29 research outputs found
El legado olmeca: continuidad y cambio cultural en el sur de Veracruz. 33. ArqueologĂa
Alvarado Tezozomoc, Fernando
1975. CrĂłnica Mexicana, Comentario por Manuel Orozco y Berra, MĂ©xico, PorrĂșa (escrita originalmente hacia 1600).Aveleyra Arroyo de Anda, Luis
1964. Obras Selectas del Arte PrehispĂĄnico (Adquisiciones Recientes) Consejo para la PlaneaciĂłn e InstalaciĂłn del Museo Nacional de AntropologĂa, SecretarĂa de EducaciĂłn PĂșblica.Barlow, R., H.
1949. The Extent of the Empire of the Culhua Mexica, Ibero-Americana 28, University of California Press, Berkeley.Berdan, Frances F.
1987. âCotton in Aztec Mexico: Production, Distribution, and Usesâ, Estudios Mexicanos, 3 (2), pp. 235-262.Berdan, Frances F. y Patricia R. Anawalt (eds.)
1992. Codex Mendoza, 4 vol., Berkeley University of California Press.Beverido Pereau, Francisco
s.f. âEl Sitio ArqueolĂłgico âLos Cansecoââ, manuscrito inĂ©dito.Blake, Michael, Brian S. Chisholm, John E. Clark, Barbara
Voorhies y Michael W. Love 1992. âPrehistoric Subsistence in the Soconusco Regionâ, Current Anthropology, 33, pp. 83-94.Blom, Franz y Oliver LaFarge
1926. Tribes and Temples. A Record of the Expedition to Middle America conducted by the Tulane University of Louisiana in 1925, vol. 1, New Orleans, The Tulane University of Louisiana.Boone, Elizabeth H.
1992. âThe Founding of Tenochtitlan and the Reign Dates of the Mexica Rulers according to thirty-nine Central Mexican sourcesâ, en Frances F. Berdan y Patricia R. Anawalt (eds.), Codex Mendoza, vol. 1, Appendix A, Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 152-153.Borstein, Joshua
2001. âTripping over Colossal Heads: Settlement Patterns and Population Development in the Upland Olmec Heartlandâ, tesis doctoral inĂ©dita, Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State
University.Bove, Frederick, J.
1978. Laguna de los Cerros, An Olmec Central Place, Journal of New World Archaeology, nĂșm. 2(3), pp. 1-56.Cangas y Quiñones, Suero de
1984. âRelaciĂłn de la Provincia de Coatzacoalcos, Villa del EspĂritu Santoâ, en RenĂ© Acuña (ed.), Relaciones GeogrĂĄficas del siglo XVI: Antequera, vol. 1, MĂ©xico, UNAM, pp. 111-126.Carrasco, Pedro
1999. The Tenochca Empire of Ancient Mexico: The Triple Alliance of Tenochtitlan, Tetzcoco, and Tlacopan, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.Ceja Tenorio, Jorge F.
1997. âLos Sitios ArqueolĂłgicos del Suroeste de los Tuxtlasâ, en Sara LadrĂłn de Guevara y Sergio VĂĄsquez Z. (eds.), Memoria del Coloquio: ArqueologĂa del Centro y Sur de Veracruz, Xalapa, Universidad Veracruzana, pp. 177-196.Clark, John E.
1994. âAntecedentes de la cultura Olmecaâ, en John E. Clark (ed.), Los Olmecas en MesoamĂ©rica, MĂ©xico, Citibank, pp. 31-41.1995. âCraft Specialization and Olmec Civilizationâ, en Bernard Wailes (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 187-200.Cobean, Robert H.
1996. âLa Oaxaqueña, Veracruz: un Centro Olmeca Menor en su Contexto Regionalâ, en Alba Guadalupe Mastache, Jeffrey R. Parsons, Robert S. Santley y Mari Carmen Serra Puche (coords.),
ArqueologĂa Mesoamericana, Homenaje a William T. Sanders, vol. II, MĂ©xico, INAH y ArqueologĂa Mexicana, pp. 37-61.Coe, Michael D.
