185 research outputs found
Masonry components
Masonry is a non-homogeneous material, composed of units and mortar, which can be of different types, with distinct mechanical properties. The design of both masonry units and mortar is based on the role of the walls in the building. Load-bearing walls relate to structural elements that bear mainly vertical loads, but can serve also to resist to horizontal loads. When a structural masonry building is submitted to in-plane and out-of-plane loadings induced by an earthquake for example, the masonry walls are the structural elements that ensure the global stability of the building. This means that the walls should have adequate mechanical properties that enable them to resist to different combinations of compressive, shear and tensile stresses.The boundary conditions influence the resisting mechanisms of the structural walls under in-plane loading and in a buildings the connection at the intersection walls are of paramount importance for the out-of-plane resisting mechanism. However, it is well established that the masonry mechanical properties are also relevant for the global mechanical performance of the structural masonry walls. Masonry units for load-bearing walls are usually laid so that their perforations are vertically oriented, whereas for partition walls, brick units with horizontal perforation are mostly adopted
Recommended from our members
Problems associated with direct displacement-based design of concrete bridges with single-column piers, and some suggested improvements
Currently available displacement-based design (DBD) procedures for bridges are critically evaluated with a view to identifying extensions and/or modifications of the procedure, for it to be applicable to final design of a fairly broad class of bridges. An improved direct DBD procedure is presented, including a suite of comprehensive design criteria and proper consideration of the degree of fixity of the pier top. The design of an overpass bridge (originally designed to a current European Code), applying the improved âdirectâ displacement-based design (DDBD) procedure is presented and both âconventionalâ and displacement-based designs are assessed using non-linear response-history analysis (NLRHA); comparisons are made in terms of both economy and seismic performance of the different designs. It is seen that DDBD provided a more rational base shear distribution among piers and abutments when compared to the force-based design procedure and adequately captured the displacement pattern, closely matching the results of the more rigorous NLRHA
Recommended from our members
Performance-Based Seismic Design and Assessment of Bridges
Current trends in the seismic design and assessment of bridges are discussed, with emphasis on two procedures that merit some particular attention, displacement-based procedures and deformation-based procedures. The available performance-based methods for bridges are critically reviewed and a number of critical issues are identified, which arise in all procedures. Then two recently proposed methods are presented in some detail, one based on the direct displacement-based design approach, using equivalent elastic analysis and properly reduced displacement spectra, and one based on the deformation-based approach, which involves a type of partially inelastic response-history analysis for a set of ground motions and wherein pier ductility is included as a design parameter, along with displacement criteria. The current trends in seismic assessment of bridges are then summarised and the more rigorous assessment procedure, i.e. nonlinear dynamic response-history analysis, is used to assess the performance of bridges designed to the previously described procedures. Finally some comments are offered on the feasibility of including such methods in the new generation of bridge codes
Ductility of wide-beam RC frames as lateral resisting system
[EN] Some Mediterranean seismic codes consider wide-beam reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (WBF) as horizontal load carrying systems that cannot guarantee high ductility performances. Conversely, Eurocode 8 allows High Ductility Class (DCH) design for such structural systems. Code prescriptions related to WBF are systematically investigated. In particular, lesson learnt for previous earthquakes, historical reasons, and experimental and numerical studies underpinning specific prescriptions on wide beams in worldwide seismic codes are discussed. Local and global ductility of WBF are then analytically investigated through (1) a parametric study on chord rotations of wide beams with respect to that of deep beams, and (2) a spectral-based comparison of WBF with conventional reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (i.e. with deep beams). Results show that the set of prescriptions given by modern seismic codes provides sufficient ductility to WBF designed in DCH. In fact, global capacity of WBF relies more on the lateral stiffness of the frames and on the overstrength of columns rather than on the local ductility of wide beams, which is systematically lower with respect to that of deep beams.GĂłmez-MartĂnez, F.; Alonso DurĂĄ, A.; De Luca, F.; Verderame, GM. (2016). Ductility of wide-beam RC frames as lateral resisting system. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 14(6):1545-1569. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9891-xS15451569146ACI (1989) Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318-89). ACI Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USAACI (2008) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary (318-08). ACI Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USAACI-ASCE (1991) Recommendations for design of beam-column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures (ACI 352R-91). Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 352, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USAACI-ASCE (2002) Recommendations for design of beam-column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures (ACI 352R-02). Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 352, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USAArslan MH, Korkmaz HH (2007) What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey? Eng Fail Anal 14(1):1â22ASCE (2007) Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-06. American Society of Civil Engineers, RestonASCE (2010) Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10. American Society of Civil Engineers, RestonBenavent-Climent A (2007) Seismic behavior of RC side beam-column connections under dynamic loading. J Earthquake Eng 11:493â511Benavent-Climent A, Zahran R (2010) An energy-based procedure for the assessment of seismic capacity of existing frames: application to RC wide beam systems in Spain. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:354â367Benavent-Climent A, CahĂs X, Zahran R (2009) Exterior wide beam-column connections in existing RC frames subjected to lateral earthquake loads. Eng Struct 31:1414â1424Benavent-Climent A, CahĂs X, Vico JM (2010) Interior wide beam-column connections in existing RC frames subjected to lateral earthquake loading. Bull Earthq Eng 8:401â420BHRC (2004) Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings. Standard NÂș 2800, 3rd edn. Building and Housing Research Center, TehranBorzi B, Elnashai AS (2000) Refined force reduction factors for seismic design. Eng Struct 22:1244â1260Borzi B, Pinho R, Crowley H (2008) Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings. Eng Struct 30:804â820BSI (2004) Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures: Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. British Standards Institutions, LondonCalvi GM (1999) A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. J Earthquake Eng 3(3):411â438CDSC (1994) Seismic construction code, NCSR-94. Committee for the Development of Seismic Codes, Spanish Ministry of Construction, Madrid, Spain (in Spanish)CDSC (2002) Seismic construction code, NCSE-02. Committee for the Development of Seismic Codes, Spanish Ministry of Construction, Madrid, Spain (in Spanish)CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistanceâpart 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Standard EN 1998-1:2003âComitĂ© EuropĂ©en de Normalisation, Brussels, BelgiumCEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistanceâpart 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Standard EN 1998-1:2005âComitĂ© EuropĂ©en de Normalisation, Brussels, BelgiumCheung PC, Paulay T, Park R (1991) Mechanisms of slab contributions in beam-column subassemblages. ACI Spec Publ 123Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Polese M, Verderame GM (2005) A multilevel approach to the capacity assessment of existing RC buildings. J Earthquake Eng 9(1):1â22Crowley H, Pinho R (2010) Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 39:223â235CS.LL.PP (2009) Instructions for the application of the technique code for the Constructions. Official Gazette of the Italian Republic, 47, Regular Supplement no. 27 (in Italian)De Luca F, Vamvatsikos D, Iervolino I (2013) Near-optimal piecewise linear fits of static pushover capacity curves for equivalent SDOF analysis. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 42(4):523â543De Luca F, Verderame GM, GĂłmez-MartĂnez F, PĂ©rez-GarcĂa A (2014) The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 12(5):1999â2026Decanini LD, Mollaioli F (2000) Analisi di vulnerabilitĂ sismica di edifici in cemento armato pre-normativa. In: Cosenza E (ed) Comportamento sismico di edifici in cemento armato progettati per carichi verticali. CNRâGruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dei Terremoti, Rome (in Italian)DolĆĄek M, Fajfar P (2004) IN2âa simple alternative for IDA. In: Proceedings of the 13th World conference on Earthquake Engineering. August 1â6, Vancouver, Canada. Paper 3353DomĂnguez D, LĂłpez-Almansa F, Benavent-Climent A (2014) Comportamiento para el terremoto de Lorca de 11-05-2011, de edificios de vigas planas proyectados sin tener en cuenta la acciĂłn sĂsmica. Informes de la ConstrucciĂłn 66(533):e008 (in Spanish)DomĂnguez D, LĂłpez-Almansa F, Benavent-Climent A (2016) Would RC wide-beam buildings in Spain have survived Lorca earthquake (11-05-2011)? Eng Struct 108:134â154Dönmez C (2013) Seismic Performance of Wide-Beam Infill-Joist Block RC Frames in Turkey. J Perform Constr Facil 29(1):04014026Fadwa I, Ali TA, Nazih E, Sara M (2014) Reinforced concrete wide and conventional beam-column connections subjected to lateral load. Eng Struct 76:34â48Fardis MN (2009) Seismic design, assessment and retrofitting of concrete, Buildings edn. Springer, LondonGentry TR, Wight JK (1992) Reinforced concrete wide beam-column connections under earthquake-type loading. Report no. UMCEE 92-12. