Bioproduction of propionic acid using levulinic acid by engineered Pseudomonas putida

The present study elaborates on the propionic acid (PA) production by the well-known microbial cell factory Pseudomonas putida EM42 and its capacity to utilize biomass-derived levulinic acid (LA). Primarily, the P. putida EM42 strain was engineered to produce PA by deleting the methylcitrate synthase (PrpC) and propionyl-CoA synthase (PrpE) genes. Subsequently, a LA-inducible expression system was employed to express yciA (encoding thioesterase) from Haemophilus influenzae and ygfH (encoding propionyl-CoA: succinate CoA transferase) from Escherichia coli to improve the PA production by up to 10-fold under flask scale cultivation. The engineered P. putida EM42:& UDelta;CE:yciA:ygfH was used to optimize the bioprocess to further improve the PA production titer. Moreover, the fed-batch fermentation performed under optimized conditions in a 5 L bioreactor resulted in the titer, productivity, and molar yield for PA production of 26.8 g/L, 0.3 g/L/h, and 83%, respectively. This study, thus, successfully explored the LA catabolic pathway of P. putida as an alternative route for the sustainable and industrial production of PA from LA

Substrate-inducible and antibiotic-free high-level 4-hydroxyvaleric acid production in engineered Escherichia coli

In this study, we developed a levulinic acid (LA)-inducible and antibiotic-free plasmid system mediated by HpdR/P- hpdH and infA-complementation to produce 4-hydroxyvaleric acid (4-HV) from LA in an engineered Escherichia coli strain. The system was efficiently induced by the addition of the LA substrate and resulted in tight dose-dependent control and fine-tuning of gene expression. By engineering the 5 & PRIME; untranslated region (UTR) of hpdR mRNA, the gene expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) increased by at least two-fold under the hpdH promoter. Furthermore, by evaluating the robustness and plasmid stability of the proposed system, the engineered strain, IRV750f, expressing the engineered 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (3HBDH*) and formate dehydrogenase (CbFDH), produced 82 g/L of 4-HV from LA, with a productivity of 3.4 g/L/h and molar conversion of 92% in the fed-batch cultivation (5 L fermenter) without the addition of antibiotics or external inducers. Overall, the reported system was highly beneficial for the large-scale and cost-effective microbial production of value-added products and bulk chemicals from the renewable substrate, LA

Inducible and tunable gene expression systems for Pseudomonas putida KT2440

Inducible and tunable expression systems are essential for the microbial production of biochemicals. Five different carbon source- and substrate-inducible promoter systems were developed and further evaluated in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 by analyzing the expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter protein. These systems can be induced by low-cost compounds such as glucose, 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3HP), levulinic acid (LA), and xylose. 3HP-inducible HpdR/P-hpdH was also efficiently induced by LA. LvaR/P-lvaA and XutR/P-xutA systems were induced even at low concentrations of LA (0.1 mM) and xylose (0.5 mM), respectively. Glucose-inducible HexR/P-zwf1 showed weak GFP expression. These inducer agents can be used as potent starting materials for both cell growth and the production of a wide range of biochemicals. The efficiency of the reported systems was comparable to that of conventional chemical-inducible systems. Hence, the newly investigated promoter systems are highly useful for the expression of target genes in the widely used synthetic biology chassis P. putida KT2440 for industrial and medical applications

Draft Genome Sequence of the Yeast Pachysolen tannophilus CBS 4044/NRRL Y-2460

A draft genome sequence of the yeast Pachysolen tannophilus CBS 4044/NRRL Y-2460 is presented. The organism has the potential to be developed as a cell factory for biorefineries due to its ability to utilize waste feedstocks. The sequenced genome size was 12,238,196 bp, consisting of 34 scaffolds. A total of 4,463 genes from 5,346 predicted open reading frames were annotated with function

Oligo- and dsDNA-mediated genome editing using a tetA dual selection system in Escherichia coli

The ability to precisely and seamlessly modify a target genome is needed for metabolic engineering and synthetic biology techniques aimed at creating potent biosystems. Herein, we report on a promising method in Escherichia coli that relies on the insertion of an optimized tetA dual selection cassette followed by replacement of the same cassette with short, single-stranded DNA (oligos) or long, double-stranded DNA and the isolation of recombinant strains by negative selection using NiCl2. This method could be rapidly and successfully used for genome engineering, including deletions, insertions, replacements, and point mutations, without inactivation of the methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR) system and plasmid cloning. The method we describe here facilitates positive genome-edited recombinants with selection efficiencies ranging from 57 to 92%. Using our method, we increased lycopene production (3.4-fold) by replacing the ribosome binding site (RBS) of the rate-limiting gene (dxs) in the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate (DXP) biosynthesis pathway with a strong RBS. Thus, this method could be used to achieve scarless, proficient, and targeted genome editing for engineering E. coli strains

Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: a review

Bioethanol has been identified as the mostly used biofuel worldwide since it significantly contributes to the reduction of crude oil consumption and environmental pollution. It can be produced from various types of feedstocks such as sucrose, starch, lignocellulosic and algal biomass through fermentation process by microorganisms. Compared to other types of microoganisms, yeasts especially Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the common microbes employed in ethanol production due to its high ethanol productivity, high ethanol tolerance and ability of fermenting wide range of sugars. However, there are some challenges in yeast fermentation which inhibit ethanol production such as high temperature, high ethanol concentration and the ability to ferment pentose sugars. Various types of yeast strains have been used in fermentation for ethanol production including hybrid, recombinant and wild-type yeasts. Yeasts can directly ferment simple sugars into ethanol while other type of feedstocks must be converted to fermentable sugars before it can be fermented to ethanol. The common processes involves in ethanol production are pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Production of bioethanol during fermentation depends on several factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, pH, fermentation time, agitation rate, and inoculum size. The efficiency and productivity of ethanol can be enhanced by immobilizing the yeast cells. This review highlights the different types of yeast strains, fermentation process, factors affecting bioethanol production and immobilization of yeasts for better bioethanol production

METHOD FOR PRODUCING DICARBOXYLIC ACID BY OMEGA OXIDATION IN MUTANT ESCHERICHIA COLI

??? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????????????????? ????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????????, ?????? ????????????, ??? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ?????????, ??? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????????????????? ????????????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ??????.clos

METHOD FOR PRODUCING CAPROIC ACID BY BETA OXIDATION IN MUTANT ESCHERICHIA COLI

??? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ??????, ??? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????, ??? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ????????????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ??? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ??? ??????.clos

TRANSFORMED MICROORGANISM PRODUCING DICARBOXYLIC ACID AND A METHOD FOR PRODUCING DICARBOXYLIC ACID USING THE SAME

??? ????????? ????????????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ?????????. ??????, ??? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ??? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ??-??????????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ???????????????. ??????, ??? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????. ?????????, ??? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ??? ??????