New Physics in the Age of Precision Cosmology

The Lambda-cold dark matter (LCDM) model has become the standard model of cosmology because of its ability to reproduce a vast array of cosmological observations, from the earliest moments of our Universe, to the current period of accelerated expansion, which it does with great accuracy. However, the success of this model only distracts from its inherent flaws and ambiguities. LCDM is purely phenomenological, providing no physical explanation for the nature of dark matter, responsible for the formation and evolution of large-scale structure, and giving an inconclusive explanation for dark energy, which drives the current period of accelerated expansion. Furthermore, cracks in its observational grounding have begun to form. When LCDM is used to interpret recent high precision measurements, tensions appear between individual experiments: the inferred values of the current cosmic expansion rate H0 and the amplitude of cosmic density fluctuations S8 based on early universe measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), are in disagreement with the values measured in the local universe, probed by supernovae, weak lensing, and galaxy surveys. These tensions, if not caused by unaccounted for systematics, suggest that the model we use to interpret early universe data may be incomplete. This thesis collects works investigating alternative cosmologies and new analysis techniques which aim to explain these tensions and ambiguities in LCDM, and provide new probes of beyond the standard model physics. I present four main projects here: I developed an assisted quintessence model of early dark energy (EDE), linking the early and late epochs of cosmic acceleration, which provides a solution to the H0 tension and coincidence problem of dark energy; I investigated the role that microphysics plays on the EDE solution to the Hubble tension, and found that EDE with an anisotropic shear can solve both the Hubble and S8 tensions simultaneously; I developed a method of using line-intensity mapping to constrain beyond the standard model physics, which I used to forecast constraints on non-CDM models and non-Gaussianity; and I derived the cosmological perturbations and initial conditions for a dark energy model built from a three classical U(1) gauge fields coupled to a scalar field, which I will use to investigate the compatibility of a such a scenario with cosmological observations

Microphysics of Early Dark Energy

Early Dark Energy (EDE) relies on scalar field dynamics to resolve the Hubble tension, by boosting the pre-recombination length scales and thereby raising the CMB-inferred value of the Hubble constant into agreement with late universe probes. However, the collateral effect of scalar field microphysics on the linear perturbation spectra appears to preclude a fully satisfactory solution. $H_0$ is not raised without the inclusion of a late universe prior, and the "$S_8$-tension", a discrepancy between early- and late-universe measurements of the structure growth parameter, is exacerbated. What if EDE is not a scalar field? Here, we investigate whether different microphysics, encoded in the constitutive relationships between pressure and energy density fluctuations, can relieve these tensions. We show that EDE with an anisotropic sound speed can soften both the $H_0$ and $S_8$ tensions while still providing a quality fit to CMB data. Future observations from the CMB-S4 experiment may be able to distinguish the underlying microphysics at the $4\sigma$ level, and thereby test whether a scalar field or some richer physics is at work.Comment: 28 pages, 19 figures; new text, figures and references added, minor typographical changes to match published version; Data available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.710186

Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies

The standard Λ Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model provides a good description of a wide range of astrophysical and cosmological data. However, there are a few big open questions that make the standard model look like an approximation to a more realistic scenario yet to be found. In this paper, we list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant H0, the σ8–S8 tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the 5.0σ tension between the Planck CMB estimate of the Hubble constant H0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the H0 evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the Planck CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density Ωm, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure (σ8,fσ8). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the H0–S8 tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals. Finally, we give an overview of upgraded experiments and next-generation space missions and facilities on Earth that will be of crucial importance to address all these open questions

Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $\sigma_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the $5.0\,\sigma$ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $\Omega_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($\sigma_8,f\sigma_8$). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the $H_0$--$S_8$ tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]Comment: Contribution to Snowmass 2021. 224 pages, 27 figures. Accepted for publication in JHEA