1968. Americaâs First Civilization, New York, The American Heritage Publishing Co.1989. The Olmec Heartland: evolution of ideology, en Robert J. harer and David C. Grove (eds.), Regional Perspectives on the Olmec, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 69-82.Coe, Michael D. y Richard A. Diehl
1980a. In the Land of the Olmec, vol. 1, The Archaeology of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Austin, University of Texas Press.1980b. In the Land of the Olmec, vol. 2, The People of the River, Austin, University of Texas Press.Cowgill, George
1988. âOnward and Upward with Collapseâ, en Norman Yoffe y George Cowgill (eds.), The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations, Tucson, University of Arizona Press, pp. 244-276.Curet, L. Antonio, Barbara L. Stark y Sergio VĂĄsquez Z.
1994. âPostclassic Changes in Veracruz, Mexicoâ,
Ancient Mesoamerica, 5, pp. 13-32.Cyphers, Ann
1994a. âOlmec Sculptureâ, National GeographicResearch and Exploration, 10(3), pp. 294-305.1994b. âSan Lorenzo Tenochtitlanâ, en John E.Clark, Los Olmecas en MesoamĂ©rica, MĂ©xico,Citibank, pp. 43-67.1997. âLa Gobernatura de San Lorenzo:Inferencias del Arte y PatrĂłn de Asentamientosâ,en Ann Cyphers (coord.), PoblaciĂłn,
Subsistencia yMedio Ambiente en San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, MĂ©xico,Instituto de Investigaciones AntropolĂłgicas,UNAM, pp.
227-243.Daneels, Annick
1997. âSettlement History in the Lower Cotaxtla
Basinâ, en Barbara L. Stark y Philip J. Arnold III
(eds.), Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient
Gulf Lowlands, Tucson, University of Arizona Press,
pp. 206-252.Diehl, Richard A.
1997. âInvestigaciones ArqueolĂłgicas en la Mojarra,
Veracruz, MĂ©xico: temporada 1995â, Informe TĂ©cnico
Final, MĂ©xico, Archivo de Monumentos
PrehispĂĄnicos, INAH.DomĂnguez Covarrubias, Elba
2001. âLa Arquitectura Monumental del periodo
ClĂĄsico en el sur de Veracruz: un enfoque
regionalâ, tesis de licenciatura, Universidad de las
Américas, Cholula, México.Drucker, Philip
1943. Ceramic Sequences at Tres Zapotes,
Veracruz, Mexico, Bureau of American Ethnology,
Bulletin 141, Washington, D.C., Smithsonian
Institution.
1952. Middle Tres Zapotes and the Preclassic
Ceramic Sequence, American Antiquity, 17, pp. 258-
260.Esquivias, Chantal
2002a. âOn the Edge of Empire?: Settlement
Changes in Chacalapan, Southern Veracruz,
Mexico, during the Classic and Postclassic
Periodsâ, tesis doctoral. Department of
Archaeology, Boston University, Massachusetts.2002b. âThe Eastern Boundaries of the Triple
Alliance on the Southern Gulf Coast of Mexico: a
Continuing Debateâ, Mexicon, vol. XXIV (3), pp,
50-54.Fedick, Scott L. (ed.)
1996. The Managed Mosaic: Ancient Maya Agriculture
and Resource Use, Salt Lake City, University of Utah
Press.Fernandez, Louise A. y Michael D. Coe
1980. âPetrographic Analysis of Rock Samples from
San Lorenzoâ, en Michael D. Coe y Richard A.
Diehl, In the Land of the Olmec, vol. 1, appendix 2,
Austin, University of Texas Press, pp. 397-404.Flannery, Kent V.
1968. âThe Olmec and the Valley of Oaxaca: a
model for inter-regional interaction in Formative
timesâ, en Elizabeth P. Benson (ed.), Dumbarton
Oaks Conference on the Olmec, Washington, D.C.,
Dumbarton Oaks, pp. 79-110.Flannery, Kent V. y Joyce Marcus
1994. âEarly Formative Pottery of the Valley of
Oaxacaâ, Memoirs of the University of Michigan
Museum of Anthropology, p. 27, Ann Arbor.Francis, Peter
1981. Volcanoes, Penguin Books, Great Britain,
Hazell Watson & Viney Ltd.Gerhard, Peter
1986. GeografĂa HistĂłrica de la Nueva España, 1519-
1821, MĂ©xico, Instituto de Investigaciones
HistĂłricas, UNAM.Gillespie, Susan D.
