Functional complementarity between the HMG1-like yeast mitochondrial histone HM and the bacterial histone-like protein HU

The mitochondrial histone HM is the major DNA-binding protein in mitochondria and is necessary for maintenance of the mitochondrial genome in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae during growth on fermentable sugars. HM and the Escherichia coli histone-like protein HU have similar activities in vitro, including DNA supercoiling, but share no sequence similarity. We show that HU can functionally complement the respiration deficiency associated with yeast strains lacking HM. Conversely, phenotypes of E. coli cells lacking HU protein, including nucleoid loss and a filamentous cell morphology, were alleviated by expression of HM in these cells. The HU protein of bacteria and the HM protein of mitochondria are therefore functionally complementary in vivo. Functional similarities among HM, HU, and the nuclear HMG1 proteins are implicated and discussed

Isoform Specific Gene Auto-Regulation via miRNAs: A Case Study on miR-128b and ARPP-21

In this study, we investigate whether miRNAs located within “host” protein-coding genes may regulate the expression of their host genes. We find that 43 of 174 miRNAs encoded within RefSeq genes are predicted to target their host genes. Statistical analysis of this phenomenon suggests that gene auto-regulation via miRNAs may be under positive selective pressure. Our analysis also indicates that several of the 43 miRNAs have a much lower expectation of targeting their host genes by chance than others. Among these examples, we identify miR-128b:ARPP-21 (cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein, 21 kD) as a case in which both the miRNA and the target site are also evolutionarily conserved. We provide experimental support for this miRNA:target interaction via reporter silencing assays, and present evidence that this isoform-specific gene auto-regulation has been preserved in vertebrate species in order to prevent detrimental consequences of ARPP-21 over-expression in brain

Essential role of the HMG domain in the function of yeast mitochondrial histone HM: functional complementation of HM by the nuclear nonhistone protein NHP6A.

The yeast mitochondrial histone protein HM is required for maintenance of the mitochondrial genome, and disruption of the gene encoding HM (H1M1/ABF2) results in formation of a respiration-deficient petite mutant phenotype. HM contains two homologous regions, which share sequence similarity with the eukaryotic nuclear nonhistone protein, HMG-1. Experiments with various deletion mutants of HM show that a single HMG domain of HM is functional and can restore respiration competency to cells that lack HM protein (him1 mutant cells). The gene encoding the putative yeast nuclear HMG-1 homolog, the NHP6A protein, can functionally complement the him1 mutation.The yeast mitochondrial histone protein HM is required for maintenance of the mitochondrial genome, and disruption of the gene encoding HM (H1M1/ABF2) results in formation of a respiration-deficient petite mutant phenotype. HM contains two homologous regions, which share sequence similarity with the eukaryotic nuclear nonhistone protein, HMG-1. Experiments with various deletion mutants of HM show that a single HMG domain of HM is functional and can restore respiration competency to cells that lack HM protein (him1 mutant cells). The gene encoding the putative yeast nuclear HMG-1 homolog, the NHP6A protein, can functionally complement the him1 mutation

E-Cadherin Is Required for Centrosome and Spindle Orientation in Drosophila Male Germline Stem Cells

Many adult stem cells reside in a special microenvironment known as the niche, where they receive essential signals that specify stem cell identity. Cell-cell adhesion mediated by cadherin and integrin plays a crucial role in maintaining stem cells within the niche. In Drosophila melanogaster, male germline stem cells (GSCs) are attached to niche component cells (i.e., the hub) via adherens junctions. The GSC centrosomes and spindle are oriented toward the hub-GSC junction, where E-cadherin-based adherens junctions are highly concentrated. For this reason, adherens junctions are thought to provide a polarity cue for GSCs to enable proper orientation of centrosomes and spindles, a critical step toward asymmetric stem cell division. However, understanding the role of E-cadherin in GSC polarity has been challenging, since GSCs carrying E-cadherin mutations are not maintained in the niche. Here, we tested whether E-cadherin is required for GSC polarity by expressing a dominant-negative form of E-cadherin. We found that E-cadherin is indeed required for polarizing GSCs toward the hub cells, an effect that may be mediated by Apc2. We also demonstrated that E-cadherin is required for the GSC centrosome orientation checkpoint, which prevents mitosis when centrosomes are not correctly oriented. We propose that E-cadherin orchestrates multiple aspects of stem cell behavior, including polarization of stem cells toward the stem cell-niche interface and adhesion of stem cells to the niche supporting cells

