To what extent has Sustainable Intensification in England been achieved?

Agricultural intensification has significantly increased yields and fed growing populations across the planet, but has also led to considerable environmental degradation. In response an alternative process of ‘Sustainable Intensification’ (SI), whereby food production increases while environmental impacts are reduced, has been advocated as necessary, if not sufficient, for delivering food and environmental security. However, the extent to which SI has begun, the main drivers of SI, and the degree to which degradation is simply ‘offshored’ are uncertain. In this study we assess agroecosystem services in England and two contrasting sub-regions, majority-arable Eastern England and majority-pastoral South-Western England, since 1950 by analysing ecosystem service metrics and developing a simple system dynamics model. We find that rapid agricultural intensification drove significant environmental degradation in England in the early 1980s, but that most ecosystem services except farmland biodiversity began to recover after 2000, primarily due to reduced livestock and fertiliser usage decoupling from high yields. This partially follows the trajectory of an Environmental Kuznets Curve, with yields and GDP growth decoupling from environmental degradation above ~£17,000 per capita per annum. Together, these trends suggest that SI has begun in England. However, the lack of recovery in farmland biodiversity, and the reduction in UK food self-sufficiency resulting in some agricultural impacts being ‘offshored’, represent major negative trade-offs. Maintaining yields and restoring biodiversity while also addressing climate change, offshored degradation, and post-Brexit subsidy changes will require significant further SI in the future

Conjunctive water management options: examples from economic assessment of system-level water savings through Liuyuankou Irrigation System, China

The paper provides results of a study aimed at saving a substantial amount of water by maintaining deeper groundwater levels to prevent fallow evaporation and by reducing the cost of groundwater abstraction for lowland farmers. An integrated LIS economic appraisal model was developed that linked simulated response of hydrological modelling of different conjunctive management options with economic analysis. The simulation results of the LIS system dynamic model show that a combination of canal lining and pumping groundwater is the most cost-effective way to reduce non-beneficial evapotranspiration and increase water availability by saving up to 68 MCM of water. The simulation results of economic parameters indicated that canal lining and pumping also offer highest net economic benefits (¥21.98 million). Among other options, canal lining also indicates reasonably high net economic benefits (¥9.02 million). The model indicates a small increase in marginal value of water with canal lining (¥1.53m 3) and pumping and canal lining (¥1.62m 3). Among other options, the marginal capital cost of water saving for pumping and canal lining together was the lowest (¥0.096m 3). However, the marginal capital cost of water saving for pumping and shifting canal water downstream was the most expensive (¥1.046m 3)