52 research outputs found
Annoyance in Response to Vibrations from Railways.
Rail transport is a key stepping stone in the EU's transport policy and is pinpointed for investment and growth over the coming decades. This expanding infrastructure implies increased exposure to environmental stressors, such as noise and ground-borne vibrations. Little is known about the health impacts of exposure to these vibrations. The aim of this paper is to examine the association between annoyance from rail vibrations and the distance of residential dwelling from the railway. It reports the first results of a large epidemiological study, EpiVib, which was designed to investigate the long-term health effects of exposure to rail vibrations. The first part of this study examines a self-reported questionnaire. In total, 6894 individuals aged between 18 and 80 living within 1 km of a railway in west Sweden participated. Results presented here examine the association between distance to the railway and annoyance from vibrations and are stratified by train type. A positive association between closer distance and increased annoyance is seen. After adjustment for important modifiers, results showed that vibrations from freight trains and maintenance operations are reported to be moderately and highly annoying at distances of up to 400 m from the railway and diesel up to 300 m. Vibration from passenger and fast trains are significantly annoying up to 200 m from the track. Vibration from freight trains and maintenance operations were considered highly annoying up to 300 m from the track, diesel up to 400 m. Vibration from passenger and fast trains are not reported to be highly annoying after adjustment. Heavier, slower moving locomotives, in the form of diesel and freight trains, appear to be the source of annoyance at distances further from the railway compared to passenger and fast trains. This has implications in terms of property, transport, and infrastructure planning
Characterisation of the natural environment: quantitative indicators across Europe
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recognises the
importance of natural environments for human health. Evidence
for natural environment-health associations comes largely from
single countries or regions, with varied approaches to measuring
natural environment exposure. We present a standardised approach
to measuring neighbourhood natural environment exposure in
cities in different regions of Europe. METHODS: The Positive
Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor environment in TYPical
populations of different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE) study
aimed to explore the mechanisms linking natural environment
exposure and health in four European cities (Barcelona, Spain;
Doetinchem, the Netherlands; Kaunas, Lithuania; and
Stoke-on-Trent, UK). Common GIS protocols were used to develop a
hierarchy of natural environment measures, from simple measures
(e.g., NDVI, Urban Atlas) using Europe-wide data sources, to
detailed measures derived from local data that were specific to
mechanisms thought to underpin natural environment-health
associations (physical activity, social interaction, stress
reduction/restoration). Indicators were created around
residential addresses for a range of straight line and network
buffers (100 m-1 km). RESULTS: For simple indicators derived
from Europe-wide data, we observed differences between cities,
which varied with different indicators (e.g., Kaunas and
Doetinchem had equal highest mean NDVI within 100 m buffer, but
mean distance to nearest natural environment in Kaunas was more
twice that in Doetinchem). Mean distance to nearest natural
environment for all cities suggested that most participants
lived close to some kind of natural environments (64 +/- 58-363
+/- 281 m; mean 180 +/- 204 m). The detailed classification
highlighted marked between-city differences in terms of
prominent types of natural environment. Indicators specific to
mechanisms derived from this classification also captured more
variation than the simple indicators. Distance to nearest and
count indicators showed clear differences between cities, and
those specific to the mechanisms showed within-city differences
for Barcelona and Doetinchem. CONCLUSIONS: This paper
demonstrates the feasibility and challenges of creating
comparable GIS-derived natural environment exposure indicators
across diverse European cities. Mechanism-specific indicators
showed within- and between-city variability that supports their
utility for ecological studies, which could inform more specific
policy recommendations than the traditional proxies for natural
environment access
Does the Health Impact of Exposure to Neighbourhood Green Space Differ between Population Groups? An Explorative Study in Four European Cities
It has been suggested that certain residents, such as those with
a low socioeconomic status, the elderly, and women, may benefit
more from the presence of neighbourhood green space than others.
We tested this hypothesis for age, gender, educational level,
and employment status in four European cities. Data were
collected in Barcelona (Spain; n = 1002), Kaunas (Lithuania; n =
989), Doetinchem (The Netherlands; n = 847), and Stoke-on-Trent
(UK; n = 933) as part of the EU-funded PHENOTYPE project.
