14 research outputs found
MetsÀ- ja vesiekosysteemien yhteys : puuston sitoman hiilen kulkeutuminen vesistöihin
The carbon cycle and hydrological cycle are closely connected combining terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. This study focuses on important processes of the carbon cycle at plant, ecosystem and landscape levels. Carbon allocation was investigated at the seedling scale with microcosm experiments, and carbon fluxes, especially the lateral carbon fluxes from soil to adjacent water bodies, at field sites.
The carbon allocation pattern differed between typical boreal tree species, but an increase in temperature did not change the net growth of seedlings, because photosynthesis and respiration increase compensated for each other. A higher temperature did not change the species composition of ectomychorrhizal fungi, but spesific species can alter carbon allocation.
This study demonstrates that CO2 efflux from the soil is largely controlled by biological processes (i.e. the rate of photosynthesis and decomposition), whereas aquatic CO2 emissions are mostly affected by physical forces (i.e. convection controlling stratification). Lateral carbon flux from soil to the lake and brook was regulated by hydrology and closely connected to the riparian zone. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in the brook were controlled by precipitation and DOC concentrations in the soil, and rain events increased CO2 concentrations both in the riparian zone and in the brook. The large water volume of the lake buffered it against changes.
It is of crucial importance to consider terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems together, since lakes and rivers act as significant pathways for terrestrially bound carbon back to the atmosphere. In the natural old-growth forest of this study, lateral carbon transport accounted for 50% and brook discharge for 19% of the terrestrial net ecosystem exchange. Thus, exclusion of the lateral carbon flux would lead to overestimation of the role of the forest as a carbon sink. However, the role of lateral transport can be less important in younger or managed forests, which are faster growing.MetsÀt, suot ja jÀrvet ovat tyypillisiÀ havumetsÀvyöhykkeen ympÀristöjÀ. Veden liikkuminen eli hydrologinen kierto ja hiilen kierto yhdistÀvÀt ne toisiinsa. Ekosysteemien vÀlisiÀ hiilivirtoja tunnetaan kuitenkin verraten huonosti, koska ekosysteemejÀ on perinteisesti tutkittu erikseen. Ilmastonmuutoksen edetessÀ tulee kuitenkin yhÀ tÀrkeÀmmÀksi tarkastella yksittÀisten kohteiden sijaan kokonaisuuksia. VÀitöskirjatutkimukseni tarkasteleekin maa- ja vesiekosysteemien kytkeytymistÀ toisiinsa. Tutkin valuma-aluetason hiilivirtoja maastomittauksin ja mallintamalla. LisÀksi tutkin laboratoriossa yksittÀisten taimien yhteyttÀmÀn hiilen allokaatiota eli jakautumista juuri- ja versobiomassan kasvuun sekÀ hengitykseen.
Tavassa, jolla eri puulajit allokoivat sidottua hiiltÀ maanalaisiin ja -pÀÀllisin osiin, oli lajikohtaisia eroja, jotka heijastavat sopeutumista erilaisiin olosuhteisiin. Symbionttiset mykoritsasienet ovat tÀrkeitÀ puiden kasvun kannalta ja tutkimustulosteni osoittavat tiettyjen sienilajien voivan muuttaa allokaatiosuhteita. Havaitsin myös sekÀ yhteytyksen ettÀ hengityksen kasvavan maan lÀmpötilan kohotessa, mutta muutokset kompensoivat toisensa eikÀ sidotun hiilen mÀÀrÀ muuttunut.
Hiilen kiertoa sÀÀtelevÀt prosessit ovat erilaisia maa- ja vesiympÀristöissÀ. MetsÀekosysteemin ja ilmakehÀn vÀlisiÀ hiilivirtoja sÀÀtelevÀt ennen kaikkea biologiset prosessit kuten yhteyttÀminen ja hajotus, kun taas jÀrven ja ilmakehÀn vÀliseen hiilenvaihtoon vaikuttavat voimakkaasti fysikaaliset tekijÀt kuten vesipatsaan kerrostuneisuutta sÀÀtelevÀ konvektio ja tuulen aiheuttama turbulenssi. MaaperÀ on vakaa ympÀristö, jossa kaasut liikkuvat lÀhinnÀ molekylÀÀrisen diffuusion avulla, kun taas vesistöissÀ ne kulkeutuvat liikkuvan vesimassan mukana eli turbulenttinen diffuusio on tÀrkeÀmpi. Horisontaalisesti maalta veteen liikkuvan veden mukana maaperÀn kaasuja ja liuenneita orgaanisia yhdisteitÀ pÀÀtyy vesistöihin.
MetsÀn hiilitaseeksi kutsutaan yhteyttÀmÀllÀ sidotun ja hengityksessÀ ja hajotuksessa vapautuvan hiilimÀÀrÀn erotusta. Taseen avulla voidaan arvioida metsÀn roolia hiilinieluna tai lÀhteenÀ. Maa- ja vesiekosysteemejÀ on tarkasteltava yhdessÀ, sillÀ vesistöjen kautta palautuu ilmakehÀÀn lopulta merkittÀviÀ mÀÀriÀ metsissÀ sidottua hiiltÀ. Tutkimukseni osoittaa, ettÀ hiiltÀ poistuu metsistÀ veden mukana vesistöihin ja kulkeutumista sÀÀtelee erityisesti kuljettavan veden mÀÀrÀ. Ilmastonmuutoksen edetessÀkin yleistyvien rankkasateiden jÀlkeen maalta vesistöihin kulkeutuvan hiilen vaikutus oli tutkimusalueellani selkein purossa. VÀitöskirjatutkimukseni osoittaa, ettÀ metsistÀ vesistöihin kulkeutuva hiili voi pienentÀÀ metsÀn hiilitasetta jopa puoleen. Sen vuoksi on tÀrkeÀÀ tarkastella hiilitaseita maisematasolla eri ympÀristöjen vÀliset hiilivuot huomioiden
Sources and sinks of greenhouse gases in the landscape : Approach for spatially explicit estimates
Climate change mitigation is a global response that requires actions at the local level. Quantifying local sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG) facilitate evaluating mitigation options. We present an approach to collate spatially explicit estimated fluxes of GHGs (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) for main land use sectors in the landscape, to aggregate, and to calculate the net emissions of an entire region. Our procedure was developed and tested in a large river basin in Finland, providing information from intensively studied eLTER research sites. To evaluate the full GHG balance, fluxes from natural ecosystems (lakes, rivers, and undrained mires) were included together with fluxes from anthropogenic activities, agriculture and forestry. We quantified the fluxes based on calculations with an anthropogenic emissions model (FRES) and a forest growth and carbon balance model (PREBAS), as well as on emission coefficients from the literature regarding emissions from lakes, rivers, undrained mires, peat extraction sites and cropland. Spatial data sources included CORINE land use data, soil map, lake and river shorelines, national forest inventory data, and statistical data on anthropogenic activities. Emission uncertainties were evaluated with Monte Carlo simulations. Artificial surfaces were the most emission intensive land-cover class. Lakes and rivers were about as emission intensive as arable land. Forests were the dominant land cover in the region (66%), and the C sink of the forests decreased the total emissions of the region by 72%. The region's net emissions amounted to 4.37 +/- 1.43 Tg CO2-eq yr(-1), corresponding to a net emission intensity 0.16 Gg CO2-eq km(-2) yr(-1), and estimated per capita net emissions of 5.6 Mg CO2-eq yr(-1). Our landscape approach opens opportunities to examine the sensitivities of important GHG fluxes to changes in land use and climate, management actions, and mitigation of anthropogenic emissions. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.peerReviewe
Comparison of static chambers to measure CH4 emissions from soils
