A rare cause of dyspnea: Left atrial angiosarcoma

WOS: 000482646600012PubMed ID: 3137565

Resistant hypertension in elderly: a clinical manifestation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? retrospective single-center analysis

Background: Resistant hypertension (RHT) is defined as high blood pressure despite three antihypertensive medications one being a diuretic. RHT is a common clinical problem and as a subgroup has not been studied widely. The present study has investigated patient demographics and if the RHT might be a clinical presentation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) in elderly. Method: The outpatient data between January and June 2015 of Izmir Kemalpasa State hospital’s hypertension specialty clinic has been reviewed retrospectively. The patients with pseudo-RHT are excluded. Among 957 patients, 68 patients have been identified as true RHT with a left ventricle ejection fraction ≥50%. HFPEF is defined according to the latest guideline. Instead of a common cut-off level for NT-proBNP, age and gender-related cut-off levels have been used. Results: The mean age was 63.24 ± 12.05 years. Among 68 patients, 49 were female. While only 3 patients in younger group (8.8%) had elevated levels of NT-proBNP, 22 of older RHT patients (64.7%) had high levels. NT-proBNP levels were disproportionally high in elderly (p < 0.001) and high levels in RHT patients were related to a larger left atrial diameter (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The underlying mechanism might be different in RHT according to age. Hypervolemia might be the key factor in older RHT patients but not in younger patients. The current study suggests RHT in elderly can be a clinical presentation of HFPEF, and they should be investigated and treated accordingly. Because of single-center results and limited patients, further studies are needed

Design and rationale of dabigatran's stroke prevention in real life in Turkey (D-SPIRIT)

Objective: The D-SPIRIT registry is designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to collect data on outcomes in clinical practice. Methods: The D-SPIRIT is a national, prospective, observational, post-marketing registry involving patients with NVAF who have been taking dabigatran etexilate therapy for stroke prevention for a minimum of 6 months prior to enrollment. The registry will collect and analyze data from routine care, enrolling up to 600 patients in 9 centers. Patients will be followed up for 2 years to evaluate effectiveness and safety. A sample size of 600 subjects is proposed based on the following assumptions; Two-sided significance level of 0.05 (1-sided significance level of 0.025), ischemic stroke incidence rate of 0.768%-1.111%, hemorrhagic stroke incidence rate of 0.109%-0.130%, transient ischemic attack incidence rate of 0.722%-0.623%, therapy discontinuation incidence rate of 40% at day 730, and duration of enrollment period of 12 months with non-uniformed enrollment rate. Ethics approval was given by Dokuz Eyll University Ethics Committee of Clinical Research (2014/54) and approved by the Turkish Ministry of Health. Conclusion: Potential results of D-SPIRIT registry will add data from clinical practice to those from the RE-LY trial to expand knowledge of dabigatran etexilate treatment in patients with NVAF

Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of acute decompensated heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular diseases. The impact of AF on in-hospital outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of AF among hospitalized patients with ADHF and describe the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of these patients with and without AF

Demographics of patients with heart failure who were over 80 years old and were admitted to the cardiology clinics in Turkey

WOS: 000468584300005PubMed ID: 30930455Objective: Heart failure (HF) has a high prevalence and mortality rate in elderly patients; however, there are few studies that have focused on patients older than 80 years. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the age-specific demographics and clinical features of Turkish elderly patients with HF who were admitted to cardiology clinics. Methods: The Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Turkish population (ELDER-TURK) study was conducted in 73 centers in Turkey, and it recruited a total of 5694 patients aged 65 years or older. In this study, the clinical profile of the patients who were aged 80 years or older and those between 65 and 79 years with HF were described and compared based on the ejection fraction (EF)-related classification: HFrEF and HFpEF (is considered as EF: >= 50%). Results: A total of 1098 patients (male, 47.5%; mean age, 83.5 +/- 3.1 years) aged 80 years and 4596 patients (male, 50.2 %; mean age, 71.1 +/- 4.31 years) aged 65-79 years were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of HF was 39.8% for patients who were >= 80 years and 27.1% for patients 65-79 years old. For patients aged >= 80 years with HF, the prevalence rate was 67% for hypertension (HT), 25.6% for diabetes mellitus (DM), 54.3% for coronary artery disease (CAD), and 42.3% for atrial fibrilation. Female proportion was lower in the HFrEF group (p=0.019). The prevalence of HT and DM was higher in the HFpEF group (p= 80 years with HFrEF (p<0.01). Conclusion: HF is common in elderly Turkish population, and its frequency increases significantly with age. Females, diabetics, and hypertensives are more likely to have HFpEF, whereas CAD patients are more likely to have HFrEF.Turkish Society of CardiologyThis study was supported by Turkish Society of Cardiology

Demographics of patients with heart failure who were over 80 years old and were admitted to the cardiology clinics in Turkey

Objective: Heart failure (HF) has a high prevalence and mortality rate in elderly patients; however, there are few studies that have focused on patients older than 80 years. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the age-specific demographics and clinical features of Turkish elderly patients with HF who were admitted to cardiology clinics. Methods: The Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Turkish population (ELDER-TURK) study was conducted in 73 centers in Turkey, and it recruited a total of 5694 patients aged 65 years or older. In this study, the clinical profile of the patients who were aged 80 years or older and those between 65 and 79 years with HF were described and compared based on the ejection fraction (EF)-related classification: HFrEF and HFpEF (is considered as EF: >= 50\%). Results: A total of 1098 patients (male, 47.5\%; mean age, 83.5 +/- 3.1 years) aged 80 years and 4596 patients (male, 50.2 \%; mean age, 71.1 +/- 4.31 years) aged 65-79 years were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of HF was 39.8\% for patients who were >= 80 years and 27.1\% for patients 65-79 years old. For patients aged >= 80 years with HF, the prevalence rate was 67\% for hypertension (HT), 25.6\% for diabetes mellitus (DM), 54.3\% for coronary artery disease (CAD), and 42.3\% for atrial fibrilation. Female proportion was lower in the HFrEF group (p=0.019). The prevalence of HT and DM was higher in the HFpEF group (p<0.01), whereas CAD had a higher prevalence in the HFrEF group (p=0.02). Among patients aged 65-79 years, 43.9\% (548) had HFpEF, and 56.1\% (700) had HFrEF. In this group of patients aged 65-79 years with HFrEF, the prevalence of DM was significantly higher than in patients aged >= 80 years with HFrEF (p<0.01). Conclusion: HF is common in elderly Turkish population, and its frequency increases significantly with age. Females, diabetics, and hypertensives are more likely to have HFpEF, whereas CAD patients are more likely to have HFrEF