70 research outputs found

    (Z,E,Z)-1,6-Di-1-naphthyl­hexa-1,3,5-triene

    Get PDF
    The title compound, C26H20, lies about an inversion centre. The naphthalene unit and the hexa­triene chain are each approximately planar (maximum deviations of 0.0143 and 0.0042 Å, respectively), and are inclined to one another at a dihedral angle of 49.20 (4)°. The dihedral angle between the two naphthalene ring systems of neighboring mol­ecules is 85.71 (4)°

    Renal Distribution of Vasohibin-1 in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

    Get PDF
    Experimental studies have demonstrated the involvement of angiogenesis-related factors in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). There have so far been no reports investigating the distribution and clinical roles of Vasohibin-1 (VASH-1), a negative feedback regulator of angiogenesis, in CKD. We recruited 54 Japanese CKD patients and 6 patients who had normal renal tissues excised due to localized renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated the correlations between the renal expression level of VASH-1 and the clinical/histological parameters. VASH-1 was observed in renal endothelial/mesangial cells, crescentic lesions and interstitial inflammatory cells. Significant positive correlations were observed between 1) crescent formation and the number of VASH-1+ cells in the glomerulus (r=0.48, p=0.001) or cortex (r=0.64, p<0.0001), 2) interstitial cell infiltration and the number of VASH-1+ cells in the cortex (r=0.34, p=0.02), 3) the glomerular VEGFR-2+ area and the number of VASH-1+ cells in the glomerulus (r=0.44, p=0.01) or medulla (r=0.63, p=0.01). These results suggest that the renal levels of VASH-1 may be affected by local inflammation, crescentic lesions and VEGFR-2

    Soft X-ray Absorption and Photoemission Studies of Ferromagnetic Mn-Implanted 3CC-SiC

    Full text link
    We have performed x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), and resonant photoemission spectroscopy (RPES) measurements of Mn-implanted 3CC-SiC (3CC-SiC:Mn) and carbon-incorporated Mn5_{5}Si2_{2} (Mn5_{5}Si2_{2}:C). The Mn 2pp core-level XPS and XAS spectra of 3CC-SiC:Mn and Mn5_{5}Si2_{2}:C were similar to each other and showed "intermediate" behaviors between the localized and itinerant Mn 3dd states. The intensity at the Fermi level was found to be suppressed in 3CC-SiC:Mn compared with Mn5_{5}Si2_{2}:C. These observations are consistent with the formation of Mn5_{5}Si2_{2}:C clusters in the 3CC-SiC host, as observed in a recent transmission electron microscopy study.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figure

    Clinical preferences for DME in Japan

    Get PDF
    Aims/Introduction: To determine the current clinical preferences of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment protocols for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Japan. Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive cross‐sectional study. Answers to a questionnaire consisting of 16 questions were obtained from 176 of 278 (63.3%) surveyed ophthalmologists. Results: The results showed that 81.2% preferred intravitreal injections of anti‐VEGF antibodies as the first‐line therapy. The most important indicators for beginning anti‐VEGF therapy were: the best‐corrected visual acuity in 44.3% and the retinal thickness in 30.7%. In the loading phase, 53.4% preferred a single injection, and in the maintenance phase, 75.0% preferred the pro re nata regimen. Financial limitation (85.8%) was reported as the most important difficulty in the treatment. For combination therapy with anti‐VEGF treatment, panretinal photocoagulation, focal photocoagulations and a sub‐Tenon steroid injection were preferred. The contraindications for anti‐VEGF therapy were: prior cerebral infarction (72.7%). Regarding the use of both approved anti‐VEGF agents in Japan, ranibizumab and aflibercept, 39.8% doctors used them appropriately. Conclusions: Our results present the current clinical preferences of anti‐VEGF treatment for DME in Japan. The best‐corrected visual acuity and the retinal thickness are important indicators to institute this therapy. The majority of the ophthalmologists use anti‐VEGF treatment as first‐line therapy and prefer the 1 + pro re nata regimen

    Ten-year follow-up of infliximab treatment for uveitis in Behçet disease patients: A multicenter retrospective study

    Get PDF
    PurposeTo evaluate 10-year outcome of infliximab (IFX) treatment for uveitis in Behçet disease (BD) patients using a standardized follow-up protocol.DesignRetrospective longitudinal cohort study.Participants140 BD uveitis patients treated with IFX enrolled in our previous study.MethodsMedical records were reviewed for demographic information, duration of IFX treatment, number of ocular attacks before IFX initiation, best corrected visual acuity (VA) at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years after IFX initiation, uveitis recurrence after IFX initiation and main anatomical site, concomitant therapies, and adverse events (AEs).Main outcome measures10-year IFX continuation rate and change in LogMAR VA.ResultsOf 140 BD patients, 106 (75.7%) continued IFX treatment for 10 years. LogMAR VA improved gradually after initiation of IFX, and the improvement reached statistical significance from 2 years of treatment. Thereafter, significant improvement compared with baseline was maintained until 10 years, despite a slight deterioration of logMAR VA from 5 years. However, eyes with worse baseline decimal VA < 0.1 showed no significant improvement from baseline to 10 years. Uveitis recurred after IFX initiation in 50 patients (recurrence group) and did not recur in 56 (non-recurrence group). Ocular attacks/year before IFX initiation was significantly higher in the recurrence group (2.82 ± 3.81) than in the non-recurrence group (1.84 ± 1.78). In the recurrence group, uveitis recurred within 1 year in 58% and within 2 years in 74%. Seventeen patients (34%) had recurrent anterior uveitis, 17 (34%) had posterior uveitis, and 16 (32%) had panuveitis, with no significant difference in VA outcome. In addition, logMAR VA at 10 years did not differ between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups. AEs occurred among 43 patients (30.7%), and 24 (17.1%) resulted in IFX discontinuation before 10 years.ConclusionsAmong BD patients with uveitis who initiated IFX, approximately 75% continued treatment for 10 years, and their VA improved significantly and was maintained for 10 years. Uveitis recurred in one-half of the patients, but visual acuity did not differ significantly from the patients without recurrence

    Clinical preferences and trends of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments for diabetic macular edema in Japan

    Get PDF
    Aims/IntroductionTo determine the current clinical preferences of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment protocols for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Japan.Materials and MethodsThis was a descriptive cross‐sectional study. Answers to a questionnaire consisting of 16 questions were obtained from 176 of 278 (63.3%) surveyed ophthalmologists.ResultsThe results showed that 81.2% preferred intravitreal injections of anti‐VEGF antibodies as the first‐line therapy. The most important indicators for beginning anti‐VEGF therapy were: the best‐corrected visual acuity in 44.3% and the retinal thickness in 30.7%. In the loading phase, 53.4% preferred a single injection, and in the maintenance phase, 75.0% preferred the pro re nata regimen. Financial limitation (85.8%) was reported as the most important difficulty in the treatment. For combination therapy with anti‐VEGF treatment, panretinal photocoagulation, focal photocoagulations and a sub‐Tenon steroid injection were preferred. The contraindications for anti‐VEGF therapy were: prior cerebral infarction (72.7%). Regarding the use of both approved anti‐VEGF agents in Japan, ranibizumab and aflibercept, 39.8% doctors used them appropriately.ConclusionsOur results present the current clinical preferences of anti‐VEGF treatment for DME in Japan. The best‐corrected visual acuity and the retinal thickness are important indicators to institute this therapy. The majority of the ophthalmologists use anti‐VEGF treatment as first‐line therapy and prefer the 1 + pro re nata regimen
    corecore