The History of Preconception Care: Evolving Guidelines and Standards

This article explores the history of the preconception movement in the United States and the current status of professional practice guidelines and standards. Professionals with varying backgrounds (nurses, nurse practitioners, family practice physicians, pediatricians, nurse midwives, obstetricians/gynecologists) are in a position to provide preconception health services; standards and guidelines for numerous professional organizations, therefore, are explored. The professional nursing organization with the most highly developed preconception health standards is the American Academy of Nurse Midwives (ACNM); for physicians, it is the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). These guidelines and standards are discussed in detail

Gefitinib and Methotrexate to Treat Ectopic Pregnancies with a Pre-Treatment Serum hCG 1000–10,000 IU/L: Phase II Open Label, Single Arm Multi-Centre Trial

This work was supported by an NHMRC Grant (#1008276) to ST, TJ and EW, and an MRC Centenary Award (G0802808) to AH. The funders had no role study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

A Critical Appraisal of Guidelines for Antenatal Care: Components of Care and Priorities in Prenatal Education

There are a variety of published prenatal care (PNC) guidelines that claim a scientific basis for the information included. Four sets of PNC guidelines published between 2005 and 2009 were examined and critiqued. The recommendations for assessment procedures, laboratory testing, and education/counseling topics were analyzed within and between these guidelines. The PNC components were synthesized to provide an organized, comprehensive appendix that can guide providers of antepartum care. The appendix may be used to locate which guidelines addressed which topics to assist practitioners to identify evidence sources. The suggested timing for introducing and reinforcing specific topics is also presented in the appendix. Although education is often assumed to be a vital component of PNC, it was inconsistently included in the guidelines that were reviewed. Even when education was included, important detail was lacking. Addressing each woman\u27s needs as the first priority was suggested historically and remains relevant in current practice to systematically provide care while maintaining the woman as the central player. More attention to gaps in current research is important for the development of comprehensive prenatal guidelines that contribute effectively to the long‐term health and well‐being of women, families, and their communities

Developing criteria for Cesarean Section using the RAND appropriateness method

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and a rapid increase has been observed in Iran. Disagreement exists between clinicians about when to use cesarean section. We aimed to identify the appropriateness criteria for the use of cesarean section in Iran.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>A consensus development study using a modified version of the RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM). We generated scenarios from valid clinical guidelines and expert opinions. A panel of experts participated in consensus development: first round via mail (12 members), second round face-to-face (9 members). We followed the RAM recommendations for the development of the scenario lists, rating scales, and statistical analyses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>294 scenarios relevant to cesarean section were identified. 191 scenarios were considered appropriate, of which 125 scenarios were agreed upon. The panel found cesarean inappropriate for 21% of scenarios, and 'equivocal' for 14% of scenarios.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>RAM is useful for identifying stakeholder views in settings with limited resources. The participants' views on appropriateness of certain indications differed with available evidence. A large number of scenarios without agreement may partly explain why it has been difficult to curb the growth in cesarean section rate.</p

Computerized data-driven interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocogram: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring remains a significant clinical challenge. We propose using cohorts of routinely collected data. We aim to combine non-classical (data-driven) and classical cardiotocography features with clinical features into a system (OxSys), which generates automated alarms for the fetus at risk of intrapartum hypoxia. We hypothesize that OxSys can outperform clinical diagnosis of "fetal distress", when optimized and tested over large retrospective data sets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a cohort of 22 790 women in labor (≥36 weeks of gestation). Paired umbilical blood analyses were available. Perinatal outcomes were defined by objective criteria (normal; severe, moderate or mild compromise). We used the data retrospectively to develop a prototype of OxSys, by relating its alarms to perinatal outcome, and comparing its performance against standards achieved by bedside diagnosis. RESULTS: OxSys1.5 triggers an alarm if the initial trace is nonreactive or the decelerative capacity (a nonclassical cardiotocography feature), exceeds a threshold, adjusted for preeclampsia and thick meconium. There were 187 newborns with severe, 613 with moderate and 3197 with mild compromise; and 18 793 with normal outcome. OxSys1.5 increased the sensitivity for compromise detection: 43.3% vs. 38.0% for severe (p = 0.3) and 36.1% vs. 31.0% for moderate (p = 0.06); and reduced the false-positive rate (14.4% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Large historic cohorts can be used to develop and optimize computerized cardiotocography monitoring, combining clinical and cardiotocography risk factors. Our simple prototype has demonstrated the principle of using such data to trigger alarms, and compares well with clinical judgment