Pollinator restoration in Brazilian ecosystems relies on a small but phylogenetically-diverse set of plant families

The alarming rate of global pollinator decline has made habitat restoration for pollinators a conservation priority. At the same time, empirical and theoretical studies on plant-pollinator networks have demonstrated that plant species are not equally important for pollinator community persistence and restoration. However, the scarcity of comprehensive datasets on plant-pollinator networks in tropical ecosystems constrains their practical value for pollinator restoration. As closely-related species often share traits that determine ecological interactions, phylogenetic relationships could inform restoration programs in data-scarce regions. Here, we use quantitative bee-plant networks from Brazilian ecosystems to test if priority plant species for different restoration criteria (bee species richness and visitation rates) can be identified using interaction networks; if phylogenetic relationships alone can guide plant species selection; and how restoration criteria influence restored network properties and function. We found plant species that maximised the benefits of habitat restoration for bees (i.e., generalists and those with distinct flower-visitor species) were clustered in a small number of phylogenetically-diverse plant families, and that prioritising the recovery of bee visitation rates improved both stability and function of restored plant-pollinator networks. Our approach can help guide restoration of pollinator communities, even where information on local ecosystems is limited.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Neglected diversity of crop pollinators: Lessons from the world’s largest tropical country

We draw attention to potential pollinator species that have not yet been reported as crop pollinators but could likely contribute to agricultural productivity. We refer to this as the neglected diversity of crop pollinators, which we argue should not be excluded from conservation strategies and land-use planning. We used Brazil as case study for at least five main reasons: (1) Brazil is one of the world’s largest food producers and exporters; (2) Tropical agricultural production is highly dependent on pollinators; (3) Brazil is almost certainly the most biologically megadiverse country; (4) Brazil has high diversity of pollinators; (5) Brazil has played a leading international role in environmental sustainability. We estimated that the neglected diversity of bees as potential crop pollinators in Brazil is 88.4%. For vertebrates, the neglected diversity is 95.2%. This means that many yet to be observed plant–pollinator interactions are entirely off the radar in terms of the conservation agenda for agricultural stability

Small Amazonian stingless bees: an opportunity for targeted cocoa pollination

Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) is a multi-billion-dollar business. This tropical crop strongly depends on animal pollination for fruit development and seed production. The lack or inefficiency of natural pollinators in cocoa plantations has driven farmers to search for alternatives, such as laborious pollination by hand. A so far untested alternative, which has received increasing attention during the past couple of years, is targeted crop pollination through managed social bees. However, owing to the smallness of the flowers of T. cacao as well as structural barriers that impede large insects to access the stigma, only tiny bees may be a viable option for targeted cocoa pollination. In the present study, we asked whether small stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini) could come into consideration as managed cocoa crop-pollinators, especially in shadowy agroforests. Among the 188 meliponine species native to the Brazilian Amazon region, which comprises an important portion of the center of origin of T. cacao, we selected 52 species based on morphological criteria (intertegular distance ≤ 1.4 mm; body length: 2.2–6.0 mm). Important for cocoa production, some of these Meliponini have an ample geographic distribution, occurring both in the center of origin of T. cacao and beyond (centers of cocoa production in Brazil: Pará: 35 spp., Bahia: 10 spp.). Presumably all species may be active at illuminance levels below those found in heavily shaded cocoa plantations, at least at times when anthers show full dehiscence and during maximum receptivity of the stigma. The bees’ potential to forage under reduced light regimes is corroborated by the finding that between 20 and 60% of the naturally exploited food sources are understory vegetation, including herbs, subshrubs, shrubs, and lianas. Many of the selected Meliponini build their nests, at least facultatively, in tree cavities, which facilitates their transfer to rational hives and, hence, the use of managed colonies in directed crop pollination. Important next steps for validating the potential of these small stingless bees in targeted cocoa pollination should comprise detailed studies on their foraging behavior and olfactory learning capacities

Valuing nature's contribution to people: The pollination services provided by two protected areas in Brazil

