Pharmacokinetics of prolonged-release tacrolimus versus immediate-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplantation: A randomized phase III substudy

Background With the same dose of tacrolimus, lower systemic exposure on the first day of dosing has been reported for prolonged-release tacrolimus compared with immediate-release tacrolimus, prompting investigation of differing initial doses. Methods This sub-study of a double-blind, randomized, phase III trial in de novo liver transplant recipients compared the pharmacokinetics of once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (initial dose: 0.2mg/kg/day) versus twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (initial dose: 0.1mg/kg/day) during the first 2 weeks post-transplant. Results Pharmacokinetic data were analysed from patients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus (n=13) and immediate-release tacrolimus (n=12). Mean systemic exposure (AUC0–24) was higher with prolonged-release versus immediate-release tacrolimus. Dose-normalized AUC0–24 (normalized to 0.1mg/kg/day) showed generally lower exposure with prolonged-release tacrolimus versus immediate-release tacrolimus. There was good correlation between AUC0–24 and concentration at 24 hours after the morning dose (r=0.96 and r=0.86, respectively), and the slope of the line of best fit was similar for both formulations. Conclusions Doubling the initial starting dose of prolonged-release tacrolimus compared with immediate-release tacrolimus overcompensated for lower exposure on Day 1. A 50% higher starting dose of prolonged-release tacrolimus than immediate-release tacrolimus may be required for similar systemic exposure. However, doses of both formulations can be optimized using the same trough-level monitoring system. (ClinicalTrials . gov number: NCT00189826) Discipline liver transplantation/hepatology, immunosuppression/immune modulation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

A multicenter study of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus ointment after first and repeated application to children with atopic dermatitis

Funding Information: This study was sponsored by Fujisawa GmbH, Munich, Germany.The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after first and repeated application of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment were evaluated in 39 children, aged 6-12 y, with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The patients were grouped according to the size of the affected body surface area to be treated: Group 1 ≤ 1500 cm 2; Group 2 > 1500 cm2≤ 3000 cm2; Group 3 > 3000 cm2 ≤ 5000 cm2. Serial blood samples to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters taken on Day 1 (first ointment application) and Day 14 (last application) showed minimal systemic exposure to tacrolimus. Overall, 92% of the blood samples assayed contained tacrolimus concentrations below 1 ng per mL and 17% of samples were below 0.025 ng per mL, the lower limit of quantification. Systemic exposure to tacrolimus varied between patients and tended to increase proportionally as the size of the treated body surface area increased. Absorption decreased with time as the skin lesions healed and there was no evidence of systemic accumulation. The mean apparent half-life of tacrolimus (t1/2, z) was 66 ± 27 h (range 19-125 h). Most patients experienced substantial clinical improvement in their atopic dermatitis. There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory values, and the most frequently reported adverse event was skin burning, which resolved quickly as the skin condition improved.Peer reviewe

Long-term, Prolonged-release Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients : 5-year Prospective Follow-up of Patients in the DIAMOND Study

Background. Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is reportedly associated with risk of renal impairment in liver transplant recipients. It is believed that this can be mitigated by decreasing initial exposure to CNIs or delaying CNI introduction until 3-4 d posttransplantation. The ADVAGRAF studied in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and basili ximab in liver transplantation (DIAMOND) trial evaluated different administration strategies for prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T). Methods. DIAMOND was a 24-wk, open-label, phase 3b trial in de novo liver transplant recipients randomized to: PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d (Arm 1); PR-T 0.15-0.175 mg/kg/d plus basiliximab (Arm 2); or PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d delayed until day 5 posttransplant plus basiliximab (Arm 3). In a 5-y follow-up, patients were maintained on an immunosuppressive regimen according to standard clinical practice (NCT02057484). Primary endpoint: graft survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Results. Follow-up study included 856 patients. Overall graft survival was 84.6% and 73.5% at 1 and 5 y post transplant, respectively. Five-year rates for Arms 1, 2, and 3 were 74.7%, 71.5%, and 74.5%, respectively. At 5 y, death-censored graft survival in the entire cohort was 74,7%. Overall graft survival in patients remaining on PR-T for z30 d was 79.1%. Graft survival in patients who remained on PR-T at 5 y was 87.3%. Patient survival was 86.6% at 1 y and 76.3% at 5 y, with survival rates similar in the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at the end of the 24-wk initial study and 5 y posttransplant was 62.1 and 61.5 mi./min/1.73 m(2), respectively, and was similar between the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Overall, 18 (2.9%) patients had z1 adverse drug reaction, considered possibly related to PR-T in 6 patients. Conclusions. In the DIAMOND study patient cohort, renal function, graft survival, and patient survival were similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplant.Peer reviewe