Surveys were used to measure mental and general health,
individual characteristics, and perceived neighbourhood green
space. Additionally, we used audit data about neighbourhood
green space. In Barcelona, there were positive associations
between neighbourhood green space and general health among
low-educated residents. In the other cities and for the other
population groups, there was little evidence that the
association between health and neighbourhood green space
differed between population groups. Overall, our study does not
support the assumption that the elderly, women, and residents
who are not employed full-time benefit more from neighbourhood
green space than others. Only in the highly urbanised city of
Barcelona did the low-educated group benefit from neighbourhood
green spaces. Perhaps neighbourhood green spaces are more
important for the health of low-educated residents in
particularly highly urbanised areas
Феномен танца как объект философской рефлексии: ключевые проблемы и основные вопросы
Цель исследования – выявить важнейшие философские проблемы, связанные с постижением феномена танца во всем его многообразии
Characterisation of the natural environment: quantitative indicators across Europe
Background: The World Health Organization recognises the importance of natural environments for human health. Evidence for natural environment-health associations comes largely from single countries or regions, with varied approaches to measuring natural environment exposure. We present a standardised approach to measuring neighbourhood natural environment exposure in cities in different regions of Europe.
Methods: The Positive health effects on the natural outdoor environment in typical populations of different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE) study aimed to explore the mechanisms linking natural environment exposure and health in four European cities (Barcelona, Spain; Doetinchem, the Netherlands; Kaunas, Lithuania; and Stoke-on-Trent, UK). Common GIS protocols were used to develop a hierarchy of natural environment measures, from simple measures (e.g., NDVI, Urban Atlas) using Europe-wide data sources, to detailed measures derived from local data that were specific to mechanisms thought to underpin natural environment-health associations (physical activity, social interaction, stress reduction/restoration). Indicators were created around residential addresses for a range of straight line and network buffers (100m to 1km).
Results: For simple indicators derived from Europe-wide data, we observed differences between cities, which varied with different indicators (e.g., Kaunas and Doetinchem had equal highest mean NDVI within 100m buffer, but mean distance to nearest natural environment in Kaunas was more twice that in Doetinchem). Mean distance to nearest natural environment for all cities suggested that most participants lived close to some kind of natural environments (64±58 to 363±281m; mean 180±204m). The detailed classification highlighted marked between-city differences in terms of prominent types of natural environment. Indicators specific to mechanisms derived from this classification also captured more variation than the simple indicators. Distance to nearest and count indicators showed clear differences between cities, and the those specific to the mechanisms showed within-city differences for Barcelona and Doetinchem.
Conclusions: This paper demonstrates the feasibility and challenges of creating comparable GIS-derived natural environment exposure indicators across diverse European cities. Mechanism-specific indicators showed within- and between-city variability that suggests their utility for ecological studies, which could inform more specific policy recommendations than the traditional proxies for natural environment access
Neighbourhood green space, social environment and mental health: an examination in four European cities
Objectives
This study examines the relationship between neighbourhood green space, the neighbourhood social environment (social cohesion, neighbourhood attachment, social contacts), and mental health in four European cities.
Methods
The PHENOTYPE study was carried out in 2013 in Barcelona (Spain), Stoke-on-Trent (United Kingdom), Doetinchem (The Netherlands), and Kaunas (Lithuania). 3771 adults living in 124 neighbourhoods answered questions on mental health, neighbourhood social environment, and amount and quality of green space. Additionally, audit data on neighbourhood green space were collected. Multilevel regression analyses examined the relation between neighbourhood green space and individual mental health and the influence of neighbourhood social environment.
Results
Mental health was only related to green (audit) in Barcelona. The amount and quality of neighbourhood green space (audit and perceived) were related to social cohesion in Doetinchem and Stoke-on-Trent and to neighbourhood attachment in Doetinchem. In all four cities, mental health was associated with social contacts.