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAGĂłmez-MartĂnez F (2015) FAST simplified vulnerability approach for seismic assessment of infilled RC MRF buildings and its application to the 2011 Lorca (Spain) earthquake. Ph.D. Thesis, Polytechnic University of Valencia, SpainGĂłmez-MartĂnez F, PĂ©rez GarcĂa A, De Luca F, Verderame GM (2015a) Comportamiento de los edificios de HA con tabiquerĂa durante el sismo de Lorca de 2011: aplicaciĂłn del mĂ©todo FAST. Informes de la ConstrucciĂłn 67(537):e065 (in Spanish)GĂłmez-MartĂnez F, PĂ©rez-GarcĂa A, Alonso DurĂĄ A, MartĂnez Boquera A, Verderame GM (2015b) Eficacia de la norma NCSE-02 a la luz de los daños e intervenciones tras el sismo de Lorca de 2011. In: Proceedings of Congreso Internacional sobre IntervenciĂłn en Obras ArquitectĂłnicas tras Sismo: LâAquila (2009), Lorca (2011) y Emilia Romagna (2012), May 13â14, Murcia, Spain (in Spanish)GĂłmez-MartĂnez F, Verderame GM, De Luca F, PĂ©rez-GarcĂa A, Alonso-DurĂĄ, A (2015c). High ductility seismic performances of wide-beam RC frames. In; XVI Convegno ANIDIS. September 13â17, L'Aquila, ItalyHawkins NM, Mitchell D (1979) Progressive collapse of flat plate structures. ACI J 76(7):775â808Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Polese M, Verderame GM, Fabbrocino G (2007) Seismic risk of RC building classes. Eng Struct 29(5):813â820Inel M, Ozmen HB, Akyol E (2013) Observations on the building damages after 19 May 2011 Simav (Turkey) earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 11(1):255â283Kurose Y, Guimaraes GN, Zuhua L, Kreger ME, Jirsa JO (1991) Evaluation of slab-beam-column connections subjected to bidirectional loading. ACI Spec Publ 123:39â67LaFave JM, Wight JK (1997) Behavior of reinforced exterior wide beam-column-slab connections subjected to lateral earthquake loading. Report no. UMCEE 97-01. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USALaFave JM, Wight JK (1999) Reinforced concrete exterior wide beam-column-slab connections subjected to lateral earthquake loading. ACI Struct J 96(4):577â586LaFave JM, Wight JK (2001) Reinforced concrete wide-beam construction vs. conventional construction: resistance to lateral earthquake loads. Earthq Spectra 17(3):479â505Li B, Kulkarni SA (2010) Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete exterior wide beam-column joints. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 136(1):26â36LĂłpez-Almansa F, DomĂnguez D, Benavent-Climent A (2013) Vulnerability analysis of RC buildings with wide beams located in moderate seismicity regions. Eng Struct 46:687â702Masi A, Santarsiero G, Nigro D (2013a) Cyclic tests on external RC beam-column joints: role of seismic design level and axial load value on the ultimate capacity. J Earthquake Eng 17(1):110â136Masi A, Santarsiero G, Mossucca A, Nigro D (2013b) Seismic behaviour of RC beam-column subassemblages with flat beam. In: Proceedings of XV Convegno della Associazione Nazionale Italiana di Ingegneria Sismica, ANIDIS. Padova, ItalyMazzolani FM, Piluso V (1997) Plastic design of seismic resistant steel frames. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 26:167â191MEPP (2000a) Greek earthquake resistant design code, EAK 2000. Ministry of Environment, Planning and Public Works, AthensMEPP (2000b) Greek code for the design and construction of concrete works, EKOS 2000. Ministry of Environment, Planning and Public Works, Athens (in Greek)Miranda E, Bertero VV (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design. Earthq Spectra 10(2):357â379MPWS (2007) Specifications for buildings to be built in seismic areas. Turkish Standards Institution, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara (in Turkish)Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS (2002) Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings. J Earthquake Eng 6(2):239â273NZS (2004) Structural design actions. Part 5: earthquake actions, NZS 1170.5. New Zealand Standards, WellingtonNZS (2006) Concrete structures standard: part 1âthe design of concrete structures, NZS 3101 part 1. New Zealand Standards, WellingtonPan A, Moehle JP (1989) Lateral displacement ductility of reinforced concrete flat plates. ACI Struct J 86(3):250â258Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN (2001) Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Struct J 98(2):135â148 [and Appendix 1 (69 pp)]Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of concrete and masonry structures. Wiley, New York, USAQuintero-Febres CG, Wight JK (1997) Investigation on the seismic behavior of RC interior wide beam-column connections. Report no. UMCEE 97-15. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAQuintero-Febres CG, Wight JK (2001) Experimental study of Reinforced concrete interior wide beam-column connections subjected to lateral loading. ACI Struct J 98(4):572â582Serna-Ros P, FernĂĄndez-Prada MA, Miguel-Sosa P, Debb OAR (2001) Influence of stirrup distribution and support width on the shear strength of reinforced concrete wide beams. Mag Concr Res 54(00):1â11Shuraim AB (2012) Transverse stirrup configurations in RC wide shallow beams supported on narrow columns. J Struct Eng 138(3):416â424Siah WL, Stehle JS, Mendis P, Goldsworthy H (2003) Interior wide beam connections subjected to lateral earthquake loading. Eng Struct 25:281â291Tore E, Demiral T (2014) A parametric study of code-based performance limits for wide beams. e-GFOS 5(8):1â11Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 31:491â514Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1994) Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 23:507â521Vielma JC, Barbat AH, Oller S (2010) Seismic safety of low ductility structures used in Spain. Bull Earthq Eng 8:135â15
