ALPPS: From human to mice highlighting accelerated and novel mechanisms of liver regeneration

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reproducible animal model mimicking a novel 2-staged hepatectomy (ALPPS: Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy) and explore the underlying mechanisms. BACKGROUND: ALPPS combines portal vein ligation (PVL) with liver transection (step I), followed by resection of the deportalized liver (step II) within 2 weeks after the first surgery. This approach induces accelerated hypertrophy of the liver remnant to enable resection of massive tumor load. To explore the underlying mechanisms, we designed the first animal model of ALPPS in mice. METHODS: The ALPPS group received 90% PVL combined with parenchyma transection. Controls underwent either transection or PVL alone. Regeneration was assessed by liver weight and proliferation-associated molecules. PVL-treated mice were subjected to splenic, renal, or pulmonary ablation instead of hepatic transection. Plasma from ALPPS-treated mice was injected into mice after PVL. Gene expression of auxiliary mitogens in mouse liver was compared to patients after ALPPS or PVL. RESULTS: The hypertrophy of the remnant liver after ALPPS doubled relative to PVL, whereas mice with transection alone disclosed minimal signs of regeneration. Markers of hepatocyte proliferation were 10-fold higher after ALPPS, when compared with controls. Injury to other organs or ALPPS-plasma injection combined with PVL induced liver hypertrophy similar to ALPPS. Early initiators of regeneration were significantly upregulated in human and mice. CONCLUSIONS: ALPPS in mice induces an unprecedented degree of liver regeneration, comparable with humans. Circulating factors in combination with PVL seem to mediate enhanced liver regeneration, associated with ALPPS

The Comprehensive Complication Index

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a comprehensive complication index (CCI) that integrates all events with their respective severity. BACKGROUND: Reporting of surgical complications is inconsistent and often incomplete. Most studies fail to provide information about the severity of complications, or inform only on the most severe event, ignoring events of lesser severity. METHODS: We used an established classification of complications, adopting methods from operation risk index analysis in marketing research to develop a formula that considers all complications that may occur in a patient. The weights of each grade of complication, defined as median reference values, were obtained from 472 participants, who rated 30 different complications. Validation to assess sensitivity to treatment effects and validity of the CCI was performed by 4 different approaches, based on 1299 patients. RESULTS: The CCI is calculated as the sum of all complications that are weighted for their severity (multiplication of the median reference values from patients and physicians). The final formula yields a continuous scale to rank the severity of any combination of complications from 0 to 100 in a single patient. The CCI was highly sensitive in detecting treatment effect differences in the context of a randomized trial (effect size detected by CCI vs conventional standardized morbidity outcomes). It also showed a negative correlation with postoperative health status (r = -0.24, P = 0.002), and high correlation with the results of patient-rated single and multiple complications on conjoint analysis (r = 0.94, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CCI summarizes all postoperative complications and is more sensitive than existing morbidity endpoints. It may serve as a standardized and widely applicable primary endpoint in surgical trials and other interventional fields of medicine. The CCI can be readily computed on the basis of tabulated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (available at www.assessurgery.com)

Defining Benchmarks for Major Liver Surgery

Objective: To measure and define the best achievable outcome after major hepatectomy. Background: No reference values are available on outcomes after major hepatectomies. Analysis in living liver donors, with safety as the highest priority, offers the opportunity to define outcome benchmarks as the best possible results. Methods: Outcome analyses of 5202 hemi-hepatectomies from living donors (LDs) from 12 high-volume centers worldwide were performed for a 10-year period. Endpoints, calculated at discharge, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, included postoperative morbidity measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), and liver failure according to different definitions. Benchmark values were defined as the 75th percentile of median morbidity values to represent the best achievable results at 3 month postoperatively. Results: Patients were young (34 +/- [9] years), predominantly male (65%) and healthy. Surgery lasted 7 +/- [2] hours; 2% needed blood transfusions. Mean hospital stay was 11.7 +/- [5] days. 12% of patients developed at least 1 complication, of which 3.8% were major events (>= grade III, including 1 death), mostly related to biliary/bleeding events, and were twice higher after right hepatectomy. The incidence of postoperative liver failure was low. Within 3-month follow-up, benchmark values for overall complication were = 100 hepatectomies had significantly lower rates for overall (10.2% vs 35.9%, P < 0.001) and major (3% vs 12.1%, P < 0.001) complications and overall CCI (2.1 vs 8.5, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The thorough outcome analysis of healthy LDs may serve as a reference for evaluating surgical performance in patients undergoing major liver resection across centers and different patient populations. Further benchmark studies are needed to develop risk-adjusted comparisons of surgical outcomes