Observational constraint on generalized Chaplygin gas model

We investigate observational constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) model as the unification of dark matter and dark energy from the latest observational data: the Union SNe Ia data, the observational Hubble data, the SDSS baryon acoustic peak and the five-year WMAP shift parameter. It is obtained that the best fit values of the GCG model parameters with their confidence level are $A_{s}=0.73^{+0.06}_{-0.06}$ ($1\sigma$) $^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$ $(2\sigma)$, $\alpha=-0.09^{+0.15}_{-0.12}$ ($1\sigma$) $^{+0.26}_{-0.19}$ $(2\sigma)$. Furthermore in this model, we can see that the evolution of equation of state (EOS) for dark energy is similar to quiessence, and its current best-fit value is $w_{0de}=-0.96$ with the $1\sigma$ confidence level $-0.91\geq w_{0de}\geq-1.00$.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figure

Combined constraints on modified Chaplygin gas model from cosmological observed data: Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach

We use the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to investigate a global constraints on the modified Chaplygin gas (MCG) model as the unification of dark matter and dark energy from the latest observational data: the Union2 dataset of type supernovae Ia (SNIa), the observational Hubble data (OHD), the cluster X-ray gas mass fraction, the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO), and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. In a flat universe, the constraint results for MCG model are, $\Omega_{b}h^{2}=0.02263^{+0.00184}_{-0.00162}$ ($1\sigma$) $^{+0.00213}_{-0.00195}$ $(2\sigma)$, $B_{s}=0.7788^{+0.0736}_{-0.0723}$ ($1\sigma$) $^{+0.0918}_{-0.0904}$ $(2\sigma)$, $\alpha=0.1079^{+0.3397}_{-0.2539}$ ($1\sigma$) $^{+0.4678}_{-0.2911}$ $(2\sigma)$, $B=0.00189^{+0.00583}_{-0.00756}$ ($1\sigma$) $^{+0.00660}_{-0.00915}$ $(2\sigma)$, and $H_{0}=70.711^{+4.188}_{-3.142}$ ($1\sigma$) $^{+5.281}_{-4.149}$ $(2\sigma)$.Comment: 12 pages, 1figur

The energy spectrum of all-particle cosmic rays around the knee region observed with the Tibet-III air-shower array

We have already reported the first result on the all-particle spectrum around the knee region based on data from 2000 November to 2001 October observed by the Tibet-III air-shower array. In this paper, we present an updated result using data set collected in the period from 2000 November through 2004 October in a wide range over 3 decades between $10^{14}$ eV and $10^{17}$ eV, in which the position of the knee is clearly seen at around 4 PeV. The spectral index is -2.68 $\pm$ 0.02(stat.) below 1PeV, while it is -3.12 $\pm$ 0.01(stat.) above 4 PeV in the case of QGSJET+HD model, and various systematic errors are under study now.Comment: 12 pages, 7 figures, accepted by Advances in space researc

Does accelerating universe indicates Brans-Dicke theory

The evolution of universe in Brans-Dicke (BD) theory is discussed in this paper. Considering a parameterized scenario for BD scalar field $\phi=\phi_{0}a^{\alpha}$ which plays the role of gravitational "constant" $G$, we apply the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to investigate a global constraints on BD theory with a self-interacting potential according to the current observational data: Union2 dataset of type supernovae Ia (SNIa), high-redshift Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) data, observational Hubble data (OHD), the cluster X-ray gas mass fraction, the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO), and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. It is shown that an expanded universe from deceleration to acceleration is given in this theory, and the constraint results of dimensionless matter density $\Omega_{0m}$ and parameter $\alpha$ are, $\Omega_{0m}=0.286^{+0.037+0.050}_{-0.039-0.047}$ and $\alpha=0.0046^{+0.0149+0.0171}_{-0.0171-0.0206}$ which is consistent with the result of current experiment exploration, $\mid\alpha\mid \leq 0.132124$. In addition, we use the geometrical diagnostic method, jerk parameter $j$, to distinguish the BD theory and cosmological constant model in Einstein's theory of general relativity.Comment: 16 pages, 3 figure

Are protons still dominant at the knee of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum?