Conclusions
Neighbourhood green was related to mental health only in Barcelona. Though neighbourhood green was related to social cohesion and attachment, the neighbourhood social environment seems not the underlying mechanism for this relationship
Does the Health Impact of Exposure to Neighbourhood Green Space Differ between Population Groups? An Explorative Study in Four European Cities
It has been suggested that certain residents, such as those with a low socioeconomic status, the elderly, and women, may benefit more from the presence of neighbourhood green space than others. We tested this hypothesis for age, gender, educational level, and employment status in four European cities. Data were collected in Barcelona (Spain; n = 1002), Kaunas (Lithuania; n = 989), Doetinchem (The Netherlands; n = 847), and Stoke-on-Trent (UK; n = 933) as part of the EU-funded PHENOTYPE project. Surveys were used to measure mental and general health, individual characteristics, and perceived neighbourhood green space. Additionally, we used audit data about neighbourhood green space. In Barcelona, there were positive associations between neighbourhood green space and general health among low-educated residents. In the other cities and for the other population groups, there was little evidence that the association between health and neighbourhood green space differed between population groups. Overall, our study does not support the assumption that the elderly, women, and residents who are not employed full-time benefit more from neighbourhood green space than others. Only in the highly urbanised city of Barcelona did the low-educated group benefit from neighbourhood green spaces. Perhaps neighbourhood green spaces are more important for the health of low-educated residents in particularly highly urbanised areas
Development of the natural environment scoring tool (NEST)
Natural environments (green and blue space) are associated with a range of health benefits, but their use is likely to be influenced by the presence of features, facilities and amenities and the condition/maintenance, or the natural environment quality. Most 'quality' assessment tools have focused on green spaces and their support for physical activity. This limits their utility for assessment of other natural environment typologies and uses (e.g., social, relaxation). We aimed to develop a tool for feasible, in situ assessment of diverse natural environments that might support a variety of uses, and to explore associations between natural environment quality and objectively measured amount of natural environment and neighbourhood-level socio-economic status (SES). This work was conducted as part of the PHENOTYPE project. Data were collected in 124 neighbourhoods in four European cities (Barcelona, Doetinchem, Kaunas, Stoke-on-Trent). The Natural Environment Scoring Tool (NEST) was developed using existing tools, expert input and field-testing. The final tool comprised 47-items across eight domains: Accessibility, Recreation facilities, Amenities, Aesthetics- natural, Aesthetics- non-natural, Significant natural features, Incivilities and Usability; typology-specific Overall Scores were derived. In total, 174 natural environments, covering a range of typologies, were audited. Mean time to complete NEST was 16±28 min. There was good inter-rater agreement. Mean domain scores showed some expected patterns by typology (e.g., higher Recreation Facilities scores in urban parks and formal recreation areas; lower Amenities scores in natural/semi-natural areas). Highest mean Overall Scores were observed for areas of blue space and woodland, the types of area that often lack the recreational facilities or amenities that can be dominant in physical activity-focused audit tools. There was a trend towards lower natural environment quality in neighbourhoods of lower SES, with some inter-city variation. Correlations between NEST scores and amount of natural environment indicated higher natural environment in areas with worse access. We recommend further testing of NEST in other locations in relation to use and health outcomes
Positive health effects of the natural outdoor environment in typical populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE): a study programme protocol
Introduction Growing evidence suggests that close contact with nature brings benefits to human health and well-being, but the proposed mechanisms are still not well understood and the associations with health remain uncertain. The Positive Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor environment in Typical Populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE) project investigates the interconnections between natural outdoor environments and better human health and well-being.
Aims and methods The PHENOTYPE project explores the proposed underlying mechanisms at work (stress reduction/restorative function, physical activity, social interaction, exposure to environmental hazards) and examines the associations with health outcomes for different population groups. It implements conventional and new innovative high-tech methods to characterise the natural environment in terms of quality and quantity. Preventive as well as therapeutic effects of contact with the natural environment are being covered. PHENOTYPE further addresses implications for land-use planning and green space management. The main innovative part of the study is the evaluation of possible short-term and long-term associations of green space and health and the possible underlying mechanisms in four different countries (each with quite a different type of green space and a different use), using the same methodology, in one research programme. This type of holistic approach has not been undertaken before. Furthermore there are technological innovations such as the use of remote sensing and smartphones in the assessment of green space.
Conclusions The project will produce a more robust evidence base on links between exposure to natural outdoor environment and human health and well-being, in addition to a better integration of human health needs into land-use planning and green space management in rural as well as urban areas
- …