Long-term, prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in de novo kidney transplant recipients: 5-year prospective follow-up of the ADHERE study patients.

The objectives of this study were to assess long-term graft survival, patient survival, renal function, and acute rejections in de novo kidney transplant recipients, treated with once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based therapy. The study was a 5-year non-interventional prospective follow-up of patients from the ADHERE study, a Phase IV 12-month open-label assessment of patients randomized to receive prolonged-release tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arm 1) or sirolimus (Arm 2). From 838 patients in the randomized study, 587 were included in the long-term follow-up, of whom 510 completed the study at year 5. At 1 year post-transplant, graft and patient survival rates were 93.0% and 97.8%, respectively, and at 5 years were 84.0% and 90.8%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no association between graft loss, initial randomized treatment arm, donor age, donor type, or sex. The 5-year acute rejection-free survival rate was 77.4%, and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival rate was 86.0%. Renal function remained stable over the follow-up period: mean ± SD eGFR 4-variable modification diet in renal disease formula (MDRD4) was 52.3 ± 21.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 6 months and 52.5 ± 23.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 5 years post-transplant. These findings support the role of long-term once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, in combination with sirolimus or MMF, for renal transplant recipients in routine clinical practice. ispartof: TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL vol:33 issue:2 pages:161-173 ispartof: location:England status: publishe

Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in stable pediatric allograft recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus to prolonged-release tacrolimus formulation.

n/

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus When Administered via Nasogastric Tube in De Novo Liver Transplantation: A Sub-Study of the DIAMOND Trial

BACKGROUND For patients unable to swallow during the immediate post-transplant period, immunosuppressant therapy may be initiated by administering prolonged-release tacrolimus as a suspension via a nasogastric tube. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this sub-study of the DIAMOND randomized controlled trial of prolonged-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of prolonged-release tacrolimus when administered via nasogastric tube immediately post-transplant. PK analyses were performed on whole-blood samples collected on Day 1 of tacrolimus administration and on Day 3 post-transplantation. Endpoints included AUC0-24, Cmax, Tmax, and Cmin. RESULTS In total, 10 patients were included in the PK sub-study. The overall mean daily dose of prolonged-release tacrolimus administered via nasogastric tube was higher on Day 1 (0.179 mg/kg) vs. Day 3 (0.140 mg/kg). Mean AUC0-24 was higher and less variable on Day 3 vs. Day 1 (AUC0-24 (coefficient of variation; CV): 301 (50.8) vs. 193 (94.5) ng\ub7h/mL). Mean Cmax was lower and median Tmax was shorter on Day 1 vs. Day 3 (Cmax (CV): 15.1 (73.9) vs. 19.1 (47.9) ng/mL; Tmax (range): 2.0 (2.0-24.0) vs. 4.5 (0.5-24.0) h). A similar pattern was also observed when data were normalized for dose and body weight. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to previously reported findings in healthy volunteers, nasogastric administration of prolonged--release tacrolimus suspension in liver transplant patients did not substantially affect the PK profile of tacrolimus vs. intact capsules. Nasogastric administration is thus a feasible option to ensure appropriate early tacrolimus exposure in de novo liver transplant recipients

