61 research outputs found

    The Forum: Fall 2006/Spring 2007

    Get PDF
    Fall 2006 / Spring 2007 journal of the Honors Program at the University of North Dakota. The issue includes stories, poems, essays and art by undergraduate students.https://commons.und.edu/und-books/1060/thumbnail.jp

    Survival after Acute Hemodialysis in Pennsylvania, 2005- 2007: A Retrospective Cohort Study

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background: Little is known about acute hemodialysis in the US. Here we describe predictors of receipt of acute hemodialysis in one state and estimate the marginal impact of acute hemodialysis on survival after accounting for confounding due to illness severity

    Safety Outcomes During Pediatric GH Therapy : Final Results From the Prospective GeNeSIS Observational Program

    Get PDF
    Altres ajuts: Financial Support: GeNeSIS was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company (Indianapolis, IN). In compliance with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts, established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the sponsor of this study did not impose any impediment, directly or indirectly, on the publication of the study's results. Disclosure Summary: C.J.C. and N.J. are employees and stockholders ofEliLilly and Company (Indianapolis, IN).W.F.B. and A.G.Z. are former employees and are stockholders of Lilly. C.L.D., T.H., M.M., and R.G.R. are former members of the GeNeSIS International Advisory Board; S.L., J.P.S., A.R.-U., and M.P. have served as regional advisors. B.P. has consulted for Eli Lilly Italia SpA, and E.C. has received grant support from Lilly. W.F.B. also reports heis aconsultant forAmmonett Pharma,Lilly Germany, and Merck KGaA Darmstadt. C.L.D. also reports receipt of grants, consultancy honoraria, and speaker fees from Lilly,EMD Serono, and Sandoz; grants fromOpko Prolor, Pfizer, and Versatis; honoraria and speaker fees from Roche; honoraria from Pfizer; and speaker fees from Novo Nordisk. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.Safety concerns have been raised regarding premature mortality, diabetes, neoplasia, and cerebrovascular disease in association with GH therapy. To assess incidence of key safety outcomes. Prospective, multinational, observational study (1999 to 2015). A total of 22,311 GH-treated children from 827 investigative sites in 30 countries. Children with growth disorders. GH treatment. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with 95% CIs for mortality, diabetes, and primary cancer using general population registries. Predominant short stature diagnoses were GH deficiency (63%), idiopathic short stature (13%), and Turner syndrome (8%), with mean ± SD follow-up of 4.2 ± 3.2 years (∼92,000 person-years [PY]). Forty-two deaths occurred in patients with follow-up, with an SMR (95% CI) of 0.61 (0.44, 0.82); the SMR was elevated for patients with cancer-related organic GH deficiency [5.87 (3.21, 9.85)]. Based on 18 cases, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk was elevated [SIR: 3.77 (2.24, 5.96)], but 72% had risk factors. In patients without cancer history, 14 primary cancers were observed [SIR: 0.71 (0.39, 1.20)]. Second neoplasms occurred in 31 of 622 cancer survivors [5.0%; 10.7 (7.5, 15.2) cases/1000 PY] and intracranial tumor recurrences in 67 of 823 tumor survivors [8.1%; 16.9 (13.3, 21.5) cases/1000 PY]. All three hemorrhagic stroke cases had risk factors. GeNeSIS (Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study) data support the favorable safety profile of pediatric GH treatment. Overall risk of death or primary cancer was not elevated in GH-treated children, and no hemorrhagic strokes occurred in patients without risk factors. T2DM incidence was elevated compared with the general population, but most cases had diabetes risk factors. Safety of GH therapy was assessed in a pediatric observational study. Death and primary cancer rates were not higher than in the general population; T2DM rate was higher owing to risk factors

    Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO telementoring program for the Namibian HIV workforce.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The Namibian Ministry of Health and Social Services (MoHSS) piloted the first HIV Project ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes) in Africa at 10 clinical sites between 2015 and 2016. Goals of Project ECHO implementation included strengthening clinical capacity, improving professional satisfaction, and reducing isolation while addressing HIV service challenges during decentralization of antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: MoHSS conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to assess the pilot. Methods included pre/post program assessments of healthcare worker knowledge, self-efficacy, and professional satisfaction; assessment of continuing professional development (CPD) credit acquisition; and focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Analysis compared the differences between pre/post scores descriptively. Qualitative transcripts were analyzed to extract themes and representative quotes. RESULTS: Knowledge of clinical HIV improved 17.8% overall (95% confidence interval 12.2-23.5%) and 22.3% (95% confidence interval 13.2-31.5%) for nurses. Professional satisfaction increased 30 percentage points. Most participants experienced reduced professional isolation (66%) and improved CPD credit access (57%). Qualitative findings reinforced quantitative results. Following the pilot, the Namibia MoHSS Project ECHO expanded to over 40 clinical sites by May 2019 serving more than 140 000 people living with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to other Project ECHO evaluation results in the United States of America, Namibia's Project ECHO led to the development of ongoing virtual communities of practice. The evaluation demonstrated the ability of the Namibia HIV Project ECHO to improve healthcare worker knowledge and satisfaction and decrease professional isolation
    corecore