Yield of continuous fiber composites under axisymmetric loading

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30437/1/0000060.pd

Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

Background : Methotrexate is the most frequently used first-line antirheumatic drug. We report the findings of a phase 3 study of monotherapy with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as compared with methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate. Methods : We randomly assigned 958 patients to receive 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily or methotrexate at a dose that was incrementally increased to 20 mg per week over 8 weeks; 956 patients received a study drug. The coprimary end points at month 6 were the mean change from baseline in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (which ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater structural joint damage) and the proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response (>= 70% reduction in the number of both tender and swollen joints and >= 70% improvement in three of five other criteria: the patient's assessment of pain, level of disability, C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, global assessment of disease by the patient, and global assessment of disease by the physician). Results : Mean changes in the modified total Sharp score from baseline to month 6 were significantly smaller in the tofacitinib groups than in the methotrexate group, but changes were modest in all three groups (0.2 points in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and <0.1 point in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, as compared with 0.8 points in the methotrexate group [ P<0.001 for both comparisons]). Among the patients receiving tofacitinib, 25.5% in the 5-mg group and 37.7% in the 10-mg group had an ACR 70 response at month 6, as compared with 12.0% of patients in the methotrexate group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Herpes zoster developed in 31 of 770 patients who received tofacitinib (4.0%) and in 2 of 186 patients who received methotrexate (1.1%). Confirmed cases of cancer (including three cases of lymphoma) developed in 5 patients who received tofacitinib and in 1 patient who received methotrexate. Tofacitinib was associated with increases in creatinine levels and in low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Conclusions : In patients who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate, tofacitinib monotherapy was superior to methotrexate in reducing signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage. The benefits of tofacitinib need to be considered in the context of the risks of adverse events

Evaluation of the short‐, mid‐, and long‐term effects of tofacitinib on lymphocytes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objective: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Altered lymphocyte cell counts and a potential association with increased infection rates have been reported in RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors. This analysis was undertaken to evaluate the short-, mid-, and long-term effects of tofacitinib on lymphocytes and infection rates in patients with RA. Methods: In this post hoc analysis, absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) were obtained from phase III studies (12–24 months; n = 717–958) and phase I/II/III/long-term extension studies of tofacitinib (≤117 months) (All RA population; n = 7,061); lymphocyte subset counts (LSCs) were from phase II studies (1.5–6 months’ exposure; n = 236–486), an ORAL Sequel vaccine substudy (~22 months; n = 198), and an ORAL Sequel lymphocyte substudy (~50 months; n = 55–1,035) of tofacitinib. The reversibility of ALC/LSC changes was evaluated. The relationship of ALC and LSC to infections was analyzed in the All RA population. The value of monitoring ALC alone was assessed by examining correlations between ALCs and LSCs. Results: Tofacitinib treatment resulted in an initial increase in ALC versus pretreatment baseline, which gradually declined to steady state by ~48 months. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts decreased over long-term treatment, and ALC and LSC changes were reversible upon treatment cessation. Patients with ALCs of <500 cells/mm 3 had an increased risk of serious infections. There was no strong association between CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell, B cell, or natural killer cell counts and serious infection incidence rates. ALC and CD4+ or CD8+ T cell counts correlated well (R = 0.65–0.86). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that monitoring of ALC alone appears to be adequate to assess infection risk in tofacitinib-treated patients with RA

Arthritis & Rheumatology / Brief Report: Remission Rates With Tofacitinib Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: : A Comparison of Various Remission Criteria

Objective Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor that is used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In previous clinical trials of tofacitinib, a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)based analysis was used to assess outcomes. In this study, remission rates according to various remission criteria were evaluated across 5 phase III randomized controlled studies. Methods In all 5 studies, tofacitinib was administered at a dosage of 5 mg twice daily or 10 mg twice daily, either as monotherapy or with background methotrexate or other conventional synthetic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs. One of the studies included adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks. In addition to the 4variable DAS28 using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS284[ESR]), a primary efficacy variable used in the phase III studies, disease activity was assessed post hoc by the 4variable DAS28 using the Creactive protein level (DAS284[CRP]), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Booleanbased assessment. Results A total of 3,306 patients were analyzed (1,213 of these patients received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, 1,212 received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, 679 received placebo, and 202 received adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks). Remission rates varied according to the criteria used, with higher rates in the activetreatment groups for the DAS284(CRP) than for other scores. At month 3, remission rates with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily were 1822% using the DAS284(CRP), 510% using the DAS284(ESR), 47% using the SDAI, 56% using the CDAI, and 27% using the Booleanbased method. In contrast, the remission rates with placebo varied from 0% to 7%, with small differences between the DAS284(ESR) and the DAS284(CRP). Conclusion Although tofacitinib at dosages of 5 mg twice daily and 10 mg twice daily was effective compared with placebo in achieving disease remission, regardless of the disease activity measure, remission rates were substantially higher when the DAS284(CRP) was used. The presence or absence and type of acutephase reactants in remission criteria were significant contributors to remission rates across treatment groups. This finding has important consequences for trial design and clinical practice.(VLID)483913

CPT : Pharmacometrics &amp; Systems Pharmacology - Inception, Maturation, and Future Vision

De två sista författarna delar sistaförfattarskapet</p