Functionally-detected cognitive impairment in high school football players without clinically-diagnosed concussion

Head trauma and concussion in football players have recently received considerable media attention. Postmortem evidence suggests that accrual of damage to the brain may occur with repeated blows to the head, even when the individual blows fail to produce clinical symptoms. There is an urgent need for improved detection and characterization of head trauma to reduce future injury risk and promote development of new therapies. In this study we examined neurological performance and health in the presence of head collision events in high school football players, using longitudinal measures of collision events (the HIT(™) System), neurocognitive testing (ImPACT(™)), and functional magnetic resonance imaging MRI (fMRI). Longitudinal assessment (including baseline) was conducted in 11 young men (ages 15-19 years) participating on the varsity and junior varsity football teams at a single high school. We expected and observed subjects in two previously described categories: (1) no clinically-diagnosed concussion and no changes in neurological behavior, and (2) clinically-diagnosed concussion with changes in neurological behavior. Additionally, we observed players in a previously undiscovered third category, who exhibited no clinically-observed symptoms associated with concussion, but who demonstrated measurable neurocognitive (primarily visual working memory) and neurophysiological (altered activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]) impairments. This new category was associated with significantly higher numbers of head collision events to the top-front of the head, directly above the DLPFC. The discovery of this new category suggests that more players are suffering neurological injury than are currently being detected using traditional concussion-assessment tools. These individuals are unlikely to undergo clinical evaluation, and thus may continue to participate in football-related activities, even when changes in brain physiology (and potential brain damage) are present, which will increase the risk of future neurological injury

Pediatric Neutropenic Patients Care In Turkey

Objective: Infection is a common complication in children with malignancies. There is no consistent guidance for environmental infection control and isolation precautions for neutropenic patients (NP). There are differences between centers. The aim of this questionnaire study was to determine these differences in Turkey. Material and Methods: A multicenter-descriptive questionnaire was conducted on 36 centers from different geografical locations of Turkey. Bone marrow transplantation units were excluded. Each center was contacted at least three-times. Questionnaire was answered by two different doctors from each center. Results: Thirty-six centers including 20 (55.5%) University Hospitals, 12 (%33.3) Research Hospitals, three (8.3%) State Hospital and one Private University Hospital participated in this survey. 94.3% of the centers had a bed capacity of 50 beds and over. Twenty-one (58.3%) centers had pediatric infection ward that followed febrile NP. All centers had an infection control committee. 25% (9/36) of the centers always followed pediatric neutropenic fever patients in a single room. 66.6% (24/36) of the centers had toilet in all patients' room. The door features of patients' room included mostly (94.1%, 32/34) manually opened door. Ten (27.7%) centers had hepa filter system, five of them had positive-negative pressure room. Thirteen (38.2%, 13/34) centers prefered hickmann catheter for accessing a patient's central line. Training was given for catheteter care in all centers. Sixteen (44.4%) centers had determined policies about keeping toys in patient rooms. Visitor restrictions were performed in all centers. None of the centers allowed plants or flowers in hospital rooms. There was a neutropenic diet specific for pediatric NP provided in twenty-seven centers (75%). Conclusion: The prevention and control of infection contributes to the improvement of the prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies. Physicians must be aware of the infection risks and take precautions for infectious complications through the neutropenic period and standard protocols should be established and implemented for patients with hematological malignancies.WoSScopu

Türkiye’ de Pediatrik Nötropenik Hasta İzlemi

Objective: Infection is a common complication in children with malignancies. There is no consistent guidance for environmental infection control and isolation precautions for neutropenic patients (NP). There are differences between centers. the aim of this questionnaire study was to determine these differences in Turkey. Material and Methods: A multicenter-descriptive questionnaire was conducted on 36 centers from different geografical locations of Turkey. Bone marrow transplantation units were excluded. Each center was contacted at least three-times. Questionnaire was answered by two different doctors from each center. Results: Thirty-six centers including 20 (55.5%) University Hospitals, 12 (%33.3) Research Hospitals, three (8.3%) State Hospital and one Private University Hospital participated in this survey. 94.3% of the centers had a bed capacity of 50 beds and over. Twenty-one (58.3%) centers had pediatric infection ward that followed febrile NP. All centers had an infection control committee. 25% (9/36) of the centers always followed pediatric neutropenic fever patients in a single room. 66.6% (24/36) of the centers had toilet in all patients’ room. the door features of patients’ room included mostly (94.1%, 32/34) manually opened door. Ten (27.7%) centers had hepa filter system, five of them had positive-negative pressure room. Thirteen (38.2%, 13/34) centers prefered hickmann catheter for accessing a patient’s central line. Training was given for catheteter care in all centers. Sixteen (44.4%) centers had determined policies about keeping toys in patient rooms. Visitor restrictions were performed in all centers. None of the centers allowed plants or flowers in hospital rooms. There was a neutropenic diet specific for pediatric NP provided in twenty-seven centers (75%). Conclusion: the prevention and control of infection contributes to the improvement of the prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies. Physicians must be aware of the infection risks and take precautions for infectious complications through the neutropenic period and standard protocols should be established and implemented for patients with hematological malignancies.Giriş: Maligniteli hastaların tedavi sürecindeki en önemli komplikasyonlardan biri enfeksiyonlardır. Nötropenik hastalarda enfeksiyon kontrolü ve izolasyon önlemleri için merkezden merkeze değişen farklı uygulamalar mevcuttur. Anket çalışmasının amacı Türkiye’deki bu farklılıkları ve ihtiyaçları belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çok merkezli tanımlayıcı çalışmaya Türkiye’nin farklı coğrafik bölgelerinden pediatrik nötropenik hasta takip eden 36 merkez dahil edildi. Kemik iliği transplantasyon üniteleri çalışmaya alınmadı. Her merkezle en az üç kez iletişime geçildi. Anketi her merkezden iki doktor yanıtladı. Anket kişisel, genel hasta bakımı ve nötropenik hasta bakımını içeren 64 sorudan oluşmaktaydı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan merkezlerin 20 (%55.5)’si üniversite hastanesi, 12 (%33.3)’si eğitim araştırma hastanesi, 3 (%8.3)’ ü devlet hastanesi ve bir tanesi de özel üniversite hastanesi idi. Merkezlerin %94.3’ünün yatak kapasitesi 50 yatak ve üzerinde idi. Yirmi bir (%58) merkezin çocuk enfeksiyon hastalıkları servisi mevcuttu. Tüm merkezlerin enfeksiyon kontrol komitesi vardı. Merkezlerin %25 (n= 9)‘inde nötropenik ateş (NPA) tanısı alan çocuk hastalar tek kişilik odalarda izleniyordu. Tüm odalarda tuvalet bulunan merkez sayısı 24 (%66.6) idi. Hasta odalarının büyük çoğunluğunda elle açılıp kapanır kapı (%94.1) ve musluk (%97.1) mevcuttu. on (%27.7) merkezin oda havalandırması için hepa-filtreli sistemi vardı. Beşinde negatif basınçlı oda mevcuttu. on üç merkezde kateter olarak hickman kateter tercih edilmişti. Tüm merkezlerde kateter bakımı için eğitim verilmekte idi. Hiçbir merkezde hasta ziyaretine ve hastane odasında bitki veya çiçek bulundurmaya izin verilmemekteydi. Merkezlerin %45.7’sinde hastanede oyuncak bulundurma ile ilgili hastane politikası vardı. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, nötropenik hastaları enfeksiyondan korumak için hastanelerde çeşitli yaklaşımlar uygulanmaktadır. Rehberler belirlenip bu rehberler ışığında hastane koşulları düzenlenmeli ve nötropenik hasta izlemi yapılmalıdır