Sirt1 Regulates Insulin Secretion by Repressing UCP2 in Pancreatic β Cells

Sir2 and insulin/IGF-1 are the major pathways that impinge upon aging in lower organisms. In Caenorhabditis elegans a possible genetic link between Sir2 and the insulin/IGF-1 pathway has been reported. Here we investigate such a link in mammals. We show that Sirt1 positively regulates insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells. Sirt1 represses the uncoupling protein (UCP) gene UCP2 by binding directly to the UCP2 promoter. In β cell lines in which Sirt1 is reduced by SiRNA, UCP2 levels are elevated and insulin secretion is blunted. The up-regulation of UCP2 is associated with a failure of cells to increase ATP levels after glucose stimulation. Knockdown of UCP2 restores the ability to secrete insulin in cells with reduced Sirt1, showing that UCP2 causes the defect in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Food deprivation induces UCP2 in mouse pancreas, which may occur via a reduction in NAD (a derivative of niacin) levels in the pancreas and down-regulation of Sirt1. Sirt1 knockout mice display constitutively high UCP2 expression. Our findings show that Sirt1 regulates UCP2 in β cells to affect insulin secretion

The Effects of Practice-Based Training on Graduate Teaching Assistants' Classroom Practices.

Evidence-based teaching is a highly complex skill, requiring repeated cycles of deliberate practice and feedback to master. Despite existing well-characterized frameworks for practice-based training in K-12 teacher education, the major principles of these frameworks have not yet been transferred to instructor development in higher educational contexts, including training of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs). We sought to determine whether a practice-based training program could help GTAs learn and use evidence-based teaching methods in their classrooms. We implemented a weekly training program for introductory biology GTAs that included structured drills of techniques selected to enhance student practice, logic development, and accountability and reduce apprehension. These elements were selected based on their previous characterization as dimensions of active learning. GTAs received regular performance feedback based on classroom observations. To quantify use of target techniques and levels of student participation, we collected and coded 160 h of video footage. We investigated the relationship between frequency of GTA implementation of target techniques and student exam scores; however, we observed no significant relationship. Although GTAs adopted and used many of the target techniques with high frequency, techniques that enforced student participation were not stably adopted, and their use was unresponsive to formal feedback. We also found that techniques discussed in training, but not practiced, were not used at quantifiable frequencies, further supporting the importance of practice-based training for influencing instructional practices

NAD and NADH Levels in Fed and Starved Mice

<p>Measurements were made in pancreases of seven fed and seven starved wild-type mice, and levels are expressed as nmol per gram of tissue. The decrease in NAD in starved mice is significant with <i>p</i> < 0.0005, while the NADH levels in fed versus starved are not significantly different.</p

Sirt1 KO Mice Have a Lower Level of Insulin

<div><p>(A) Plasma insulin levels in wild-type (open bars) or Sirt1 KO mice (black bars) <i>ad libitum</i> or after O/N starvation (<i>n</i> = 12 wild-type, 11 KO, *<i>p</i> < 0.03 in <i>ad libitum</i> and O/N starvation mice, ANOVA).</p> <p>(B) Plasma insulin levels in Sirt1 KO mice (black bar) compared with wild-type mice (open bars) 2, 10, or 20 min after injection with glucose (<i>n</i> = 4 or 5, *<i>p</i> < 0.05 compared with wild-type, ANOVA).</p> <p>(C) Insulin secretion in islets isolated from wild-type (open bars) or Sirt1 KO mice (black bars) after induction by 20 mM glucose for 1 h (<i>n</i> = 4, *<i>p</i> < 0.005 in wild-type, ANOVA).</p> <p>(D) Glucose levels in wild-type (open bars) and Sirt1 KO (black bars) mice (<i>n</i> = 12 wild-type, 11 KO, *<i>p</i> < 0.03 <i>ad libitum,</i> ANOVA).</p> <p>(E) Glucose tolerance tests in wild-type (black) and Sirt1 KO (green) mice (<i>n</i> = 6, *<i>p</i> < 0.05 at 20, 40, 60, and 120 min).</p></div

