Atherosclerosis and liver inflammation induced by increased dietary cholesterol intake: a combined transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis

With increasing dietary cholesterol intake the liver switches from a mainly resilient to a predominantly inflammatory state, which is associated with early lesion formation

Semi-automated non-target processing in GC × GC–MS metabolomics analysis: applicability for biomedical studies

Due to the complexity of typical metabolomics samples and the many steps required to obtain quantitative data in GC × GC–MS consisting of deconvolution, peak picking, peak merging, and integration, the unbiased non-target quantification of GC × GC–MS data still poses a major challenge in metabolomics analysis. The feasibility of using commercially available software for non-target processing of GC × GC–MS data was assessed. For this purpose a set of mouse liver samples (24 study samples and five quality control (QC) samples prepared from the study samples) were measured with GC × GC–MS and GC–MS to study the development and progression of insulin resistance, a primary characteristic of diabetes type 2. A total of 170 and 691 peaks were quantified in, respectively, the GC–MS and GC × GC–MS data for all study and QC samples. The quantitative results for the QC samples were compared to assess the quality of semi-automated GC × GC–MS processing compared to targeted GC–MS processing which involved time-consuming manual correction of all wrongly integrated metabolites and was considered as golden standard. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) obtained with GC × GC–MS were somewhat higher than with GC–MS, due to less accurate processing. Still, the biological information in the study samples was preserved and the added value of GC × GC–MS was demonstrated; many additional candidate biomarkers were found with GC × GC–MS compared to GC–MS

Lipidomics Reveals Multiple Pathway Effects of a Multi-Components Preparation on Lipid Biochemistry in ApoE*3Leiden.CETP Mice

Background: Causes and consequences of the complex changes in lipids occurring in the metabolic syndrome are only partly understood. Several interconnected processes are deteriorating, which implies that multi-target approaches might be more successful than strategies based on a limited number of surrogate markers. Preparations from Chinese Medicine (CM) systems have been handed down with documented clinical features similar as metabolic syndrome, which might help developing new intervention for metabolic syndrome. The progress in systems biology and specific animal models created possibilities to assess the effects of such preparations. Here we report the plasma and liver lipidomics results of the intervention effects of a preparation SUB885C in apolipoprotein E3 Leiden cholesteryl ester transfer protein (ApoE*3Leiden.CETP) mice. SUB885C was developed according to the principles of CM for treatment of metabolic syndrome. The cannabinoid receptor type 1 blocker rimonabant was included as a general control for the evaluation of weight and metabolic responses. Methodology/Principal Findings: ApoE*3Leiden.CETP mice with mild hypercholesterolemia were divided into SUB885C-, rimonabant- and non-treated control groups. SUB885C caused no weight loss, but significantly reduced plasma cholesterol (-49%, p <0.001), CETP levels (-31%,

Mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics: limitations and recommendations for future progress with particular focus on nutrition research

Mass spectrometry (MS) techniques, because of their sensitivity and selectivity, have become methods of choice to characterize the human metabolome and MS-based metabolomics is increasingly used to characterize the complex metabolic effects of nutrients or foods. However progress is still hampered by many unsolved problems and most notably the lack of well established and standardized methods or procedures, and the difficulties still met in the identification of the metabolites influenced by a given nutritional intervention. The purpose of this paper is to review the main obstacles limiting progress and to make recommendations to overcome them. Propositions are made to improve the mode of collection and preparation of biological samples, the coverage and quality of mass spectrometry analyses, the extraction and exploitation of the raw data, the identification of the metabolites and the biological interpretation of the results

Assessing the performance of statistical validation tools for megavariate metabolomics data

Statistical model validation tools such as cross-validation, jack-knifing model parameters and permutation tests are meant to obtain an objective assessment of the performance and stability of a statistical model. However, little is known about the performance of these tools for megavariate data sets, having, for instance, a number of variables larger than 10 times the number of subjects. The performance is assessed for megavariate metabolomics data, but the conclusions also carry over to proteomics, transcriptomics and many other research areas. Partial least squares discriminant analyses models were built for several LC-MS lipidomic training data sets of various numbers of lean and obese subjects. The training data sets were compared on their modelling performance and their predictability using a 10-fold cross-validation, a permutation test, and test data sets. A wide range of cross-validation error rates was found (from 7.5% to 16.3% for the largest trainings set and from 0% to 60% for the smallest training set) and the error rate increased when the number of subjects decreased. The test error rates varied from 5% to 50%. The smaller the number of subjects compared to the number of variables, the less the outcome of validation tools such as cross-validation, jack-knifing model parameters and permutation tests can be trusted. The result depends crucially on the specific sample of subjects that is used for modelling. The validation tools cannot be used as warning mechanism for problems due to sample size or to representativity of the samplin

