22 research outputs found
OPEN Introduction: Address as Social Action Across Cultures and Contexts
This is the introductory chapter of Address Practice as Social Action: European Perspectives. It is open access under a CC BY license.How we address one another says a great deal about our social relationships and which groups in society we belong to. This edited volume examines address choices in a range of everyday interactions taking place in Dutch, Finnish, Flemish, French, German, Italian and the two national varieties of Swedish, Finland Swedish and Sweden Swedish
Introduction : Address as Social Action Across Cultures and Contexts
The introduction provides a brief overview of address research, particularly focusing on address practices in Europe. It also serves to contextualize the six chapters of the volume, all of which present up-to-date empirical research of address and social relations in a variety of contexts and languages including Dutch, French, Finnish, German, Italian and Swedish.Interaction and variation in pluricentric languages (IVIP
Impacts of prescribed burning on soil fertility and regeneration of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)
Knowledge of objective modality
The epistemology of modality has focused on metaphysical modality and, more
recently, counterfactual conditionals. Knowledge of kinds of modality that are not
metaphysical has so far gone largely unexplored. Yet other theoretically interesting
kinds of modality, such as nomic, practical, and 'easy' possibility, are no less puzzling
epistemologically. Could Clinton easily have won the 2016 presidential election—was it
an easy possibility? Given that she didn't in fact win the election, how, if at all, can we
know whether she easily could have? This paper investigates the epistemology of the
broad category of 'objective' modality, of which metaphysical modality is a special,
limiting case. It argues that the same cognitive mechanisms that are capable of
producing knowledge of metaphysical modality are also capable of producing
knowledge of all other objective modalities. This conclusion can be used to explain the
roles of counterfactual reasoning and the imagination in the epistemology of objective
modality