A hybrid experiment consisting of emulsion chambers, burst detectors and the Tibet II air-shower array was carried out at Yangbajing (4,300 m a.s.l., 606 g/cm$^2$) in Tibet to obtain the energy spectra of primary protons and heliums. From three-year operation, these energy spectra are deduced between $10^{15}$ and $10^{16}$ eV by triggering the air showers associated with a high energy core and using a neural network method in the primary mass separation. The proton spectrum can be expressed by a single power-law function with a differential index of $-3.01 \pm 0.11$ and $-3.05 \pm 0.12$ based on the QGSJET+HD and SIBYLL+HD models, respectively, which are steeper than that extrapolated from the direct observations of $-2.74 \pm 0.01$ in the energy range below $10^{14}$ eV. The absolute fluxes of protons and heliums are derived within 30% systematic errors depending on the hadronic interaction models used in Monte Carlo simulation. The result of our experiment suggests that the main component responsible for the change of the power index of the all-particle spectrum around $3 \times 10^{15}$ eV, so-called ``knee'', is composed of nuclei heavier than helium. This is the first measurement of the differential energy spectra of primary protons and heliums by selecting them event by event at the knee energy region.Comment: This paper has been accepted for publication Physics Letters B on October 19th, 2005. This paper has been accepted for publication Physics Letters B on October 19th, 200

J/ψ polarization in p+p collisions at s=200 GeV in STAR

AbstractWe report on a polarization measurement of inclusive J/ψ mesons in the di-electron decay channel at mid-rapidity at 2<pT<6 GeV/c in p+p collisions at s=200 GeV. Data were taken with the STAR detector at RHIC. The J/ψ polarization measurement should help to distinguish between different models of the J/ψ production mechanism since they predict different pT dependences of the J/ψ polarization. In this analysis, J/ψ polarization is studied in the helicity frame. The polarization parameter λθ measured at RHIC becomes smaller towards high pT, indicating more longitudinal J/ψ polarization as pT increases. The result is compared with predictions of presently available models

Beam-energy Dependence Of Charge Balance Functions From Au + Au Collisions At Energies Available At The Bnl Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Balance functions have been measured in terms of relative pseudorapidity (Δη) for charged particle pairs at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider from Au + Au collisions at sNN=7.7GeV to 200 GeV using the STAR detector. These results are compared with balance functions measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider from Pb + Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV by the ALICE Collaboration. The width of the balance function decreases as the collisions become more central and as the beam energy is increased. In contrast, the widths of the balance functions calculated using shuffled events show little dependence on centrality or beam energy and are larger than the observed widths. Balance function widths calculated using events generated by UrQMD are wider than the measured widths in central collisions and show little centrality dependence. The measured widths of the balance functions in central collisions are consistent with the delayed hadronization of a deconfined quark gluon plasma (QGP). The narrowing of the balance function in central collisions at sNN=7.7 GeV implies that a QGP is still being created at this relatively low energy. © 2016 American Physical Society.942CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationMOE, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaMOST, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNRF-2012004024, National Research FoundationNSF, National Stroke FoundationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

Periodicities in the Daily Proton Fluxes from 2011 to 2019 Measured by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station from 1 to 100 GV

We present the precision measurement of the daily proton fluxes in cosmic rays from May 20, 2011 to October 29, 2019 (a total of 2824 days or 114 Bartels rotations) in the rigidity interval from 1 to 100 GV based on 5.5×109 protons collected with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer aboard the International Space Station. The proton fluxes exhibit variations on multiple timescales. From 2014 to 2018, we observed recurrent flux variations with a period of 27 days. Shorter periods of 9 days and 13.5 days are observed in 2016. The strength of all three periodicities changes with time and rigidity. The rigidity dependence of the 27-day periodicity is different from the rigidity dependences of 9-day and 13.5-day periods. Unexpectedly, the strength of 9-day and 13.5-day periodicities increases with increasing rigidities up to ∼10 GV and ∼20 GV, respectively. Then the strength of the periodicities decreases with increasing rigidity up to 100 GV.</p

Dielectron Azimuthal Anisotropy At Mid-rapidity In Au+au Collisions At Snn =200 Gev

