14 research outputs found

    Vasa previa in singleton pregnancies: Diagnosis and clinical management based on an international expert consensus

    Get PDF
    There are limited data to guide the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Currently, what is known is largely based on case reports or series and cohort studies. (s): To systematically collect and classify expert opinions and achieve consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of vasa previa using focus group discussions (FGD) and a Delphi technique. A four-round FGD and a three-round Delphi survey of an international panel of experts on vasa previa were conducted. Experts were selected based on their publication record on vasa previa. First, we convened an FGD panel of 20 experts and agreed on which issues were unresolved in the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. A three-round anonymous electronic survey was then sent to the full expert panel. Survey questions were presented on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa that the experts were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 5). Consensus was defined as a median score of 5. Following responses to each round, any statements that had median scores of 3 or less were deemed to have had no consensus and excluded. Statements with a median score of 4 were revised and re-presented to the experts in the next round. Consensus and non-consensus statements were then aggregated. Sixty-eight international experts were invited to participate in the study, of which 57 participated. Experts were from 13 countries on five continents and have contributed to over 80% of published cohort studies on vasa previa, as well as national and international society guidelines. Completion rates were 84%, 93%, 91% for the first, second, and third rounds, respectively, and 71% completed all three rounds. The panel reached a consensus on 26 statements regarding the diagnosis and key points of management of vasa previa, including: 1) While there is no agreement on a distance between the fetal vessels and the cervical internal os to define vasa previa, the definition should not be limited to a 2 cm distance; 2) All pregnancies should be screened for vasa previa with routine examination for placental cord insertion and a color Doppler sweep of the region over the cervix at the second-trimester anatomy scan; 3) When a low-lying placenta or placenta previa is found in the second trimester, a transvaginal ultrasound with Doppler should be performed at around 32 weeks to rule out vasa previa; 4) Outpatient management of asymptomatic patients without risk factors for preterm birth is reasonable; 5)Asymptomatic patients with vasa previa should be delivered by scheduled cesarean between 35- and 37-weeks of gestation; and 6) There was no agreement on routine hospitalization, avoidance of intercourse, or use of 3-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of vasa previa. Through FGD and a Delphi process, an international expert panel reached consensus on the definition, screening, clinical management, and timing of delivery in vasa previa, which could inform the development of new clinical guidelines. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

    Anatomy in a New Curriculum: Facilitating the Learning of Gross Anatomy Using Web Access Streaming Dissection Videos

    No full text
    As anatomy course hours have decreased, it has become increasingly important to provide tools that facilitate laboratory task efficiency. Digital video clips were created to present dissection guidance to medical students. The video clips communicate challenging aspects of the dissection process with succinct visual demonstrations easily accessed via an online course site. Students were asked to complete a survey designed to assess the quality and utility of the videos. Survey respondents indicated that the videos enhanced the quality of the anatomy course as well as their individual performances. This teaching tool enhances student competencies in human gross anatomy

    Quantitative T1 and T2 mapping by magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) of the placenta before and after maternal hyperoxia

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: MR relaxometry has been used to assess placental exchange function, but methods to date are not sufficiently fast to be robust to placental motion. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) permits rapid, voxel-wise, intrinsically co-registered T1 and T2 mapping. After characterizing measurement error, we scanned pregnant women during air and oxygen breathing to demonstrate MRF's ability to detect placental oxygenation changes. METHODS: The accuracy of FISP-based, sliding-window reconstructed MRF was tested on phantoms. MRF scans in 9-s breath holds were acquired at 3T in 31 pregnant women during air and oxygen breathing. A mixed effects model was used to test for changes in placenta relaxation times between physiological states, to assess the dependency on gestational age (GA), and the impact of placental motion. RESULTS: MRF estimates of known phantom relaxation times resulted in mean absolute errors for T1 of 92 ms (4.8%), but T2 was less accurate at 16 ms (13.6%). During normoxia, placental T1 = 1825 ± 141 ms (avg ± standard deviation) and T2 = 60 ± 16 ms (gestational age range 24.3-36.7, median 32.6 weeks). In the statistical model, placental T2 rose and T1 remained contant after hyperoxia, and no GA dependency was observed for T1 or T2. DISCUSSION: Well-characterized, motion-robust MRF was used to acquire T1 and T2 maps of the placenta. Changes with hyperoxia are consistent with a net increase in oxygen saturation. Toward the goal of whole-placenta quantitative oxygenation imaging over time, we aim to implement 3D MRF with integrated motion correction to improve T2 accuracy

    Geographic variation in management of patients with placenta accreta spectrum : an international survey of experts (GPASS)

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE : To describe global geographic variations in the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). METHODS : An international cross-sectional study was conducted among PAS experts practicing at medical institutions in member states of the United Nations. Survey questions focused on diagnostic evaluation and management strategies for PAS. RESULTS : A total of 134 centers participated. Participating centers represented each of the United Nations' designated regions. Of those, 118 (88%) reported practicing in a medium-volume or high-volume center. First-trimester PAS screen was reported in 35 (26.1%) centers. Respondents consistently implement guideline-supported care practices, including utilization of ultrasound as the primary diagnostic modality (134, 100%) and implementation of multidisciplinary care teams (115, 85.8%). Less than 10% of respondents reported routinely managing PAS without hysterectomy; these centers were predominantly located in Europe and Africa. Antepartum management and availability of mental health support for PAS patients varied widely. CONCLUSION : Worldwide, there is a strong adherence to PAS care guidelines; however, regional variations do exist. Comparing variations in care to outcomes will provide insight into the clinically significant practice variability. SYNOPSIS : This international study sought to determine the geographic variations in diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum worldwide.http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ijgo2022-10-05hj2022Obstetrics and Gynaecolog

    Delivery outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy following the conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Objective:Cesarean hysterectomy is generally presumed to decrease maternal morbidity and mortality secondary to placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS). Recently, uterine-sparing techniques have been introduced in conservative management of PAS to preserve fertility and potentially reduce surgical complications. However, despite often expressing the intention for future conception, few data are available regarding the subsequent pregnancy outcome after conservative management of PAS. Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the subsequent pregnancy outcomes following conservative management of PAS. Data sources:PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to September 2022. Study eligibility criteria:We included all studies, with the exception of case studies, that reported the first subsequent pregnancy outcomes in individuals with a previous history of PAS who underwent any type of conservative management. Study appraisal and synthesis method:The R programming language with the meta package was used. The random effects model and inverse variance method were used to pool the proportion of pregnancy outcomes. Results:We identified five studies involving 1,458 subjects that were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The type of conservative management included placenta left in situ (n=1), resection surgery (n=1), and not reported in three studies. The PAS recurrence rate in the subsequent pregnancy was 11.8% (95% CI: 1.1-60.3, I2 = 86.4%), and 1.9% (95% CI: 0.0-34.1, I2 = 82.4%) underwent Cesarean hysterectomy. Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 10.3% (95% CI: 0.3-81.4, I2 = 96.7%). A composite adverse maternal outcome was reported in 22.7% of subjects (95% CI: 0.0-99.4, I2 = 56.3%). Conclusion:Favorable pregnancy outcome is possible following successful conservation of the uterus in a PAS pregnancy. Approximately one out of four subsequent pregnancies following conservative management of PAS experienced significant adverse maternal outcomes. Given such high incidence of adverse outcomes and morbidity, patient and provider preparation is vital when managing this population
    corecore