Differential tolerance of sugarcane cultivars to clomazone

Weed control is one of the most relevant costs of sugarcane production. If weeds are not controlled at the right time, the productivity and longevity of sugarcane plantations are reduced. In this crop, chemical control is the most used method, since it is efficient and it has a lower cost. Differentiated tolerance of sugarcane cultivars to the herbicide clomazone has been observed in the fields. However, there is no scientific evidence of this effect on the productivity of crops. This study evaluated the effects of clomazone on three sugarcane cultivars (RB966928, RB93579 and RB867515). Herbicide application was performed 40 days after the emergence of sugarcane plants and 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after the application, the toxicity caused by the herbicide in the culture was evaluated through grades ranging from 0 (no toxicity) to 100 (plant death). The harvest was performed 580 days after the herbicide application. On this occasion, the length and diameter of the stem, number of tillers, tons of stems per hectare, total soluble solids of the juice, sucrose of the juice, apparent purity of the juice, sugarcane fiber, reducing sugars and total recoverable sugars were evaluated. The differential tolerance among sugarcane cultivars in response to clomazone application in the early stages of crop development was confirmed. Nevertheless, in all cultivars, the symptoms of intoxication disappeared over time and did not reflect on crop productivity. It was concluded that plant control in the sugarcane crop with clomazone, following the recommendation of the manufacturer, does not interfere negatively in the growth, development and productivity of the crop.As plantas daninhas, se não controladas no momento adequado, reduzem a produtividade e longevidade dos canaviais. Nesta cultura, o método químico de controle das plantas daninhas, por ser eficiente e de menor custo, é o mais utilizado. No campo, tem-se observado tolerância diferenciada de cultivares de cana-de-açúcar ao herbicida clomazone. Contudo, não existe comprovação científica desse efeito sobre a produtividade dos cultivares. Neste trabalho foram avaliados os efeitos do clomazone em três cultivares de cana-de-açúcar (RB966928, RB93579 e RB867515). A aplicação do herbicida foi feita aos 40 dias após emergência das plantas de cana, e aos 7, 14, 21 e 28 dias após a aplicação foram avaliadas as intoxicações causadas pelo herbicida na cultura, atribuindo-se notas que variaram de 0 (ausência de intoxicação) até 100 (morte das plantas). Aos 580 dias após a aplicação foi realizada a colheita da cultura. Nessa ocasião, foram avaliados o comprimento e diâmetro do colmo, número de perfilho, tonelada de colmos por hectare, sólidos solúveis totais do caldo, sacarose do caldo, pureza aparente do caldo, fibra da cana, açúcares redutores e açúcares totais recuperáveis. Foi confirmada a tolerância diferenciada entre cultivares de cana-de-açúcar à aplicação do clomazone no início de desenvolvimento da cultura. Entretanto, os sintomas de intoxicação desapareceram ao longo do tempo e não refletiram na produtividade da cultura. Concluiu-se que o controle de plantas na cultura da cana-de-açúcar com o clomazone, seguindo a recomendação do fabricante, não interfere no crescimento, no desenvolvimento e na produtividade da cultura

Phyllosticta citricarpa and sister species of global importance to Citrus.

Several Phyllosticta species are known as pathogens of Citrus spp., and are responsible for various disease symptoms including leaf and fruit spots. One of the most important species is P. citricarpa, which causes a foliar and fruit disease called citrus black spot. The Phyllosticta species occurring on citrus can most effectively be distinguished from P. citricarpa by means of multilocus DNA sequence data. Recent studies also demonstrated P. citricarpa to be heterothallic, and reported successful mating in the laboratory. Since the domestication of citrus, different clones of P. citricarpa have escaped Asia to other continents via trade routes, with obvious disease management consequences. This pathogen profile represents a comprehensive literature review of this pathogen and allied taxa associated with citrus, focusing on identification, distribution, genomics, epidemiology and disease management. This review also considers the knowledge emerging from seven genomes of Phyllosticta spp., demonstrating unknown aspects of these species, including their mating behaviour.TaxonomyPhyllosticta citricarpa (McAlpine) Aa, 1973. Kingdom Fungi, Phylum Ascomycota, Class Dothideomycetes, Order Botryosphaeriales, Family Phyllostictaceae, Genus Phyllosticta, Species citricarpa.Host rangeConfirmed on more than 12 Citrus species, Phyllosticta citricarpa has only been found on plant species in the Rutaceae.Disease symptomsP. citricarpa causes diverse symptoms such as hard spot, virulent spot, false melanose and freckle spot on fruit, and necrotic lesions on leaves and twigs.Useful websitesDOE Joint Genome Institute MycoCosm portals for the Phyllosticta capitalensis (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phycap1), P. citriasiana (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phycit1), P. citribraziliensis (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phcit1), P. citrichinaensis (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phcitr1), P. citricarpa (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phycitr1, https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phycpc1), P. paracitricarpa (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phy27169) genomes. All available Phyllosticta genomes on MycoCosm can be viewed at https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Phyllosticta