1994. âLlano del JĂcaroâ, Ancient Mesoamerica, 5(2),
pp. 231-242.GĂłmez-Pompa, Arturo
1973. âEcology of the Vegetation of Veracruzâ, en
Alan Graham (ed.), Vegetation and Vegetational History
of Northern Latin America, Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp.
73-148.GĂłmez Rueda, Hernando
1989. âNuevas exploraciones en la regiĂłn Olmeca:
una aproximaciĂłn a los patrones de asentamientoâ,
en Marta Carmona (coord.), El PreclĂĄsico o
Formativo: Avances y Perspectivas, MĂ©xico, Museo
Nacional de AntropologĂa e Historia/INAH,
pp. 91-100.1991. âTerritorios y Asentamientos en la RegiĂłn
Olmeca: hacia un modelo de distribuciĂłn de
poblaciĂłnâ, Trace, 20, pp. 60-67.
1996. Las Limas, Veracruz, y Otros Asentamientos
PrehispĂĄnicos de la RegiĂłn olmeca, MĂ©xico, INAH
(CientĂfica, 324).GonzĂĄlez JĂĄcome, Alba
1988. PoblaciĂłn, ambiente y economĂa en Veracruz Central
durante la Colonia, Fondo de las Naciones Unidas
para actividades en material de poblaciĂłn, MĂ©xico,
Universidad Iberoamericana.GonzĂĄlez Lauck, Rebecca B.
1995. âLa antigua ciudad en La Venta, Tabascoâ,
en John E. Clark (ed.), Los Olmecas en Mesoamérica,
MĂ©xico, Citibank, pp. 93-112.
1996. âLa Venta: An Olmec Capitalâ, en Elizabeth
P. Benson y Beatriz de la Fuente (eds.), Olmec Art
of Ancient Mexico, Washington, D.C., National
Gallery of Art, pp. 73-82.GonzĂĄlez de CosĂo, Francisco (ed.)
1952. El Libro de las Tasaciones de Pueblos de la Nueva
España, Siglo XVI, México, Archivo General de la
NaciĂłn.Grove, David C.
1994. âLa Isla, Veracruz, 1991: A Preliminary
Report with Comments on the Olmec Uplandsâ,
Ancient Mesoamerica, 5(2), pp. 223-230.
1997. âOlmec Archaeology: Half a Century of
Research and Its Accomplishmentsâ, Journal of
World Prehistory, 11(1), pp. 52-101.Grove, David C., Susan D. Gillespie, Ponciano Ortiz
Ceballos y Michael Hayton
1993. âFive Olmec Monuments from the Laguna
de los Cerros Hinterlandâ, Mexican (XV) 5, pp. 91-
95.Heizer, Robert F., Philip Drucker y John A. Graham
1968. âInvestigaciones de 1967 y 1968 en la
Ventaâ, BoletĂn del Instituto Nacional de AntropologĂa e
Historia, 33, pp. 21-28.âąINEGI
1983. Carta GeolĂłgica, Coatzacoalcos, E15-1-4,
MĂ©xico, DirecciĂłn General de GeografĂa (SPP).Joralemon, Peter D.
1971. A Study of Olmec Iconographyâ, Studies in
Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 7, Dumbarton
Oaks, Washington, DC.Justeson, John S. y Terrence Kaufman
1993. âA decipherment of Epi-Olmec hieroglyphic
writingâ Science, 259, pp. 1703-1711.Killion, Thomas W. (ed.)
1992. Gardens of Prehistory: The Archaeology of
Settlement Agriculture in Greater Mesoamerica,
Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press.Kruger, Robert P.
1996. âAn Archaeological Survey in the Region of the
Olmecâ, disertaciĂłn doctoral inĂ©dita, University of
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Ann Arbor, University
Microfilms.Lee, Thomas A. Jr.
