On passion and moral behavior in achievement settings: The mediating role of pride

The Dualistic Model of Passion (Vallerand et al., 2003) distinguishes two types of passion: harmonious passion (HP) and obsessive passion (OP) that predict adaptive and less adaptive outcomes, respectively. In the present research, we were interested in understanding the role of passion in the adoption of moral behavior in achievement settings. It was predicted that the two facets of pride (authentic and hubristic; Tracy & Robins, 2007) would mediate the passion-moral behavior relationship. Specifically, because people who are passionate about a given activity are highly involved in it, it was postulated that they should typically do well and thus experience high levels of pride when engaged in the activity. However, it was also hypothesized that while both types of passion should be conducive to authentic pride, only OP should lead to hubristic pride. Finally, in line with past research on pride (Carver, Sinclair, & Johnson, 2010; Tracy et al., 2009), only hubristic pride was expected to negatively predict moral behavior, while authentic pride was expected to positively predict moral behavior. Results of two studies conducted with paintball players (N=163, Study 1) and athletes (N=296, Study 2) supported the proposed model. Future research directions are discussed in light of the Dualistic Model of Passion

Microtubules gate tau condensation to spatially regulate microtubule functions.

Tau is an abundant microtubule-associated protein in neurons. Tau aggregation into insoluble fibrils is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia1, yet the physiological state of tau molecules within cells remains unclear. Using single-molecule imaging, we directly observe that the microtubule lattice regulates reversible tau self-association, leading to localized, dynamic condensation of tau molecules on the microtubule surface. Tau condensates form selectively permissible barriers, spatially regulating the activity of microtubule-severing enzymes and the movement of molecular motors through their boundaries. We propose that reversible self-association of tau molecules, gated by the microtubule lattice, is an important mechanism of the biological functions of tau, and that oligomerization of tau is a common property shared between the physiological and disease-associated forms of the molecule

Evidence of a Causal Association Between Insulinemia and Endometrial Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Insulinemia and type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been associated with endometrial cancer risk in numerous observational studies. However, the causality of these associations is uncertain. Here we use a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess whether insulinemia and T2D are causally associated with endometrial cancer. METHODS: We used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with T2D (49 variants), fasting glucose (36 variants), fasting insulin (18 variants), early insulin secretion (17 variants), and body mass index (BMI) (32 variants) as instrumental variables in MR analyses. We calculated MR estimates for each risk factor with endometrial cancer using an inverse-variance weighted method with SNP-endometrial cancer associations from 1287 case patients and 8273 control participants. RESULTS: Genetically predicted higher fasting insulin levels were associated with greater risk of endometrial cancer (odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation = 2.34, 95% confidence internal [CI] = 1.06 to 5.14, P = .03). Consistently, genetically predicted higher 30-minute postchallenge insulin levels were also associated with endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.76, P = .003). We observed no associations between genetic risk of type 2 diabetes (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.04, P = .16) or higher fasting glucose (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.50, P = .99) and endometrial cancer. In contrast, endometrial cancer risk was higher in individuals with genetically predicted higher BMI (OR = 3.86, 95% CI = 2.24 to 6.64, P = 1.2x10(-6)). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence to support a causal association of higher insulin levels, independently of BMI, with endometrial cancer risk.This study was supported by MRC grant MC_UU_12015/1 and by the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under EMIF grant agreement n° 115372 (contributions from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies). ANECS recruitment was supported by project grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (ID#339435), The Cancer Council Queensland (ID#4196615) and Cancer Council Tasmania (ID#403031 and ID#457636). SEARCH recruitment was funded by a programme grant from Cancer Research UK [C490/A10124]. Case genotyping was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (ID#552402). Control data was generated by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC), and a full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the data is available from the WTCCC website. We acknowledge use of DNA from the British 1958 Birth Cohort collection, funded by the Medical Research Council grant G0000934 and the Wellcome Trust grant 068545/Z/02. Funding for this project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 085475. Recruitment of the QIMR controls was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC). The University of Newcastle, the Gladys M Brawn Senior Research Fellowship scheme, The Vincent Fairfax Family Foundation, the Hunter Medical Research Institute and the Hunter Area Pathology Service all contributed towards the costs of establishing the Hunter Community Study. K.T.N. was supported by the Gates Cambridge Trust. R.K.S. is supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number WT098498). A.B.S. is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowship Scheme. D.F.E. is a Principal Research Fellow of Cancer Research UK. A.M.D is supported by the Joseph Mitchell Trust.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Oxford University Press via http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv17

A Kallikrein 15 (KLK15) single nucleotide polymorphism located close to a novel exon shows evidence of association with poor ovarian cancer survival.

