Psychological rejection of the transplanted organ and graft dysfunction in kidney transplant patients

Melinda Látos,1 György Lázár,1 Zoltán Horváth,1 Victoria Wittmann,1 Edit Szederkényi,1 Zoltán Hódi,1 Pál Szenohradszky,1 Márta Csabai2 1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, 2Psychology Institute, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Abstract: Interdisciplinary studies suggest that the mental representations of the transplanted organ may have a significant effect on the healing process. The objective of this study was to examine the representations of the transplanted organ and their relationship with emotional and mood factors, illness perceptions, and the functioning of the transplanted organ. One hundred and sixty-four kidney transplant patients were assessed using the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, the Beck’s Depression Scale, the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and the Transplanted Organ Questionnaire. Medical parameters were collected from the routine clinical blood tests (serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate levels) and biopsy results. Our most outstanding results suggest that kidney-transplanted patients’ illness representations are associated with health outcomes. The Transplanted Organ Questionnaire “psychological rejection” subscale was connected with higher serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate levels. Logistic regression analysis showed that psychological rejection subscale, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and Posttraumatic Growth Questionnaire total scores were associated with graft rejection. These results may serve as a basis for the development of complex treatment interventions, which could help patients to cope with the bio-psycho-social challenges of integrating the new organ as part of their body and self. Keywords: anxiety, depression, illness representations, posttraumatic growth, psychological rejection, renal transplantatio

The cellular electrophysiologic effect of a new amiodarone like antiarrhythmic drug GYKI 16638 in undiseased human ventricular muscle: comparison with sotalol and mexiletine

The cellular electrophysiologic effect of GYKI 16638, a new antiarrhythmic compound was studied and compared with that of sotalol and mexiletine in undiseased human right ventricular muscle preparation by applying the conventional microelectrode technique. GYKI 16638 (5 muM), at stimulation cycle length of 1000 ms, lengthened action potential duration (APD(90)) from 338.9 +/- 28.6 ms to 385.4 +/- 24 ms (n = 9, p < 0.05). This APID lengthening effect, unlike that of sotalol (30 muM), was rate-independent. GYKI 16638, contrary to sotalol and like mexiletine (10 muM), exerted a use-dependent depression of the maximal rate of depolarization (V-max) which amounted to 36.4 +/- 11.7 % at cycle length of 400 ms (n = 5, p < 0.05) and was characterised with an offset kinetical time constant of 298.6 +/- 70.2 ms. It was concluded that GYKI 16638 in human ventricular muscle shows combined Class IB and Class III antiarrhythmic properties, resembling the electrophysiological manifestation seen after chronic amiodarone treatment

Freedom from rejection and stable kidney function are excellent criteria for steroid withdrawal in tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, randomized, multicentre study investigated the efficacy and safety of two tacrolimus-based regimens and their potential to withdraw steroids. METHODS: In total 489 patients were randomised to receive either tacrolimus and MMF (n = 243) or tacrolimus and azathioprine (n = 246) concomitantly with steroids in both treatment groups. The initial oral dose of tacrolimus was 0.2 mg/kg/day, MMF dose was 1 g/day, azathioprine was administered at 1-2 mg/day. Steroids were tapered from 20 mg/day to 5 mg/day. From month 3 onwards, steroids were withdrawn in patients who were free from steroid-resistant rejection and who had serum creatinine concentrations < 160 mumol/L. Study duration was 6 months. RESULTS: Patient survival at month 6 was 98.3% (Tac/MMF/S) and 98.4% (Tac/Aza/S), graft survival at 6 month was 95.0% (Tac/MMF/S) and 93.5% (Tac/Aza/S). The 6-month incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 18.9% (Tac/MMF/S) compared with 26.8% (Tac/Aza/S), p = 0.038. The 6-month incidences of steroid-resistant acute rejection were 2.1% (Tac/MMF/S) and 4.9% (Tac/Aza/S), p = ns. At the end of month 3, steroid withdrawal was performed in 60.5% (Tac/MMF/S) and 48.8% (Tac/Aza/S) of patients, p < 0.01. During months 4-6, 2.7% of patients in the Tac/MMF group had a biopsy-confirmed acute rejection compared with 0.8% of patients in the Tac/Aza group. In patients who continued to receive steroids, the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejections during months 4-6 were 3.5% (Tac/MMF/S) and 7.1% (Tac/Aza/S). At study end, the steroid-free patients had an excellent kidney function, the median serum creatinine concentration was 119.5 mumol/L (Tac/MMF) and 115.1 mumol/L (Tac/Aza); the median serum creatinine of the total study group was 130.5 mumol/L (Tac/MMF/S) and 132.8 mumol/L (Tac/Aza/S). CONCLUSION: Both tacrolimus regimens are efficacious and safe. The combination of Tacrolimus and MMF achieved a lower rejection rate and permitted a higher proportion of steroid-free patients. The overall incidence of acute rejection was low and kidney function was good