1989. âChiapas and the Olmecâ, en Robert J.
Sharer y David C. Grove (eds.), Regional Perspectives
on the Olmec, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, pp. 198-226.Lowe, Gareth W.
1989. âThe heartland Olmec: evolution of material
cultureâ, en Robert J. Sharer y David C. Grove
(eds.), Regional Perspectives on the Olmec, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-67.MedellĂn Zenil, Alfonso
1960a. âNopiloa: Un Sitio ClĂĄsico del Veracruz
Centralâ, La Palabra y el Hombre, 13, pp. 37-48.
1960b. âMonolitos InĂ©ditos Olmecasâ, La Palabra y
el Hombre, 16, pp. 75-97.
1983. Obras Maestras del Museo de Xalapa, MĂ©xico,
Miguel Galas, S.A.Montmollin, Olivier de
1988. âSettlement Survey in the Rosario Valley,
Chiapas, Mexicoâ, Papers of the New World
Archaeological Foundation, 57, Provo, Utah.Nelson, Stephen A. y Erika Gonzalez-Caver
1992. âGeology and K-Ar dating of the Tuxtla
Volcanic Field, Veracruz, Mexicoâ, Bulletin of
Volcanology, 55, pp. 85-96.Nicholson, Henry B.
1971. âThe Iconography of Classic Central
Veracruz Ceramic Sculpturesâ, en Ancient Art of
Veracruz: An Exhibit Sponsored by the Ethnic Arts
Council of Los Angeles at the Los Angeles County Museum
of Natural History, February 23-June 13, 1971, pp.
13-17.1972. âThe Cult of Xipe-Totec in Mesoamericaâ,
en Jaime Litvak King y NoemĂ Castillo Tejero
(eds.), Religión en Mesoamérica, México, Sociedad
Mexicana de AntropologĂa, pp. 213-218A.Ortiz Ceballos, Ponciano
1975. âLa CerĂĄmica de Los Tuxtlasâ, tesis de
licenciatura inédita, Universidad Veracruzana,
Xalapa.Ortiz Ceballos, Ponciano y Robert S. Santley
1989. âLa CerĂĄmica de Matacapanâ, manuscrito
inédito en los archivos del Centro Regional INAHVeracruz,
Veracruz.Palerm, Ăngel y Eric R. Wolf
1957. âEcological potential and cultural
development in Mesoamericaâ, en Lawrence
Krader y Angel Palerm (eds.), Studies in Human
Ecology, Washington, D.C., Anthropological Society
of Washington and General Secretariat of the
Organization of American States, pp. 1-37.Paso y Troncoso, Francisco del
1905. Papeles de la Nueva España. Segunda Serie
GeografĂa y EstadĂstica, t. V, Relaciones GeogrĂĄficas de la
DiĂłcesis de Tlaxcala, Madrid, Estudio TipogrĂĄfico
Sucesores de Rivadeneyra.Pires-Ferreira, Jane W.
1976. âShell and Iron-Ore Mirror Exchange in
Formative Mesoamerica, with Comments on other
Commoditiesâ, en Kent V. Flannery (ed.), The
Early Mesoamerican Village, New York, Academic
Press, pp. 311-328.Pool, Christopher A.
1995. âLa cerĂĄmica del ClĂĄsico tardĂo y el
PosclĂĄsico en la Sierra de los Tuxtlasâ, ArqueologĂa,
13-14, pp. 37-48.1997. âProyecto ArqueolĂłgico Tres Zapotesâ, en
Sara LadrĂłn de Guevara y Sergio VĂĄsquez Z.
