfect, around 20% persist with chronic postoperative pain. Therefore, it’s necessary to advance in the knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms and to study new therapeutic approaches to add to the existing ones, aiming to better manage pain and to restore function more effectively. These questions motivated three central questions that originated the three studies that compose this thesis. Study I In the first study we evaluated the mechanisms by which there is perpetuation of pain in knee osteoarthritis and to answer this question sought to answer the following objectives: I) To compare if the function of the descending inhibitory pain pathway is associated with the state of inhibition in the corticospinal system, indexed by the motor evoked potential (MEP) and the cortical silent period (CSP) in patients with KOA and healthy controls. II) To determine if there is a correlation between the intracortical inhibition measures (CSP, MEP) with changes in the numerical pain scale (NPS 0-10) in the KOA during the task of conditioned pain modulation (CPM-task) considering the effect of the self-reported function evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) and the use of analgesics. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 21 female patients with KOA and 10 healthy controls aged 19-75 years old. Motor cortex excitability parameters (MEP and CSP) were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Pain assessment and disability by WOMAC and NPS (0-10) during the CPM-task. Results: The adjusted mean (SD) of CSP observed in patients with OA was 23.43% lower than in healthy subjects [54,54 (16,10) vs 70.94 (22.87)], respectively (P = 0.01). The function of the descending pain modulatory system evaluated by the NPS (0-10) change during the CPM-task was negatively correlated with the cortical excitability parameter indexed by CSP (P = 0.001). CSP was negatively correlated with pain and disability assessed by the WOMAC index. Conclusion: It was observed a descending pain inhibitory system weakened, corroborating the findings of other chronic pain conditions. Study II The second study sought to determine if one active IMS session compared to sham promoted an effect on motor cortex excitability (MEP, short intracortical inhibition - SICI, intracortical facilitation (ICF) and CSP and in the pain measures [pressure pain threshold (PPT); Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and numerical pain scale change (NPS0-10) during the CPM-task]. This study also aimed to determine whether serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mediates the effect of this stimulation on the cortico-spinal system, as assessed by MEP and PPT. Methods: Twenty-six women with KOA, aged 50-75 years old, were included. They were randomly divided to receive a 30-minute session of active IMS (n = 13) or IMS sham (n = 13) by electrostimulation with a frequency of 2 Hz. The needles were inserted paravertebral at the level of the lumbar roots exit from L1 to S2 and in the muscles whose innervation corresponds to these roots and which support the knee joint (vastus medialis, rectus anterior, vastus lateral, tibialis anterior and insertion of the anserine paw). The outcomes were pain measures (VAS, PPT, NPS during CPM-task) and excitability parameters (MEP, CSP, SICI, ICF) performed before and immediately after the intervention. Results: the active IMS compared with sham decreased the MEP by 31.61% [confidence interval (CI) 95%, 2.34-60.98]. For the secondary outcomes, IMS reduced ICF and increased CSP. IMS improved pain reported in VAS, PPT, and NPS score (0-10) during the CPM-task. BDNF was negatively correlated with PPT (r = 20.56). Conclusion: We obtained results demonstrating improvement of pain and enhancement of the inhibitory corticospinal system compared to sham treatment with IMS. Study III The third study aimed to: 1) Evaluate if the use of the combined tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) to IMS can promote a better result of modulation of the corticospinal pain pathway through the potentiation of the effects of the two treatments; compared to each of them alone, and with the sham treatment. 2) To evaluate the ability of the tDCS to strengthen the descending inhibitory pain system and to modulate neuronal excitability through VAS, PPT and NPS during CPM-task. In addition, we evaluated whether serum BDNF could predict the effect of therapy at the end of treatment. Methods: 60 women aged 50 to 75 years old. Randomized in one of four groups: tDCS + IMS, tDCS + IMS sham, tDCS sham + IMS, tDCS sham + IMS sham. They received 5 sessions of treatment: anodal tDCS, opposite side to affected knee, 2mA, 30 min. IMS: stimulation with frequency of 2Hz, 30 min; needles placed at 2 cm from L1 to S2, in the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus anterior, tibialis anterior and insertion of the anserine paw. Results: a-tDCS + a-IMS showed the best results with significant difference in pain (VAS) [mean (SD) related to treatment (post and pre): 0.46 (0.04) vs. 6.32 (1.97); 95% CI -5.42 (-8.24 to -4.36), p = .003] and functionality. This result started in the first session and was maintained throughout the study. A-tDCS + a-IMS was the only one able to modify the descending inhibitory pain system. Conclusion: We achieved improved pain and functional capacity with IMS, tDCS and tDCS + IMS. But only the tDCS + IMS treatment group demonstrated ability to modify the descending inhibitory pain system