40 research outputs found

    How should novelty be valued in science?

    Get PDF
    <p>Box plot analysis of serum concentrations of sRAGE (A), esRAGE (B), S100A9 (C) and HMGB1 (D) in patients with CTEPH (n = 26) and controls (n = 33). Independent Student’s t-test was used to compare groups. <i>RAGE</i> receptor for advanced glycation endproducts, <i>sRAGE</i> soluble RAGE, <i>esRAGE</i> endogenous secretory RAGE, <i>S100A9</i> member of S100 family of Ca+ binding proteins, <i>HMGB1</i> high mobility group box1, <i>CTEPH</i> chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.</p

    Riociguat treatment in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Final safety data from the EXPERT registry

    Get PDF
    Objective: The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is approved for the treatment of adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) following Phase

    Pulmonary pressure recovery in idiopathic, hereditary and drug and toxin-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension. determinants and clinical impact

    No full text
    Over the past two decades randomized controlled trials of combination treatments for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) have demonstrated improvements of clinical status but only modest reductions in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP). Recent experiences with upfront combination treatments including parenteral prostacyclins have shown more substantial mPAP reductions, and have provided grounds for reconsiderations of treatment

    The risk profile change in patients with severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with subcutaneous treprostinil

    No full text
    Abstract Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is successfully treatable with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and medical therapy. Registry to Evaluate Early and Long‐Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management risk score (RRS) is able to predict long‐term outcome in inoperable patients or in patients with residual PH after surgery. We performed a post hoc analysis of RRS in patients who were enrolled in the CTREPH study (NCT01416636), a randomized, double‐blind clinical trial comparing high‐dose and low‐dose subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil in patients with severe CTEPH that was classified by an interdisciplinary CTEPH team as nonoperable, or as persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Baseline mean RRS was similar in both treatment groups (8.7 in high‐dose arm vs. 8.6 in low‐dose arm), but mean RRS change from baseline to Week 24 was greater in the high‐dose treprostinil group than in the low‐dose treprostinil group (−0.88 vs. −0.17). The difference in RRS change from baseline to Week 24 between high dose versus low dose was statistically significant with mean difference of −0.70 (95% confidence interval: −1.36 to −0.05, p = 0.0352), and was driven mainly by improvement of World Health Organization functional class and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide concentration. SC treprostinil therapy administered in standard dose had positive effect on the risk profile measured by RRS in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent severe CTEPH. Although our study was limited by the small sample size and post hoc nature, assessment of risk profile is of great importance to this particular patient population with very poor prognosis
    corecore