(eds.), Memoria del Coloquio: ArqueologĂa del Centro y
Sur de Veracruz, Xalapa, Universidad Veracruzana,
pp. 169-176.2000. âFrom Olmec to Epi-Olmec at Tres Zapotes,
Veracruz, Mexicoâ, en John E. Clark y Mary E. Pye
(eds.), Olmec Art and Archaeology in Mesoamerica,
Studies in the History of Art 58, Center for Advanced
Study in the Visual Arts, Symposium Papers XXXV,
National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., New
Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 137-154.Pool, Christopher A. y Georgia M. Britt
2000. âA Ceramic Perspective on the Formative to
Classic Transition in Southern Veracruz, Mexicoâ,
Latin American Antiquity, 11(2), pp. 139-161.Renfrew, Colin
1986. âIntroduction: Peer-Polity Interaction and
Socio-Political Changeâ, en Colin Renfrew y John
F. Cherry (eds.), Peer Polity Interaction and
Sociopolitical Change, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press, pp. 115-126.Rust, William F. y Barbara W. Leyden
1994. âEvidence of Maize Use at Early and Middle
Classic La Venta Olmec Sitesâ, en Sissel
Johannessen y Christine A. Hastorf (eds.), Corn
and Culture in the Prehistoric New World, Boulder,
Colorado, Westview Press, pp. 181-202.Rust, William F. y Robert J. Sharer
1988. âOlmec Settlement Data from La Venta,
Mexicoâ, Science, 242, pp. 102-104.Sanders, William T.
1971. âCultural Ecology and Settlement Patterns
of the Gulf Coastâ, en Gordon F. Ekholm e Ignacio
Bernal (eds.), Archaeology of Northern Mesoamerica,
Part 2. Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 11,
R. Wauchope, ed. general, Austin, University of
Texas Press, pp. 543-557.Santley, Robert S.
1983. âObsidian Trade and Teotihuacan Influence
in Mesoamericaâ, en Arthur G. Miller (ed.),
Highland-Lowland Interaction in Mesoamerica:
Interdisciplinary Approaches, Washington, D.C.,
Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and
Collections, pp. 69-124.1989. âObsidian Working, Long-distance
Exchange, and the Teotihuacan Presence on the
South Gulf Coastâ, en Richard A. Diehl y Janet C.
Berlo (eds.), Mesoamerica after the Decline of
Teotihuacan, A.D. 700-900, Washington, D.C.,
Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and
Collections, pp. 131-151.1992. âA Consideration of the Olmec Phenomenon
in the Tuxtlas: Early Formative Settlement
Pattern, Land Use, and Refuse Disposal at
Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexicoâ, en Thomas W.
Killion (ed.), Gardens of Prehistory: The Archaeology of
Settlement Agriculture in Greater Mesoamerica,
Tuscaloosa and London, The University of
Alabama Press, pp. 150-183.1994. âSpecialized Commodity Production in and
around Matacapan: Testing the Goodness of Fit Of
the Regal-Ritual and Administrative Modelsâ, en
Glenn M. Schwartz y Steven E. Falconer (eds.),
Archaeological Views from the Countryside: Village
Communities in Early Complex Societies, Washington,
D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 91-108.Santley, Robert S. y Philip J. Arnold III
1996. âPrehispanic Settlement Patterns in the
Tuxtlas Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexicoâ,
Journal of Field Archaeology, 23, pp. 225-249.Santley, Robert S., Philip J. Arnold III y Thomas P. Barrett
1997. âFormative Period Settlement Patterns in
the Tuxtla Mountainsâ, en Barbara L. Stark y
Philip J. Arnold III (eds.), Olmec to Aztec: Settlement
Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands,Tucson,
University of Arizona Press, pp. 174-205.Scholes, France V. y Ralph L. Roys
1968. The Maya Chontal Indians of Acalan-Tichel: A
Contribution to the History and Ethnography of the
Yucatan Peninsula, Norman, University of Oklahoma
Press.Scholes, France V. y Dave Warren
1965. âThe Olmec Region at Spanish Contactâ, en
Gordon R. Willey (ed.), Archaeology of Southern
Mesoamerica, Part 2. Handbook of Middle American
Indians, vol. 3, Robert Wauchope, ed. general,
Austin, University of Texas Press, pp. 776-787.Seler, Eduard
1993. âThe Antiquities of Castillo de Teayoâ, en
Collected Works in Mesoamerican Linguistics and
Archaeology, traducción al inglés del Gesammelte
Abhandlungen Zur Amerikanischen Sprach-Und
Alterthumskunde (publicado originalmente en 1904)
California, Labyrinthos.Sharer, Robert J. y David C. Grove (eds.)