Long-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Role of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus has significantly improved outcomes for kidney transplant patients and remains the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy. While improvements in short-term outcomes in transplantation have been achieved in recent years, maintaining long-term graft survival remains a challenge in kidney transplantation. Minimizing risk factors for poor long-term kidney graft function and survival, and modifying tacrolimus regimens in the early and maintenance phases post-transplantation are essential to maintain long-term kidney transplant outcomes. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, resulting in a tightly defined range of optimal drug exposure. Underimmunosuppression is associated with long-term risks, such as the development of donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection, with a high possibility of a decline in kidney function and progression to graft failure. Conversely, prolonged overimmunosuppression carries a risk of drug-related adverse events. This review provides an overview of the differences in the formulation, delivery, and pharmacokinetic profiles between immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus and evaluates the effect of prolonged-release tacrolimus on the risk factors for poor outcomes in kidney transplantation. Recent evidence is used to provide guidance on target tacrolimus trough levels in the early and maintenance phases post-transplantation, with a view to improving long-term kidney graft function

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics of once-versus twice-daily formulations in de novo kidney transplantation: A substudy of a randomized phase III trial

Background: Tacrolimus is a well-established immunosuppressive agent for the treatment and prevention of solid organ graft rejection. It is available as an immediate-release, twice-daily formulation (Tacrolimus BID) and a prolonged-release, once-daily formulation (Tacrolimus QD). In a previous study of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of these formulations, mean systemic exposure [area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24)] of tacrolimus on day 1 was approximately 30% lower for Tacrolimus QD than for Tacrolimus BID; by day 14, systemic exposure was similar; however, the mean dose of Tacrolimus QD was higher to achieve similar systemic exposure as Tacrolimus BID. Methods: To further compare the PK of the tacrolimus formulations during the first 2 weeks posttransplant, a substudy was performed in a subset of patients enrolled into a phase III trial in de novo kidney transplant recipients comparing Tacrolimus QD and Tacrolimus BID. To minimize the difference in exposure observed in the earlier study, tacrolimus therapy was initiated before transplant. The PK analysis set comprised 34 patients (17 patients per treatment group) who had 4 complete PK profiles and no major PK-related protocol violations. Results: Mean AUC 0-24 of tacrolimus on day 1 was approximately 16% lower for Tacrolimus QD than for Tacrolimus BID, although by day 3 onward, the exposure was similar between treatment groups. Analysis of dose-normalized AUC0-24 (dose normalized to 0.1 mg/kg) showed a similar pattern. There was a good correlation between AUC0-24 and concentration of tacrolimus at 24 hours postdose for both formulations (Tacrolimus QD, r = 0.87; Tacrolimus BID, r = 0.92), and the slope of the line of best fit was similar. Conclusions: These results suggest that initiating tacrolimus therapy before transplant reduces the difference in exposure between Tacrolimus QD and Tacrolimus BID. © 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Long-Term Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in De Novo KidneyTransplant Recipients : 5-Y Prospective Follow-Up of Patients in the ADVANCE study

Background. Although prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) is widely approved for posttransplantation immunosuppres-sion in kidney recipients, large-scale studies are required to assess long-term outcomes. We present follow-up data from the ADVANCE trial, in which kidney transplant patients (KTPs) received corticosteroid minimization with PR-T. Methods. ADVANCE was a 24-wk, randomized, open-label, phase-4 study. De novo KTPs received PR-T with basiliximab and mycophe-nolate mofetil and were randomized to receive an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus plus tapered corticosteroids until day 10 (arm 1) or an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus (arm 2). In this 5-y, noninterventional follow-up, patients received maintenance immunosuppression according to standard practice. Primary endpoint included graft survival (Kaplan-Meier). Secondary end-points included patient survival, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection–free survival, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (4-vari-able modification of diet in renal disease). Results. Follow-up study included 1125 patients. Overall graft survival at 1 and 5 y posttransplant was 93.8% and 88.1%, respectively, and was similar between treatment arms. At 1 and 5 y, patient survival was 97.8% and 94.4%, respectively. Five-year graft and patient survival rates in KTPs who remained on PR-T were 91.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated similar risk of graft loss and death between treatment arms. Five-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection–free survival was 84.1%. Mean ± standard deviation values of estimated glo-merular filtration rate were 52.7 ± 19.5 and 51.1 ± 22.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 and 5 y, respectively. Fifty adverse drug reactions were recorded, probably tacrolimus-related, in 12 patients (1.5%). Conclusions. Graft survival and patient survival—over-all and for KTPs who remained on PR-T—were numerically high and similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplant