Analysis of the efficiency of production of whole-muscle turkey products with vegetable sprinkles

Human health is largely determined by the nature, level and structure of nutrition. A promising direction in the development of new food products is the expansion of the base of used ingredients used to partially replace meat raw materials with vegetable ones, in order to maximize the saturation of products with nutrients that contribute to the maintenance of normal life of the consumer. The use of new food ingredients contributes to the actual task set by the State policy in the field of healthy eating — expanding the range of enriched and functional food products. The work is devoted to the study of baked whole-muscle products using turkey meat and vegetable dressing as sources of high protein content, which solves the problem of deficiency of this component in the diet. A recipe for brine with the addition of the food additive “Glimalask”, which has a complex effect on the products under study, has been presented. The evaluation of quality indicators of finished products has been carried out, the article presents the results of a comparative analysis of baked whole-muscle turkey meat products, calculations of the product cost price. The comparative analysis has shown that, in comparison with the control sample, the baked whole-muscle products from turkey meat with vegetative dressing have improved physical and chemical properties, outstanding organoleptic characteristics, the yield of the product increases by 9.0–12.0%, depending on the formulation. Differences in the dynamics of microbial growth in the experimental and control samples were insignificant, the vegetable dressing helps to slow the growth of microorganisms on the surface of the product. The presented baked whole-muscle turkey meat products using optimized brine and vegetable sprinkles of chickpeas, sesame and paprika are recommended to a wide range of consumers of different age groups

Effect of recombinant Sox9 protein on the expression of cartilage-specific genes in human dermal fibroblasts cell culture

As a result of the experiments, it was shown that the recombinant Sox9 protein has practically no effect on chondrogenic differentiation and does not significantly change the expression of chondrogenesis gene

Сравнительное исследование эффективности и безопасности препарата Хондрогард ® при комбинированном (внутрисуставное и внутримышечное) и внутримышечном введении у пациентов с остеоартритом коленных суставов

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chondroguard® in the combined (intra-articular (IA) + intramuscular (IM)) and IM injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).Patients and methods. The study enrolled 150 patients with knee OA who were divided into two groups with 75 patients in each group. Group 1 received the drug (100 mg/ml) intramuscularly: 25 injections every other day, the first three injections at a dose of 100 mg, the fourth injection was started with a dose of 200 mg. Group 2 had five IA injections into the target joint at a daily dose of 200 mg with an interval of 3 days between injections, then 16 IM injections at 200 mg every other day. All the patients were prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as meloxicam 15 mg. To determine the efficiency of treatment, the investigators estimated the following parameters: pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS), the total WOMAC index and its components (pain, stiffness, and functional insufficiency), sensory and affective-emotional pain characteristics (for the target joint) according to McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) scores. Clinical and biochemical blood tests, clinical urinalysis, coagulogram, and electrocardiography were performed in all the patients at the beginning and the end of the study.Results and discussion. Comparison of two Chondroguard® regimens showed that by the end of treatment, the pain intensity on VAS was significantly lower in Group 2 (IA + IM administration) than in Group 1 (16.81±13.49 and 21.88±13.24, respectively; p<0.0001). Analysis revealed that there were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 in the changes of the overall WOMAC index and its components (pain, stiffness, and functional performance), as well as in MPQ pain scores. No serious adverse events (AEs) were recorded in the study. There were 11 AEs in 3.3% (n = 5/150) of the patients throughout the study. By its end, resolution/termination of AEs was noted in 100% of cases. There were no clinically significant pathological laboratory and ECG findings.Conclusion. The test drug during any (IM or combined) route of administration quickly and effectively reduces pain syndrome and stiffness and improves joint functional performance and at the same time it is a safe drug. Its important advantage is a quick effect achieved by IA and IM administration. This makes it possible to reduce the dose of NSAIDs or to discontinue the latter, which is very important for OA patients with comorbidity. Цель – оценить эффективность и безопасность препарата Хондрогард® при комбинированном (внутрисуставное, в/с + внутримышечное, в/м) и внутримышечном введении у пациентов с остеоартритом (ОА) коленных суставов.Пациенты и методы. В исследование были включены 150 пациентов с ОА коленных суставов. Пациенты были разделены на две группы (по 75 пациентов в каждой группе). Первая группа (R) получала изучаемый препарат (100 мг/мл) внутримышечно: 25 инъекций через день, первые три инъекции в дозе 100 мг, начиная с 4-й инъекции – в дозе 200 мг. Вторая группа (N) получала 5 внутрисуставных инъекций в целевой сустав по 200 мг с перерывом 3 дня между введениями, далее 16 внутримышечных инъекций по 200 мг через день. Всем пациентам назначали нестероидные противовоспалительные препараты (НПВП, мелоксикам 15 мг). Для определения эффективности лечения оценивали следующие параметры: интенсивность боли по визуальной аналоговой шкале (ВАШ), индекс WOMAC общий и его составляющие (боль, скованность и функциональная недостаточность), сенсорные и аффективно-эмоциональные характеристики боли (для целевого сустава) по опроснику MPQ (McGiIl Pain Questionnaire). Всем пациентам в начале и в конце исследования выполняли клинический и биохимический анализы крови, клинический анализ мочи и анализ показателей коагулограммы, электрокардиографию.Результаты и обсуждение. При сравнении двух режимов введения Хондрогарда® интенсивность боли по ВАШ к концу лечения в группе N (в/с + в/м введение) была достоверно ниже, чем в группе R (16,81±13,49 и 21,88±13,24; р<0,0001 соответственно). Анализ динамики общего индекса WOMAC и его составляющих (боль, скованность, функциональное состояние), а также оценки боли по опроснику MPQ достоверных различий между группами N и R не выявил. Серьезных нежелательных явлений (НЯ) в исследовании не зарегистрировано. За весь период исследования выявлено 11 НЯ у 3,3% (5/150) пациентов. К концу исследования разрешение/прекращение НЯ отмечено в 100% случаев. Клинически значимых отклонений лабораторных показателей и данных ЭКГ не наблюдалось.Выводы. Изучаемый препарат при любом способе введения (в/м или комбинированный) быстро и эффективно уменьшает болевой синдром и скованность, улучшает функциональное состояние суставов и при этом является безопасным препаратом. Важное его преимущество – быстрый эффект за счет в/с и в/м введения. Это позволяет снизить дозу НПВП или отменить их, что очень важно для больных ОА с коморбидностью.

Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study

Despite current guidelines, intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery remains widespread. Drains were not associated with earlier detection of intraperitoneal collections, but were associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased risk of surgical-site infections.Background Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice. Methods COMPASS (COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery) was a prospective, international, cohort study which enrolled consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery (February to March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included: rate and time to diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections; rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); time to discharge; and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade at least III). After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the independent association of the secondary outcomes with drain placement. Results Overall, 1805 patients from 22 countries were included (798 women, 44.2 per cent; median age 67.0 years). The drain insertion rate was 51.9 per cent (937 patients). After matching, drains were not associated with reduced rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 2.23; P = 0.287) or earlier detection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 0.33 to 2.31; P = 0.780) of collections. Although not associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR 1.09, 0.68 to 1.75; P = 0.709), drains were associated with delayed hospital discharge (HR 0.58, 0.52 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of SSIs (OR 2.47, 1.50 to 4.05; P < 0.001). Conclusion Intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery is not associated with earlier detection of postoperative collections, but prolongs hospital stay and increases SSI risk

PCR IN TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPAEDICS: METHOD DESCRIPTION AND APPLICABILITY

Review brief presents description of polymerase chain reaction method (PCR) and its most common variants. Three PCR-based lines of research, carried out in the traumatology and orthopaedics, include identifying a causative agents of the implant-associated infection after orthopaedic surgery; detection of antibiotic resistance genes and biofilm forming genes. It was shown that PCR can be used as additional method for detection of genetic disorders, significant for traumatology and orthopaedics, and for investigation of cartilage and bone regeneration

Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)

The rate of periprosthetic infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty ranges from 0,5 to 6%, while after the revision arthroplasty PJI rate grows up to 13,6%. Despite the fact that PJI is more often caused by gram-positive microorganisms, the treatment of patients induced by gram-negative pathogens and fungi is the most complex and associated with the higher recurrence rate. This paper presents a positive two-stage treatment of a patient with fungal periprosthetic infection with a review of current medical literature. Revision, sanation of infection site and implantation of articulating antibacterial spacer was performed in the first stage of treatment. The second stage, which was the implantation of a revision prosthesis, followed in 6 months after removal of infection nidus. Subsequently the authors obtained good functional outcomes and stopping the infection process

Adverse Trends in the Etiology of Orthopedic Infection: Results of 6-Year Monitoring of the Structure and Resistance of Leading Pathogens