The assessment of nature's contribution to people (NCP) is an important strategy for decision-making given the increasing need to reconcile biodiversity and human society with conservation. A monetary and a non-monetary approaches were combined to evaluate the pollination services provided by two Brazilian protected areas (PAs) in northern (Serra da Bocaina, Pará) and southeastern region (Mata do Jambreiro, Minas Gerais) within the Amazon forest and Atlantic forest biomes, respectively. The monetary valuation methodology was based on the role of pollination for crop production in the municipalities surrounding the PAs, and the non-monetary involved estimating the areas with wider range of resources for sustaining pollinators. In Serra da Bocaina, the total annual monetary value of the pollination services performed by bee species was estimated at approximately 564,000 dollars and in Mata do Jambreiro, 246,000 dollars, both for 2016. The non-monetary valuation highlighted the PAs and their surrounding areas with denser plant coverage. The methods used in this study allowed us to evaluate and integrate different types of information: bee diversity data, the spatial data of the PAs and their surroundings, and the economic value of the agricultural production of the neighbouring municipalities. The results can be applied in management and sustainability studies aiming to increase awareness about the importance of PAs and their value and importance for agricultural production. This study demonstrates where efforts can be concentrated for future proposals for valuating pollination services and conservation strategies, especially in areas where data are scarce. © 2019 The Author

Riesgos y oportunidades asociados a la conservación de los polinizadores y a la gestión de los servicios de polinización en América Latina

Se realizó una revisión sobre el estado de conservación de los polinizadores y la polinización en América Latina (LA). Se presentan pautas para mejorar las oportunidades de conservación, considerando las amenazas a los polinizadores y las perspectivas desde el conocimiento tradicional y local. El análisis indica que diversas amenazas (e.g., agricultura a gran escala, deforestación, uso excesivo de agroquímicos) están vinculadas con la disminución de polinizadores, afectando la reproducción de las plantas nativas y los rendimientos de muchos cultivos. LA alberga la mayor diversidad de abejas en todo el mundo y una gran diversidad de polinizadores vertebrados (e.g., colibríes, aves de percha nectarívoras, murciélagos nectarívoros y otros mamíferos). Se proporcionan recomendaciones para proteger los polinizadores nativos y mejorar los servicios de polinización, las que podrían ser consideradas por los tomadores de decisiones y así promover la conservación biocultural. Por ejemplo, desarrollar instrumentos legales, políticas e incentivos para ayudar a los agricultores a mantener los hábitats naturales, para reemplazar o reducir el uso de agroquímicos y para promover las prácticas agroecológicas; perfeccionar las reglamentaciones sobre aplicación de agroquímicos para minimizar la exposición de los polinizadores a insecticidas y herbicidas; mejorar la comunicación pública del conocimiento sobre los polinizadores y la polinización para incentivar un cambio en las prácticas agrícolas hegemónicas y los patrones de consumo actuales; considerar otras éticas ambientales de las minorías étnicas para enfatizar la necesidad de promover una relación sostenible entre producción de alimentos y biodiversidad. Se necesita urgentemente una visión más amplia que combine las dimensiones sociales, ecológicas y culturales para una mejor toma de decisiones. Esta perspectiva socio-agroecológica holística es importante para conservar y gestionar los polinizadores a diferentes escalas espaciales y temporales, y para poder integrar los servicios de polinización con enfoques de gestión del territorio favorables a los polinizadores y con sistemas agrícolas diversificados.The conservation status of pollinators and pollination in Latin America (LA) is reviewed. The knowledge regarding native and managed pollinators (e.g., honeybee and stingless bees) and pollination services was synthetized, and the guidelines to improve the opportunities for conservation are provided, considering the threats to pollinators and the perspectives from traditional and local knowledge. The analysis indicates that diverse threats (e.g., large-scale agriculture, deforestation, overuse of agrochemicals) are linked with pollination and pollinator decline, which affect the reproduction of most native plants and the yields of many crops. LA harbours the highest bee diversity worldwide, with 26% of the total recorded species, and it is a biodiversity hotspot of vertebrate pollinators, including hummingbirds, perching birds, nectarivorous bats and other mammal pollinators. Specific recommendations to conserve native pollinators and to improve pollination services are provided, which could be considered by stakeholders and governments aiming to elaborate biocultural conservation. For example, introducing policies and legal responses for incentives to help farmers maintain natural habitats and forests, to replace or reduce agrochemicals and to improve diversified crop production with agroecological practices; refining agrochemical regulations to minimize the exposure of pollinators to insecticides and herbicides; improving knowledge and education on pollinators and pollination gives societies worldwide the opportunity to change current hegemonic agricultural practices and consumption patterns; integrating different land ethical views of ethnic minorities on a sustainable relationship between production and biodiversity. A wider view combining social, ecological, cultural dimensions may support better decision making. This holistic socio-agroecological perspective is urgently needed to conserve and manage pollinators at different spatial and temporal scales, and to integrate pollination services, pollinator-friendly habitat management approaches and diversified farming systems.Fil: Galetto, Leonardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - CONICET. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV)Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Universidad Nacional del Comahue - CONICET. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA)Fil: del Coro Arizmendi, María. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalnepantla, MéxicoFil: Magalhães Freitas, Breno. Universidade Federal do Ceará - Departamento de Zootecnia - Setor de Abelhas, Fortaleza, BrazilFil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro - CONICET. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD)Fil: Giannini, Tereza Cristina. Instituto Tecnológico Vale Desenvolvimento Sustentavel, Belem, BrazilFil: Lopes, Ariadna Valentina. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Departamento de Botánica, Recife, BrazilFil: Espírito Santo, Maria do. Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros - Departamento de Biologia Geral (CCBS), MG, BrasilFil: Nates Parra, Guiomar. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá DC, ColombiaFil: Motta Maués, Márcia. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental - Laboratório de Entomologia, Belém, Pará, BrazilFil: Rodríguez, Jaime I.. Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Bolivia, La Paz, BoliviaFil: Quezada Euán, José Javier Guadalupe. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán - Departamento de Apicultura Tropical, Mérida, México (FMVZ)Fil: Viana, Blandina Felipe. Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, BrazilFil: Imperatriz Fonseca, Vera Lucia. Instituto Tecnológico Vale Desenvolvimento Sustentavel, Belem, Para, BrazilFil: Vandame, Rémy. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Méxic

