Allograft and patient survival after sequential HSCT and kidney transplantation from the same donorA multicenter analysis

Item does not contain fulltex

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma in Switzerland, 20 years of experience: 2001–2020

Despite the high cure rate with initial therapy, approximately 10% of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are refractory to initial treatment, and up to 30% of patients will relapse after achieving initial complete remission. Despite promising initial results of treatment by immune checkpoint inhibitors, most patients will eventually progress. We analyzed 62 adult patients with relapsed or refractory HL (rrHL) treated by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in one of three University Hospitals of Switzerland (Zurich, Basel, and Geneva) between May 2001 and January 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse incidence, which were assessed in univariate analysis. The median follow-up was 61 months (interquartile range 59–139). The 2- and 5-year OS was 54% (standard error (SE) ±12) and 50.2% (SE ±13.3), respectively, and the 2- and 5-year RFS was 40.7% (SE ±16.3) and 34.4% (SE ±19.0), respectively. NRM was 23.1% (SE ±2.2) and 27.4% (SE ±2.5) at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 36.1% (SE ±5.6) at 2 years and 38.2% (SE ±6.6) at 5 years. Our analysis of allo-HSCT outcomes in the context of rrHL shows encouraging OS and RFS rates, with the mortality rate reaching plateau at 50% at 2 years after allo-HSCT. This confirms that allo-HSCT still remains as a potentially curative option for half of patients with rrHL

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non‐Hodgkin lymphoma in Switzerland, 30 years of experience: Sooner is better

Abstract Due to relatively high nonrelapse mortality (NRM), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) in non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains the ultimate line of treatment but the only curable approach in a setting of relapse/refractory disease. Here, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, registry‐based analysis on patients who underwent allo‐HSCT for NHL in Switzerland, over 30‐year (1985–2020) period. The study included 301 allo‐HSCTs performed for NHL patients in three University Hospitals of Switzerland (Zurich, Basel and Geneva) 09/1985 to 05/2020. We assessed in univariate and multivariable analysis the impact on survivals (overall survival [OS], relapse free survival [RFS], relapse incidence [RI], and non‐treatment related mortality [NRM]). The maximum follow‐up was 25 years with median follow‐up for alive patients of 61 months. The median age at allo‐HSCT was 51 years. Three‐ and ‐year OS was ‐ 59.5% and 55.4%; 3‐ and 5‐year PFS was 50% and 44%; 3‐ and 5‐year NRM was 21.7% and 23.6%. RI at 3 and 5 years was 27.4% and 34.9%. In conclusion, our analysis of the entire Swiss experience of allo‐HSCT in patients with NHL shows promising 5‐ and possibly 10‐year OS and relatively acceptable NRM rates for such population, the majority being not in complete remission (CR) at the time of transplantation

Haematopoietic cell transplantation in Switzerland, changes and results over 20 years: a report from the Swiss Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Working Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry 1997-2016.

In 1997, the Swiss Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Group (SBST) initiated a mandatory national registry for all haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCTs) in Switzerland. As of 2016, after 20 years, information was available for 7899 patients who had received an HCT (2781 allogeneic [35%] and 5118 autologous [65%]). As some patients had more than one transplant the total number of transplants was 3067 allogeneic and 6448 autologous. We compared patient characteristics and outcome of the first decade (1997-2006) and second decade (2007-2016) of the registry. There were numerous changes over time. For allogeneic HCT, transplant rates, and therefore use of HCT technology, increased from 14 to 21.8 HCTs per 1 million inhabitants per year from the first to the second decade. Likewise autologous HCTs increased from 24.8 to 37.2 annually corrected for population growth. Allogeneic transplant recipients were older (38.4 vs 48.3 years) and more frequently had unrelated donors in the second decade. Similarly, age increased for recipients of autologous HCT (50.8 vs 56.4 years). Analysis of outcome showed that the probabilities of overall and progression-free survival were stable over time, in spite of the treatment of older and higher risk patients. In multivariate analysis, nonrelapse mortality decreased in recipients of allogeneic HCT (relative risk 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.87) over the two decades. Improvement in adjusted nonrelapse mortality compensated for the fact that higher risk patients were treated in more recent years, resulting in similar overall survival. Five-year survival probabilities were 56% (53-59%) in the first and 54% (51-57%) in the second decade for allogeneic HCT, and 59% (57-61%) in the first and 61% (59-63%) in the second decade for autologous HCT. Detailed analyses of changes over time are presented. This study included all HCTs performed in Switzerland during the period of observation and the data are useful for quality assurance programmes, healthcare cost estimation and healthcare planning. Between 50 and 60% of patients were long-term survivors after both types of HCT, indicating growing populations of surviving patients requiring long-term care and observation

Outcomes and toxicity of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia patients previously treated with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors : a prospective non-interventional study from the Chronic Malignancy Working Party of the EBMT