1989. Regional Perspectives on the Olmec, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.Siemens, Alfred H.
1998. A Favored Place: San Juan River Wetlands,
Central Veracruz, A.D. 500 to the Present, Austin,
University of Texas Press.Sisson, Edward B.
1976. âSurvey and Excavation in the Northwestern
Chontalpa, Tabasco, Mexicoâ, disertaciĂłn Doctoral
inédita, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Massachusetts.1983. âLa Venta: ubicaciĂłn estratĂ©gica de un sitio
Olmecaâ, MesoamĂ©rica, pp. 195-202.Smith, Michael E.
1992. âArchaeological research at Aztec period
rural sites in Morelos, Mexicoâ, Memoirs in Latin
American Archaeology, (4), vol. 1, Pittsburgh,
University of Pittsburgh.
1997. âLife in the provinces of the Aztec Empireâ,
Scientific American, september, pp, 76-83.Stark, Barbara L.
1978. âAn Ethnohistoric Model for Native
Economy and Settlement Patterns in Southern
Veracruz, Mexicoâ, en Barbara Voorhies (ed.),
Prehistoric Coastal Adaptations, The Economy and
Ecology of Maritime Middle America, New York,
Academic Press, pp. 211-238.1989. âPatarata Pottery: Classic Period Ceramics of
the South-central Gulf Coast, Veracruz, Mexicoâ,
Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona,
nĂșm. 51, Tucson, University of Arizona Press.1990. âThe Gulf Coast and the Central Highlands
of Mexico: Alternative Models for Interactionâ, en
Barry L. Isaac (ed.), Research in Economic
Anthropology, vol. 12, Greenwich, Connecticut, JAI
Press, pp. 243-285.1997. âGulf Lowland Ceramic Styles and Political
Geography in Ancient Veracruzâ, en Barbara L.
Stark y Philip J. Arnold III (eds.), Olmec to Aztec:
Settlement Patterns in the ancient Gulf Lowlands,
Tucson, The University of Arizona Press,
pp. 278-309.1999. âFormal Architectural Complexes in South-
Central Veracruz, Mexico: A Capital Zone?â,
Journal of Field Archaeology, 26 (2), pp. 197-225.Stark, Barbara L. y L. Antonio Curet
1994. The Development of Classic-Period
Mixtequilla In South-Central Veracruz, Mexico,
Ancient Mesoamerica, 5, pp. 267-287.Stark, Barbara L., Lynette Heller y Michael A. Ohnersorgen
1998. People with cloth: Mesoamerican economic
change from the perspective of cotton in southcentral
Veracruz, Latin American Antiquity, 9 (1),
pp. 7-36.Stuart, George E.
1993. âNew Light on the Olmecâ, National
Geographic Magazine, 184(5), pp. 88-115.Symonds, Stacey C. y Roberto LunagĂłmez
1997. âSettlement System and Population
Development at San Lorenzo, Mexicoâ, en
Barbara L. Stark y Philip J. Arnold III (eds.),
Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the ancient Gulf
Lowlands, Tucson: The University of Arizona
Press, pp. 144-173.Symonds, Stacey C., Ann Cyphers y Roberto LunagĂłmez
2002. Asentamiento PrehispĂĄnico en San Lorenzo
Tenochtitlan, Instituto de Investigaciones
AntropolĂłgicas, UNAM.Umberger, Emily
1996. âAztec Presence and Material Remains in
the Outer Provincesâ, en Frances F. Berdan,
Richard E. Blanton, Elizabeth H. Boone, Mary
G. Hodge, Michael E. Smith y Emily Umberger,
Aztec Imperial Strategies, Washington, D.C.,
Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and
Collection, pp. 151-180.Umberger, Emily y Cecilia Klein
1993. âAztec Art and Imperial Expansionâ, en Don
S. Rice (ed.), Latin American Horizons. A Symposium
at Dumbarton Oaks, 1986, Washington, D.C.,
Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection,
pp. 295-336.Valenzuela, Juan
1945. âLa Segunda Temporada de Exploraciones
en la regiĂłn de los Tuxtlas, Estado de Veracruzâ,
Anales del Instituto Nacional de AntropologĂa e Historia,
MĂ©xico, Stylo.VizcaĂno, Antonio
1988. The Xalapa Museum of Anthropology, MĂ©xico,
Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, MĂ©xico, San
Ăngel Ediciones, S.A.Von Nagy, Christopher
1997. âThe Geoarchaeology of Settlement in the
Grijalva Deltaâ, en Barbara L. Stark y Philip J.