Osteomyelitis remains one of the most intractable diseases. The nature of the pathogen and its resistance to antibiotics significantly affect the outcome and cost of treatment.The aim of the study: to analyze the dynamics of the spectrum and antibiotic resistance of the leading pathogens of orthopedic infection for the period 2012– 2017.Material and methods. The structure of pathogens isolated from the focus of infection from 2774 patients with periprosthetic infection and chronic osteomyelitis was retrospectively analyzed. Antibiotic resistance of the leading pathogens that occupied more than 4% in the species structure was studied. Comparative analysis of changes in the spectrum of pathogens and antibiotic resistance was carried out for the periods 2012-2013, 2014–2015 and 2016-2017. Epidemiological analysis was performed in the program „microbiological monitoring system” Microbe-2. Statistical processing of the obtained data was carried out using the Z-criterion.Results. From 2774 patients with orthopedic infection have been isolated 4359 strains, in the structure of which about 73.5% were occupied by S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. faecalis, E. faecium, P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter sp. representatives of the family Enterobacteriacea. In 27% of the cases, microorganisms of other species were identified. Microbial associations were identified in 19.4% of cases. In the structure of the leading Gram(+) pathogens, a significant decrease in the incidence of S. aureus was detected, while the share of S. epidermidis increased significantly. Among the leading Gram(-) microorganisms, a significant increase in the proportion of representatives of the fam. Enterobacteriacea was found, against the background of a decrease in the share of Acinetobacter sp. and P. aeruginosa. The level of resistance of MSSA to the studied antibiotics ranged from 0.1 to 8.8%, for MSSE the spread was from 1.9 to 16.7%. Negative dynamics of growth of resistance of non-fermenting bacteria is established. The strains of Acinetobacter sp. demonstrated greater resistance to tested antibiotics in comparison with P. aeruginosa.Conclusion. An increase in the role of S. epidermidis and K. pneumoniae in the etiology of orthopedic infection was established. The revealed increase in the resistance of microbial pathogens to most tested and used antibiotics should be taken into account in the appointment of empirical antibiotic therapy. The extremely high frequency of resistance of gram-negative bacteria to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones excludes the possibility of their empirical use, which requires the management of carbapenems in the starting treatment regimens. High resistance to fluoroquinolones limits the ability of oral antibiotic therapy in patients with periprosthetic infection

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of Chondroguard® during its combined (intra-articular and intramuscular) and intramuscular injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chondroguard® in the combined (intra-articular (IA) + intramuscular (IM)) and IM injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).Patients and methods. The study enrolled 150 patients with knee OA who were divided into two groups with 75 patients in each group. Group 1 received the drug (100 mg/ml) intramuscularly: 25 injections every other day, the first three injections at a dose of 100 mg, the fourth injection was started with a dose of 200 mg. Group 2 had five IA injections into the target joint at a daily dose of 200 mg with an interval of 3 days between injections, then 16 IM injections at 200 mg every other day. All the patients were prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as meloxicam 15 mg. To determine the efficiency of treatment, the investigators estimated the following parameters: pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS), the total WOMAC index and its components (pain, stiffness, and functional insufficiency), sensory and affective-emotional pain characteristics (for the target joint) according to McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) scores. Clinical and biochemical blood tests, clinical urinalysis, coagulogram, and electrocardiography were performed in all the patients at the beginning and the end of the study.Results and discussion. Comparison of two Chondroguard® regimens showed that by the end of treatment, the pain intensity on VAS was significantly lower in Group 2 (IA + IM administration) than in Group 1 (16.81±13.49 and 21.88±13.24, respectively; p<0.0001). Analysis revealed that there were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 in the changes of the overall WOMAC index and its components (pain, stiffness, and functional performance), as well as in MPQ pain scores. No serious adverse events (AEs) were recorded in the study. There were 11 AEs in 3.3% (n = 5/150) of the patients throughout the study. By its end, resolution/termination of AEs was noted in 100% of cases. There were no clinically significant pathological laboratory and ECG findings.Conclusion. The test drug during any (IM or combined) route of administration quickly and effectively reduces pain syndrome and stiffness and improves joint functional performance and at the same time it is a safe drug. Its important advantage is a quick effect achieved by IA and IM administration. This makes it possible to reduce the dose of NSAIDs or to discontinue the latter, which is very important for OA patients with comorbidity