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who fail to respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). While imatinib seems to have no adverse impact on outcomes after transplant, little is known on the effects of prior use of second-generation TKI (2GTKI). We present the results of a prospective non-interventional study performed by the EBMT on 383 consecutive CML patients previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib undergoing allo-HCT from 2009 to 2013. The median age was 45 years (18-68). Disease status at transplant was CP1 in 139 patients (38%), AP or >CP1 in 163 (45%), and BC in 59 (16%). The choice of 2GTKI was: 40% dasatinib, 17% nilotinib, and 43% a sequential treatment of dasatinib and nilotinib with or without bosutinib/ponatinib. With a median follow-up of 37 months (1-77), 8% of patients developed either primary or secondary graft failure, 34% acute and 60% chronic GvHD. There were no differences in post-transplant complications between the three different 2GTKI subgroups. Non-relapse mortality was 18% and 24% at 12 months and at 5 years, respectively. Relapse incidence was 36%, overall survival 56% and relapse-free survival 40% at 5 years. No differences in post-transplant outcomes were found between the three different 2GTKI subgroups. This prospective study demonstrates the feasibility of allo-HCT in patients previously treated with 2GTKI with a post-transplant complications rate comparable to that of TKI-naive or imatinib-treated patients.Peer reviewe

Allograft and patient survival after sequential HSCT and kidney transplantation from the same donor - A multicenter analysis

Tolerance induction through simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell and renal transplantation has shown promising results, but it is hampered by the toxicity of preconditioning therapies and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Moreover, renal function has never been compared to conventionally transplanted patients, thus, whether donor-specific tolerance results in improved outcomes remains unanswered. We collected follow-up data of published cases of renal transplantations after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the same donor and compared patient and transplant kidney survival as well as function with caliper-matched living-donor renal transplantations from the Austrian dialysis and transplant registry. Overall, 22 tolerant and 20 control patients were included (median observation period 10 years [range 11 months to 26 years]). In the tolerant group, no renal allograft loss was reported, whereas 3 were lost in the control group. Median creatinine levels were 85 μmol/l (interquartile range [IQR] 72-99) in the tolerant cohort and 118 μmol/l (IQR 99-143) in the control group. Mixed linear-model showed around 29% lower average creatinine levels throughout follow-up in the tolerant group (P < .01). Our data clearly show stable renal graft function without long-term immunosuppression for many years, suggesting permanent donor-specific tolerance. Thus sequential transplantation might be an alternative approach for future studies targeting tolerance induction in renal allograft recipients

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) prevention in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: T cell depletion strategies to reduce GvHD risk while preserving graft versus tumor (GvT) effect

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a well-establishedtherapeutic approach for a wide range of malignant and non malignant hematologicdiseases, often offering the only curative option. AlloHSCT success, based on the immunegraft-vs-tumor (GvT) effect, is hampered by graft-vs-host disease (GvHD), major cause ofmorbidity and nonrelapse mortality. Optimal GvHD prophylaxis would prevent clinicallysignificant GvHD while maintaining GvT effect and allowing immune reconstitution.Transplant modalities may be modified to reduce GvHD risk, but the basis of GvHDprophylaxis is still the pharmacological inhibition of T cell activation and proliferation by acalcineurin inhibitor associated to an anti-metabolite as described almost 40 years ago.Graft engineering to safely reduce GvHD risk while preserving GvT is a challenging area ofresearch. Most of the strategies consist in a kind of graft T cell depletion (TCD), whichhowever is associated with delayed immune reconstitution and increased risk of relapse.Different TCD approaches exist including ex vivo TCD (graft manipulation by negative orpositive selection before infusion), or in vivo TCD (administration of medications, such asanti-thymocyte globulin, cyclophosphamide or alemtuzumab to the patient before or/and aftergraft infusion). Geneva’s TCD approach is a partial TCD (pTCD) consisting in in vitro TCD by “alemtuzumabin the bag” of a part of the graft followed by an add-back of unmanipulated graft containing afixed dose of T cells. We consider that our approach of pTCD for GvHD prevention mitigatesthe disadvantages of extensive TCD methods and may abrogate severe GvHD, resulting inlow transplant related morbidity and mortality and better quality of life, without weakening thecurative potential of alloHSCT. We believe that it is particularly beneficial in case oftransplantation for severe aplastic anemia, and potentially other benign diseases, wherepTCD provides peripheral blood stem cell grafts containing a high number of hematopoieticstem cells and a sufficient number of T cells to ensure engraftment with low GvHD risk, andfor chronic myeloid leukemia where pTCD decreases GvHD risk in the early post-transplantperiod, while postponing a possible molecular relapse of the disease to a time when thepatients could achieved complete remission by donor infusion lymphocytes without importantrisk of GvHD. Efforts to modify T cell composition of the graft in favor of lymphocyte subsets reported to bemore important mediators of GvT than GvHD by more refined and sophisticated techniquesof TCD have been made. The results are promising, improving both efficacy and safety ofalloHSCT, but wide implementation of these methods is not possible yet.</p