24 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Who Are the “Middle Class”?
There is no consensus definition of middle class, neither is there an official government definition. What constitutes the middle class is relative, subjective, and not easily defined. The mid-point in the distribution is the median, and in 2007 the median household income was 39,100 and 20,291 and 250,000. Similarly, survey responses suggest that the lower end of the middle class might be close to $40,000
Recommended from our members
Salaries of Members of Congress: A List of Payable Rates and Effective Dates, 1789-2008
Congress is required by Article I, Section 6, of the Constitution to determine its own pay. Prior to 1969, Congress did so by enacting stand-alone legislation. From 1789 through 1968, Congress raised its pay 22 times using this procedure. Congressional salaries initially were 30,000. Stand-alone legislation may still be used to raise Member pay, as it was most recently in 1982, 1983, 1989, and 1991, but two other methods — including an automatic annual adjustment procedure and a commission process — are now also available.
Under the annual adjustment procedure, Members were scheduled to receive a 2.7% increase in January 2008. The increase was revised to 2.5%, resulting in a salary in 2008 of 165,200
Recommended from our members
The Cost of Government Financial Interventions, Past and Present
[Excerpt] Between March and September 2008, the federal government intervened financially with private corporations on three occasions, resulting in the government receiving significant debt and equity considerations. The firms affected were Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and AIG. Dissatisfaction with the case-by-case approach to addressing the ongoing financial turmoil led Treasury to propose a more comprehensive approach on September 19, 2008. On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA, P.L. 110-343) was signed into law, authorizing the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). TARP gave Treasury the option of purchasing or insuring up to 250 billion in financial firms’ preferred stock under the TARP authority, with approximately 85 billion AIG loan from mid-September was first augmented and then revamped into a combination package of a 40 billion in preferred share purchases, up to 52.5 billion in troubled asset purchases. Citigroup received an additional 25 billion, along with federal guarantees to cover losses on a 5 billion preferred share purchase from GMAC, up to 4 billion in loans promised to Chrysler.
These interventions have prompted questions regarding the taxpayer costs and the sources of funding. The sources of funding are relatively straightforward—primarily the Federal Reserve (Fed) and the U.S. Treasury. The costs, however, are difficult to quantify at this stage. In most of the interventions, many of the financial outflows that are possible have yet to occur, and the ultimate value of the debt and equity considerations received from the private firms is uncertain. At this point, the federal government has the option to own nearly 80% of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG. Depending on the final proceeds from the various debt and equity considerations, the federal government may end up seeing a positive fiscal contribution from the recent interventions, as was the case in some of the past interventions summarized in the tables at the end of this report. The government may also suffer significant losses, as has also occurred in the past.
This report will be updated as warranted by legislative and market events
Recommended from our members
Salaries of Members of Congress: A List of Payable Rates and Effective Dates, 1789-2003
This report contains information on the pay procedure and recent adjustments. It also contains historical information on the rate of pay for Members of Congress since 1789
Vice Presidential Vacancies: Congressional Procedures in the Ford and Rockefeller Nominations
This report was issued approximately a month and a half before the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton. If Clinton had been impeached and removed, the Twenty-Fifth Amendment would have been used to fill the vice presidential vacancy.https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/twentyfifth_amendment_congressional_materials/1018/thumbnail.jp
Presidential and Vice Presidential Succession: Overview and Current Legislation
Reviews legislative history of presidential and vice presidential succession.https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/twentyfifth_amendment_congressional_materials/1019/thumbnail.jp
Presidential and Vice Presidential Succession: Overview and Current Legislation
Reviews legislative history of presidential and vice presidential succession.https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/twentyfifth_amendment_congressional_materials/1019/thumbnail.jp