Arnold III (eds.), Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns
in the ancient Gulf Lowlands, Tucson, The University
of Arizona Press, pp. 253-277.Wauchope, Robert
1962. Lost Tribes and Sunken Continents, Chicago,
University of Chicago Press.West, Robert C., Norbert P. Psuty y Bruce G. Thom
1969. The Tabasco Lowlands of Southeastern Mexico,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press.Weyerstall, Albert
1932. âSome Observations on Indian Mounds,
Idols and Pottery in the Lower Papaloapam Basin,
State of Veracruz, Mexicoâ, Middle American
Research Series, Publication nĂșm. 4, New Orleans,
Tulane University.Wilkerson, Jeffrey K.
1981. âThe Northern Olmec and the Pre-Olmec
Frontier on the Gulf Coastâ, en Elizabeth P.
Benson (ed.), The Olmec and Their Neighbors: Essays
in Memory of Matthew W. Stirling, Washington, D.C.,
Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and
Collections, pp. 181-194.Williams, Howel y Robert F. Heizer
1965. âSources of Rocks Used in Olmec
Monumentsâ, Contributions of the University of
California Archaeological Research Facility, nĂșm. 1,
Berkeley, University of California.Yoffee, Norman y George Cowgill
1988. The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations, Tucson, University of Arizona Press
Final Field Report of the Matacapan Archaeological Project: The 1982 Season
In 1982 we initiated a program of archaeological fieldwork at the site of Matacapan, a large Classic Period urban center in the Tuxtlas Region of the South Gulf Coast of Veracruz, Mexico (see Figure 1). Our working hypothesis was that Matacapan
contained an encl ave of merchants from the the city of Teotihuacan in Central Mexico. That research had two principal objectives: (1) to define the structure of the Teotihuacan barrio, that portion of Matacapan where past research indicated
that Teotihuacan materials were most highly concentrated; and (2) to establish the context of the barrio within the urban center of Matacapan. The following is a report of that research. Our presentation is divided into several parts. First, we discuss a general model describing Teotihuacan influence throughout Mesoamerica. We then summarize the methods we employed during surface survey and excavation, review the settlement history of
the site, as defined by the survey, and discuss the evidence we retrieved from a series of excavations conducted in the
Teotihuacan barrio. Next, we present an analysis of the obsidian assemblage, outlining major sources of variability across space and through time. Obsidian, we believe, was an important commodity traded to the Tuxtlas by Teotihuacan. We close with a prospectus for future research
A role for long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase-4 (ACSL4) in diet-induced phospholipid remodeling and obesity-associated adipocyte dysfunction
Objective: Regulation of fatty acid (FA) metabolism is central to adipocyte dysfunction during diet-induced obesity (DIO). Long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase-4 (ACSL4) has been hypothesized to modulate the metabolic fates of polyunsaturated FA (PUFA), including arachidonic acid (AA), but the in vivo actions of ACSL4 are unknown. The purpose of our studies was to determine the in vivo role of adipocyte ACSL4 in regulating obesity-associated adipocyte dysfunction. Methods: We developed a novel mouse model with adipocyte-specific ablation of ACSL4 (Ad-KO) using loxP Cre recombinase technology. Metabolic phenotyping of Ad-KO mice relative to their floxed littermates (ACSL4floxed) was performed, including body weight and body composition over time; insulin and glucose tolerance tests; and energy expenditure, activity, and food intake in metabolic cages. Adipocytes were isolated for ex vivo adipocyte oxygen consumption by Clark electrode and lipidomics analysis. In vitro adipocyte analysis including oxygen consumption by Seahorse and real-time PCR analysis were performed to confirm our in vivo findings. Results: Ad-KO mice were protected against DIO, adipocyte death, and metabolic dysfunction. Adipocytes from Ad-KO mice fed high-fat diet (HFD) had reduced incorporation of AA into phospholipids (PL), free AA, and levels of the AA lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE). Additionally, adipocytes from Ad-KO mice fed HFD had reduced p53 activation and increased adipocyte oxygen consumption (OCR), which we demonstrated are direct effects of 4-HNE on adipocytes in vitro. Conclusion: These studies are the first to elucidate ACSL4's in vivo actions to regulate the incorporation of AA into PL and downstream effects on DIO-associated adipocyte dysfunction. By reducing the incorporation of AA into PL and free fatty acid pools in adipocytes, Ad-KO mice were significantly protected against HFD-induced increases in adipose and liver fat accumulation, adipocyte death, gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) inflammation, and insulin resistance (IR). Additionally, deficiency of adipocyte ACSL4 expression in mice fed a HFD resulted in increased gWAT adipocyte OCR and whole body energy expenditure (EE). Keywords: Adipocytes, Fatty acid metabolism, Obesity, Arachidonic acid, Polyunsaturated fatty aci
Recommended from our members
A role for long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase-4 (ACSL4) in diet-induced phospholipid remodeling and obesity-associated adipocyte dysfunction.
