Identifying and managing patients at risk of severe allergic reactions to food: report from two iFAAM workshops

Food allergy affects a small but important number of children and adults. Much of the morbidity associated with food allergy is driven by the fear of a severe reaction, and fatalities continue to occur. Foods are the commonest cause of anaphylaxis. One of the aims of the European Union funded Integrated Approaches to Food Allergen and Allergy Risk Management (iFAAM) project was to improve the identification and management of children and adults at risk of experiencing a severe reaction. A number of interconnected studies within the project have focused on quantifying the severity of allergic reactions; the impact of food matrix, immunological factors on severity of reactions; the impact of co‐factors such as medications on the severity of reactions; utilising single dose challenges to understand threshold and severity of reactions; and community studies to understand the experience of patients suffering real‐life allergic reactions to food. Associated studies have examined population thresholds, and co‐factors such as exercise and stress. This paper summarises two workshops focused on the severity of allergic reactions to food. It outlines the related studies being undertaken in the project indicating how they are likely to impact on our ability to identify individuals at risk of severe reactions and improve their management

APPEAL-2: A pan-European qualitative study to explore the burden of peanut-allergic children, teenagers and their caregivers

Background: Allergy to Peanuts ImPacting Emotions And Life (APPEAL-1) was a recent European multi-country questionnaire survey that highlighted the negative impacts of peanut allergy (PA) on quality of life. A follow-on qualitative study, APPEAL-2, further assessed the burden of PA and associated coping strategies through semi-structured interviews. Objective: To gain qualitative insight on the strategies used to cope with and manage PA and the impact of these strategies on the quality of life of children, teenagers and caregivers. Methods: This cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in eight European countries: the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Denmark and the Netherlands. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with children (aged 8-12 years) and teenagers (aged 13-17 years) with self-/proxy-reported moderate or severe PA and with parents/caregivers of children or teenagers (aged 4-17 years) with moderate or severe PA. Data were analysed using thematic analysis; data saturation was assessed. Two conceptual models were developed to illustrate the impacts of PA and coping strategies used to manage them for (a) individuals with PA and (b) parents/caregivers of children with PA. Results: 107 participants were interviewed: 24 children, 39 teenagers and 44 caregivers. The conceptual models illustrated themes related to coping and control, driven by the fear of PA reactions, and the associated emotional, social, relationship and work impacts. Factors moderating these impacts included social attitudes and support, child-caregiver relationship and coping strategies used. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: The APPEAL-2 results substantiate the findings of APPEAL-1; the results also suggest that the severity of experience with PA may not correlate with perception of its overall burden and show variable impacts by country

Managing food allergy:GA²LEN guideline 2022

Food allergy affects approximately 2–4% of children and adults. This guideline provides recommendations for managing food allergy from the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN). A multidisciplinary international Task Force developed the guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II framework and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. We reviewed the latest available evidence as of April 2021 (161 studies) and created recommendations by balancing benefits, harms, feasibility, and patient and clinician experiences. We suggest that people diagnosed with food allergy avoid triggering allergens (low certainty evidence). We suggest that infants with cow's milk allergy who need a breastmilk alternative use either hypoallergenic extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk formula or an amino acid-based formula (moderate certainty). For selected children with peanut allergy, we recommend oral immunotherapy (high certainty), though epicutaneous immunotherapy might be considered depending on individual preferences and availability (moderate certainty). We suggest considering oral immunotherapy for children with persistent severe hen's egg or cow's milk allergy (moderate certainty). There are significant gaps in evidence about safety and effectiveness of the various strategies. Research is needed to determine the best approaches to education, how to predict the risk of severe reactions, whether immunotherapy is cost-effective and whether biological therapies are effective alone or combined with allergen immunotherapy

Can we define a level of protection for allergic consumers that everyone can accept?

Substantial progress has been made in characterising the risk associated with exposure to allergens in food. However, absence of agreement on what risk is tolerable has made it difficult to set quantitative limits to manage that risk and protect allergic consumers effectively. This paper reviews scientific progress in the area and the diverse status of allergen management approaches and lack of common standards across different jurisdictions, including within the EU. This lack of regulation largely explains why allergic consumers find Precautionary Allergen Labelling confusing and cannot rely on it. We reviewed approaches to setting quantitative limits for a broad range of food safety hazards to identify the reasoning leading to their adoption. This revealed a diversity of approaches from pragmatic to risk-based, but we could not find clear evidence of the process leading to the decision on risk acceptability. We propose a framework built around the criteria suggested by Murphy and Gardoni (2008) for approaches to defining tolerable risks. Applying these criteria to food allergy, we concluded that sufficient knowledge exists to implement the framework, including sufficient expertise across the whole range of stakeholders to allow opinions to be heard and respected, and a consensus to be achieved

Earth Virtualization Engines (EVE)

To manage Earth in the Anthropocene, new tools, new institutions, and new forms of international cooperation will be required. Earth Virtualization Engines is proposed as an international federation of centers of excellence to empower all people to respond to the immense and urgent challenges posed by climate change

Allergy to Peanuts imPacting Emotions And Life (APPEAL) study : The impact of peanut allergy on children, teenagers, adults and caregivers in Germany