BACKGROUND: KLK15 over-expression is reported to be a significant predictor of reduced progression-free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer. Our aim was to analyse the KLK15 gene for putative functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and assess the association of these and KLK15 HapMap tag SNPs with ovarian cancer survival. RESULTS: In silico analysis was performed to identify KLK15 regulatory elements and to classify potentially functional SNPs in these regions. After SNP validation and identification by DNA sequencing of ovarian cancer cell lines and aggressive ovarian cancer patients, 9 SNPs were shortlisted and genotyped using the Sequenom iPLEX Mass Array platform in a cohort of Australian ovarian cancer patients (N = 319). In the Australian dataset we observed significantly worse survival for the KLK15 rs266851 SNP in a dominant model (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.96). This association was observed in the same direction in two independent datasets, with a combined HR for the three studies of 1.16 (1.00-1.34). This SNP lies 15 bp downstream of a novel exon and is predicted to be involved in mRNA splicing. The mutant allele is also predicted to abrogate an HSF-2 binding site. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence of association for the SNP rs266851 with ovarian cancer survival. Our results provide the impetus for downstream functional assays and additional independent validation studies to assess the role of KLK15 regulatory SNPs and KLK15 isoforms with alternative intracellular functional roles in ovarian cancer survival.RIGHTS : This article is licensed under the BioMed Central licence at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/license which is similar to the 'Creative Commons Attribution Licence'. In brief you may : copy, distribute, and display the work; make derivative works; or make commercial use of the work - under the following conditions: the original author must be given credit; for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are

Discourses of student orientation to medical education programs

Background: Although medical students’ initial orientation is an important point of transition in medical education, there is a paucity of literature on the subject and major variations in the ways that different institutions orient incoming medical students to their programs. Methods: We conducted a discourse analysis of medical education orientation in the literature and on data from a survey of peer institutions’ approaches to orientation. Results: These two discourses of orientation had clear similarities, in particular, the critical role of ceremony and symbols, and the focus on developing professionalism and physician identities. There were also differences between them, in particular, in the way that the discourse in the literature focused on the symbolic and professional aspects of orientation; something we have called ‘cultural orientation’. Meanwhile, those who were responsible for orientation in their own institutions tended to focus on the practical and social dimensions. Conclusion: By examining how orientation has been described and discussed, we identify three domains of orientation: cultural, social, and practical. These domains are relatively distinct in terms of the activities associated with them, and in terms of who is involved in organizing and running these activities. We also describe orientation as a liminal activity system on the threshold of medical school where incoming students initially cross into the profession. Interestingly, this state of ambiguity also extends to the scholarship of orientation with only some of its aspects attracting formal enquiry, even though there is a growing interest in transitions in medical education as a whole. We hope, therefore, that this study can help to legitimize enquiry into orientation in all its forms and that it can begin to situate the role of orientation more firmly within the firmament of medical education practice and research

Resolving the paradox of shame: differentiating among specific appraisal-feeling combinations explains pro-social and self-defensive motivation

Research has shown that people can respond both self-defensively and pro-socially when they experience shame. We address this paradox by differentiating among specific appraisals (of specific self-defect and concern for condemnation) and feelings (of shame, inferiority, and rejection) often reported as part of shame. In two Experiments (Study 1: N = 85; Study 2: N = 112), manipulations that put participants’ social-image at risk increased their appraisal of concern for condemnation. In Study 2, a manipulation of moral failure increased participants’ appraisal that they suffered a specific self-defect. In both studies, mediation analyses showed that effects of the social-image at risk manipulation on self-defensive motivation were explained by appraisal of concern for condemnation and felt rejection. In contrast, the effect of the moral failure manipulation on pro-social motivation in Study 2 was explained by appraisal of a specific self-defect and felt shame. Thus, distinguishing among the appraisals and feelings tied to shame enabled clearer prediction of pro-social and self-defensive responses to moral failure with and without risk to social-image

Comprehensive genetic assessment of the ESR1 locus identifies a risk region for endometrial cancer.

