Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment of Sensititre and Agar Disk Diffusion for Determining Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Bovine Clinical Mastitis Pathogens▿

Determining the accuracy and precision of a measuring instrument is pertinent in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This study was conducted to predict the diagnostic accuracy of the Sensititre MIC mastitis panel (Sensititre) and agar disk diffusion (ADD) method with reference to the manual broth microdilution test method for antimicrobial resistance profiling of Escherichia coli (n = 156), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 154), streptococcal (n = 116), and enterococcal (n = 31) bovine clinical mastitis isolates. The activities of ampicillin, ceftiofur, cephalothin, erythromycin, oxacillin, penicillin, the penicillin-novobiocin combination, pirlimycin, and tetracycline were tested against the isolates. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; intertest essential and categorical agreements were determined as well. Sensititre and the ADD method demonstrated moderate to highly accurate (71 to 99%) and moderate to perfect (71 to 100%) predictive accuracies for 74 and 76% of the isolate-antimicrobial MIC combinations, respectively. However, the diagnostic accuracy was low for S. aureus-ceftiofur/oxacillin combinations and other streptococcus-ampicillin combinations by either testing method. Essential agreement between Sensititre automatic MIC readings and MIC readings obtained by the broth microdilution test method was 87%. Essential agreement between Sensititre automatic and manual MIC reading methods was 97%. Furthermore, the ADD test method and Sensititre MIC method exhibited 92 and 91% categorical agreement (sensitive, intermediate, resistant) of results, respectively, compared with the reference method. However, both methods demonstrated lower agreement for E. coli-ampicillin/cephalothin combinations than for Gram-positive isolates. In conclusion, the Sensititre and ADD methods had moderate to high diagnostic accuracy and very good essential and categorical agreement for most udder pathogen-antimicrobial combinations and can be readily employed in veterinary diagnostic laboratories

Comparison of BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F Medium to VersaTREK Redox 1 Blood Culture Medium for Detection of Candida spp. in Seeded Blood Culture Specimens Containing Therapeutic Levels of Antifungal Agents▿

Recovery of Candida spp. using the BD Bactec FX blood culture (BC) system (Bactec Plus Aerobic/F medium) and the VersaTREK system (aerobic Redox medium) was evaluated using seeded BC bottles with and without the addition of commonly used antifungal agents. BC bottles (n = 1,442) were each inoculated with 10 ml human whole blood and 0.1 ml of suspensions of Candida spp., with or without antifungal agents. BC bottles were incubated in the corresponding system for a maximum of 5 days. In the absence of antifungal agents, Bactec FX recovered 97.4% of Candida spp., and VersaTREK recovered 99.1% (P = 0.154). With regard to length of time to detection (LTD) and overall recovery, both systems had various levels of effectiveness in recovering C. glabrata. In bottles containing antifungal agents, Bactec FX recovered 83.1% of isolates, whereas VersaTREK recovered 50.7% of Candida spp. (P < 0.001). For BC bottles without the addition of antifungal agents, the median LTD for VersaTREK was 2.2 h faster than that of Bactec FX (P < 0.001). In the presence of antifungal agents, the Bactec FX recovery time was significantly faster than that of VersaTREK (median difference of 10.8 h, P < 0.001). We conclude that both systems have comparable abilities to recover Candida spp. from seeded blood cultures in the absence of antifungal agents. In the presence of therapeutic levels of commonly used antifungal agents, the Bactec FX system demonstrated a significantly greater recovery of various Candida spp., as well as a shorter LTD