Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.

Cervical cerclage is a well-known surgical procedure carried out during pregnancy. It involves positioning of a suture (stitch) around the neck of the womb (cervix), aiming to give mechanical support to the cervix and thereby reduce risk of preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of this procedure remains controversial. This is an update of a review last published in 2012.To assess whether the use of cervical stitch in singleton pregnancy at high risk of pregnancy loss based on woman's history and/or ultrasound finding of 'short cervix' and/or physical exam improves subsequent obstetric care and fetal outcome.We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (30 June 2016) and reference lists of identified studies.We included all randomised trials of cervical suturing in singleton pregnancies. Cervical stitch was carried out when the pregnancy was considered to be of sufficiently high risk due to a woman's history, a finding of short cervix on ultrasound or other indication determined by physical exam. We included any study that compared cerclage with either no treatment or any alternative intervention. We planned to include cluster-randomised studies but not cross-over trials. We excluded quasi-randomised studies. We included studies reported in abstract form only.Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We resolved discrepancies by discussion. Data were checked for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.This updated review includes a total of 15 trials (3490 women); three trials were added for this update (152 women). Cerclage versus no cerclageOverall, cerclage probably leads to a reduced risk of perinatal death when compared with no cerclage, although the confidence interval (CI) crosses the line of no effect (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04; 10 studies, 2927 women; moderate quality evidence). Considering stillbirths and neonatal deaths separately reduced the numbers of events and sample size. Although the relative effect of cerclage is similar, estimates were less reliable with fewer data and assessed as of low quality (stillbirths RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.75; 5 studies, 1803 women; low quality evidence; neonatal deaths before discharge RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.39; 6 studies, 1714 women; low quality evidence). Serious neonatal morbidity was similar with and without cerclage (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.18; 6 studies, 883 women; low-quality evidence). Pregnant women with and without cerclage were equally likely to have a baby discharged home healthy (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.06; 4 studies, 657 women; moderate quality evidence).Pregnant women with cerclage were less likely to have preterm births compared to controls before 37, 34 (average RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89; 9 studies, 2415 women; high quality evidence) and 28 completed weeks of gestation.Five subgroups based on clinical indication provided data for analysis (history-indicated; short cervix based on one-off ultrasound in high risk women; short cervix found by serial scans in high risk women; physical exam-indicated; and short cervix found on scan in low risk or mixed populations). There were too few trials in these clinical subgroups to make meaningful conclusions and no evidence of differential effects. Cerclage versus progesteroneTwo trials (129 women) compared cerclage to prevention with vaginal progesterone in high risk women with short cervix on ultrasound; these trials were too small to detect reliable, clinically important differences for any review outcome. One included trial compared cerclage with intramuscular progesterone (75 women) which lacked power to detect group differences. History indicated cerclage versus ultrasound indicated cerclageEvidence from two trials (344 women) was too limited to establish differences for clinically important outcomes.Cervical cerclage reduces the risk of preterm birth in women at high-risk of preterm birth and probably reduces risk of perinatal deaths. There was no evidence of any differential effect of cerclage based on previous obstetric history or short cervix indications, but data were limited for all clinical groups. The question of whether cerclage is more or less effective than other preventative treatments, particularly vaginal progesterone, remains unanswered