Building Multivariate Systems Biology Models

Systems biology methods using large-scale “omics” data sets face unique challenges: integrating and analyzing near limitless data space, while recognizing and removing systematic variation or noise. Herein we propose a complementary multivariate analysis workflow to both integrate “omics” data from disparate sources and analyze the results for specific and unique sample correlations. This workflow combines principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA), orthogonal 2 projections to latent structures (O2PLS), and shared and unique structures (SUS) plots. The workflow is demonstrated using data from a study in which ApoE3Leiden mice were fed an atherogenic diet consisting of increasing cholesterol levels followed by therapeutic intervention (fenofibrate, rosuvastatin, and LXR activator T-0901317). The levels of structural lipids (lipidomics) and free fatty acids in liver were quantified via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). The complementary workflow identified diglycerides as key hepatic metabolites affected by dietary cholesterol and drug intervention. Modeling of the three therapeutics for mice fed a high-cholesterol diet further highlighted diglycerides as metabolites of interest in atherogenesis, suggesting a role in eliciting chronic liver inflammation. In particular, O2PLS-based SUS2 plots showed that treatment with T-0901317 or rosuvastatin returned the diglyceride profile in high-cholesterol-fed mice to that of control animals

Dietary Medium Chain Fatty Acid Supplementation Leads to Reduced VLDL Lipolysis and Uptake Rates in Comparison to Linoleic Acid Supplementation

<div><p>Dietary medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) and linoleic acid follow different metabolic routes, and linoleic acid activates PPAR receptors. Both these mechanisms may modify lipoprotein and fatty acid metabolism after dietary intervention. Our objective was to investigate how dietary MCFA and linoleic acid supplementation and body fat distribution affect the fasting lipoprotein subclass profile, lipoprotein kinetics, and postprandial fatty acid kinetics. In a randomized double blind cross-over trial, 12 male subjects (age 51±7 years; BMI 28.5±0.8 kg/m²), were divided into 2 groups according to waist-hip ratio. They were supplemented with 60 grams/day MCFA (mainly C8:0, C10:0) or linoleic acid for three weeks, with a wash-out period of six weeks in between. Lipoprotein subclasses were measured using HPLC. Lipoprotein and fatty acid metabolism were studied using a combination of several stable isotope tracers. Lipoprotein and tracer data were analyzed using computational modeling. Lipoprotein subclass concentrations in the VLDL and LDL range were significantly higher after MCFA than after linoleic acid intervention. In addition, LDL subclass concentrations were higher in lower body obese individuals. Differences in VLDL metabolism were found to occur in lipoprotein lipolysis and uptake, not production; MCFAs were elongated intensively, in contrast to linoleic acid. Dietary MCFA supplementation led to a less favorable lipoprotein profile than linoleic acid supplementation. These differences were not due to elevated VLDL production, but rather to lower lipolysis and uptake rates.</p></div

Ratios between average VLDL metabolism parameters after dietary MCFA supplementation versus linoleic acid supplementation; values < 1 indicate a higher value after linoleic acid supplementation.

<p>Ratios are shown to allow comparing differences after dietary supplementation between parameters with different dimensions. * Indicates a significant difference in two-way ANOVA between MCFA and linoleic acid supplementation, with p<0.05. The first three parameters have dimensions <i>volume/# particles</i>, the uptake and lipolysis measure have the dimension <i>1/time</i>, and the production measure has dimension <i># particles/(volume * time)</i>. Differences in VLDL triglyceride and cholesterol pool size can be found in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0100376#pone-0100376-t002" target="_blank">table 2</a>. The p-values of the significant measures are: uptake/production in VLDL (p = 0.030); VLDL performance (p = 0.040); VLDL lipolysis (p = 0,0213); VLDL uptake (p = 0.0135).</p

Correlation Network Analysis for Data Integration and Biomarker Selection

This work demonstrates the application of correlation networks to a systems-based investigation of drug-induced hepatotoxicity and the identification of specific and relevant biomarkers in this context