Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Evaluation of pain as a preference-based health status measure in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing central corpectomy

BACKGROUND: Assessment of pain in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) before and after decompressive surgery has not been adequately addressed in the literature. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the intensity of various pain scores in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) before and after surgery, and to assess their correlation with other outcome measures. METHODS: In this prospective study, 51 patients with CSM were assessed preoperatively and 1 year or more after uninstrumented central corpectomy (CC) using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Nurick grade, patient perceived outcome score (PPOS) and SF-36. RESULTS: At presentation, there was a higher incidence of neck pain (43.1%) and arm pain (51%) than low axial pain (23.5%), with the mean VAS scores being 53.6 ± 27.4, 55.5 ± 27.4 and 34.0 ± 20.3, respectively. Following surgery, the mean neck, arm and low axial pain scores decreased significantly (p < 0.05) to 14.4 ± 22.6, 5.2 ± 11.8 and 16.0 ± 26.1, respectively. Improvement in pain scores demonstrated poor agreement (κ <0.2) with PPOS, Nurick grade recovery rate (NGRR), and the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) of the SF-36. Pain scores did not influence quality of life as assessed by SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: Pain was reported by about half the patients with CSM, but was not severe in any of them. Following decompressive surgery, the intensity of all these pain components decreased significantly. Low axial pain, a reflection of CSM-related spasticity perceived in the lumbosacral region, became prominent in many patients after surgery

Quality of life assessment after central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative evaluation of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the World Health Organization quality of Life-Bref

Object: In this study, the authors assessed the construct validity and the reliability of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and compared the performance of the WHOQOL-Bref and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in assessing quality of life (QOL) in patients with CSM. Methods: In this prospective study, 70 patients with CSM were assessed preoperatively and again 1 year after central corpectomy using the Nurick scale, the SF-36, and the WHOQOL-Bref. Construct validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref, its responsiveness compared with that of the SF-36, and the correlations between the 2 scales were studied. Results: The WHOQOL-Bref was found to be valid (p < 0.001, Cuzick test for trend between the physical domain of the WHOQOL-Bref and Nurick grade) and reliable (Cronbach > 0.7). It had smaller floor and ceiling effects (ranges 1.4-7.1% and 0-7.1%, respectively) than the SF-36 (ranges 2.9-71.4% and 0-14.1%, respectively). There was significant postoperative improvement in patient scores on all the SF-36 scales (p < 0.001) and the physical, psychological, and environment domains of the WHOQOL-Bref (p < 0.001). The SF-36 scales were more responsive to change (relative efficiency range 0.24-1) than the WHOQOL-Bref domains (relative efficiency range 0.002-0.73). Among scales measuring similar concepts, only the physical functioning and bodily pain scales of the SF-36 had a moderate correlation (r = 0.57 and 0.53, respectively; p < 0.001) with the physical domain of WHOQOL-Bref. Many of the scales of these 2 QOL instruments unexpectedly had a fair correlation with one another (r range = 0.2-0.4). Conclusions: The WHOQOL-Bref, like the SF-36, is valid and reliable in assessing outcome in patients with CSM. It measures impairment in CSM in a more uniform manner than the SF-36, but its domains are less responsive to postoperative changes. Because the WHOQOL-Bref measures different constructs and has additive value, it should be used along with the SF-36 for QOL assessment in patients with CSM

Correlation between change in graft height and change in segmental angle following central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Object: This study was undertaken to examine the correlation between change in graft height and change in angulation across grafted segments (segmental angle) in patients undergoing central corpectomy (CC) with autologous bone reconstruction for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 70 cases in which patients with CSM underwent uninstrumented single- or multilevel CC and had evidence of osseous fusion of their grafts at follow-up. The segmental angles and heights of the grafted segments on preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiographs were compared. Results: The mean change in graft height (± standard deviation) was -7.3 ± 3.8 mm (mean duration of follow-up 19.7 ± 5.4 months, range 13-53 months). There was a mean kyphotic change in segmental angle of -7.3 ± 3.8° (p < 0.001). In patients who had a straight or kyphotic cervical spine (28 patients) or a straight or kyphotic segment (32 patients) preoperatively, there was a significant linear correlation between changes in graft height and changes in segmental angle (Pearson correlation, r = 0.40, p = 0.03; r = 0.40, p = 0.02, respectively). Such a correlation was not seen in the patients who had a lordotic cervical spine (42 patients) or a lordotic segment (38 patients) preoperatively (Pearson correlation, r = -0.04, p = 0.81; r = 0.08, p = 0.62, respectively). The change in segmental angle did not influence improvement in Nurick grade (p = 0.8). The degree of agreement between the 2 observers was almost perfect for measurement of graft height (postoperative intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94, follow-up ICC = 0.90) but was significantly lower for measurement of segmental angles (postoperative ICC = 0.71, follow-up ICC = 0.67). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing uninstrumented CC for CSM, there is a significant correlation between postoperative settling and kyphotic change across fused segments in those who had straight or kyphotic cervical spines or segments preoperatively but not in those who had lordotic cervical spines or segments preoperatively. A more vigorous surgical correction of the segmental kyphosis than achieved in this study might have caused the kyphotic segments to behave like the lordotic segments. Paraspinal muscles and ligaments may play a role in determining the segmental angle as graft settling in patients with lordotic spines or segments is not linearly correlated with angular change

Skull-base Ewing sarcoma with multifocal extracranial metastases

Intracranial occurrence of Ewing sarcoma (ES) is unusual, with a skull-base location being anecdotal. We report a 29-year-old man who presented with rapidly progressive ophthalmoplegia, and was found to be harboring an infiltrative lesion involving the sphenoid sinus, sella, and clivus. He underwent trans-sphenoidal decompression of the lesion which was histologically suggestive of ES. He developed paraparesis 2 weeks after commencing adjuvant therapy. Imaging revealed two thoracic extradural lesions and florid vertebral and pulmonary metastases. This is the first report in indexed literature of a primary intracranial ES on the skull-base with disseminated extracranial disease

A computed tomography-based localizer to determine the entry site of the ventricular end of a parietal ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Background: One of the major principles of shunt insertion into the brain involves choosing an entry site that avoids eloquent cortex. Objetive: We describe a novel tool to accurately locate the burr hole for insertion of the ventricular end of a catheter during parietal ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. Methods: Computed tomography (CT)-based measurements in 2 dimensions were used to mark the entry point with the help of an indigenously designed Vellore burr hole localizer (VL). Patients underwent surgery with either the conventional method to localize the burr hole (Keen point; group A; n = 28) or the VL (group B; n = 28). An independent observer determined the accuracy of shunt placement on postoperative CT scans. The VL is designed with a fixed horizontal arm that can be aligned with the CT or magnetic resonance reference plane and a vertical arm with a flexible sliding horizontal arm that is attached to it with an adjustable screw. By manipulating the flexible arm along the contour of the skull and using the scale provided on both the vertical and horizontal arms, we can mark the burr hole site for placement of a parietal ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Results: Overall accuracy in group A was 32.1%, whereas in group B, an accuracy of 82.1% could be achieved (P < .01). Conclusion: Placement of a burr hole guided by the VL increases the accuracy of the desired entry point of the ventricular catheter

The Impact of telemedicine in the postoperative care of the neurosurgery patient in an outpatient clinic : a unique perspective of this valuable resource in the developing world - an experience of more than 3000 teleconsultations

Telemedicine has always been used as a teleconsultation tool in neurological emergencies (e.g., triage in head injuries, stroke, and cerebrovascular accidents). At Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Bangalore, India, we have been operating two teleconsultation sessions per week for the postoperative patient population, addressing routine follow-up and semiemergent conditions in this cohort of patients. At our center more than 80% of the neurosurgical procedures are conducted in patients traveling more than 1500 km. Telemedicine as a routine tool in clinical medicine has significant financial and psychosocial benefits versus routine outpatient clinics. There are very few reports of telemedicine use in routine outpatient teleconsultations in the available neurosurgical literature; those that are present do not differentiate or analyze the use in routine versus emergency neurosurgery. We discuss the role of this underused resource in the developing countries and retrospectively analyze the clinical data in more than 1500 patients and 3000 teleconsultations during a period of 6 years. We address the financial implications, psychosocial factors, and several other factors that could make this relatively modest technology an indispensible tool in current neurosurgical practice, especially in a developing country like India.14 page(s