13 research outputs found

    Assessment of Margins in Transoral Laser and Robotic Surgery

    No full text
    The growing practice of endoscopic surgery has changed the therapeutic management of selected head and neck cancers. Although a negative surgical margin in resection of neoplasm is the most important surgical principle in oncologic surgery, controversies exist regarding assessment and interpretation of the status of margin resection. The aim of this review was to summarize the literature considering the assessment and feasibility of negative margins in transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Free margin status is being approached differently in vocal cord cancer (1–2 mm) compared with other sites in the upper aerodigestive tract (2–5 mm). Exposure, orientation of the pathological specimen, and co-operation with the pathologist are crucial principles needed to be followed in transoral surgery. Piecemeal resection to better expose deep tumor involvement and biopsies taken from surgical margins surrounding site of resection can improve margin assessment. High rates of negative surgical margins can be achieved with TLM and TORS. Adjuvant treatment decision should take into consideration also the surgeon’s judgment with regard to the completeness of tumor resection

    The Origin of regional failure in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with pathologically negative neck metastases

    No full text
    Importance: Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) is a common malignant tumor worldwide. OBJECTIVE To determine if regional failure in patients with OSCC and pathologically negative neck nodes (pN-) is due to an incomplete sampling procedure during surgery. Design, setting, and participants: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 2258 patients from 11 cancer centers worldwide who underwent neck dissection for OSCC (1990-2011) and who were pN-. Of those, 345 had clinical evidence of nodal metastases (cN+) on radiologic workup. The neck specimens were available for reanalysis in 193 patients. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier graphs and analyzed by multivariable analysis. Main outcomes and measures: Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Resectioning and analysis of the neck dissection specimens in the cN+/pN-subgroup revealed false-negative results in 29 (15%) of 193 patients. The negative predictive value of the initial pathologic examination was 85%. The 5-year OS and DSS in the cN-/pN-group were 77.6% and 87.2%, respectively. The 5-year OS and DSS of the cN+/pN- group were 62.6% and 78.5%, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, cN+ classification was significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95%CI, 1.1-3.8; P = .03) and poor DSS (HR, 1.46; 95%CI, 1.1-4.1; P = .04). A cN+ classification was associated with lower DFS (66.3%vs 76.2%; P = .05) and lower regional recurrence-free survival (68.6%vs 78.8%; P = .02) but not with local (P = .20) or distant recurrence (P = .80). Conclusions and relevance: Pathologic staging underestimates the incidence of nodal metastases in cN+ disease. After correction for pathologically missed nodal metastases, radiologic evidence of neck nodes is an independent predictor of outcome, suggesting that traditional sampling during surgery might miss metastases, and this fact might explain the origin of treatment failure in these patients.8 page(s

    The Role of Adjuvant Treatment in Early-Stage Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An International Collaborative Study

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Up to half of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) have stage I to II disease. When adequate resection is attained, no further treatment is needed; however, re-resection or radiotherapy may be indicated for patients with positive or close margins. This multicenter study evaluated the outcomes and role of adjuvant treatment in patients with stage I to II OCSCC.METHODS: Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, local-free survival, and disease-free survival rates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.RESULTS: Of 1257 patients with T1-2N0M0 disease, 33 (2.6%) had positive margins, and 205 (16.3%) had close margins. The 5-year OS rate was 80% for patients with clear margins, 52% for patients with close margins, and 63% for patients with positive margins (P2-fold increase in the risk of recurrence (P<.0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that adjuvant treatment significantly improved the outcomes of patients with close/positive margins (P=.002 to .03).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage I to II OCSCC and positive/close margins have poor long-term outcomes. For this population, adjuvant treatment may be associated with improved survival. (C) 2018 American Cancer Society
    corecore