Genetic Analysis of Lung Cancer and the Germline Impact on Somatic Mutation Burden

International audienceBackground Germline genetic variation contributes to lung cancer (LC) susceptibility. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated susceptibility loci involved in smoking behaviors and DNA repair genes, but further work is required to identify susceptibility variants. Methods To identify LC susceptibility loci, a family history-based genome-wide association by proxy (GWAx) of LC (48 843 European proxy LC patients, 195 387 controls) was combined with a previous LC GWAS (29 266 patients, 56 450 controls) by meta-analysis. Colocalization was used to explore candidate genes and overlap with existing traits at discovered susceptibility loci. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were tested within an independent validation cohort (1 666 LC patients vs 6 664 controls) using variants selected from the LC susceptibility loci and a novel selection approach using published GWAS summary statistics. Finally, the effects of the LC PRS on somatic mutational burden were explored in patients whose tumor resections have been profiled by exome (n = 685) and genome sequencing (n = 61). Statistical tests were 2-sided. Results The GWAx–GWAS meta-analysis identified 8 novel LC loci. Colocalization implicated DNA repair genes (CHEK1), metabolic genes (CYP1A1), and smoking propensity genes (CHRNA4 and CHRNB2). PRS analysis demonstrated that these variants, as well as subgenome-wide significant variants related to expression quantitative trait loci and/or smoking propensity, assisted in LC genetic risk prediction (odds ratio = 1.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.29 to 1.45; P < .001). Patients with higher genetic PRS loads of smoking-related variants tended to have higher mutation burdens in their lung tumors. Conclusions This study has expanded the number of LC susceptibility loci and provided insights into the molecular mechanisms by which these susceptibility variants contribute to LC development

Information services and resources in an area of environment

Main aim of this thesis is analysis of availability of informational resources and services in the field of environment in the Czech Republic. In the first chapter a brief characterization of the field of environment is provided. Following chapter briefly defines typical users of information about the environment. Next chapters are devoted to a classification and an overview of selected informational resources (both electronic and printed) and also to an overview of mostly Czech institutions providing informational support for the field of environment (especially universities, research institutions and government organizations). The thesis also includes a research part focusing on analysis of the resource availability at selected institutions in Brno, which is supplemented with graphs and tables. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org

Information services and resources in an area of environment

Hlavním záměrem bakalářské práce je analyzovat dostupnost informačních zdrojů a služeb v oblasti životního prostředí v České republice. V úvodní kapitole je stručně charakterizován obor životní prostředí. Následující kapitola stručně stanovuje typické uživatele informací. Další kapitoly práce jsou věnovány klasifikaci a přehledu vybraných informačních zdrojů (elektronických a tištěných) a také přehledu převážně českých institucí zajišťujících informační podporu oboru životního prostředí (především vysoké školy, výzkumné instituce a organizace státní správy). Součástí práce je také výzkumná část zaměřující se na analýzu dostupnosti zdrojů ve vybraných brněnských institucích, která je doplněna grafy a tabulkami. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)Main aim of this thesis is analysis of availability of informational resources and services in the field of environment in the Czech Republic. In the first chapter a brief characterization of the field of environment is provided. Following chapter briefly defines typical users of information about the environment. Next chapters are devoted to a classification and an overview of selected informational resources (both electronic and printed) and also to an overview of mostly Czech institutions providing informational support for the field of environment (especially universities, research institutions and government organizations). The thesis also includes a research part focusing on analysis of the resource availability at selected institutions in Brno, which is supplemented with graphs and tables. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)Ústav informačních studií a knihovnictvíInstitute of Information Studies and LibrarianshipFaculty of ArtsFilozofická fakult

Genetic Analysis of Lung Cancer and the Germline Impact on Somatic Mutation Burden.

BACKGROUND: Germline genetic variation contributes to lung cancer (LC) susceptibility. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated susceptibility loci involved in smoking behaviors and DNA repair genes, but further work is required to identify susceptibility variants. METHODS: To identify LC susceptibility loci, a family history-based genome-wide association by proxy (GWAx) of LC (48 843 European proxy LC patients, 195 387 controls) was combined with a previous LC GWAS (29 266 patients, 56 450 controls) by meta-analysis. Colocalization was used to explore candidate genes and overlap with existing traits at discovered susceptibility loci. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were tested within an independent validation cohort (1 666 LC patients vs 6 664 controls) using variants selected from the LC susceptibility loci and a novel selection approach using published GWAS summary statistics. Finally, the effects of the LC PRS on somatic mutational burden were explored in patients whose tumor resections have been profiled by exome (n = 685) and genome sequencing (n = 61). Statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: The GWAx-GWAS meta-analysis identified 8 novel LC loci. Colocalization implicated DNA repair genes (CHEK1), metabolic genes (CYP1A1), and smoking propensity genes (CHRNA4 and CHRNB2). PRS analysis demonstrated that these variants, as well as subgenome-wide significant variants related to expression quantitative trait loci and/or smoking propensity, assisted in LC genetic risk prediction (odds ratio = 1.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.29 to 1.45; P < .001). Patients with higher genetic PRS loads of smoking-related variants tended to have higher mutation burdens in their lung tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This study has expanded the number of LC susceptibility loci and provided insights into the molecular mechanisms by which these susceptibility variants contribute to LC development

Risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancer and type of alcoholic beverage: a European multicenter case–control study

The general relationship between cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) and alcohol drinking is established. Nevertheless, it is uncertain whether different types of alcoholic beverages (wine, beer and liquor) carry different UADT cancer risks. Our study included 2,001 UADT cancer cases and 2,125 controls from 14 centres in 10 European countries. All cases were histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinomas. Controls were frequency matched by sex, age and centre. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) adjusted for age, sex, centre, education level, vegetable and fruit intake, tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking, where appropriate. Risk of beverage-specific alcohol consumption were calculated among ‘pure drinker’ who consumed one beverage type exclusively, among ‘predominant drinkers’ who consumed one beverage type to more than 66 % and among ‘mixed drinkers’ who consumed more than one beverage type to similar proportions. Compared to never drinkers and adjusted for cumulative alcohol consumption, the OR and 95 %CI for wine, beer and liquor drinking, respectively, were 1.24 (0.86, 1.78), 1.54 (1.05, 2.27) and 0.94 (0.53, 1.64) among ‘pure drinkers’ (p value for heterogeneity across beverage types = 0.306), 1.05 (0.76,1.47), 1.25 (0.87,1.79) and 1.43 (0.95, 2.16) among ‘predominant drinkers’ (p value = 0.456), and 1.09 (0.79, 1.50), 1.20 (0.88, 1.63) and 1.12 (0.82, 1.53) among ‘mixed drinkers’ (p value = 0.889). Risk of UADT cancer increased with increasing consumption of all three alcohol beverage types. Our findings underscore the strong and comparable carcinogenic effect of ethanol in wine, beer and liquor on organs of the UADT