Excessive exposure to estrogen is a well-established risk factor for endometrial cancer (EC), particularly for cancers of endometrioid histology. The physiological function of estrogen is primarily mediated by estrogen receptor alpha, encoded by ESR1. Consequently, several studies have investigated whether variation at the ESR1 locus is associated with risk of EC, with conflicting results. We performed comprehensive fine-mapping analyses of 3633 genotyped and imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 6607 EC cases and 37 925 controls. There was evidence of an EC risk signal located at a potential alternative promoter of the ESR1 gene (lead SNP rs79575945, P=1.86×10(-5)), which was stronger for cancers of endometrioid subtype (P=3.76×10(-6)). Bioinformatic analysis suggests that this risk signal is in a functionally important region targeting ESR1, and eQTL analysis found that rs79575945 was associated with expression of SYNE1, a neighbouring gene. In summary, we have identified a single EC risk signal located at ESR1, at study-wide significance. Given SNPs located at this locus have been associated with risk for breast cancer, also a hormonally driven cancer, this study adds weight to the rationale for performing informed candidate fine-scale genetic studies across cancer types.This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (ID#1031333 to A B Spurdle, DF, A M Dunning, ID#39435 to ANECS, ID#552402, QIMR Controls); National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Fellowship Scheme (to A B Spurdle); Principal Research Fellow of Cancer Research UK (to D F Easton); Joseph Mitchell Trust (to A M Dunning); Oxford Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre (to I Tomlinson); The European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement number 22175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS); Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118 to COGS and BCAC, C1287/A10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014 to COGS and BCAC, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C8197/A16565, C490/A10124 to SEARCH, CORGI - NSECG, to I Tomlinson); National Institutes of Health (CA128978, R01 CA122443 to MECS and MAY, P30 CA15083 to MECS, P50 CA136393 to MECS and MAY, CAHRES); Post-Cancer GWAS Initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065, 1U19 CA148112 – the GAME-ON initiative); Department of Defence (W81XWH-10-1-0341); Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer; Komen Foundation for the Cure; The Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Ovarian Cancer Research Fund (to COGS); Cancer Council Queensland (ID#4196615 to ANECS); Council Cancer Tasmania (ID#403031, #ID457636 to ANECS); Medical Research Council (G0000934 to the British 1958 Birth Cohort); Wellcome Trust (068545/Z/02, 085475 to the British 1958 Birth Cohort); Wellcome Trust Human Genetics Grant (090532/Z/09/Z to NSECG); European Union (EU FP7 CHIBCHA to NSECG); The University of Newcastle (to QIMR Controls, to NECS); Gladys M Brawn Senior Research Fellowship (QIMR Controls); The Vincent Fairfax Family Foundation (QIMR Controls); Hunter Medical Research Institute (HCS, NECS); Hunter Area Pathology Service (HCS); ELAN fund of the University of Erlangen (BECS); Verelst Foundation for endometrial cancer (LES); Fred C and Katherine B Anderson Foundation (to MECS, to MAY); Mayo Foundation (to MECS, to MAY); Ovarian Cancer Research Fund with support of the Smith family, in memory of Kathryn Sladek Smith (MECS, PPD/RPCI.07 to OCAC); Helse Vest Grant (MoMaTEC); University of Bergen (MoMaTEC); Melzer Foundation (MoMaTEC); The Norwegian Cancer Society – Harald Andersens legat (MoMaTEC); The Research Council of Norway (MoMaTEC); Haukeland University of Hospital (MoMaTEC); NBN Children's Cancer Research Group (NECS); Ms Jennie Thomas (NECS); regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet (20110222, 20110483, 20110141 and DF 07015 all to RENDOCAS, to KARBAC); The Swedish Labor Market Insurance (100069 to RENDOCAS); The Swedish Cancer Society (11 0439 to RENDOCAS); Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (CAHRES); Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (CAHRES); UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres at the University of Cambridge (OCAC); Baden-Württemberg state Ministry of Science, Research and Arts (ESTHER); Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (ESTHER); Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany (01KW9975/5 to GENICA, 01KW9976/8 to GENICA, 01KW9977/0 to GENICA, 01KW0114 to GENICA, to ESTHER); Robert Bosch Foundation (GENICA); Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum – DKFZ (GENICA); Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum, IPA (GENICA); Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus (GENICA); Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. (70-2892-BR I to MARIE); Hamburg Cancer Society (MARIE); German Cancer Research Center (MARIE); Breast Cancer Research Foundation (MCBCS); David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation (MCBCS); Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Foundation (MCBCS); VicHealth (MCCS); Cancer Council Victoria (MCCS); Breakthrough Breast Cancer (UKBGS); Institute of Cancer Research (UKBGS); and NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (UKBGS/ICR).This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from the Society for Endocrinology via http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERC-15-031

CYP19A1 fine-mapping and Mendelian randomization: estradiol is causal for endometrial cancer.