Acute cardiovascular changes in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF), a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: Ovarian stimulation during fertility treatment leads to profound maternal physiological changes. Women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) may be at an increased risk of future cardiovascular morbidity, though little is known about the effects on maternal cardiovascular function. We aim to systematically review whether IVF treatment is associated with changes in maternal haemodynamic parameters, and the effects of different protocols. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of English language studies identified on Medline and EMBASE database, between 1978, to 2019. Search terms: IVF, maternal haemodynamics, and cardiovascular. Studies reporting on ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination, and oocyte donation were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed by using the adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. A meta-analysis was conducted for blood pressure and heart rate on patients undergoing the long GnRH agonist protocol according to Cochrane guidelines. We considered four time points in the IVF cycle, in chronological order: pre-treatment, pituitary down regulation, peak oestradiol and the luteal phase. Results: Nine suitable studies were identified; four fulfilled the criteria for meta-analysis. Two studies measuring heart rate found a significant increase in heart rate from pituitary down-regulation to peak estradiol levels, which was supported by the meta-analysis (3.78 \ub1 2.18 (p= < 0.0001)). Three studies reported a significant decrease in blood pressure from baseline, with those suitable for meta-analysis showing a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (-2.08 \ub1 1.79 (p= < 0.0001)). Cardiac functional changes were reported for all studies and the changes depended on the type of protocol used. Conclusions: In Vitro Fertilisation leads to acute changes in maternal haemodynamics at different time points of the stimulation protocol. We found an increase in heart rate from pituitary down-regulation to peak estradiol levels and a significant decrease in blood pressure from baseline or pituitary down-regulation to the luteal phase. Cardiac functional changes were reported for all studies on the agonist protocol, but no significant changes were found using the antagonist protocol. It remains unclear as to whether these acute changes were associated with pregnancy complications or chronic cardiovascular sequelae

Current use and performance of the different fetal growth charts in the Italian population

Objectives: The choice of growth charts impacts on screening, diagnosis and clinical management of fetal growth abnormalities. The objectives of the study were to evaluate: 1) the clinical practice at a national level among tertiary referral centers in the use of fetal biometric growth charts; and 2) the impact on fetal growth screening of existing national and international growth charts. Study design: A questionnaire was sent to 14 Italian tertiary referral centers to explore biometric reference growth charts used in clinical practice. National and international (Intergrowth-21st and World Health Organization) fetal growth charts were tested on a large national cohort of low risk women with singleton uneventful pregnancy derived from a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study (21 centers). The percentage of fetuses with biometric measurements below and above the 10th and 90th percentile for each biometric parameter and gestational week were calculated for each growth chart. The percentile curves of the study population were calculated by non-linear quantile regressions. Results: Twelve Italian centers (86 %) answered to the questionnaire showing a wide discrepancy in the use of growth charts for fetal biometry. The cohort included 7347 pregnant women. By applying Intergrowth-21st growth charts the percentage of fetuses with head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length below the 10th centile was 3.9 %, 3.6 % and 2.3 %, and above the 90th centile 29.9 %, 32.5 % and 46 %, respectively. The percentages for the World Health Organization growth charts for head and abdominal circumferences and femur length were: below the 10th centile 6.3 %, 7.2 % and 5.3 %, and above 90th centile 22.8 %, 21.3 % and 31.9 %, respectively. Conclusions: The wide discrepancy in clinical use of fetal growth charts in Italian centers warrants the adoption of an uniform set of charts. Our data suggest that immediate application into clinical practice of international growth charts might result into an under-diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses and, especially, in an over-diagnosis of large for gestational age fetuses with major consequences for clinical practice. On these grounds, there is an urgent need for a nationwide study for the prospective evaluation of international growth charts and, if needed, the construction and adoption of methodologically robust national growth charts

Current practice in the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: An international survey