Features of mammalian microRNA promoters emerge from polymerase II chromatin immunoprecipitation data

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short, non-coding RNA regulators of protein coding genes. miRNAs play a very important role in diverse biological processes and various diseases. Many algorithms are able to predict miRNA genes and their targets, but their transcription regulation is still under investigation. It is generally believed that intragenic miRNAs (located in introns or exons of protein coding genes) are co-transcribed with their host genes and most intergenic miRNAs transcribed from their own RNA polymerase II (Pol II) promoter. However, the length of the primary transcripts and promoter organization is currently unknown. Methodology: We performed Pol II chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-chip using a custom array surrounding regions of known miRNA genes. To identify the true core transcription start sites of the miRNA genes we developed a new tool (CPPP). We showed that miRNA genes can be transcribed from promoters located several kilobases away and that their promoters share the same general features as those of protein coding genes. Finally, we found evidence that as many as 26% of the intragenic miRNAs may be transcribed from their own unique promoters. Conclusion: miRNA promoters have similar features to those of protein coding genes, but miRNA transcript organization is more complex. © 2009 Corcoran et al

Genetic Interaction of Centrosomin and Bazooka in Apical Domain Regulation in Drosophila Photoreceptor

Cell polarity genes including Crumbs (Crb) and Par complexes are essential for controlling photoreceptor morphogenesis. Among the Crb and Par complexes, Bazooka (Baz, Par-3 homolog) acts as a nodal component for other cell polarity proteins. Therefore, finding other genes interacting with Baz will help us to understand the cell polarity genes' role in photoreceptor morphogenesis. mutation on developing eyes to determine its role in photoreceptor morphogenesis. We found that Cnn is dispensable for retinal differentiation in eye imaginal discs during the larval stage. However, photoreceptors deficient in Cnn display dramatic morphogenesis defects including the mislocalization of Crumbs (Crb) and Bazooka (Baz) during mid-stage pupal eye development, suggesting that Cnn is specifically required for photoreceptor morphogenesis during pupal eye development. This role of Cnn in apical domain modulation was further supported by Cnn's gain-of-function phenotype. Cnn overexpression in photoreceptors caused the expansion of the apical Crb membrane domain, Baz and adherens junctions (AJs). photoreceptor

Identification of microRNA-mRNA modules using microarray data

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are post-transcriptional regulators of mRNA expression and are involved in numerous cellular processes. Consequently, miRNAs are an important component of gene regulatory networks and an improved understanding of miRNAs will further our knowledge of these networks. There is a many-to-many relationship between miRNAs and mRNAs because a single miRNA targets multiple mRNAs and a single mRNA is targeted by multiple miRNAs. However, most of the current methods for the identification of regulatory miRNAs and their target mRNAs ignore this biological observation and focus on miRNA-mRNA pairs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We propose a two-step method for the identification of many-to-many relationships between miRNAs and mRNAs. In the first step, we obtain miRNA and mRNA clusters using a combination of miRNA-target mRNA prediction algorithms and microarray expression data. In the second step, we determine the associations between miRNA clusters and mRNA clusters based on changes in miRNA and mRNA expression profiles. We consider the miRNA-mRNA clusters with statistically significant associations to be potentially regulatory and, therefore, of biological interest.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our method reduces the interactions between several hundred miRNAs and several thousand mRNAs to a few miRNA-mRNA groups, thereby facilitating a more meaningful biological analysis and a more targeted experimental validation.</p

