Chromosomal aberrations in benign and malignant Bilharzia-associated bladder lesions analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization

BACKGROUND: Bilharzia-associated bladder cancer (BAC) is a major health problem in countries where urinary schistosomiasis is endemic. Characterization of the genetic alterations in this cancer might enhance our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of the disease but, in contrast to nonbilharzia bladder cancer, BAC has rarely been the object of such scrutiny. In the present study, we aimed to characterize chromosomal imbalances in benign and malignant post-bilharzial lesions, and to determine whether their unique etiology yields a distinct cytogenetic profile as compared to chemically induced bladder tumors. METHODS: DNAs from 20 archival paraffin-embedded post-bilharzial bladder lesions (6 benign and 14 malignant) obtained from Sudanese patients (12 males and 8 females) with a history of urinary bilharziasis were investigated for chromosomal imbalances using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Subsequent FISH analysis with pericentromeric probes was performed on paraffin sections of the same cases to confirm the CGH results. RESULTS: Seven of the 20 lesions (6 carcinomas and one granuloma) showed chromosomal imbalances varying from 1 to 6 changes. The most common chromosomal imbalances detected were losses of 1p21-31, 8p21-pter, and 9p and gain of 19p material, seen in three cases each, including the benign lesion. CONCLUSION: Most of the detected imbalances have been repeatedly reported in non-bilharzial bladder carcinomas, suggesting that the cytogenetic profiles of chemical- and bilharzia-induced carcinomas are largely similar. However, loss of 9p seems to be more ubiquitous in BAC than in bladder cancer in industrialized countries

Identification of MSRA gene on chromosome 8p as a candidate metastasis suppressor for human hepatitis B virus-positive hepatocellular carcinoma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remains very dismal, which is mainly due to metastasis. In our previous studies, we found that chromosome 8p deletions might contribute to metastasis of HCC. In this study, we aimed to identify the candidate metastatic suppressor gene on chromosome 8p.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Oligo-nucleotide microarrays which included 322 genes on human chromosome 8p were constructed to analyze the difference in gene expression profiles between HCC tissues with and without metastasis. The leading differentially expressed genes were identified and selected for further analysis by real-time PCR and Western blotting. Recombinant expression plasmid vectors for each target gene were constructed and transfected into HCC cells and its <it>in vitro </it>effects on proliferation and invasion of HCC cells were also investigated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Sixteen leading differentially expressed genes were identified from the HCC tissues with metastasis compared with those without metastasis (<it>p </it>< 0.01, <it>q </it>< 16 %). Among of the 10 significantly down-regulated genes in HCC with metastasis, methionine sulfoxide reductase A (<it>MSRA</it>) had the lowest <it>p </it>value and false discovery rate (FDR), and was considered as a potential candidate for metastasis suppressor gene. Real-time PCR and Western blotting confirmed that the mRNA and protein expression levels of <it>MSRA </it>were significantly decreased in HCC with metastasis compared with those without metastasis (<it>p </it>< 0.001), and <it>MSRA </it>mRNA level in HCCLM6 cells (with high metastatic potential) was also much lower than that of other HCC cell lines. Transfection of a recombinant expression plasmid vector and overexpression of <it>MSRA </it>gene could obviously inhibit cell colony formation (4.33 ± 2.92 vs. 9.17 ± 3.38, <it>p </it>= 0.008) and invasion (7.40 ± 1.67 vs. 17.20 ± 2.59, <it>p</it>= 0.0001) of HCCLM6 cell line.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p><it>MSRA </it>gene on chromosome 8p might possess metastasis suppressor activity in HCC.</p

High resolution chromosome 3p, 8p, 9q and 22q allelotyping analysis in the pathogenesis of gallbladder carcinoma

Our recent genome-wide allelotyping analysis of gallbladder carcinoma identified 3p, 8p, 9q and 22q as chromosomal regions with frequent loss of heterozygosity. The present study was undertaken to more precisely identify the presence and location of regions of frequent allele loss involving those chromosomes in gallbladder carcinoma. Microdissected tissue from 24 gallbladder carcinoma were analysed for PCR-based loss of heterozygosity using 81 microsatellite markers spanning chromosome 3p (n=26), 8p (n=14), 9q (n=29) and 22q (n=12) regions. We also studied the role of those allele losses in gallbladder carcinoma pathogenesis by examining 45 microdissected normal and dysplastic gallbladder epithelia accompanying gallbladder carcinoma, using 17 microsatellite markers. Overall frequencies of loss of heterozygosity at 3p (100%), 8p (100%), 9q (88%), and 22q (92%) sites were very high in gallbladder carcinoma, and we identified 13 distinct regions undergoing frequent loss of heterozygosity in tumours. Allele losses were frequently detected in normal and dysplastic gallbladder epithelia. There was a progressive increase of the overall loss of heterozygosity frequency with increasing severity of histopathological changes. Allele losses were not random and followed a sequence. This study refines several distinct chromosome 3p, 8p, 9q and 22q regions undergoing frequent allele loss in gallbladder carcinoma that will aid in the positional identification of tumour suppressor genes involved in gallbladder carcinoma pathogenesis

Cellular Proliferation and Cell-Cell Cycle Regulatory Proteins as Prognostic Markers for Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder

Normal cellular proliferation is a tightly regulated process. The two most important events of the eukaryotic cell cycle are DNA synthesis (replication of chromosomes) and mitosis (segregation of chromosomes into dividing cells),which occur during the S-phase and the M-phase of the cell cycle, respectively.1 The remainder of the cell cycle consists of two gap phases (G1 and G2) which occur prior to S-phase (G1) and prior to M-phase (G2) (see Figure 1). As growth quiescent cells enter and progress through the cell cycle, a number of “checkpoints” are encountered that are positioned at transition points between the different cell cycle states.2 These checkpoints are positioned at the initiation and completion of DNA replication (S-phase) and at the initiation and completion of cell division (M-phase). The most extensively studied of these checkpoints occurs late in G1, at the G1 to S transition, when the cell commits itself to another round of DNA replication.2 Bypass of this important cell cycle checkpoint may allow cells to replicate damaged DNA thereby resulting in the accumulation of genetic mutations that may eventually contribute to a neoplastic phenotype