Geographical distribuition of associated bees and plants through computational modeling

As abelhas e plantas apresentam diferentes graus de especialização em suas interações. Parceiros mais especialistas frequentemente apresentam uma história evolutiva mútua e sobreposição nas áreas de ocorrência. No entanto, a estrutura espacial dos ambientes nos quais esses grupos se distribuem é caracterizada por padrões complexos e dinâmicos. Para analisar a influência dos fatores que atuam na distribuição de espécies de abelhas e plantas associadas foram utilizadas a modelagem de distribuição de espécies, análise multivariada e ferramentas de sistemas de informações geográficas. Os resultados indicaram que a distribuição de gêneros estritamente associados, como é o caso de Peponapis e Cucúrbita, é influenciada pelo clima das áreas de ocupação, bem como provavelmente, por sua história evolutiva e pela domesticação das abóboras (Cucúrbita). Já os gêneros Krameria e Centris apresentam um padrão mais intrincado de distribuição, uma vez que a interação entre ambos é mais complexa. Centris é um grupo diverso que utiliza recursos florais de outras famílias botânicas além de Krameriaceae, o que provavelmente influencia seus padrões de distribuição. No entanto, os resultados obtidos para Krameria demonstraram de maneira geral, a influência de características climáticas na distribuição do grupo e uma provável dependência maior de Centris em alguns casos. Finalmente, foi também demonstrada a importância da inclusão de dados bióticos no processo da modelagem de distribuição, resultando no aumento da acurácia dos modelos e na alteração da projeção da distribuição para o futuro, considerando-se um cenário de mudança climática. Os resultados foram mais conspícuos quando foram consideradas interações mais estreitas entre espécies de abelhas parasitas e hospedeiras do gênero Bombus, do que entre Centris e Krameria. As técnicas utilizadas, em especial a modelagem de distribuição, representaram uma importante contribuição para a análise efetuada. No entanto, embora crescentemente utilizada, a modelagem de distribuição de espécies demanda técnicas e testes mais robustos para avaliar a acurácia dos modelos gerados. Além disso, um desafio adicional a ser vencido consiste no aumento e melhoria da qualidade dos pontos de ocorrência das espécies, principalmente no Brasil. Faz-se necessário um esforço adicional de coleta, especialmente em algumas áreas específicas, bem como, a conservação e digitalização dos dados das coleções biológicas. Porém, as técnicas utilizadas mostraram um grande potencial a ser explorado em outras análises, envolvendo questões biológicas diferentes, ou outros grupos taxonômicos e camadas de dados.Bees and plants present different degrees of specialism in their interactions. More specialized partners generally present a mutual evolutionary history and overlap with their occurrence areas. Nevertheless, the spatial structure of environments occupied by them is characterized by complex and dynamic patterns. Species distribution modelling, multivariate analyses and geographical system information tools were used in order to analyze the influence of different factors that act in the geographical distribution of associated bees and plants. Results showed that the geographical distribution of close associated genera, such as Peponapis and Cucúrbita are influenced by the clime of occurrence areas, and also, by their evolutionary history and cucurbits domestication (squashes and pumpkins). On the other hand, Centris and Krameria genera presented a more intricate distribution pattern, since their interaction is more complex. Centris is a diverse group that uses other floral resources than those provided by the Krameriacea family, which has probably influenced its distribution, also. However, the results obtained for Krameria showed the influence of clime in its distribution and a stronger relationship with Centris in some cases. Finally, the importance of including biotic data in the species distribution modelling process was also demonstrated, resulting in a general increase in the models accuracy and also altering future scenarios projection, considering climate changes. Stronger interaction, such as the host-parasite bee species of Bombus showed more conspicuous results than those found for Krameria and Centris. The techniques, especially distribution modelling, made an important contribution to the analyses. However, in spite of being increasingly used, distribution modelling demands more robust tests and techniques to evaluate the accuracy of final models. Besides, an additional challenge to be achieved consists in the increase and improvement of species occurrence data, mainly in Brazil. An additional survey effort is necessary, especially in specific areas, as well as the conservation and data digitalization of biological collections. However, the techniques used here showed a great potential to be further explored in other analyses, involving different biological issues, other taxonomic groups and other data layers