Aurora-A Interacts with AP-2α and Down Regulates Its Transcription Activity

Aurora-A is a serine/threonine protein kinase and plays an important role in the control of mitotic progression. Dysregulated expression of Aurora-A impairs centrosome separation and maturation, which lead to disrupted cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis. However, the molecular mechanism by which Aurora-A causes cell malignant transformation remains to be further defined. In this report, using transcription factors array and mRNA expression profiling array, we found that overexpression of Aurora-A suppressed transcription activity of AP-2α, a tumor suppressor that is often downregulated in variety of tumors, and inhibited expression of AP-2α-regulated downstream genes. These array-based observations were further confirmed by microwell colorimetric TF assay and luciferase reporter assay. Downregulated transcription activity of AP-2α by Aurora-A was found to be associated with reduced AP-2α protein stability, which appeared to be mediated by Aurora-A enhanced ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of AP-2α protein. Interestingly, Aurora-A-mediated AP-2α degradation was likely dependent Aurora-A kinase activity since inhibition of Aurora-A kinase activity was able to rescue Aurora-A-induced degradation of AP-2α. Moreover, we defined a physical interaction between Aurora-A and AP-2α, and such interaction might bridge the suppressive effect of Aurora-A on AP-2α protein stability. These findings provide new insights into molecular mechanism by which Aurora-A acts as an oncogenic molecule in tumor occurrence and malignant development

Inferring the Regulatory Network of the miRNA-mediated Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Melon