Introduction The aim of this survey was to evaluate the current practice in respect of diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction among obstetricians in different countries. Material and methods An e-questionnaire was sent via REDCap with "click thru" links in emails and newsletters to obstetric practitioners in different countries and settings with different levels of expertise. Clinical scenarios in early and late fetal growth restriction were given, followed by structured questions/response pairings. Results A total of 275 participants replied to the survey with 87% of responses complete. Participants were obstetrician/gynecologists (54%; 148/275) and fetal medicine specialists (43%; 117/275), and the majority practiced in a tertiary teaching hospital (56%; 153/275). Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction diagnosis were used by 81% of participants (223/275) and 82% (225/274) included a drop in fetal growth velocity in their diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction. For early fetal growth restriction, TRUFFLE criteria were used for fetal monitoring and delivery timing by 81% (223/275). For late fetal growth restriction, indices of cerebral blood flow redistribution were used by 99% (250/252), most commonly cerebroplacental ratio (54%, 134/250). Delivery timing was informed by cerebral blood flow redistribution in 72% (176/244), used from >= 32 weeks of gestation. Maternal biomarkers and hemodynamics, as additional tools in the context of early-onset fetal growth restriction (<= 32 weeks of gestation), were used by 22% (51/232) and 46% (106/230), respectively. Conclusions The diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction are fairly homogeneous among different countries and levels of practice, particularly for early fetal growth restriction. Indices of cerebral flow distribution are widely used in the diagnosis and management of late fetal growth restriction, whereas maternal biomarkers and hemodynamics are less frequently assessed but more so in early rather than late fetal growth restriction. Further standardization is needed for the definition of cerebral blood flow redistribution

Fetal cerebral Doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study

Peer reviewe

Ultrasound prediction of adverse outcome and perinatal complications at diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a cohort study

Background: Abnormal umbilical, cerebral and uterine artery Doppler findings and fetal biometry below the 3rd percentile have been proposed as risk factors for perinatal complications in late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR). Recent evidence has allowed to reach a consensus on the clinical use of Doppler ultrasound for the monitoring and timing of delivery in early-onset FGR, however there is limited data on the relationship between abnormal Doppler and severity of the growth restriction and adverse outcome when a diagnosis of late-onset FGR is made. Objective: To evaluate the relationship between the ultrasound parameters measured at diagnosis and perinatal adverse outcome within a cohort of late-onset FGR fetuses. Methods: This is a multicentre retrospective study between 2014 and 2019 including non-anomalous singleton pregnancies complicated by late-onset FGR, which was defined either by abdominal circumference (AC), estimated fetal weight (EFW) &lt;10th percentile for the gestation or by a reduction of the longitudinal growth of the AC by over 50 percentiles compared to an ultrasound scan performed between 18 and 32 weeks of gestation. Sonographic findings at diagnosis were compared between fetuses with and without adverse outcomes including stillbirth, obstetric intervention due to intrapartum distress, neonatal acidaemia, transfer to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and composite adverse perinatal outcome (CAO), which was defined by either stillbirth or the combination of at least two adverse perinatal outcomes. Results: Overall, 468 cases with full biometry and umbilical, middle cerebral, and uterine artery (UtA) Doppler data were included, among whom CAO was recorded in 53 (11.3%). At logistic regression analysis, only the EFW percentile proved to be independently associated with CAO (p=0.01) and NICU admission (p&lt;0.01), while the mean UtA pulsatility index (PI) MoM &gt;95th percentile at diagnosis proved to be independently associated with obstetric intervention due to intrapartum distress (p&lt;0.01). The model including baseline pregnancy characteristics and the EFW percentile was associated with an area under the curve of 0.889, 95%CI (0.813-0.966), p&lt;0.001 for CAO. A cut-off value corresponding to the 3.95th percentile was found to better discriminate between cases with and without CAO yielding a 58.5% sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI) (44.1-71.9)], a 69.6% specificity [95%CI (65.0-74.0)], a 19.8% positive predictive value [95%CI (13.8-26.8)], and a 92.9% negative predictive value [95%CI (89.5-95.5)]. Conclusions: Retrospective data on a large cohort of late-onset FGR fetuses shows that at diagnosis the EFW is the only sonographic parameter independently associated with the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes, while a mean UtA PI MoM &gt;95th percentile at diagnosis is independently associated with intrapartum distress leading to obstetric intervention. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction

N/

Intrauterine versus post-mortem magnetic resonance in second trimester termination of pregnancy for central nervous system abnormalities