Candidate gene studies have reported CYP19A1 variants to be associated with endometrial cancer and with estradiol (E2) concentrations. We analyzed 2937 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 6608 endometrial cancer cases and 37 925 controls and report the first genome wide-significant association between endometrial cancer and a CYP19A1 SNP (rs727479 in intron 2, P=4.8×10(-11)). SNP rs727479 was also among those most strongly associated with circulating E2 concentrations in 2767 post-menopausal controls (P=7.4×10(-8)). The observed endometrial cancer odds ratio per rs727479 A-allele (1.15, CI=1.11-1.21) is compatible with that predicted by the observed effect on E2 concentrations (1.09, CI=1.03-1.21), consistent with the hypothesis that endometrial cancer risk is driven by E2. From 28 candidate-causal SNPs, 12 co-located with three putative gene-regulatory elements and their risk alleles associated with higher CYP19A1 expression in bioinformatical analyses. For both phenotypes, the associations with rs727479 were stronger among women with a higher BMI (Pinteraction=0.034 and 0.066 respectively), suggesting a biologically plausible gene-environment interaction.Fine-mapping analysis was supported by NHMRC project grant [ID#1031333] to ABS, DFE and AMD. ABS, PW, GWM, and DRN are supported by the NHMRC Fellowship scheme. AMD is supported by the Joseph Mitchell Trust. IT is supported by Cancer Research UK and the Oxford Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre. Funding for the iCOGS infrastructure came from: the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no 223175 [HEALTH-F2-2009-223175] [COGS], Cancer Research UK [C1287/A10118, C1287/A 10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C8197/A16565], the National Institutes of Health [CA128978] and Post-Cancer GWAS initiative [1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065 and 1U19 CA148112 - the GAME-ON initiative], the Department of Defence [W81XWH-10-1-0341], the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR] for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer, Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. ANECS recruitment was supported by project grants from the NHMRC [ID#339435], The Cancer Council Queensland [ID#4196615] and Cancer Council Tasmania [ID#403031 and ID#457636]. SEARCH recruitment was funded by a programme grant from Cancer Research UK [C490/A10124]. Stage 1 and stage 2 case genotyping was supported by the NHMRC [ID#552402, ID#1031333]. This study 647 makes use of data generated by the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium (WTCCC). A full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the data is available from www.wtccc.org.uk. Funding for the project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 076113. We acknowledge use of DNA from the British 1958 Birth Cohort collection, funded by the Medical Research Council grant G0000934 and the Wellcome Trust grant 068545/Z/02 - funding for this project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 085475. NSECG was supported by the EU FP7 CHIBCHA grant and Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics Grant 090532/Z/09Z, and CORGI by Cancer Research UK. Recruitment of the QIMR Berghofer controls was supported by the NHMRC. The University of Newcastle, the Gladys M Brawn Senior Research Fellowship scheme, The Vincent Fairfax Family Foundation, the Hunter Medical Research Institute and the Hunter Area Pathology Service all contributed towards the costs of establishing the Hunter Community Study. The Bavarian Endometrial Cancer Study (BECS) was partly funded by the ELAN fund of the University of Erlangen. The Leuven Endometrium Study (LES) was supported by the Verelst Foundation for endometrial cancer. The Mayo Endometrial Cancer Study (MECS) and Mayo controls (MAY) were supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of United States Public Health Service [R01 CA122443, P30 CA15083, P50 CA136393, and GAME-ON the NCI Cancer Post-GWAS Initiative U19 CA148112], the Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation, the Mayo Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund with support of the Smith family, in memory of Kathryn Sladek Smith. MoMaTEC received financial support from a Helse Vest Grant, the University of Bergen, Melzer Foundation, The Norwegian Cancer Society (Harald Andersens legat), The Research Council of Norway and Haukeland University Hospital. 672 The Newcastle Endometrial Cancer Study (NECS) acknowledges contributions from the University of Newcastle, The NBN Children’s Cancer Research Group, Ms Jennie Thomas and the Hunter Medical Research Institute. RENDOCAS was supported through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet [numbers: 20110222, 20110483, 20110141 and DF 07015], The Swedish Labor Market Insurance [number 100069] and The Swedish Cancer Society [number 11 0439]. The Cancer Hormone Replacement Epidemiology in Sweden Study (CAHRES, formerly called The Singapore and Swedish Breast/Endometrial Cancer Study; SASBAC) was supported by funding from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (A*STAR), the US National Institutes of Health and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) is funded by Cancer Research UK [C1287/A10118, C1287/A12014]. The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) is supported by a grant from the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund thanks to donations by the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith [PPD/RPCI.07], and the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres at the University of Cambridge. Additional funding for individual control groups is detailed in the Supplementary Information. EPIC-Norfolk was funded by research programme grant funding from Cancer Research UK and the Medical Research Council with additional support from the Stroke Association, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health, Research into Ageing and Academy of Medical Sciences. The SIBS study was supported by program grant C1287/A10118 and project grants from Cancer Research 697 UK (grant numbers C1287/8459).This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Bioscientifica via http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERC-15-038