A building classification scheme of housing stock in Malawi for earthquake risk assessment
This study presents a building classification scheme for residential houses in Malawi by focusing upon informal construction, which accounts for more than 90% of housing in the country, which has the highest urbanisation rate in the world. The proposed classification is compatible with the Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) method and can be used for seismic vulnerability assessments of building stock in Malawi. To obtain realistic proportions of the building classes that are prevalent in Malawi, a building survey was conducted in Central and Southern Malawi between 10th and 20th July 2017. The results from the survey are used to modify the PAGER-based proportions of main housing typologies by reflecting actual housing construction in the surveyed areas. The results clearly highlight the importance of using realistic building stock data for seismic risk assessment in Malawi; relying on global building stock information can result in significant bias of earthquake impact assessment
Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of historic masonry buildings
Seismic risk evaluation of built-up areas involves analysis of the level of earthquake hazard of the region, building vulnerability and exposure. Within this approach that defines seismic risk, building vulnerability assessment assumes great importance, not only because of the obvious physical consequences in the eventual occurrence of a seismic event, but also because it is the one of the few potential aspects in which engineering research can intervene. In fact, rigorous vulnerability assessment of existing buildings and the implementation of appropriate retrofitting solutions can help to reduce the levels of physical damage, loss of life and the economic impact of future seismic events. Vulnerability studies of urban centresshould be developed with the aim of identifying building fragilities and reducing seismic risk. As part of the rehabilitation of the historic city centre of Coimbra, a complete identification and inspection survey of old masonry buildings has been carried out. The main purpose of this research is to discuss vulnerability assessment methodologies, particularly those of the first level, through the proposal and development of a method previously used to determine the level of vulnerability, in the assessment of physical damage and its relationship with seismic intensity
Seismic Performance of Historical Masonry Structures Through Pushover and Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses
Earthquakes are the main cause of damage for ancient masonry buildings. In order to reduce their vulnerability with compatible and light interventions, it is necessary to have accurate models for the seismic analysis, able to simulate the nonlinear behaviour of masonry, and well defined Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) procedure, aimed to guarantee acceptable levels of risk for the use of the building, the safety of occupants and the conservation of the monument itself. Displacement-based approach is the more appropriate for this type of structures, which cracks even for low intensity earthquakes and can survive to severe ones only if they have a sufficient displacement capacity. Among the wide variety of historical masonry structures, buildings characterized by a box-type behavior are here considered, which can be modeled through the equivalent frame model, considering the assembling of nonlinear piers and spandrels. Thus, the main object of the paper is to establish a strict equivalence between the use of static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses for the PBA. Pros and cons of the two methods are discussed, as well as some critical issues related to their application. A multiscale approach is proposed for the definition of the performance levels, which considers the seismic response at different scales: local damage in single elements, performance of single walls and horizontal diaphragms and global behavior. An original contribution is the use of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) technique for the correct interpretation of numerical and experimental dynamic results
biological properties of hsc scientific basis for hsct
Hematopoiesisâfrom the Greek term for "blood making"âis the adaptive process by which mature and functional blood cells are continuously replaced over the entire lifetime of an individual. Erythrocytes, platelets, and the various subsets of leukocytes all have finite although different life spans. As a consequence, the daily production of red blood cells, platelets, and neutrophils in homeostatic conditions amount to more than 300 billion cells
- âŠ