11 research outputs found

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Survival Outcomes of Clinical Trials in Patients With Recurrent Cervical Cancer

    Get PDF
    AbstractIntroductionA large proportion of patients with cervical cancer have a lower socioeconomic background with inherent barriers to clinical trial participation. The present authors hypothesized that patients participating in a clinical trial would have better outcomes compared with those not enrolled in a trial. The objective was to review the clinical outcomes of women with recurrent cervical cancer treated on a clinical trial versus those treated off trial.Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of women treated for recurrent cervical cancer on versus off clinical trial between 1998 and 2010. Women participating in Gynecologic Oncology Group clinical trials for recurrent cervical cancer were identified and matched 1:1 with women treated off trial based on age within 10 years, ethnicity, stage at initial diagnosis, histology, primary treatment, and baseline renal function.ResultsA total of 60 women with recurrent cervical cancer were identified; 30 were treated for their recurrence on a clinical trial and were matched to 30 treated off trial. The median number of salvage regimens was 1.0 for the trial group (range, 1-5) and 1.5 for the off-trial group (range, 1-5) (P = .74). There was no significant difference in the number of cycles of chemotherapy completed on versus off trial (7.5 vs. 5.9; P = .44). There was also no significant difference in progression-free and overall survival from time of recurrence on trial and off trial (4.2 vs. 3.1 months [P = .75] and 15.0 vs. 13.8 months [P = .64], respectively).ConclusionThis study found that the progression-free survival and overall survival are similar between women treated with chemotherapy on or off trial for cervical cancer

    Associations between DSM-IV mental disorders and subsequent heart disease onset:Beyond depression

    No full text
    <p>Background: Prior studies on the depression-heart disease association have not usually used diagnosticmeasures of depression, or taken other mental disorders into consideration. As a result, it is not clear whether the association between depression and heart disease onset reflects a specific association, or the comorbidity between depression and other mental disorders. Additionally, the relative magnitude of associations of a range of mental disorders with heart disease onset is unknown.</p><p>Methods: Face-to-face household surveys were conducted in 19 countries (n = 52,095; person years = 2,141,194). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview retrospectively assessed lifetime prevalence and age at onset of 16 DSM-IV mental disorders. Heart disease was indicated by self-report of physician's diagnosis, or self-report of heart attack, togetherwith their timing (year). Survival analyses estimated associations between first onset of mental disorders and subsequent heart disease onset.</p><p>Results: After comorbidity adjustment, depression, panic disorder, specific phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders were associated with heart disease onset (ORs 1.3-1.6). Increasing number of mental disorderswas associated with heart disease in a dose-response fashion. Mood disorders and alcohol abusewere more strongly associated with earlier onset than later onset heart disease. Associations did not vary by gender.</p><p>Conclusions: Depression, anxiety and alcohol use disorders were significantly associated with heart disease onset; depression was the weakest predictor. If confirmed in future prospective studies, the breadth of psychopathology's links with heart disease onset has substantial clinical and public health implications. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</p>
    corecore