17,939 research outputs found

    The involvement of posterior parietal cortex in feature and conjunction visuomotor search.

    Get PDF
    Successful interaction with the environment often involves the identification and localization of a particular item. Right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) is necessary for the successful completion of conjunction but not feature visual search, regardless of the attentional requirements. One account for this dissociation is that rPPC is primarily involved in processing spatial information. For target identification, conjunction tasks require that spatial information is used to determine if features occur at the same location, whilst feature search does not require such a process. This account suggests that if the requirement to localize the target is made explicit then rPPC may also be necessary for feature search. This was examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and by manipulating the response mode: participants were either required to press a button indicating the presence/absence of the target, or else had to point to the target. TMS over rPPC did not disrupt performance of the feature task when a button-press was required, but significantly increased response time and movement time for the same task in the pointing condition. Conjunction search in both response conditions was significantly impaired by TMS. Performance on a task which required pointing to a target in the absence of distractors, and thus did not involve visual search, was unaffected by rPPC stimulation. We conclude that rPPC is involved in coding and representing spatial information, and is therefore crucial when the task requires determining whether or not two features spatially co-occur, or when search is combined with explicit target localization via a visuomotor transformation

    Behavior of nozzles and acoustic liners in three-dimensional acoustic fields Quarterly report, 1 Jun. - 31 Aug. 1970

    Get PDF
    Updating computer program for determining nozzle admittances to eliminate double-root solution and to fit resultant admittance data curves by statistical mean

    Behavior of nozzles and acoustic liners in three-dimensional acoustic fields Quarterly report, 1 Sep. - 31 Nov. 1970

    Get PDF
    Behavior of nozzles and acoustic liners in three dimensional acoustic field

    Behavior of nozzles and acoustic liners in three-dimensional acoustic fields Quarterly report, 1 Sep. - 31 Dec. 1969

    Get PDF
    Theoretical studies and test facility installation for investigating behavior of rocket nozzles and acoustic liners in three dimensional acoustic field

    Behavior of nozzles and acoustic liners in three-dimensional acoustic fields Quarterly report, 1 Mar. - 31 May 1969

    Get PDF
    Behavior of convergent-divergent nozzles and acoustic liners in three dimensional acoustic field

    Rewards have a transient and task-specific effect on saccade latency

    Get PDF
    The eye movement system is sensitive to reward. However, whilst the eye movement system is extremely flexible, the extent to which changes to oculomotor behaviour induced by reward paradigms persist beyond the training period or transfer to other oculomotor tasks is unclear. To address these issues we examined the effects of presenting feedback that represented small monetary rewards to spatial locations on the latency of saccadic eye movements, the time-course of learning and extinction of the effects of rewarding saccades on exogenous spatial attention and oculomotor IOR. Reward feedback produced a relative facilitation of saccadic latency in a stimulus driven saccade task which persisted for 3 blocks of extinction trials. However this hemifield-specific effect failed to transfer to peripheral cueing tasks. We conclude that rewarding specific spatial locations is unlikely to induce long-term, systemic changes to the human oculomotor or attention systems

    Behavior of nozzles and acoustic liners in three dimensional acoustic fields

    Get PDF
    Theoretical values of the admittances of various nozzles were computed and compared with the corresponding experimental values. The existing data reduction scheme was corrected and all available experimental data has been rechecked and corrected whenever necessary; the updated experimental admittance values are presented. An analysis associated with the frequency sensitivity of experimental admittance values was initiated and the analog-to-digital Data Reduction Program which has become operational is discussed. Fourteen nozzle tests were conducted during this report period

    The SMC SNR 1E0102.2-7219 as a Calibration Standard for X-ray Astronomy in the 0.3-2.5 keV Bandpass

    Get PDF
    The flight calibration of the spectral response of CCD instruments below 1.5 keV is difficult in general because of the lack of strong lines in the on-board calibration sources typically available. We have been using 1E 0102.2-7219, the brightest supernova remnant in the Small Magellanic Cloud, to evaluate the response models of the ACIS CCDs on the Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO), the EPIC CCDs on the XMM-Newton Observatory, the XIS CCDs on the Suzaku Observatory, and the XRT CCD on the Swift Observatory. E0102 has strong lines of O, Ne, and Mg below 1.5 keV and little or no Fe emission to complicate the spectrum. The spectrum of E0102 has been well characterized using high-resolution grating instruments, namely the XMM-Newton RGS and the CXO HETG, through which a consistent spectral model has been developed that can then be used to fit the lower-resolution CCD spectra. We have also used the measured intensities of the lines to investigate the consistency of the effective area models for the various instruments around the bright O (~570 eV and 654 eV) and Ne (~910 eV and 1022 eV) lines. We find that the measured fluxes of the O VII triplet, the O VIII Ly-alpha line, the Ne IX triplet, and the Ne X Ly-alpha line generally agree to within +/-10 % for all instruments, with 28 of our 32 fitted normalizations within +/-10% of the RGS-determined value. The maximum discrepancies, computed as the percentage difference between the lowest and highest normalization for any instrument pair, are 23% for the O VII triplet, 24% for the O VIII Ly-alpha line, 13% for the Ne IX triplet, and 19% for the Ne X Ly-alpha line. If only the CXO and XMM are compared, the maximum discrepancies are 22% for the O VII triplet, 16% for the O VIII Ly-alpha line, 4% for the Ne IX triplet, and 12% for the Ne X Ly-alpha line.Comment: 16 pages, 11 figures, to be published in Proceedings of the SPIE 7011: Space Telescopes and Instrumentation II: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray 200
    corecore