7 research outputs found

    Evaluación del procesamiento sensorial a niños de 4-6 años de edad, III nivel preescolar, Centro Educativo “Edgar Arvizú”. Agosto-Diciembre 2015. Managua

    Get PDF
    El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el nivel de procesamiento sensorial, en niños preescolares de 4 y 6 años, del Centro Educativo Edgar Arvizu, de este modo crear conciencia de la importancia de detectar tempranamente alteraciones motoras, sensoriales, cognitivas y/o de aprendizaje en los niños. La integración sensorial corresponde a la habilidad del Sistema Nervioso Central de recibir, organizar e interpretar las experiencias sensoriales para su uso efectivo,este fenómeno no es observable o cuantificable directamente, y es por ello que nos referiremos al término de procesamiento sensorial como un reflejo directo de lo que ocurre a nivel cerebral expresado o evidenciado en la conducta de cada niño(a). El tipo de estudio es descriptivo con un enfoque cuali-cuantitativo, siendo el tiempo de ocurrencia de los hechos y registro de la información prospectivo. Se definió una muestra de 35 niños, de los cuales 15 correspondieron al sexo femenino y 20 al sexo masculino; seleccionados según los criterios de inclusión descritos en el estudio. Se aplicó el cuestionario de “Evaluación de Procesamiento Sensorial” a los niños y padres respectivamente; que revelo según la distribución porcentual que un 37.1% de la muestra presentó una alta probabilidad de disfunción sensorial, mientras el 67.9% restante obtuvieron puntajes fuera de riesgo. Posteriormente se realizó un programa de integración sensorial como una guía de juegos prácticos en donde se pueden llevar a cabo en la escuela, con el objetivo de favorecer diferentes estímulos y experiencias mediante la integración de los sistemas sensoriales de los niños

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study (Intensive Care Medicine, (2021), 47, 2, (160-169), 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9)

    No full text
    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Trials Group Collaborators were not shown in the article but only in the ESM. The full list of collaborators is shown below. The original article has been corrected
    corecore