The static chamber method (non-flow-through-non-steady-state chambers) is the most common method to measure fluxes of methane (CH4) from soils. Laboratory comparisons to quantify errors resulting from chamber design, operation and flux calculation methods are rare. We tested fifteen chambers against four flux levels (FL) ranging from 200 to 2300 g CH4mâ2 hâ1. The measurements were conducted on a calibration tank using three quartz sand types with soil porosities of 53% (dry fine sand, S1), 47% (dry coarse sand, S2), and 33% (wetted fine sand, S3). The chambers tested ranged from 0.06 to 1.8 m in height, and 0.02 to 0.195 m3 in volume, 7 of them were equipped with a fan, and 1 with a vent-tube. We applied linear and exponential flux calculation methods to the chamber data and compared these chamber fluxes to the reference fluxes from the calibration tank. The chambers underestimated the reference fluxes by on average 33% by the linear flux calculation method (Rlin), whereas the chamber fluxes calculated by the exponential flux calculation method (Rexp) did not significantly differ from the reference fluxes (p < 0.05). The flux under- or overestimations were chamber specific and independent of flux level. Increasing chamber height, area and volume significantly reduced the flux underestimation (p < 0.05). Also, the use of non-linear flux calculation method significantly improved the flux estimation; however, simultaneously the uncertainty in the fluxes was increased. We provide correction factors, which can be used to correct the under- or overestimation of the fluxes by the chambers in the experiment.Peer reviewe
White paper on Terrestrial Ecological and Environmental Research Infrastructures in Finland: Analysis of the current landscape and proposal for future steps
This White Paper presents a vision of globally leading, scientifically important and socially relevant
environmental research infrastructures (RIs) in Finland, and identifies what we consider as the key issues to be developed to improve the impact and to support the Finnish national infrastructures in their
international visibility. The focus is on: 1. The scientific questions driving the terrestrial ecosystem and
environmental research globally and in Finland; 2. Specific requirements by different user groups in
Finland for ecological and environmental RIs; and 3. Roadmap for the sustainable ecological and environmental RI in Finland. We also present the strategies of organizations regarding their RI development,
and the existing infrastructures and networks which form the basis for future development. The final
goal of this document is to encourage the development of a coherent vision at national level, and to increase the scientific significance, national synergies and benefits towards a stronger research community.
The need for developing a national RI strategy for environmental field arises from the global challenges, which threaten the ecosystemsâ functioning. Human activities are imposing many identified, but
also previously unknown pressures to ecosystem properties and functions, which are also feeding back
to the societies via the quality and quantity of ecosystem services. However, the ecosystem responses to
changes in environment are in many cases poorly quantified and the studies only cover short time
scales. In order to succeed in providing answers to the grand challenges (ICSU 2010), integrated research infrastructures and efficient analysis tools are crucially needed. The request to improve our
knowledge of the state of the environment and the complex biosphere-hydrosphere-atmosphere interactions, and to detect and analyze the impact of global change on these systems has been recognized as a
general priority in developing environmental research infrastructures in EU and globally.
Currently, Finland is one of the world leaders in atmospheric and environmental sciences, both in
terms of research and in coordinating the European and global observation station networks and infrastructures. With this existing experience from close-by research fields and the high research outputs
from ecology and ecophysiology in our research organizations, Finland has also the potential to actively
promote the ecosystem RI concept, and to act as an example of integrated RIs for other countries. The
vision is to develop the capacity of the Finnish ecosystem research community to integrate, upscale and
synthesize the observations with relevant holistic process understanding as well as open and reliable
data management practices. This can be implemented by creating functional and cost-efficient in-situ
platforms and by providing quality-checked data in findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable
(FAIR) manner for high-level environmental research.
This White paper was made in connection with the INAR Ecosystems initiative funded by Academy of Finland and updated with proceeding of European processes, and it provides a starting point for
national cooperation in environmental research infrastructures. Keywords: Terrestrial ecosystems, research infrastructures, ESFRI</p
White paper on Terrestrial Ecological and Environmental Research Infrastructures in Finland
This White Paper presents a vision of globally leading, scientifically important and socially relevant environmental research infrastructures (RIs) in Finland, and identifies what we consider as the key issues to be developed to improve the impact and to support the Finnish national infrastructures in their international visibility. The focus is on: 1. The scientific questions driving the terrestrial ecosystem and environmental research globally and in Finland; 2. Specific requirements by different user groups in Finland for ecological and environmental RIs; and 3. Roadmap for the sustainable ecological and environmental RI in Finland. We also present the strategies of organizations regarding their RI development, and the existing infrastructures and networks which form the basis for future development. The final goal of this document is to encourage the development of a coherent vision at national level, and to increase the scientific significance, national synergies and benefits towards a stronger research community.
The need for developing a national RI strategy for environmental field arises from the global challenges, which threaten the ecosystemsâ functioning. Human activities are imposing many identified, but also previously unknown pressures to ecosystem properties and functions, which are also feeding back to the societies via the quality and quantity of ecosystem services. However, the ecosystem responses to changes in environment are in many cases poorly quantified and the studies only cover short time scales. In order to succeed in providing answers to the grand challenges (ICSU 2010), integrated research infrastructures and efficient analysis tools are crucially needed. The request to improve our knowledge of the state of the environment and the complex biosphere-hydrosphere-atmosphere interactions, and to detect and analyze the impact of global change on these systems has been recognized as a general priority in developing environmental research infrastructures in EU and globally.
Currently, Finland is one of the world leaders in atmospheric and environmental sciences, both in terms of research and in coordinating the European and global observation station networks and infrastructures. With this existing experience from close-by research fields and the high research outputs from ecology and ecophysiology in our research organizations, Finland has also the potential to actively promote the ecosystem RI concept, and to act as an example of integrated RIs for other countries. The vision is to develop the capacity of the Finnish ecosystem research community to integrate, upscale and synthesize the observations with relevant holistic process understanding as well as open and reliable data management practices. This can be implemented by creating functional and cost-efficient in-situ platforms and by providing quality-checked data in findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) manner for high-level environmental research.
This White paper was made in connection with the INAR Ecosystems initiative funded by Academy of Finland and updated with proceeding of European processes, and it provides a starting point for national cooperation in environmental research infrastructures
Developing a spatially explicit modelling and evaluation framework for integrated carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation: application in southern Finland
The challenges posed by climate change and biodiversity loss are deeply interconnected. Successful co-managing of these tangled drivers requires innovative methods that can prioritize and target management actions against multiple criteria, while also enabling cost-effective land use planning and impact scenario assessment. This paper synthesises the development and application of an integrated multidisciplinary modelling and evaluation framework for carbon and biodiversity in forest systems. By analysing and spatio-temporally modelling carbon processes and biodiversity elements, we determine an optimal solution for their co-management in the study landscape. We also describe how advanced Earth Observation measurements can be used to enhance mapping and monitoring of biodiversity and ecosystem processes. The scenarios used for the dynamic models were based on official Finnish policy goals for forest management and climate change mitigation. The development and testing of the system were executed in a large region in southern Finland (KokemĂ€enjoki basin, 27 024 km2) containing highly instrumented LTER (Long-Term Ecosystem Research) stations; these LTER data sources were complemented by fieldwork, remote sensing and national data bases. In the study area, estimated total net emissions were currently 4.2 TgCO2eq a-1, but modelling of forestry measures and anthropogenic emission reductions demonstrated that it would be possible to achieve the stated policy goal of carbon neutrality by low forest harvest intensity. We show how this policy-relevant information can be further utilised for optimal allocation of set-aside forest areas for nature conservation, which would significantly contribute to preserving both biodiversity and carbon values in the region. Biodiversity gain in the area could be increased without a loss of carbon-related benefits.The challenges posed by climate change and biodiversity loss are deeply interconnected. Successful co-managing of these tangled drivers requires innovative methods that can prioritize and target management actions against multiple criteria, while also enabling cost-effective land use planning and impact scenario assessment. This paper synthesises the development and application of an integrated multidisciplinary modelling and evaluation framework for carbon and biodiversity in forest systems. By analysing and spatio-temporally modelling carbon processes and biodiversity elements, we determine an optimal solution for their co-management in the study landscape. We also describe how advanced Earth Observation measurements can be used to enhance mapping and monitoring of biodiversity and ecosystem processes. The scenarios used for the dynamic models were based on official Finnish policy goals for forest management and climate change mitigation. The development and testing of the system were executed in a large region in southern Finland (KokemĂ€enjoki basin, 27,024 km2) containing highly instrumented LTER (Long-Term Ecosystem Research) stations; these LTER data sources were complemented by fieldwork, remote sensing and national data bases. In the study area, estimated total net emissions were currently 4.2 TgCO2eq aâ1, but modelling of forestry measures and anthropogenic emission reductions demonstrated that it would be possible to achieve the stated policy goal of carbon neutrality by low forest harvest intensity. We show how this policy-relevant information can be further utilized for optimal allocation of set-aside forest areas for nature conservation, which would significantly contribute to preserving both biodiversity and carbon values in the region. Biodiversity gain in the area could be increased without a loss of carbon-related benefits.Peer reviewe
Transport and transformation of soil-derived CO2, CH4 and DOC sustain CO2 supersaturation in small boreal streams
11 pages, 5 figures, 1 appendixStreams are typically supersaturated in carbon dioxide (CO) and methane (CH), and are recognized as important components of regional carbon (C) emissions in northern landscapes. Whereas there is consensus that in most of the systems the CO emitted by streams represents C fixed in the terrestrial ecosystem, the pathways delivering this C to streams are still not well understood. We assessed the contribution of direct soil CO injection versus the oxidation of soil-derived dissolved organic C (DOC) and CH in supporting CO supersaturation in boreal streams in QuĂ©bec. We measured the concentrations of CO, CH and DOC in 43 streams and adjacent soil waters during summer base-flow period. A mass balance approach revealed that all three pathways are significant, and that the mineralization of soil-derived DOC and CH accounted for most of the estimated stream CO emissions (average 75% and 10%, respectively), and that these estimated contributions did not change significantly between the studied low order (â€Â 3) streams. Whereas some of these transformations take place in the channel proper, our results suggest that they mainly occur in the hyporheic zones of the streams. Our results further show that stream CH emissions can be fully explained by soil CH inputs. This study confirms that these boreal streams, and in particular their hyporheic zones, are extremely active processors of soil derived DOC and CH, not just vents for soil produced COThis study was co-funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Hydro-QuĂ©bec Industrial Research Chair in Carbon Biogeochemistry in Boreal Aquatic Systems (NSERC Grant #592000)Peer Reviewe
What does nature feel like? Using embodied walking interviews to discover cultural ecosystem services
The development of cultural ecosystem services (CES) concept has progressed beyond the common categories of economic benefits from tourism and recreation, and yet definitions of CES remain vague and often shallow. It is necessary to develop methodologies that can more fully express the depth of meaning of non-material benefits humans receive from nature to both strengthen the conceptual foundation of CES, and to support the evaluation, management, and decision-making processes pertaining to protected areas and other environments. This study demonstrates how embodied interviews, conducted with informants while walking in nature, capture real-time intuitive and grounded perceptions of, and reactions to, four different ecosystem types and their associated services. The results provide a deeper and more nuanced understanding of diverse human-nature relationships and reflect two distinct groups of CES values or themes: general (common across research sites) and local (site specific). The twelve General CES include cognitive and psychological services, among them calmness and newness, heightened imagination and curiosity, increased energy and motivation, and gaining new perspectives. Local themes differed from one ecosystem to another and included more biodiversity-and geodiversity-related values pertaining to local species and geology, as well as more sensory-based experiences.Peer reviewe