12 research outputs found

    Infotainment a ochrona prywatno艣ci os贸b powszechnie znanych

    Get PDF
    This paper focuses on the personalization of information, in particular as regards commonly known individuals and the issue of privacy infringement. It should be indicated that tabloids and infotainment are characterized by mixing entertainment with news, paying more attention to people than to issues, and transforming social and human tragedies so they become a topic of public discussion for the purpose of providing entertainment. Information is now conveyed by means of human stories, concrete examples taken from the world of well-known people. This leads to the privacy of this category of people being infringed.This paper focuses on the personalization of information, in particular as regards commonly known individuals and the issue of privacy infringement. It should be indicated that tabloids and infotainment are characterized by mixing entertainment with news, paying more attention to people than to issues, and transforming social and human tragedies so they become a topic of public discussion for the purpose of providing entertainment. Information is now conveyed by means of human stories, concrete examples taken from the world of well-known people. This leads to the privacy of this category of people being infringed

    Wok贸艂 rekodyfikacji prawa cywilnego. Prace jubileuszowe

    Get PDF
    Praca recenzowana / Peer-reviewed paperPrezentowana ksi膮偶ka to g艂os w debacie nad stanem naszej kodyfikacji cywilnej. Jubileusz 50-lecia uchwalenia Kodeksu cywilnego, Kodeksu rodzinnego i opieku艅czego oraz Kodeksu post臋powania cywilnego zbiega si臋 z jubileuszem Profesora Janusza Szwai1. Profesor, wybitny cywilista, obchodzi swoje 80. urodziny, mija tak偶e 50 lat od obrony przez Niego doktoratu. Jest to doskona艂a okazja by przyjrze膰 si臋 propozycjom zmian prawa cywilnego p艂yn膮cych z r贸偶nych 艣rodowisk akademickich. Wszak du偶膮 cz臋艣膰 swojego 偶ycia Profesor Szwaja po艣wi臋ci艂 pracom legislacyjnym, ich komentowaniu czy krytykowaniu. Sam aktywnie w zmianach r贸偶nych kodyfikacji uczestniczy艂. Jego pogl膮dy zawsze by艂y wywa偶one. Dzi艣 w艂a艣nie taki wywa偶ony g艂os w dyskusji nad kszta艂tem polskiego prawa cywilnego sta艂 si臋 niezb臋dny

    Infotainment and the protection of the privacy of commonly known individuals

    No full text
    This paper focuses on the personalization of information, in particular as regards commonly known individuals and the issue of privacy infringement. It should be indicated that tabloids and infotainment are characterized by mixing entertainment with news, paying more attention to people than to issues, and transforming social and human tragedies so they become a topic of public discussion for the purpose of providing entertainment. Information is now conveyed by means of human stories, concrete examples taken from the world of well-known people. This leads to the privacy of this category of people being infringed

    The injunction consisting of prohibiting publication in cases of protection of personal rights

    No full text
    On 3 May 2012 an extensive amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure came into effect by the force of the Act of 16 September 2011 on the Amendment to the Act on the Code of Civil Procedure and some other acts of law. Following the amendment the regulation in Article 755 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure determining premises of admissibility of granting injunction consisting of prohibiting publications in cases of protection of personal rights has been changed. The amendment also introduced a maximum period for which the injunction may be granted as well as conditions of its prolongation. This article provides an analysis of the introduced legal regulation in order to answer the question if the change was of editorial nature only or if it affected tightening or easing the premises determining issuing the injunction. Therefore, it was indispensable to compare the substance of Article 755 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure before and after its amending on the basis of a statement on deduction. It was also purposeful to precise the term 'public interest', which constitutes a negative premise of granting the injunction consisting of prohibiting publication, as well as to discuss rules and procedures of prolonging the period for which the injunction involving prohibiting publication was granted

    Infotainment and the protection of the privacy of commonly known individuals

    No full text
    This paper focuses on the personalization of information, in particular as regards commonly known individuals and the issue of privacy infringement. It should be indicated that tabloids and infotainment are characterized by mixing entertainment with news, paying more attention to people than to issues, and transforming social and human tragedies so they become a topic of public discussion for the purpose of providing entertainment. Information is now conveyed by means of human stories, concrete examples taken from the world of well-known people. This leads to the privacy of this category of people being infringed

    ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS RELATED TO IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT ON THE REUSE OF PUBLIC-SECTOR INFORMATION AT MUSEUMS

    No full text
    The article discusses both the legal and factual problems related to the necessity of implementing the provisions of the Act on the reuse of public sector information (PSI) of 25 February 2016. The authors highlight the inaccuracies in the way the statutory provisions have been formulated, and which require urgent intervention by legislators due to their doubtful interpretation and the conflict of the Act鈥檚 provisions on reuse with those of other acts, in particular the Act on museums. They also identify the discrepancies between how museums currently share their collections and the requirements set by the Act on the reuse of PSI. Individual practical problems are discussed in separate parts of the text. The aim of the article is not to settle the doubts concerning the Act on reuse of PSI, nor to decide what museums should do in that matter, but rather to draw attention to possible ways of interpreting the provisions and the related problems

    ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS RELATED TO IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT ON THE REUSE OF PUBLIC-SECTOR INFORMATION AT MUSEUMS

    No full text
    The article discusses both the legal and factual problems related to the necessity of implementing the provisions of the Act on the reuse of public sector information (PSI) of 25 February 2016. The authors highlight the inaccuracies in the way the statutory provisions have been formulated, and which require urgent intervention by legislators due to their doubtful interpretation and the conflict of the Act鈥檚 provisions on reuse with those of other acts, in particular the Act on museums. They also identify the discrepancies between how museums currently share their collections and the requirements set by the Act on the reuse of PSI. Individual practical problems are discussed in separate parts of the text. The aim of the article is not to settle the doubts concerning the Act on reuse of PSI, nor to decide what museums should do in that matter, but rather to draw attention to possible ways of interpreting the provisions and the related problems.Artyku艂 przedstawia problemy zar贸wno natury prawnej, jak i faktycznej, zwi膮zane z konieczno艣ci膮 wdro偶enia w dzia艂alno艣ci muze贸w przepis贸w Ustawy o ponownym wykorzystywaniu informacji sektora publicznego (ISP) z dnia 25 lutego 2016 roku. Autorzy zwracaj膮 uwag臋 na nie艣cis艂o艣ci w sposobie sformu艂owania przepis贸w ustawowych, kt贸re wymagaj膮 pilnej ingerencji ustawodawcy z uwagi na w膮tpliwo艣ci dotycz膮ce ich wyk艂adni i interpretacji oraz na kolizj臋 przepis贸w Ustawy o re-use z przepisami innych ustaw, zw艂aszcza Ustawy o muzeach. Wskazuj膮 r贸wnie偶 na rozbie偶no艣ci mi臋dzy dotychczasow膮 praktyk膮 udost臋pniania zbior贸w muzealnych przez muzea a wymaganiami Ustawy o ponownym wykorzystywaniu ISP. Poszczeg贸lne problemy natury praktycznej zosta艂y om贸wione w odr臋bnych rozdzia艂ach tekstu. Celem artyku艂u nie jest rozstrzygni臋cie w膮tpliwo艣ci pojawiaj膮cych si臋 na tle stosowania Ustawy o ponownym wykorzystywaniu ISP, czy przes膮dzenie praktyki muze贸w w tym zakresie, lecz zwr贸cenie uwagi na mo偶liwe sposoby wyk艂adni przepis贸w i problemy, kt贸re si臋 z tym wi膮偶膮
    corecore