ObjectiveRegulation of fatty acid (FA) metabolism is central to adipocyte dysfunction during diet-induced obesity (DIO). Long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase-4 (ACSL4) has been hypothesized to modulate the metabolic fates of polyunsaturated FA (PUFA), including arachidonic acid (AA), but the in vivo actions of ACSL4 are unknown. The purpose of our studies was to determine the in vivo role of adipocyte ACSL4 in regulating obesity-associated adipocyte dysfunction.MethodsWe developed a novel mouse model with adipocyte-specific ablation of ACSL4 (Ad-KO) using loxP Cre recombinase technology. Metabolic phenotyping of Ad-KO mice relative to their floxed littermates (ACSL4floxed) was performed, including body weight and body composition over time; insulin and glucose tolerance tests; and energy expenditure, activity, and food intake in metabolic cages. Adipocytes were isolated for ex vivo adipocyte oxygen consumption by Clark electrode and lipidomics analysis. In vitro adipocyte analysis including oxygen consumption by Seahorse and real-time PCR analysis were performed to confirm our in vivo findings.ResultsAd-KO mice were protected against DIO, adipocyte death, and metabolic dysfunction. Adipocytes from Ad-KO mice fed high-fat diet (HFD) had reduced incorporation of AA into phospholipids (PL), free AA, and levels of the AA lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE). Additionally, adipocytes from Ad-KO mice fed HFD had reduced p53 activation and increased adipocyte oxygen consumption (OCR), which we demonstrated are direct effects of 4-HNE on adipocytes in vitro.ConclusionThese studies are the first to elucidate ACSL4's in vivo actions to regulate the incorporation of AA into PL and downstream effects on DIO-associated adipocyte dysfunction. By reducing the incorporation of AA into PL and free fatty acid pools in adipocytes, Ad-KO mice were significantly protected against HFD-induced increases in adipose and liver fat accumulation, adipocyte death, gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) inflammation, and insulin resistance (IR). Additionally, deficiency of adipocyte ACSL4 expression in mice fed a HFD resulted in increased gWAT adipocyte OCR and whole body energy expenditure (EE)
Preparing facilitators for experiential education: The role of intentionality and intuition
A facilitator is considered to act intentionally when they are deliberate about what they are doing and can provide rationales for their actions. The same facilitator is said to practice intuitively when they are not able to articulate a clear rationale for their actions, yet they are still able to facilitate effectively. A review of the facilitation literature and the experiential education literature demonstrates the importance of both intentionality and intuitive processes when facilitating. However, rather than presenting these important aspects of facilitation dichotomously, this paper describes the need for both of them to be present in facilitator education, albeit in tension with each other. The findings of a naturalistic inquiry into the theories and practices of seven facilitator educators are presented. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and participant observation with the facilitator educators, and qualitative surveys with a sample of their course graduates. The study confirmed the importance of an emphasis on both intentionality and intuition in the preparation of facilitators for experiential education