181 research outputs found

    Impact: Collected Essays on the Threat of Economic Inequality.

    Get PDF
    On April 17, 2015, the Impact Center for Public Interest Law at New York Law School hosted a symposium entitled Tackling Economic Inequality to bring together policymakers, advocates, academics, and community members to explore some of the causes and solutions to this growing problem. The essays collected in this volume, written by leading social justice advocates, are published to stimulate continued conversation on this critically important issue.https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/racial_justice_project/1004/thumbnail.jp

    Impact: Collected Essays on the Threat of Economic Inequality.

    Get PDF
    On April 17, 2015, the Impact Center for Public Interest Law at New York Law School hosted a symposium entitled Tackling Economic Inequality to bring together policymakers, advocates, academics, and community members to explore some of the causes and solutions to this growing problem. The essays collected in this volume, written by leading social justice advocates, are published to stimulate continued conversation on this critically important issue.https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/racial_justice_project/1004/thumbnail.jp

    Legal Empowerment and Horizontal Inequalities after Conflict

    Get PDF
    This article explores whether legal empowerment can address horizontal inequalities in post-conflict settings, and, if so, how. It argues that legal empowerment has modest potential to reduce these inequalities. Nevertheless, there are risks that legal empowerment might contribute to a strengthening of group identities, reduction of social cohesion, and, in the worst case, triggering of conflict. It looks at how two legal empowerment programmes in Liberia navigated the tensions between equity and peace

    Re-evaluating post-conviction disclosure: A case for ‘better late than never’

    Get PDF
    This article contends that the legal position regarding the scope of post-conviction disclosure duties ought to be revisited. First, it will discuss the leading Supreme Court case on this issue Nunn v Chief Constable of Suffolk Police and will argue that the decision warrants reconsideration as it is grounded in flawed assumptions that cannot be sustained. Second, it will make the case for strengthening the rights of defendants to access material post-trial, particularly in a climate of austerity where more defendants are relying on university projects and other charitable organisations to assist them in appealing against their conviction. Third, the article will suggest that consideration is given to proposals in an ‘Open Justice Charter’ to promote fairness and transparency in the criminal justice system and, furthermore, will suggest that an independent disclosure agency ought to be established to deal with criminal disclosure issues pre and post-trial
    corecore