23 research outputs found
Uncertainty and precaution in European environmental risk assessment of chemicals
It is recognised that there is a need for a proper treatment and transparency of uncertainty in risk assessment and management, especially in view of the upcoming proposed new chemical policy REACH, which delegates the responsibility for conducting risk assessments to industry. The current EU risk assessment for new and existing substances is largely deterministic and prudential measures are implicitly embedded in calculation schemes and rules. In this paper, a more probabilistic approach to risk assessment is advocated. The advantage is twofold: 1) inherent variability and other uncertainty pertaining to exposure and effects are transparently taken into account, while at the same time 2) issues of caution are explicitly transferred to the risk management phase. The result of a probabilistic risk assessment as suggested is improved transparency with quantitative and qualitative uncertainty estimates. Such uncertainty information can be used to discuss precautionary measures in the context of risk management.</jats:p
Water quality guidelines for chemicals: learning lessons to deliver meaningful environmental metrics
Consideration of the bioavailability of metal/metalloid species in freshwaters: experiences regarding the implementation of biotic ligand model-based approaches in risk assessment frameworks
After the scientific development of Biotic Ligand Models (BLMs) in recent decades these models are now considered suitable for implementation in regulatory risk assessment of metals in freshwater bodies. The approach has been developed over several years and has been described in many peer-reviewed publications. The original complex BLMs have been applied in prospective risk assessment reports for metals and metal compounds and are also recommended as suitable concepts for the evaluation of monitoring data in the context of the European Water Framework Directive. Currently, several user-friendly BLM-based bioavailability software tools are available for assessing the aquatic toxicity of a limited number of metals (mainly copper, nickel, and zinc). These tools need only a basic set of water parameters as input (e.g., pH, hardness, dissolved organic matter and dissolved metal concentration). Such tools seem appropriate to foster the implementation in routine water quality assessments. This work aims to review the existing bioavailability-based regulatory approaches and the application of available BLM-based bioavailability tools for this purpose. Advantages and possible drawbacks of these tools (e.g., feasibility, boundaries of validity) are discussed, and recommendations for further implementation are given
Evaluatie van ammonium toxiciteit in verontreinigde waterbodems van de Bovenschelde: ontwikkeling en toepassing van Toxiciteit-Identificatie Evaluatie procedures. Water, 1997, 92, pp.7-9.
Mobility and toxicity of metals in sandy sediments deposited on land (vol 54, pg 65, 2003)
Simulation of spatial and temporal variability of chronic copper toxicity to Daphnia magna and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata in Swedish and British surface waters
Water Quality Criteria (WQC) for metals are usually based on single species laboratory toxicity data. The influence of water characteristics of the surface waters on bioavailability to freshwater organisms is hence neglected, along with regional and temporal variability of these water characteristics. A methodology is presented to account for regional and temporal variability in the WQC setting for copper in the United Kingdom and Sweden. Bioavailability models were applied in a Monte-Carlo approach to account for temporal variability and a Geographic Information System was used to account for geographical variability on the chronic copper toxicity to Daphnia magna and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Fifth percentiles of distributions of the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) for both model species were derived in both study regions. For P subcapitata, it was demonstrated that this fifth percentile can vary by a factor 10 in the UK study region. The ratio of these NOEC fifth percentiles (D. magna percentile divided by P subcapitata percentile) was used to compare the ecotoxicity of copper to two model species. This ratio showed the highest variability (a factor 5) within the Swedish study region. The findings of this research stress the need for the use of region-specific WQC for copper