MS1.xlsx

data base on amazonian forest</p

Generalist Bee Species on Brazilian Bee-Plant Interaction Networks

Determining bee and plant interactions has an important role on understanding general biology of bee species as well as the potential pollinating relationship between them. Bee surveys have been conducted in Brazil since the end of the 1960s. Most of them applied standardized methods and had identified the plant species where the bees were collected. To analyze the most generalist bees on Brazilian surveys, we built a matrix of bee-plant interactions. We estimated the most generalist bees determining the three bee species of each surveyed locality that presented the highest number of interactions. We found 47 localities and 39 species of bees. Most of them belong to Apidae (31 species) and Halictidae (6) families and to Meliponini (14) and Xylocopini (6) tribes. However, most of the surveys presented Apis mellifera and/or Trigona spinipes as the most generalist species. Apis mellifera is an exotic bee species and Trigona spinipes, a native species, is also widespread and presents broad diet breath and high number of individuals per colony

Eriocaulaceae in the Brazilian Amazon and the use of Species Distribution Modelling in its conservation

Abstract Following a survey in herbaria in Brazil and abroad, complemented by a survey of the literature and searches of biodiversity data, 66 taxa of Eriocaulaceae have been identified in the Brazilian Amazon, as defined by the states of Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Pará, Rondônia and Roraima. Six genera of Eriocaulaceae were found in the Amazon with the following taxon numbers: Comanthera (3 taxa), Eriocaulon (10), Paepalanthus (15), Rondonanthus (2), Syngonanthus (35) and Tonina (1). Of this total, 25 taxa present distributions in the states of the Amazon and other Brazilian states (considered as widely distributed) and the remaining 41 taxa are restricted to the Amazon Rainforest biome. The distribution data for 31 species were used for Species Distribution Modelling, due to the low number of occurrence points reported for the other taxa, 17 of those are known from a single location. The overlap of these models indicates areas from Amapá, Amazonas, Pará and Roraima where modelled species are most likely to occur. These data can further contribute to the location of new populations of species of Eriocaulaceae. New detection of Eriocaulaceae species can assist in filling the gaps on their geographic distribution and ecology, contributing to the protection or restoration of priority areas set aside for their conservation