Hintergrund: In Industrieländern sind bis zu 3 % aller Kinder von einer Erdnussallergie betroffen. Allergy to Peanuts imPacting Emotions And Life (APPEAL) ist die erste große Studie, die die Auswirkungen und Belastungen durch eine Erdnussallergie auf Betroffene und Angehörige untersucht. Material und Methoden : Betroffene mit Erdnussallergie und deren Eltern/Betreuer nahmen entweder an einer Online-Umfrage teil (APPEAL‑1, n = 273) oder gaben detaillierte Interviews (APPEAL‑2, n = 32). Ergebnisse : Von den Befragten der APPEAL-1-Studie (56 erwachsene Patienten mit Erdnussallergie und 217 Eltern/Betreuer von Personen mit Erdnussallergie) gaben 85 % an, dass die Erdnussallergie ihre täglichen Aktivitäten beeinflusst, 65 % fühlten sich deshalb isoliert. 91 % sorgten sich besonders bei gesellschaftlichen Anlässen vor einer potenziellen Erdnussexposition; 85 % verspürten Hindernisse beim Pflegen sozialer Kontakte. Die häufigsten psychologischen Auswirkungen der Erdnussallergie waren Frustration (89 %), Unsicherheit (86 %) und Stress (88 %). Ein Großteil der Befragten (84 %) beschrieb ein Gefühl der Andersartigkeit. Durch die Erdnussallergie kommt es häufig zu Beeinträchtigungen bei sozialen Aktivitäten, im schulischen Umfeld, im Beruf (bei Eltern und erwachsenen Betroffenen) sowie in Bezug auf emotionales Befinden und Beziehungen. Als wichtigste Bewältigungsstrategien nannten die Teilnehmer eine gute Überwachung von Nahrung und Hygiene, den Austausch mit anderen und eine akribische Planung von Aktivitäten. Schlussfolgerungen : Dies ist die erste alltagsbezogene Umfrage in Deutschland, die die Auswirkungen und Belastungen einer Erdnussallergie bei betroffenen Kindern, Jugendlichen und deren Eltern/Betreuern sowie bei selbst betroffenen Erwachsenen aufzeigt.Background: Peanut allergy (PA) has been reported to affect up to 3% of children in developed countries. The Allergy to Peanuts imPacting Emotions And Life study (APPEAL) is the first large study to investigate the impact and burden of living with PA in patients and their caregivers. Material and methods: Children, teenagers and adults with PA and their caregivers completed either an online questionnaire (APPEAL‑1, n = 273) or provided in-depth interviews (APPEAL‑2, n = 32). Results: Of the responders in APPEAL‑1 (56 adult patients with PA and 217 parents and caregivers of persons with PA), 85% stated that PA affects their daily activities and 65% felt isolated as a result of living with PA. Feelings of worry about potential exposure to peanuts on social occasions where food is involved were reported by 91% and a total of 85% reported restrictions in socializing. The psychological impact of PA included feelings of frustration (89%), uncertainty (86%) and stress (88%). A large proportion of responders (84%) reported a feeling of differentness due to PA. The main factors that drove the impact of PA included social and school activities, relationships, emotional well-being, and work (parents and caregivers). The main coping strategies to avoid peanuts included monitoring of food and hygiene, communication with others and detailed planning of activities. Conclusion: This is the first real-world survey in Germany to demonstrate the impact and burden of a PA on and unmet needs of allergic children, teenagers and their parents or caregivers as well as affected adults

Position paper of the Food Allergy Working Group of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie, DGAKI)

Background: Parents of school-age children with food allergies and potential anaphylactic reactions want their children to have an unburdened and risk-free everyday school life. Thus, particularly in the case of peanut allergy, demands for peanut-free schools are put forward. Results and discussion: The position paper of the food allergy working group of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie) highlights why the concept of peanut-free schools does not protect peanut allergic children, but rather bears potential disadvantages and risks for all those involved. The focus on peanut as a potential trigger of anaphylactic reactions ignores other relevant triggers. Conclusion: In order to address the fears and concerns of patients, parents, and school staff, it is mandatory to develop various coping strategies. These should enable and ensure the safety and participation of food-allergic pupils in classes and other school activities. Therefore, it is important to implement adequate measures for allergen avoidance and emergency treatment for students with confirmed food allergies

Statement by the Food Allergy Working Group of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI)

Background: Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) may cause difficult-to-treat symptoms of the airways, skin, or gastrointestinal tract in hypersensitive patients. Due to the chemical relationship between salicylic acid and ASA, a role of a low-salicylate diet has been discussed. Methods: This review evaluates whether low salicylate diets are meaningful from an allergological or nutritional–physiological perspective. Results: The body’s arachidonic acid metabolism plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of ASA intolerance. Despite their chemical affinity, ASA and salicylic acid affect the arachidonic pathway differently. The intake of salicylic acid with food is low compared to therapeutic doses of ASA. There is increasing evidence that protective effects of a high fruit and vegetables diet is related in part to the intake of salicylates. In salicylatelow diets, fruit and vegetables are reduced, harboring the risk of an insufficient diet and malnutrition. Conclusion: Dietary therapy in ASA-intolerant patients is not recommended