Tem palhaço na Educação Física escolar? Tem, sim senhor!

Neste estudo relatamos a implementação do ensino do palhaço como conteúdo nas aulas de Educação Física numa turma de 8.º ano de Ensino Fundamental de uma escola pública. O público-alvo foram 30 alunos de 12-17 anos (13 meninas e 17 meninos). As aulas ocorreram duas vezes por semana, num total de dez, ministradas por 2 professores monitores, orientados por 1 professor orientador local e 1 professor orientador especialista em palhaçaria. Nas aulas pesquisou-se o imaginário dos alunos sobre circo e palhaço; foram propostos jogos que buscaram o riso, exposições sobre quatro palhaços brasileiros, atividades que buscaram a conexão entre as pessoas, acrobacias cômicas e uma avaliação final com desenhos. Finalmente, o relato aponta que é possível inserir o palhaço nas aulas de Educação Física e que esse processo pode promover mudanças no comportamento dos alunos e ampliar o imaginário circense brasileiro

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries