From bare peat desert to nature reserve within ten years: a review of restoration practice on Little Woolden Moss, Manchester, UK

Peat-harvesting results in significant carbon emissions and complete eradication of specialised flora and fauna on lowland peatlands; recovery can be lengthy, difficult and not always successful. This review documents the techniques and procedures used to transform a bare peat-milled site into a functioning nature reserve within a decade. Site preparation, planting regimes, and methods of measuring progress are discussed, and evaluation of the site’s natural capital include three descriptive essays from an initial project officer, an experienced species recorder and a long-term volunteer. The aim of the review is both to celebrate the success of the venture and to offer experience gained to other lowland bog restoration managers

Publisher Correction: Science diplomacy for plant health

Correction to: Nature Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0744-x, published online 11 August 2020.1 Pág.An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.In the version of this Comment originally published, in the penultimate paragraph of the section “Steps towards global phytosanitary research coordination” the second sentence incorrectly defined IPPC as ‘Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, though it was cor rectly defined earlier as ‘International Plant Protection Convention’; the sentence has now been corrected to read “Ideally, they should benefit from the reputation of a United Nations mandate convention, such as the IPPC…”Peer reviewe

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression as a tool for crinivirus antibody production

EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol

Background Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a major concern for patients following treatment for primary breast cancer, affecting 60–99% of breast cancer survivors. Mini-AFTER is a brief intervention developed to address this fear, that breast care nurses are ideally placed to deliver. However, their interest in delivering such an intervention is unknown and crucial to its introduction. This study aims to assess the perceived feasibility of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for implementation by breast care nurses to manage moderate levels of fear of recurrence among breast cancer survivors. Methods A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design will be used, informed by normalisation process theory (NPT). The design will be guided by the stages of NPT. Specifically, understanding and evaluating the process (implementation) that would enable an intervention, such as the Mini-AFTER, not only to be operationalised and normalised into everyday work (embedded) but also sustained in practice (integration). Phase 1: all members on the UK Breast Cancer Care Nursing Network database (n = 905) will be emailed a link to a web-based survey, designed to investigate how breast cancer survivors’ FoR is identified and managed within current services and their willingness to deliver the Mini-AFTER. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) will be interviewed to build upon the responses in phase 1 and explore breast care nurses’ individual views on the importance of addressing fear of recurrence in their clinical consultations, interest in the Mini-AFTER intervention, the content, skills required and challenges to deliver the intervention. Discussion This study will provide information about the willingness of breast care nurses (BCNs) to provide a structured intervention to manage fear of recurrence. It will identify barriers and facilitators for effective delivery and inform the future design of a larger trial of the Mini-AFTER intervention.</p

Curbing adult student attrition: Evidence from a field experiment Curbing adult student attrition: Evidence from a field experiment* Curbing adult student attrition: Evidence from a field experiment *

Abstract Finding a job, especially in a recovering economy, is challenging and success is reliant upon effective job-search activity. Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) welfare benefit claimants in the United Kingdom have many competing options available to them in terms of how they direct their efforts in looking for work. Often it is hard to determine which is most productive. Unsurprisingly, Jobcentres -the organisations that support JSA claimants during their unemployment -themselves have very strong links to the labour market. For example, they are often invited to run recruitment events in direct partnership with large employers seeking to hire in bulk. At Bedford Jobcentre, we observe that, despite the relatively high likelihood of gaining work from attending such events, jobseeker attendance rates are still low and, instead, we can only assume that jobseekers may be taking part in less productive work search activities. This paper reports the results of a randomised control trial designed to test the effectiveness of mobile phone text messaging in compelling jobseekers in the Bedford area to attend such events. Tailored text messages are found to significantly increase the likelihood of attendance. We find text messages to be particularly effective when they evoke a sense of reciprocity in the recipient. Electronic version: Address for correspondence CMPO 2 Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TX www.bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/ [email protected] Tel +4

Science diplomacy for plant health

The battle between humans and plant pests is as old as agriculture, but the movement of pests as a consequence of human activities has been exacerbated only recently. International research collaboration is increasingly important to tackle pests causing serious damage to economies

UK Health Watch Editorial Group

This report has been produced entirely by unpaid, voluntary effort. The Politics of Health Group Steering Group wishes to thank all those who have contributed to this report, the editorial group who brought UK Health Watch 2005 together, and also colleagues at Global Health Watch who first suggested the idea