Depression and anxiety in epilepsy: the association with demographic and seizure-related variables

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Depression and anxiety are common psychiatric symptoms in patients with epilepsy, exerting a profound negative effect on health-related quality of life. Several issues, however, pertaining to their association with psychosocial, seizure-related and medication factors, remain controversial. Accordingly, the present study was designed to investigate the association of interictal mood disorders with various demographic and seizure-related variables in patients with newly-diagnosed and chronic epilepsy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We investigated 201 patients with epilepsy (51.2% males, mean age 33.2 ± 10.0 years, range 16–60) with a mean disease duration of 13.9 ± 9.5 years. Depression and anxiety were assessed in the interictal state with the Beck Depression Inventory, 21-item version (BDI-21) and the state and trait subscales of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S and STAI-T), respectively. The association of mood disorders with various variables was investigated with simple and multiple linear regression analyses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>High seizure frequency and symptomatic focal epilepsy (SFE) were independent determinants of depression, together accounting for 12.4% of the variation of the BDI-21. The STAI-S index was significantly associated with the type of epilepsy syndrome (SFE). Finally, high seizure frequency, SFE and female gender were independent determinants of trait anxiety accounting for 14.7% of the variation of the STAI-T.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results confirm the prevailing view that depression and anxiety are common psychological disorders in epileptics. It is additionally concluded that female gender, high seizure frequency and a symptomatic epilepsy syndrome are independent risk factors for the development of anxiety and/or depression.</p

An asymptomatic double aortic arch with separate right vertebral artery and left subclavian artery originating from Kommerell Diverticulum combined with congenital asplenia and absence of celiac trunk

This report describes the unique case of a completely patent Double Aortic Arch (DAA) combined with Kommerell Diverticulum (KD), absence of celiac trunk and congenital asplenia. The anatomical variants described were identified and assessed in a 51-year old female from a computed-tomography angiography (CTA) images with 3D-volume rendered reconstructions during her follow-up after hysterectomy. The reconstructed CTA images showed a DAA with the left common carotid artery stemming from the hypoplastic left aortic arch while  the left subclavian artery originated from a KD in the descending thoracic aorta. A symmetric arrangement of the aortic arch branches was demonstrated, comprising a full vascular ring. Since the patient had been completely asymptomatic and with no symptoms of compression of the esophagus or trachea, no surgical management was advised. The abdomen CTA imaging revealed absence of the celiac trunk with direct origin of the common hepatic and the left gastric artery from the superior mesenteric artery as well as asplenia. We presented a case of asymptomatic DAA of completely patent arches with  the right vertebral artery branching separately of and the left SCA originating from KD in the descending aorta. The term KD can be identified also in other arch anomalies than the one originally described. Since anatomical anomalies can be frequently combined, thorough imaging inspection with CTA of both thorax and abdomen is suggested

Correction to: Two years later: Is the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still having an impact on emergency surgery? An international cross-sectional survey among WSES members

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is still ongoing and a major challenge for health care services worldwide. In the first WSES COVID-19 emergency surgery survey, a strong negative impact on emergency surgery (ES) had been described already early in the pandemic situation. However, the knowledge is limited about current effects of the pandemic on patient flow through emergency rooms, daily routine and decision making in ES as well as their changes over time during the last two pandemic years. This second WSES COVID-19 emergency surgery survey investigates the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on ES during the course of the pandemic. Methods: A web survey had been distributed to medical specialists in ES during a four-week period from January 2022, investigating the impact of the pandemic on patients and septic diseases both requiring ES, structural problems due to the pandemic and time-to-intervention in ES routine. Results: 367 collaborators from 59 countries responded to the survey. The majority indicated that the pandemic still significantly impacts on treatment and outcome of surgical emergency patients (83.1% and 78.5%, respectively). As reasons, the collaborators reported decreased case load in ES (44.7%), but patients presenting with more prolonged and severe diseases, especially concerning perforated appendicitis (62.1%) and diverticulitis (57.5%). Otherwise, approximately 50% of the participants still observe a delay in time-to-intervention in ES compared with the situation before the pandemic. Relevant causes leading to enlarged time-to-intervention in ES during the pandemic are persistent problems with in-hospital logistics, lacks in medical staff as well as operating room and intensive care capacities during the pandemic. This leads not only to the need for triage or transferring of ES patients to other hospitals, reported by 64.0% and 48.8% of the collaborators, respectively, but also to paradigm shifts in treatment modalities to non-operative approaches reported by 67.3% of the participants, especially in uncomplicated appendicitis, cholecystitis and multiple-recurrent diverticulitis. Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still significantly impacts on care and outcome of patients in ES. Well-known problems with in-hospital logistics are not sufficiently resolved by now; however, medical staff shortages and reduced capacities have been dramatically aggravated over last two pandemic years

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Unusual Cases of Multiple Symmetrical Lipomatosis with Neurological Disorders

Multiple symmetrical lipomatosis (MSL) is a rare disorder of unknown etiology defined as the presence of multiple and symmetrical fatty accumulations, usually involving the upper trunk, neck and head. Frequently associated findings include diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, liver disease, hypothyroidism and polyneuropathy of unknown origin, but nevertheless, there are published reports of cognitive disorders in patients with MSL. We describe two unusual cases (38-year-old and 45-year-old Greek men) of MSL who presented with polyneuropathy and memory disorders. This is the first description of memory disorders in patients with MSL. We propose that Mini-Mental State Examination and assessment of cognitive functions should be performed for all patients with MSL. The underlying mechanism in our patients remains unknown, and this question should be the subject of a future study