[EN] Background: MiRNAs have emerged as key regulators of stress response in plants, suggesting their potential as candidates for knock-in/out to improve stress tolerance in agricultural crops. Although diverse assays have been performed, systematic and detailed studies of miRNA expression and function during exposure to multiple environments in crops are limited. Results: Here, we present such pioneering analysis in melon plants in response to seven biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Deep-sequencing and computational approaches have identified twenty-four known miRNAs whose expression was significantly altered under at least one stress condition, observing that down-regulation was preponderant. Additionally, miRNA function was characterized by high scale degradome assays and quantitative RNA measurements over the intended target mRNAs, providing mechanistic insight. Clustering analysis provided evidence that eight miRNAs showed a broad response range under the stress conditions analyzed, whereas another eight miRNAs displayed a narrow response range. Transcription factors were predominantly targeted by stressresponsive miRNAs in melon. Furthermore, our results show that the miRNAs that are down-regulated upon stress predominantly have as targets genes that are known to participate in the stress response by the plant, whereas the miRNAs that are up-regulated control genes linked to development. Conclusion: Altogether, this high-resolution analysis of miRNA-target interactions, combining experimental and computational work, Illustrates the close interplay between miRNAs and the response to diverse environmental conditions, in melon.The authors thank Dr. A. Monforte for providing melon seeds and Dra. B. Pico (Cucurbits Group - COMAV) for providing melon seeds and Monosporascus isolate respectively. This work was supported by grants AGL2016-79825-R, BIO2014-61826-EXP (GG), and BFU2015-66894-P (GR) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (co-supported by FEDER). The funders had no role in the experiment design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Sanz-Carbonell, A.; Marques Romero, MC.; Bustamante-González, AJ.; Fares Riaño, MA.; Rodrigo Tarrega, G.; Gomez, GG. (2019). Inferring the Regulatory Network of the miRNA-mediated Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Melon. BMC Plant Biology. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1679-0S117Zhang B. MicroRNAs: a new target for improving plant tolerance to abiotic stress. J Exp Bot. 2015;66:1749–61.Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167:313–24.Bielach A, Hrtyan M, Tognetti VB. Plants under stress: involvement of auxin and Cytokinin. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;4(18):7.Zarattini M, Forlani G. Toward unveiling the mechanisms for transcriptional regulation of proline biosynthesis in the plant cell response to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2017;2(8):927.Nolan T, Chen J, Yin Y. Cross-talk of Brassinosteroid signaling in controlling growth and stress responses. Biochem J. 2017;474:2641–61.Mittler R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combinations. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:15–9.Djami-Tchatchou AT, Sanan-Mishra N, Ntushelo K, Dubery IA. Functional roles of microRNAs in Agronomically important plants—potential as targets for crop improvement and protection. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:378.Baxter A, Mittler R, Suzuki N. ROS as key players in plant stress signaling. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:1229–40.Golldack D, Li C, Mohan H, Probst N. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: unraveling the signaling networks. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:151.Lee SH, Li HW, Koh KW, Chuang HY, Chen YR, Lin CS, Chan MT. MSRB7 reverses oxidation of GSTF2/3 to confer tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana to oxidative stress. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:5049–62.Carrera J, Rodrigo G, Jaramillo A, Elena SF. Reverse-engineering the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptional network under changing environmental conditions. Genome Biol. 2009;10(9):R96.Shriram V, Kumar V, Devarumath RM, Khare TS, Wani SH. MicroRNAs as potential targets for abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:817.Sunkar R, Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JH. Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12:301–9.Kumar R. Role of microRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Appl Biochem Biotechnology. 2014;174:93–115.Reis RS, Eamens AL, Waterhouse PM. Missing pieces in the puzzle of plant MicroRNAs. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20:721–8.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–97.Borges F, Martienssen RA. The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:727–41.Axtell MJ, Bartel DP. Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land-plants. Plant Cell. 2005;17:1658–73.Cuperus JT, Fahlgren N, Carrington JC. Evolution and functional diversification of MIRNA genes. Plant Cell. 2011;23:431–42.Cui J, You C, Chen X. The evolution of microRNAs in plants. Current Opinions in Plant Biology. 2016;35:61–7.Sunkar R, Li YF, Jagadeeswaran G. Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:196–203.Zhang T, Zhao YL, Zhao JH, Wang S, Jin Y, Chen ZQ, Fang YY, Hua CL, Ding SW, Guo HS. Cotton plants export microRNAs to inhibit virulence gene expression in a fungal pathogen. Nature Plants. 2016;2(10):16153.Chaloner T, vanKan JA, Grant-Downton R. RNA ‘Information Warfare’ in pathogenic and mutualistic interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;9:738–48.Niu D, Wang Z, Wang S, Qiao L Zhao H. Profiling of small RNAs involved in plant-pathogen interactions. Methods Molecular Biology. 2015;1287:61–79.Wei S, Wang L, Zhang Y, Huang D. Identification of early response genes to salt stress in roots of melon (Cucumis melo L.) seedlings. Molecular Biology Report. 2013;40:2915–26.Clepet C, Joobeur T, Zheng Y, Jublot D, Huang M, Truniger V, et al. Analysis of expressed sequence tags generated from full-length enriched cDNA libraries of melon. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:252.González M, Xu M, Esteras C, Roig C, Monforte AJ, Troadec C, et al. Towards a TILLING platform for functional genomics in Piel de Sapo melons. BMC Research Notes. 2011;4:289.García MJ. The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:11872–7.Pollack FG, Uecker FA. Monosporascus cannonballus: an unusual ascomycete in cantaloupe roots. Mycologia. 1974;66:346–9.Kofalvi S, Marcos J, Cañizares MC, Pallas V, Candresse T. Hop stunt viroid (HSVd) sequence variants from Prunus species: evidence for recombination between HSVd isolates. J Gen Virol. 1997;78:3177–86.Sattar S, Song Y, Anstead J, Sunkar R, Thompson G. Cucumis melo expression profile during aphid herbivory in a resistant and susceptible interaction. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012;25:839–48.Herranz MC, Navarro JA, Sommen E, Pallas V. Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:117.Jagadeeswaran G, Nimmakayala P, Zheng Y, Gowdu K, Reddy UK, Sunkar R. Characterization of the small RNA component of leaves and fruits from four different cucurbit species. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:329.Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D68–73.Barciszewska-Pacak M, Milanowska K, Knop K, Bielewicz D, Nuc P, Plewka P, et al. Arabidopsis microRNA expression regulation in a wide range of abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:410.Zhou L, Liu Y, Liu Z, Kong D, Duan M, Luo L. Genome-wide identification and analysis of drought-responsive microRNAs in Oryza sativa. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:4157–68.Samad A, Sajad M, Nazaruddin N, Fauzi I, Murad A, Zainal Z, Ismanizan Ismail I. MicroRNA and transcription factor: key players in plant regulatory network. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:565.Danisman S. TCP transcription factors at the Interface between environmental challenges and the Plant’s growth responses. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1930.Llave C, Xie Z, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC. Cleavage of scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science. 2002;297:2053–6.Gupta OP, Meena NL, Sharma I, et al. Differential regulation of microRNAs in response to osmotic, salt and cold stresses in wheat. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:4623.Wang M, Wang Q, Zhang B. 2013. Response of miRNAs and their targets to salt and drought stresses in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ). Gene 30: 26–32.Savageau MA. Demand theory of gene regulation. I. Quantitative development of the theory. Genetics. 1998;149:1665–76.Negrão S, Schmöckel SM, Tester M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann Bot. 2017;119:1–11.Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(2):101–13.Megraw M, Cumbie J, Ivanchenko M, Filichkin S. Small genetic circuits and MicroRNAs: big players in polymerase II transcriptional control in plants. Plant Cell. 2016;28:286–303.Wang St, Sun Xl, Hoshino Y, Yu Y, Jia B, et al. 2014. MicroRNA319 Positively Regulates Cold Tolerance by Targeting OsPCF6 and OsTCP21 in Rice (Oryza sativa). PLoS ONE 9(3): e91357.Fang Y, Xie K, Xiong L. Conserved miR164-targeted NAC genes regulate drought resistence in rice. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:2119–35.Goossens A, de la Fuente N, Forment J, Serrano R, Portillo F. Regulation of yeast H+-ATPase by protein kinases belonging to a family dedicated to activation of plasma membrane transporters. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:7654–61.Roig C, Fita A, Ríos G, Hammond JP, Nuez F, Picó B. Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to Monosporascus cannonballus (Pollack et Uecker) infection. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:601.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet Journal. 2011;17:10–2.R Core Team 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org /.Tarazona S, Furió-Tarí P, Turrà D, Di Pietro A, Nueda MJ, Ferrer A, Conesa A. Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/bioc package. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e140.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.Czimmerer Z, Hulvely J, Simandi Z, Varallyay E, Havelda Z, Szabo E, Balint BL. A versatile method to design stem-loop primer-based quantitative PCR assays for detecting small regulatory RNA molecules. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55168.Zhai J, Arikit S, Simon S, Kingham B, Meyers B. Rapid construction of parallel analysis of RNA end (PARE) libraries for Illumina sequencing. Methods. 2014;67:84–90.Pink S, Vogel S. 2014. D3NETWORK: Stata module to create network visualizations using D3.js http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s457844 .Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Int J Complex Systems. 2006;1695:1–9

Bivalent-Like Chromatin Markers Are Predictive for Transcription Start Site Distribution in Human

Deep sequencing of 5′ capped transcripts has revealed a variety of transcription initiation patterns, from narrow, focused promoters to wide, broad promoters. Attempts have already been made to model empirically classified patterns, but virtually no quantitative models for transcription initiation have been reported. Even though both genetic and epigenetic elements have been associated with such patterns, the organization of regulatory elements is largely unknown. Here, linear regression models were derived from a pool of regulatory elements, including genomic DNA features, nucleosome organization, and histone modifications, to predict the distribution of transcription start sites (TSS). Importantly, models including both active and repressive histone modification markers, e.g. H3K4me3 and H4K20me1, were consistently found to be much more predictive than models with only single-type histone modification markers, indicating the possibility of “bivalent-like” epigenetic control of transcription initiation. The nucleosome positions are proposed to be coded in the active component of such bivalent-like histone modification markers. Finally, we demonstrated that models trained on one cell type could successfully predict TSS distribution in other cell types, suggesting that these models may have a broader application range