Objective: To evaluate if limiting factors of intrauterine magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) performed in the early second trimester of pregnancy (19\u201323 weeks) affect its accuracy in comparison to post-mortem MRI (pmMRI) in fetuses that underwent termination of pregnancy (TOP) for central nervous system (CNS) defects. Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a 10 years prospective observational study. Cases of TOP < 23 weeks for CNS malformation that had undergone neurosonography (NSG), iuMRI, pmMRI and autopsy were included. The agreement between iuMRI and pmMRI was calculated. The autopsy represented the gold-standard. Results: Overall, 143 TOPs for fetal congenital anomaly underwent the post-mortem diagnostic protocol. Of these, 31 cases underwent iuMRI and pmMRI for CNS abnormality. Three cases were excluded due to brain autolysis at autopsy. Corpus callosum defects were the most represented (16/28; 57 %). In only one case of posterior fossa defect, pmMRI identified the presence of vermian hypoplasia not diagnosed at iuMRI. In 2 cases (7%), iuMRI added clinically relevant additional findings to NSG, that were posteriorly confirmed by pmMRI. Conclusions: The study shows that, at 19\u201323 weeks and for CNS defects, limiting factors that might influence the performance of iuMRI have little influence on iuMRI accuracy. This finding is particularly important for professionals who work in countries with legal bound for TOP in the early second trimester

Exploring the Needs and Expectations of Expectant and New Parents for an mHealth Application to Support the First 1000 Days of Life: Steps toward a Co-Design Approach

To improve maternal and child health, it is essential to adhere to health-promoting and preventive measures. However, reliable information as well as effective tools are not easy to identify in this field. Our cross-sectional study investigated the needs and expectations of expectant and new mothers and fathers as potential primary users of a hypothetical application supporting the first 1000 days of life. Between May and August 2022, we recruited expectant and new parents by administering an 83-item 5-point Likert scale questionnaire related to the content, functionalities, and technical features of the hypothetical app. We stratified responses using sociodemographic characteristics and then performed ward hierarchical clustering. The 94 women and 69 men involved in our study generally agreed with the proposed content, but expressed low interest in certain app functionalities or features, including those related to the interaction mechanism and interactivity. Women were generally more demanding than men. Our findings, resulting from the engagement of end-users, may be useful for designers and technology providers to implement mHealth solutions that, in addition to conveying reliable information, are tailored to the needs and preferences of end-users in the first 1000 days of life

Current practice in the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: An international survey

Introduction The aim of this survey was to evaluate the current practice in respect of diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction among obstetricians in different countries. Material and methods An e-questionnaire was sent via REDCap with “click thru” links in emails and newsletters to obstetric practitioners in different countries and settings with different levels of expertise. Clinical scenarios in early and late fetal growth restriction were given, followed by structured questions/response pairings. Results A total of 275 participants replied to the survey with 87% of responses complete. Participants were obstetrician/gynecologists (54%; 148/275) and fetal medicine specialists (43%; 117/275), and the majority practiced in a tertiary teaching hospital (56%; 153/275). Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction diagnosis were used by 81% of participants (223/275) and 82% (225/274) included a drop in fetal growth velocity in their diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction. For early fetal growth restriction, TRUFFLE criteria were used for fetal monitoring and delivery timing by 81% (223/275). For late fetal growth restriction, indices of cerebral blood flow redistribution were used by 99% (250/252), most commonly cerebroplacental ratio (54%, 134/250). Delivery timing was informed by cerebral blood flow redistribution in 72% (176/244), used from ≥32 weeks of gestation. Maternal biomarkers and hemodynamics, as additional tools in the context of early-onset fetal growth restriction (≤32 weeks of gestation), were used by 22% (51/232) and 46% (106/230), respectively. Conclusions The diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction are fairly homogeneous among different countries and levels of practice, particularly for early fetal growth restriction. Indices of cerebral flow distribution are widely used in the diagnosis and management of late fetal growth restriction, whereas maternal biomarkers and hemodynamics are less frequently assessed but more so in early rather than late fetal growth restriction. Further standardization is needed for the definition of cerebral blood flow redistribution