Sirt1 Binds at the UCP2 Promoter and Represses the Gene

<div><p>(A) In vitro CAT assay. 293T cells were transfected with a CAT reporter driven by the UCP2 promoter. Cells were also co-transfected with Sirt1 or not and with PPARγ or not, as indicated. CAT activity was determined (<i>n</i> = 3 experiments done in triplicate, *<i>p</i> < 0.05 in the no Sirt1 transfection experiment, ANOVA).</p> <p>(B) Schematic representation of the primer sets (arrows) in the UCP2 promoter (shown schematically and with excerpted DNA sequence).</p> <p>(C) Chromatin-immunoprecipitation (IP) was carried out on INS-1 control cells (lanes 1–3) or Sirt1 knockdown cells (columns 4–6) using Sirt1 antibody or a Gal4 control antibody, as indicated. PCR was carried out with the indicated primers. INPUT (columns 7–10) refers to PCR carried out on samples prepared prior to immunoprecipitation. Negative controls for the PCR (minus DNA) are also indicated (columns 11 and 12).</p></div

UCP2 mRNA or Protein Levels in Fed or Starved Wild-Type Mice

<div><p>(A) Northern blot for UCP2 in whole pancreas of two <i>ad libitum</i> mice and two mice starved for 18 h.</p> <p>(B) Western blot for UCP2 in isolated islets in two <i>ad libitum</i> and two starved mice.</p> <p>(C) Western blot for UCP2 in wild-type (WT) or Sirt1 KO littermates either fed <i>ad libitum</i> or starved for 18 h. The experiment shown is representative of four pairs of wild-type and KO littermates analyzed.</p> <p>(D) RT-PCR for UCP2 in wild-type or Sirt1 KO mice fed or starved.</p></div

Knockdown of UCP2 in Sirt1 Knockdown Cells Restores Glucose-Induced Insulin Secretion

<div><p>(A) Northern blot for UCP2 RNA in control INS-1 cells, and cells knocked down for Sirt1 (SiRNA Sirt1), UCP2 (SiRNA UCP2), or both Sirt1 and UCP2 (SiRNA Sirt1-SiRNA UCP2). RNAs were quantitated by densitometry, setting the level of UCP2 in control cells at 1.0.</p> <p>(B) Insulin secretion in INS-1 control cells and cells with knockdown levels of Sirt1, UCP2, or both Sirt1 and UCP2 after treatment with 16.7 mM glucose (+) or 4mM glucose (−) for 1 h (<i>n</i> = 3 experiments done in triplicate, *<i>p</i> < 0.05 in SiRNA Sirt1-SiRNA UCP2, ANOVA).</p></div

Sirt1 Is a Positive Regulator of Insulin Secretion in INS-1 and MIN6 Cells

<div><p>(A) Immunofluorescence in INS-1 cells using Sirt1 antibody (green) and DAPI staining (blue). Nuclear localization of Sirt1 is evident.</p> <p>(B) Induction of insulin secretion in INS-1 cells with 16.7 mM glucose (+) compared with 4 mM glucose control (−). The left side shows no nicotinamide and the right side shows treatment with 10 mM nicotinamide for 48 h prior to induction (<i>n</i> = 3 experiments done in triplicate, *<i>p</i> < 0.05 in the no nicotinamide experiment, ANOVA).</p> <p>(C) Western blot of Sirt1 in INS-1 cells with knockdown levels of the protein (SiRNA Sirt1) compared with control cells (pSUPER).</p> <p>(D) INS-1 cells infected with the pSUPERretro SiRNA-GFP control (open bars) or pSUPER retro SiRNA-Sirt1 knockdown cells (black bars) were induced for insulin secretion as in (B) (<i>n</i> = 3 experiments done in triplicate, *<i>p</i> < 0.008 in the control experiment, ANOVA).</p> <p>(E) Western blot of Sirt1 in MIN6 cells with knockdown levels of the protein (SiRNA Sirt1) compared with control cells (pSUPER).</p> <p>(F) Glucose induction (20 mM versus 4 mM) of insulin secretion in MIN6 cells with the pSUPER control vector (open bars) or the SiRNA Sirt1 vector (black bars) in the absence or presence of nicotinamide (<i>n</i> = 3 experiments done in triplicate*<i>p</i> < 0.05 in the control without nicotinamide, ANOVA).</p> <p>(G) Glucose uptake in INS-1 cells stably transfected with control or SiRNA Sirt1 vectors. 2-NBDG fluorescence was determined by flow cytometry 10 min after addition and expressed as arbitrary units (<i>n</i> = 2, *<i>p</i> < 0.0005 compared with no glucose).</p></div