We report on the first measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy (v2) of dielectrons (e+e- pairs) at mid-rapidity from sNN=200 GeV Au+Au collisions with the STAR detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), presented as a function of transverse momentum (pT) for different invariant-mass regions. In the mass region Mee<1.1 GeV/c2 the dielectron v2 measurements are found to be consistent with expectations from π0,η,ω, and φ decay contributions. In the mass region 1.1<Mee<2.9GeV/c2, the measured dielectron v2 is consistent, within experimental uncertainties, with that from the cc¯ contributions.906Adams, J., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 102. , NUPABL 0375-9474Arsene, I., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 1. , NUPABL 0375-9474Adcox, K., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 184. , NUPABL 0375-9474Back, B.B., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 28. , NUPABL 0375-9474Rapp, R., Wambach, J., (2002) Adv. Nucl. Phys., 25, p. 1. , 0065-2970David, G., Rapp, R., Xu, Z., (2008) Phys. Rep., 462, p. 176. , PRPLCM 0370-1573Agakichiev, G., (2005) Eur. Phys. J. C, 41, p. 475. , EPCFFB 1434-6044Arnaldi, R., (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, p. 162302. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Brown, G.E., Rho, M., (1996) Phys. Rep., 269, p. 333. , PRPLCM 0370-1573Rapp, R., Wambach, J., (1999) Eur. Phys. J. A, 6, p. 415. , EPJAFV 1434-6001Dusling, K., Teaney, D., Zahed, I., (2007) Phys. Rev. C, 75, p. 024908. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Van Hees, H., Rapp, R., (2008) Nucl. Phys. A, 806, p. 339. , NUPABL 0375-9474Renk, T., Ruppert, J., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 77, p. 024907. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 034911. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adamczyk, L., (2014) Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, p. 022301. , a longer version (unpublished). PRLTAO 0031-9007Rapp, R., Wambach, J., Van Hees, H., (2010) Relativistic Heavy-Ion Physics, , in, edited by R. Stock, Landolt Börnstein New Series I/23A (Springer, Berlin), Chap. 4-1Linnyk, O., Cassing, W., Manninen, J., Bratkovskaya, E.L., Ko, C.M., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 85, p. 024910. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Xu, J.-H., Chen, H.F., Dong, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y.F., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 85, p. 024906. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, p. 132301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (1998) Phys. Rev. C, 58, p. 1671. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2012) Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, p. 122302. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Van Hees, H., Gale, C., Rapp, R., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84, p. 054906. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Chatterjee, R., Srivastava, D.K., Heinz, U., Gale, C., (2007) Phys. Rev. C, 75, p. 054909. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2009) Phys. Lett. B, 670, p. 313. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693Bonner, B., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 508, p. 181. , NIMAER 0168-9002Shao, M., (2002) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 492, p. 344Wu, J., (2005) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 538, p. 243. , NIMAER 0168-9002Landgraf, J.M., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 762. , NIMAER 0168-9002Ackermann, K.H., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 624. , NIMAER 0168-9002Anderson, M., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 659. , NIMAER 0168-9002Bichsel, H., (2006) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 562, p. 154. , NIMAER 0168-9002Xu, Y., (2010) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 614, p. 28. , NIMAER 0168-9002Shao, M., (2006) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 558, p. 419. , NIMAER 0168-9002Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Lett. B, 616, p. 8. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693Ruan, L., Ph.D. thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, 2005, arXiv:nucl-ex/0503018 (unpublished)Llope, W.J., (2004) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 522, p. 252. , NIMAER 0168-9002Adler, C., (2002) Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, p. 202301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, p. 062301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Adamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 86, p. 024906. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Zhao, J., (2013), https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/theses/phd-32, Ph.D. thesis, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, (unpublished)Voloshin, S.A., Poskanzer, A.M., Snellings, R., (2010) Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics, pp. 5-54. , in, Landolt-Börnstein Vol. 1/23 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), ppAdamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 88, p. 014902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 77, p. 054901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, p. 152301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 034909. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 064903. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Lett. B, 612, p. 181. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693Adler, S.S., (2007) Phys. Rev. C, 75, p. 024909. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Tang, Z., Xu, Y., Ruan, L., Van Buren, G., Wang, F., Xu, Z., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 051901. , (R) () PRVCAN 0556-2813Shao, M., Yi, L., Tang, Z., Chen, H., Li, C., Xu, Z., (2010) J. Phys. G, 37, p. 085104. , JPGPED 0954-3899Afanasiev, S., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80, p. 054907. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. C, 72, p. 014904. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2007) Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, p. 112301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Kroll, N.M., Wada, W., (1955) Phys. Rev., 98, p. 1355. , PHRVAO 0031-899XRuan, L., (2011) Nucl. Phys. A, 855, p. 269. , NUPABL 0375-9474Huang, B., (2011), Ph.D. thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, (unpublished)Sjöstrand, T., (2001) Comput. Phys. Commun., 135, p. 238. , CPHCBZ 0010-4655Adamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. D, 86, p. 072013. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998Agakishiev, H., (2011) Phys. Rev. D, 83, p. 052006. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998Adare, A., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84, p. 044905. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 85, p. 064914. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2007) Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, p. 162301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Adams, J., (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, p. 052302. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Vujanovic, G., Young, C., Schenke, B., Jeon, S., Rapp, R., Gale, C., (2013) Nucl. Phys. A, 904-905, p. 557c. , NUPABL 0375-9474Vujanovic, G., Young, C., Schenke, B., Jeon, S., Rapp, R., Gale, C., (2014) Phys. Rev. C, 89, p. 034904. , PRVCAN 0556-281