Congenital dislocation of the hip: Optimal screening strategies in 2014

AbstractA prospective multi-centre nationwide study of patients with congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) diagnosed after 3 months of age was conducted with support from the French Society for Paediatric Orthopaedics (Société Française d’Orthopédie Pédiatrique [SoFOP]), French Organisation for Outpatient Paediatrics (Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire [AFPA]), and French-Speaking Society for Paediatric and Pre-Natal Imaging (Société Francophone d’Imagerie Pédiatrique et Prénatale [SFIPP]). The results showed inadequacies in clinical screening for CDH that were patent when assessed quantitatively and probably also present qualitatively. These findings indicate a need for a communication and educational campaign aimed at highlighting good clinical practice guidelines in the field of CDH screening. The usefulness of routine ultrasound screening has not been established. The findings from this study have been used by the authors and French National Health Authority (Haute Autorité de Santé [HAS]) to develop recommendations about CDH screening. There is an urgent need for a prospective randomised multi-centre nationwide study, which should involve primary-care physicians

Calendrier vaccinal InfoVac

International audienc

Vaccines and atopic/allergic children: A survey among private paediatricians

International audienc

Le nouveau calendrier vaccinal est-il adapté à l’ancien prématuré ?

International audienceThe French 2013 immunization schedule having a goal of simplification with comparable efficacy, has decreased the number of injections and removed the injection performed at three months of age in the general population. Apart from the prevention of invasive pneumococcal infections for which it is recommended to maintain three dose primary immunization, vaccination of premature is not addressed in this new calendar. Can the extremely preterm infants (< 33 weeks of gestational age) benefit from this new schedule or should we keep them in three injections schedule? The objective of this paper is to clarify this point through the data available in the literature. Children born prematurely and especially the “extremely premature” born before 33 weeks are at high risk of infections, some of them are preventable by immunization. Although there is no clinical evidence, for pertussis, pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenzae b, hepatitis B, whatever the immunogenicity criteria, immunogenicity is significantly lower in preterm than in term newborn after 3 doses primary schedule. This lower immunogenicity raises concerns about the transition to two doses, about the ability to give short term protection and booster responses. Given these data, GPIP takes the position for maintaining a primary 3-dose vaccination at 2.3 and 4 months for premature infants less than 33 weeks.Le calendrier vaccinal 2013 répondant à un objectif de simplification à efficacité comparable, a diminué le nombre d’injections recommandées et a en particulier supprimé l’injection effectuée à l’âge de trois mois en population générale. En dehors de la prévention des infections invasives à pneumocoque pour laquelle il est recommandé de maintenir trois doses en primovaccination, la vaccination du prématuré n’est pas abordée dans ce nouveau calendrier. Les grands prématurés peuvent-ils bénéficier de ce nouveau calendrier ou doit-on maintenir chez eux trois injections ? L’objectif de ce travail est de préciser ce point à travers les données disponibles dans la littérature. Les enfants nés prématurément et surtout les « grands prématurés » nés avant 33 SA sont des enfants à haut risque de contracter des infections dont certaines peuvent être prévenues par la vaccination. Pour les valences coqueluche, pneumocoque, Hib, hépatite B quels que soient les critères d’immunogénicité retenus, elle est nettement moins bonne chez les grands prématurés que chez les nouveau-nés à terme. Bien qu’il n’y ait pas de preuve clinique, ceci fait craindre que le passage à deux doses ne permette pas d’une part, de protéger suffisamment à court terme et, d’autre part, laisse craindre une moins bonne réponse immunitaire après le rappel à 11 mois. Compte tenu de ces données, le GPIP prend position pour le maintien d’une primo-vaccination à 3 doses à 2,3 et 4 mois pour les prématurés de moins de 33 semaines

Infovac Bulletin-France: Consultation of a two-month old child diagnosed with degenerative encephalopathy (Menke's disease). Is vaccination against whooping cough a contraindication?

2 page(s

Health Research on Immunization after 2016: the need for a plural methodological approach

In French : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03675482International audienceThe current “generalized digitization” of society is influencing the health environment, healthcare organizations as well as actors. In this context, human and social sciences deconstruct, nuance and sometimes even challenge certain preconceived ideas and/or dominant discourses.In this book, researchers of four nationalities and three different disciplines have agreed to open the “black box” of their work. They display their scientific practices from the perspective of epistemology, ethics and methodology. They present and analyze their values and postulates but, also, what may have influenced the project, the definition of the object and objectives, as well as their approaches. In a contextual way, the first part presents some changes in environments and info-communicational practices related to digital health. The second part opens space to reflect on ethics and deontology. Finally, postulating that scientific fact is not an essence but the result of a process, the last part discusses the methods implemented, which may be different from those initially envisaged.This book is dedicated to the researchers and postgraduate students in the human and social sciences as well as the health practitioners likely to collaborate with them