8 research outputs found

    Thermography at the Elbow Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparison with Ultrasound-Detected Joint Inflammation Findings

    No full text
    Abstract Introduction There is a lack of data on the use of thermography for elbow joint inflammation assessment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Hence, we aimed to compare thermography with ultrasonography (a more established imaging modality for joint inflammation assessment) in the assessment of inflammation in the elbows of patients with RA. Methods Standardised minimum (Tmin), maximum (Tmax) and average (Tavg) temperatures at each elbow (medial, lateral, posterior and anterior aspects) were summed to obtain the thermographic parameters MIN, MAX and AVG, respectively. Ultrasound parameters of elbow joint inflammation included total greyscale (TGS) and total power Doppler (TPD) scores. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was utilized for correlation analysis between parameters. The relationship between parameters was characterized using simple linear regression. Results Sixty elbows were evaluated from 30 patients with RA in this cross-sectional study. Thermographic parameters (MIN, MAX and AVG) showed significant correlation (P < 0.05) with (1) TPD scores at both elbows (correlation coefficient ranging 0.40 to 0.55) and (2) TGS scores at the right elbow (correlation coefficient ranging 0.39 to 0.42). A statistically significant relationship (P values ranging from 0.002 to 0.033) between parameters was demonstrable as follows: (1) MIN, MAX and AVG versus TPD scores (bilateral elbows) and (2) MIN, MAX and AVG versus TGS scores (right elbow). Conclusion Thermographic temperatures have been demonstrated to correlate with ultrasound-detected joint inflammation at the elbow in patients with RA. The association is more consistently observed with ultrasound PD joint inflammation than its GS counterpart

    Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with autoimmune disease on high-dose glucocorticoid

    No full text
    10.1097/RHU.0000000000000215Journal of Clinical Rheumatology21272-7

    Ex vivo-expanded but not in vitro-induced human regulatory T cells are candidates for cell therapy in autoimmune diseases thanks to stable demethylation of the FOXP3 regulatory T cell-specific demethylated region

    No full text
    Regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy is a promising approach for transplant rejection and severe autoimmunity. Unfortunately, clinically meaningful Treg numbers can be obtained only upon in vitro culture. Functional stability of human expanded (e)Tregs and induced (i)Tregs has not been thoroughly addressed for all proposed protocols, hindering clinical translation. We undertook a systematic comparison of eTregs and iTregs to recommend the most suitable for clinical implementation, and then tested their effectiveness and feasibility in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Regardless of the treatment, iTregs acquired suppressive function and FOXP3 expression, but lost them upon secondary restimulation in the absence of differentiation factors, which mimics in vivo reactivation. In contrast, eTregs expanded in the presence of rapamycin (rapa) retained their regulatory properties and FOXP3 demethylation upon restimulation with no stabilizing agent. FOXP3 demethylation predicted Treg functional stability upon secondary TCR engagement. Rapa eTregs suppressed conventional T cell proliferation via both surface (CTLA-4) and secreted (IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-35) mediators, similarly to ex vivo Tregs. Importantly, Treg expansion with rapa from RA patients produced functionally stable Tregs with yields comparable to healthy donors. Moreover, rapa eTregs from RA patients were resistant to suppression reversal by the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α, and were more efficient in suppressing synovial conventional T cell proliferation compared with their ex vivo counterparts, suggesting that rapa improves both Treg function and stability. In conclusion, our data indicate Treg expansion with rapa as the protocol of choice for clinical application in rheumatological settings, with assessment of FOXP3 demethylation as a necessary quality control step

    Orbital Aspergillosis or Giant Cell Arteritis — A Diagnostic Dilemma

    No full text
    Orbital aspergillosis is an uncommon but potentially fatal disease. Its initial clinical presentation can be nonspecific and may be easily confused with other systemic diseases (such as neoplasms, other orbital infections which could include bacterial, mycobacterium and fungal infections), systemic vasculitis and other inflammatory conditions. Use of systemic corticosteroid may result in transient symptom relief further delaying the diagnosis. We describe its occurrence in a 76-year-old Chinese female with underlying rheumatoid arthritis who presented with a four-week history of left fronto-temporal headache, and ipsilateral blurring of vision with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Although temporal artery biopsy was negative for giant cell arteritis (GCA), high-dose corticosteroids were initially started for presumptive GCA. There was an initial transient improvement in headache and in her left eye's visual acuity. However, this was followed by a worsening headache and complete visual loss in her left eye. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a new orbital apical mass-like lesion extending from the sphenoid sinus which was diagnosed as aspergillus infection on biopsy. Her condition improved and remained stable after the institution of appropriate anti-fungal therapy
    corecore